Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

SAFC settings for A32 ecu, Z32 maf, 370 cc/min injectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 06:12 AM
  #1  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
SAFC settings for A32 ecu, Z32 maf, 370 cc/min injectors

I went out for a few runs yesterday to determine what SAFC settings are needed to bring the afr down to a safe level when running an A32 ecu with a Z32 maf. My earlier experiments with this setup resulting in pinging at anything over about half throttle.

Test conditions:
  • 55 F, 70% humidity
  • dry, open road

SC and engine configuration:
  • V1 blower with 3" pulley (10 psi @ 6400 rpm)
  • 370 cc/min injectors at oem fuel pressure (43 psi, 34 psi base fp)
  • Z32 maf
  • A32 ecu
  • functioning MEVI

First run SAFC settings:

2 krpm: 0
3 krpm: +7%
4 krpm: +11%
5 krpm: +13%
6 krpm: +13%
7 krpm: +13%

Here is a run I did in second gear all the way to redline:



In this run the afr hit a low of 12.9:1 at 4520 rpm and gradually rose from there to a high level of 14.36:1 at 6000 rpm. The weirdness at time=6.5 seconds is when I hit the rev limiter. I have gotten used to shifting at 7000 rpm with the JWT ecu, and the rev limit caught me by surprise. At first I thought I had toasted the engine. Boost pressure was 10.3 psi at redline. I didn't hear any pinging, probably because the air was nice and cool, but I didn't like the high afr at 6000 rpm, so I did another run with lower SAFC settings.

Second run SAFC settings:

2krpm: 0
3 krpm: +10%
4 krpm: +15%
5 krpm: +20%
6 krpm: +25%
7 krpm: +25%
8 krpm: +25%

Second and third gear run:



The afr at 6000 rpm is now 13.05:1 in second gear, and 12.4:1 in third gear. Much better. Why the lower afr in third compared to second gear? I don't know, but I've seen that trend in every run I've done where I shift gears during data collection. Maybe the ecu and the safc perform better when the rpm is changing at a slower rate.

One other interesting note is that I have added an air intake temperature gauge with a peak hold feature. I saw a high temperature of 165 F at full boost, with normal steady-state non-boosted temperature at about 105 F (heat soaked engine and blower), so a 60 F temperature rise due to 10 psi boost.

Conclusions:
  • The combination of the A32 ecu and Z32 maf with 370 cc/min injectors can be made to work along with SAFC corrections
  • Boost levels higher than 10 psi may not be possible, since the SAFC can only correct a maximum of 25% (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong).
  • The ecu maintained a perfect 14.7:1 afr at idle and partial throttle operation
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #2  
JeffesonM's Avatar
living out of a maxima...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,432
From: NJ
Good news for those of us who don't have the option of a JWT ECU.

If you wanted to run a little richer, or to tune above 10psi, could you run a FMU with a 1:1 or 2:1 disc, then lean it out using the SAFC?
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:16 AM
  #3  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by JeffesonM
Good news for those of us who don't have the option of a JWT ECU.

If you wanted to run a little richer, or to tune above 10psi, could you run a FMU with a 1:1 or 2:1 disc, then lean it out using the SAFC?
Good point. It would take greater than 1:1, since that is what I was using. The oem fpr is 1:1 boost sensitive.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:18 AM
  #4  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Stephen,

You can adjust the correction ratio to a higher amount which will allow you to do more than just the standard 25%. Like lets say it was set to 3%, then the max you raise is 25% based on 3% correction factor. If you raise that 3% to a 6 or 9 or even 15, then you wouldnt need to go as high as 25% anymore, probably less than half of that.

I forget where the option is, believe it is in the setting, I dont have the SAFC anymore, but I do remember that one.

Dixit
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #5  
subs1000w's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,371
Originally Posted by JeffesonM
Good news for those of us who don't have the option of a JWT ECU.

If you wanted to run a little richer, or to tune above 10psi, could you run a FMU with a 1:1 or 2:1 disc, then lean it out using the SAFC?
hes using the stock FPR which already is 1:1

this is very good news for alot of peolple and an oportunity to save ALOT of money
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #6  
JeffesonM's Avatar
living out of a maxima...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,432
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Good point. It would take greater than 1:1, since that is what I was using. The oem fpr is 1:1 boost sensitive.
Oh, okay, thanks. I didn't know if the aftermarket unit ran 1:1 on top of what the OEM was providing, or if it actually replaced the OEM, but it sounds like the latter is the case.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #7  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by BigDogJonx
Stephen,

You can adjust the correction ratio to a higher amount which will allow you to do more than just the standard 25%. Like lets say it was set to 3%, then the max you raise is 25% based on 3% correction factor. If you raise that 3% to a 6 or 9 or even 15, then you wouldnt need to go as high as 25% anymore, probably less than half of that.

I forget where the option is, believe it is in the setting, I dont have the SAFC anymore, but I do remember that one.

Dixit
Thanks, Dixit. I'll look into that. By the way, I have your SAFC, remember?
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Thanks, Dixit. I'll look into that. By the way, I have your SAFC, remember?
Hahhha, I completely forgot. I remember I used to have an SAFCI before I sold it to get the new SAFCII which I dont have anymore either.

Good deal.

Dixit
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #9  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Actually, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it take a 4:1 or higher for a JWT ECU and a 5:1 or higher for the stock ECU?

With stock 1:1 FPR at 10psi, fuel pressure would be 53psi(43psi at WOT+10psi FPR).

So, for the FMU it's 1/2(static fuel pressure at idle) + (FMU ratio*psi).

With JWT at OEM fuel pressure that would mean:
1/2(34)+(4*10)=57psi for a 4:1 FMU ratio

WithOUT JWT you have to lower base fuel to ~26psi:
1/2(26)+(5*10)=63psi for a 5:1 FMU ratio

Correct?
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #10  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Also, I'd feel MUCH safer subtracting fuel with the S-AFC vs. adding.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #11  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Actually, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it take a 4:1 or higher for a JWT ECU and a 5:1 or higher for the stock ECU?

With stock 1:1 FPR at 10psi, fuel pressure would be 53psi(43psi at WOT+10psi FPR).

So, for the FMU it's 1/2(static fuel pressure at idle) + (FMU ratio*psi).

With JWT at OEM fuel pressure that would mean:
1/2(34)+(4*10)=57psi for a 4:1 FMU ratio

WithOUT JWT you have to lower base fuel to ~26psi:
1/2(26)+(5*10)=63psi for a 5:1 FMU ratio

Correct?
You don't need the fmu with the JWT ecu unless you are maxing out injectors. At 10 psi (actually I'm at 11.5 psi at 7000 rpm) I'm only seeing 80% duty cycle on my duty cycle meter. So there's still some headroom (well, only if you're comfortable with going higher than 80%).

With the A32 ecu you can use the fmu along with the SAFC, but you can keep the fuel pressure at the stock 34 psi if you are using the Z32 maf and 370 cc/min injectors.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #12  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Also, I'd feel MUCH safer subtracting fuel with the S-AFC vs. adding.
That would be the safe thing to do, no doubt about it.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:15 AM
  #13  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
You don't need the fmu with the JWT ecu unless you are maxing out injectors. At 10 psi (actually I'm at 11.5 psi at 7000 rpm) I'm only seeing 80% duty cycle on my duty cycle meter. So there's still some headroom (well, only if you're comfortable with going higher than 80%).
Augh..very good clarification. I was intending to point out for more head room....not that it was required. Thanks.

With the A32 ecu you can use the fmu along with the SAFC, but you can keep the fuel pressure at the stock 34 psi if you are using the Z32 maf and 370 cc/min injectors.
Good point.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:56 AM
  #14  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
ok, so on the chart with the 2-3 shift when the a/f ratio drops, does that mean that you are running extra rich because of the shift in rpm?

im still a little hazy about the fpr calculations.

steve
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #15  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
If the BOV is after the MAF withOUT a recirc tube, it releases already metered air into the atmosphere causing the ECU to add fuel for air that is no longer there.

Originally Posted by slimer
ok, so on the chart with the 2-3 shift when the a/f ratio drops, does that mean that you are running extra rich because of the shift in rpm?

im still a little hazy about the fpr calculations.

steve
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #16  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
so stephen max has a bov after his?

im still runnin na because stillen is giving me trouble on the warranty with bracket #2, so i havent experienced it with mine


its an old picture
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #17  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Yes, the MAF is on the CAI now.

Originally Posted by slimer
so stephen max has a bov after his?

im still runnin na because stillen is giving me trouble on the warranty with bracket #2, so i havent experienced it with mine


its an old picture
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #18  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
yeah, i know

but stephen, did you relocate the z32 maf farther away from the blower inlet? i know that you were having trouble with the MAF when it was mounted next to it. did you put it next to the filter in the wheel well?
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #19  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by slimer
yeah, i know

but stephen, did you relocate the z32 maf farther away from the blower inlet? i know that you were having trouble with the MAF when it was mounted next to it. did you put it next to the filter in the wheel well?
Yes, I had a lot of trouble with the maf in the wheel well because of back flow from the blower whenever the throttle closed at anything above about 1500 rpm, such as during shifts. It made the engine run momentarily super-rich - to the point that my plugs were completely soot covered after only a couple hundred miles. It also occurred during low throttle cruising when modulating between, say, 5% and 0% throttle. I could tell it was happening because my duty cycle meter would light up to 10-20% whenever I let off the gas.

Against JWT's recommendations, I have been running the Z32 maf between the bov and the throttle body - back in the normal place the Stillen kit provides. All problems have disappeared and it drives normally. I've had it in that position since November with no ill effects to the maf.

The reason the afr momentarily lowers during shifting is that just before the shift the injectors are dumping fuel based on WOT and massive airflow. Letting off the throttle shuts off air flow fairly instantaneously, and it takes a fraction of a second for the ecu to detect the overly rich condition. The same situation happens in reverse (i.e. momentarily lean) after completion of the 2-3 shift when suddenly it's at WOT again.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #20  
MAXimumHP's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,561
From: Appleton, WI
Might it be possible to create some kind of cylindrical sleeve to slide into the Z32 maf to partially fool the sensor via changed flow area and get a little closer ratios without so much electronic correction?
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:17 PM
  #21  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by MAXimumHP
Might it be possible to create some kind of cylindrical sleeve to slide into the Z32 maf to partially fool the sensor via changed flow area and get a little closer ratios without so much electronic correction?
Yeah, that might work. But it would be hard to get a uniform afr that way, methinks, without some electronic correction. Plus, blocking airflow just doesn't set well with me.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:33 PM
  #22  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
so your maf is where mine is? or is that too close to the bov?

Steve
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #23  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by slimer
so your maf is where mine is? or is that too close to the bov?

Steve
Mine is closer to the throttle body:

Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #24  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
yeah, but my air to water after cooler is where yours is
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #25  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by slimer
yeah, but my air to water after cooler is where yours is

I think you should be okay where your maf is, regardless, since it's not going to see any backflow from the SC.
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #26  
slimer's Avatar
A couple of Blaxxx's? Lawls.
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,529
yeah, but im still waiting on that new s/c bracket from stillen, so it doesnt matter right now.

im just trying to do some more research for when it IS up and running.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
gustavison
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
Oct 4, 2015 06:50 PM
QueensMAX
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Sep 15, 2015 04:14 AM
ef9
Buyer/Seller Feedback
0
Sep 10, 2015 10:13 PM
ballerchris510
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:35 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 AM.