5th Gen Owner Wants to switch to 4th
5th Gen Owner Wants to switch to 4th
I own a 2001 Max and hate it. I've owned so many other cars that I would rather be driving. How much different is the 4th gen performance wise than a 5th gen. Besides the motor, horsepower, torque etc. Is the 5-Speed the same as the 2000's? How easy is it to truely unlease the power of the VQ30? Such as turbos etc. Also main thing, handling... The 5th gen's handling is nothing special even with aftermarket susp. Is the 4th gen lighter or set up different such as the rear beam? Im sorry for all the basic stupid questions, but the main thing is is this smart going from a 2001 Auto to a 99 5 spd? Or would yhall call me a moron. I always have loved the looks of 4th gens and envy my friends moded 99 SE.
Thanks in advance
And sorry for the newbie questions,
Alec
Thanks in advance
And sorry for the newbie questions,
Alec
The literature is out there on this forum and beyond. It would be a downgrade in many ways. But it also depends on your future plans.
They're about the same stock for stock .. with the 5th gen putting better power and pulling ahrder after 70 mph or so due to it's superior powerband.
In what sense? If you mean the tranny in particular--->Gear ratios, yes, mechanical reliability, no, the 2001 is stronger, particularly 3rd gear.
Depends on how much money your willing to spend.
They both have the same, almost identical suspension, but a slight advantage for the 4th gen being slightly lighter, but not by much.
No, not at all, espeically not a 99 ...
Close ...
If you plan on making it a 1/4 mile beast ... go 4th gen, it's lighter and has the capability for a 3.5L, or there's always F/I options for either the 3.0L and 3.5L ... once again, this is dependent on your willingness to spend $$ and how much ...
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
I own a 2001 Max and hate it. I've owned so many other cars that I would rather be driving. How much different is the 4th gen performance wise than a 5th gen.
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
Besides the motor, horsepower, torque etc. Is the 5-Speed the same as the 2000's?
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
How easy is it to truely unlease the power of the VQ30? Such as turbos etc.
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
Also main thing, handling... The 5th gen's handling is nothing special even with aftermarket susp. Is the 4th gen lighter or set up different such as the rear beam?
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
Im sorry for all the basic stupid questions, but the main thing is is this smart going from a 2001 Auto to a 99 5 spd?
Originally Posted by remembermorriso
Or would yhall call me a moron.
If you plan on making it a 1/4 mile beast ... go 4th gen, it's lighter and has the capability for a 3.5L, or there's always F/I options for either the 3.0L and 3.5L ... once again, this is dependent on your willingness to spend $$ and how much ...
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
The literature is out there on this forum and beyond. It would be a downgrade in many ways. But it also depends on your future plans.
They're about the same stock for stock .. with the 5th gen putting better power and pulling ahrder after 70 mph or so due to it's superior powerband.
In what sense? If you mean the tranny in particular--->Gear ratios, yes, mechanical reliability, no, the 2001 is stronger, particularly 3rd gear.
Depends on how much money your willing to spend.
They both have the same, almost identical suspension, but a slight advantage for the 4th gen being slightly lighter, but not by much.
No, not at all, espeically not a 99 ...
Close ...
If you plan on making it a 1/4 mile beast ... go 4th gen, it's lighter and has the capability for a 3.5L, or there's always F/I options for either the 3.0L and 3.5L ... once again, this is dependent on your willingness to spend $$ and how much ...
They're about the same stock for stock .. with the 5th gen putting better power and pulling ahrder after 70 mph or so due to it's superior powerband.
In what sense? If you mean the tranny in particular--->Gear ratios, yes, mechanical reliability, no, the 2001 is stronger, particularly 3rd gear.
Depends on how much money your willing to spend.
They both have the same, almost identical suspension, but a slight advantage for the 4th gen being slightly lighter, but not by much.
No, not at all, espeically not a 99 ...
Close ...
If you plan on making it a 1/4 mile beast ... go 4th gen, it's lighter and has the capability for a 3.5L, or there's always F/I options for either the 3.0L and 3.5L ... once again, this is dependent on your willingness to spend $$ and how much ...
this man knows his stuff.4th gen - but im biased. It is nicer for FI options as stated.
im with you man ... the 4th gen looks hotter than the 5th gen ... in certain ways the 5th gen looks better than the 4th..but you have to spend a lil dough to make it look better .... the 4th gen interior is MUCH hotter than the 5th gen, thats only in my opinion ... my suggestion: take a look at some hot 4th gen int./ext. pics and then compare them to some hot 5th gen int./ext. pics....there are some seriously hot 4th gens .... a 5 speed 99 will probably beat an 01 automatic....it would be close....but with stick, your a full second faster! .... the 4th gen is a few hundred pounds lighter for sure......the 4th gen motor has 190bhp and the 5th gen has 222...they are both vq30's......basically the same motor .... now the 02' has 255 horse which you probably allready know .... all for now
In what sense? If you mean the tranny in particular--->Gear ratios, yes, mechanical reliability, no, the 2001 is stronger, particularly 3rd gear.
The 4Gen is a nice car. I'm not sure how much of a step down a 4th gen is to a 5th gen but for me, the 4th Gen has more leg and head room in it. I've driven the early 5th Gens and they didn't feel as powerful in the low end as my car but I have gotten beaten by them at the track near the end of the track. This is when I was stock though.
Personally, I feel the 4th Gen is a better car if you don't care about the car being a newer model.
Personally, I feel the 4th Gen is a better car if you don't care about the car being a newer model.
I have both (well, the 5th gen is actually my wife's car) and I have always enjoyed the feel of the 4th gen over the 5th gen, even before I started doing any mods to my 95. It feels lighter and nimbler.
Originally Posted by Supermax95
If i recall correctly someone recently ripped apart a 5th gen tranni and third gear was the same weight/thickness as the fourth gen, which led most of us to believe it was pretty much the same. 

I have a 4th gen and 5.5g, and the 4th gen feels better controlled, maybe due to my suspsension mods, or the weight, or a combonation of the 2.
My 5.5g for obvious resons feels quite a bit more powerful .. bit I like the throttle response and tachometer accuracy of my 4th gen better.
I love the 4th gen and 5.5g, I don't really like the 5th gen (00-01) .. but I'm weird.
Cannot go wrong w/ a VI'd VQ30, a DEK, or a VQ35 ... IMO .
yes i know what synchros are, they are there to make it so that you do not have to double clutch every down shift. although, learning to double clutch well is important so that you do not need to change these often or your clutch. (you have to rev match to double clutch)
Originally Posted by liqidvenom
im going to say that a 4th gen is a step down from a 5th gen. u have the vi, more mods out for u, and u have way better body kits. i would stay with a 5th gen
There's a Viper Blue 5th gen with a Stillen body kit and S/C kit around my area. It's sick.
Originally Posted by MaximaConvert
5th gen is also an extra 700 lbs if i recall correctly......
I'd say 2-300.
yes i know what synchros are, they are there to make it so that you do not have to double clutch every down shift.
okay, well good to know from the guy with two autos. if you have manual, and say synchros go on second gear, you cant just put the stick in second gear gate and 45. you need to manually match the rpm. sychro, as in synchronize. it may not be the mechanics term, but thats what they do.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Honostly I think the 5th gen is ugly. Absolutely ugly, I wouldn't own one. The 4th gen is considerably lighter, and if you drive the two (back to back) you notice the difference in ride. As far as power is concerned, there not very different- but you would have better results with a VQ35 in a 4th gen then in a 5th gen simply because of the weight issue.
And yeah, 4th gens are by far sexier.
And yeah, 4th gens are by far sexier.
Originally Posted by sdoherty_tjm
okay, well good to know from the guy with two autos. if you have manual, and say synchros go on second gear, you cant just put the stick in second gear gate and 45. you need to manually match the rpm. sychro, as in synchronize. it may not be the mechanics term, but thats what they do.
To be specific, I misinformed everyone by stating that 3rd gear specifically was the weak link in the 4th gen transmission, when I should've stated the synchros were.
Now, do you want to re-invnet the wheel and talk about the specifics of synchros, or call it good?
Originally Posted by sdoherty_tjm
okay, well good to know from the guy with two autos. if you have manual, and say synchros go on second gear, you cant just put the stick in second gear gate and 45. you need to manually match the rpm. sychro, as in synchronize. it may not be the mechanics term, but thats what they do.
man you've really been in attack mode lately, whats your problem?
i did a comparison of a 96 and 00. here is the stuff i thought to be important.
Weight
96=3,000
00=3,193
Power to weight ratios. (hp or tq divided by weight *10)
HP
96= 0.63
00'=0.69
TQ
96=0.68
00'=0.67
coefficient of drag
96=0.31
00=0.32
0-60 + 1/4 mile
96=6.6 + 15.2
00=7.0 + 15.6
^(both se trim)
Weight
96=3,000
00=3,193
Power to weight ratios. (hp or tq divided by weight *10)
HP
96= 0.63
00'=0.69
TQ
96=0.68
00'=0.67
coefficient of drag
96=0.31
00=0.32
0-60 + 1/4 mile
96=6.6 + 15.2
00=7.0 + 15.6
^(both se trim)
Originally Posted by sdoherty_tjm
im getting really tired of waking up so early
Well dont take it out on people on the org. All this time you spend responding back and getting attitudes is time you could be spending sleeping.
Talk about misplaces frustration. sheesh
[QUOTE=NY 95 VQ30DE]
Even that's a long shot ....
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Are you saure you didn't mistype that? 700 lbs is a stretch.
I'd say 2-300.
He might be thinking of the 600+ lb ifference between the 5th and 6th gens..
I'd say 2-300.
He might be thinking of the 600+ lb ifference between the 5th and 6th gens..
Wish I made $$ like that when I was 16...
assuming you really ARE 16!!
assuming you really ARE 16!!
Originally Posted by sdoherty_tjm
i cant sleep i am at work. it is really slow here and there is nothing to do. i do data entry in euro dollar options. when the market is slow, so is my job. but i still get 400 a week.




