ToyoŽ Proxes T1-S
The T1-S has beed replaced by the T1-R, FYI.
I've bought two set of tires "rated no. 1" by CR; the Dunlop A2 D60s and the Falken 512s. Both sucked one way or another. Never again will I follow CR for tires (though I agree w/ the Proxes).
Originally Posted by BLAKE0072
ToyoŽ Proxes T1-S is the best so far , rate 1 consumer reports ,
Different optimizations
Originally Posted by CCS2k1Max
The T1-S has beed replaced by the T1-R, FYI.
I've bought two set of tires "rated no. 1" by CR; the Dunlop A2 D60s and the Falken 512s. Both sucked one way or another. Never again will I follow CR for tires (though I agree w/ the Proxes).
I've bought two set of tires "rated no. 1" by CR; the Dunlop A2 D60s and the Falken 512s. Both sucked one way or another. Never again will I follow CR for tires (though I agree w/ the Proxes).
I have run both Toyo Proxes T1-S and Dunlop SP Sport 01 tires (same size: 225/55-16) on my Maxima. The T1-S has a directional tread design; the SP Sport 01 is an asymmetrical tire (internally, as well as in the tread pattern). The T1-S has a soft and flexible single-ply sidewall (polyester in the 225/55-16 size), which yields a nice ride, good vibration absorbtion over small road irregularities, and a "soft" feel through the steering wheel. The SP Sport 01 has a relatively stiff two-ply sidewall (rayon in all sizes), which yields hairline precision handling (the feeling that you can thread a needle with the nose of the car), a bit of harshness over small road irregularities, and a "tight" feel through the steering wheel. The Dunlop seems to track better (less wander in a "hands-off" test on imperfect streets) than the Toyo, but the Toyo is no slouch in that regard. either.
Lacking precision testing facilities to document the ultimate g-forces the two tires could sustain, I can say only that both are very "sticky" through tight corners and both brake well; there does not seem to be a lot of difference in ultimate grip. However, they present very different feel through the steering wheel from one another.
(Summer) Toyo's t1-s (Winter )??
Going to be in the market for some winter tires soon , really dont want drive my ride in salt , but thats life , Guess its s trade off with perfomace tires now,two have 2 sets s/w , looking for recomndations ?? will spend the extra cash for some quiet ones ,maybe go with the all season Toyo's ?
Originally Posted by Triple8Sol
The T1R is replacing the T1-S. I have a pair on my rears right now. It's been confirmed by several major tire companies...
However, one imagines that Toyo will want to have cleaned the T1-S out of its inventory before the time the EU noise regulations come into effect in 2007, as any noncomplying tires will not be able to be sold in Europe after that date.
If you look at Toyo's data sheets for the T1-S vs. the T1R, some things jump out.
In identical sizes:
The T1R is heavier across the board than the T1-S
The T1R has a slightly greater mounted diameter than the T1-S
(and therefore a T1R will make fewer revolutions per mile than a T1-S)
The T1-S has a tread depth of 10.3mm vs. the T1R's 11mm
Generally, all else being equal, it is desirable to minimize unsprung weight, and a lighter tire is a better tire for performance.The T1R has a slightly greater mounted diameter than the T1-S
(and therefore a T1R will make fewer revolutions per mile than a T1-S)
The T1-S has a tread depth of 10.3mm vs. the T1R's 11mm
The slight differences in diameter and revolutions per mile will not affect speedometer/odometer readings or effective gearing significantly (but they do illustrate why tire size calculators such as the one in this Maxima.org forum can give no better than an approximation of actual tire size).
Of course their site still lists it...the tire hasn't been phased out yet, but it's in process. When I was tire shopping, I wanted the T1-S originally, and didn't even know the T1R existed. I was told by several companies that they only had whatever sizes were remaining in stock, and wouldn't be getting any more. They also said it was being replaced by the T1R.
While both excellent tires, the T1-R is replacing the T1-S which will be fazed out and discontinued when the T1-R is finally available in all sizes. They have to discontinue the T1-S as the Proxe 4 actually outperforms it.
I just got my wheel and tire setup yesterday with Proxe 4 and so far I'm in love with these tires..
I just got my wheel and tire setup yesterday with Proxe 4 and so far I'm in love with these tires..
Originally Posted by Y2KSESteve
They have to discontinue the T1-S as the Proxe 4 actually outperforms it.
I just got my wheel and tire setup yesterday with Proxe 4 and so far I'm in love with these tires..
I just got my wheel and tire setup yesterday with Proxe 4 and so far I'm in love with these tires..A "summer" tire (probably not the best designation for it, but we don't get to make the rules of language) is really an every-day-of-the-year-it-does-not-snow tire. Think of it as a three-and-a-half season tire. If you want traction on _wet_ roads, a "summer" tire will beat the beejeezus out of an "all season" tire just about every time, right across brands and price levels.
What makes a tire an "all season" or "M & S" tire is the rubber in the tread compound, nothing more. In fact, some manufacturers make some of their tires in two versions, "summer" and "all season." Look at the Pirelli P Zero Nero (a "summer" tire): the tread pattern is identical to the tread pattern of the P Zero Nero M & S (an "all season" tire), and in some sizes both versions are available. The "M & S" designated tire is called M & S ("mud and snow": another name for "all season) because it has a tread compound that in technical jargon is called _hydrophilic_ -- "hydrophilic" is Greek for "likes water." This means that, in snow, when the weight of the car compacts the snow and causes it to melt ever so slightly, the snow gets wet and sticks to the tread; the snow sticking to the tread then compacts with the snow on the pavement, as in packing a snowball, and the tire gains traction.
"Summer" tires, in contrast, are made with _hydrophobic_ ("dislikes water") tread compounds, better to evaculate the water away from the tread, because a thin layer of water sticking to the tread between you and the pavement (which is what happens when the tread compound "likes water") acts as a fair lubricant between the tire and the pavement, which is Not a Good Thing for traction.
Roll two cars, one with "all season" tires, and one with "summer" tires, through a puddle, then look at their respective treads. The tread of the "all season" tire will look shiny and wet, while the tread of the "summer" tire will look dry enough to light a match on. It is the summer tire you want under you on a wet road.
The Toyo Proxes 4 is an "all season" tire.
You don't need to take my word for it. The Tire Rack regularly runs comparison tests of the tires they stock. usually in groups of four, almost always with their pet BMW 330Ci (sorry, they don't test on Maximas). Tire Rack never tests Toyo tires because Tire Rack does not sell Toyo tires. The tests of the brands of tires that Tire Rack does sell are done by different people under different ambient weather conditions, which yields great variability, and would never pass peer review in a scientific journal, but they are useful enough within individual test groupings to get a feel for the respective tires' strengths and weaknesses. One of the most revealing tests, always conducted, is braking on a wet surface from 50 to 0.
Here are some Tire Rack test wet braking 50-0 results:
2003 July 7: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished third of four , best showing in all of the tests (see below).
2003 August 1: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 May 28: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 September 22: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 October 14: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 November 12: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 April 15: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 May 13: four "all season" tires. Interesting result is that the same tire (Goodyear RS-A) that had finished dead last in several of the above tests against "summer" tires, finished first of four -- by a comfortable margin -- against fellow "all season" tires.
2005 May 27: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
What does this say to you?
2003 August 1: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 May 28: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 September 22: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 October 14: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 November 12: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 April 15: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 May 13: four "all season" tires. Interesting result is that the same tire (Goodyear RS-A) that had finished dead last in several of the above tests against "summer" tires, finished first of four -- by a comfortable margin -- against fellow "all season" tires.
2005 May 27: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
The latest Toyo add compaign shows only the Proxes 4, the RA-1 and the T1R only (funny you mention European tire noise laws and the lack of the '-' in the name, the European Toyo websites have the T1R listed as T1-R). The T1-S will soon be history.
Originally Posted by Tosh
A classic example of cognitative dissonance there. The Proxes T1-S and the Proxes 4 are designed and built to different specs for different purposes. The Proxes 4 will outperform the T1-S in the snow every time; the T1-S will outperform the 4 under all other conditions. The difference is inherent in the way the two tires are made.
A "summer" tire (probably not the best designation for it, but we don't get to make the rules of language) is really an every-day-of-the-year-it-does-not-snow tire. Think of it as a three-and-a-half season tire. If you want traction on _wet_ roads, a "summer" tire will beat the beejeezus out of an "all season" tire just about every time, right across brands and price levels.
What makes a tire an "all season" or "M & S" tire is the rubber in the tread compound, nothing more. In fact, some manufacturers make some of their tires in two versions, "summer" and "all season." Look at the Pirelli P Zero Nero (a "summer" tire): the tread pattern is identical to the tread pattern of the P Zero Nero M & S (an "all season" tire), and in some sizes both versions are available. The "M & S" designated tire is called M & S ("mud and snow": another name for "all season) because it has a tread compound that in technical jargon is called _hydrophilic_ -- "hydrophilic" is Greek for "likes water." This means that, in snow, when the weight of the car compacts the snow and causes it to melt ever so slightly, the snow gets wet and sticks to the tread; the snow sticking to the tread then compacts with the snow on the pavement, as in packing a snowball, and the tire gains traction.
"Summer" tires, in contrast, are made with _hydrophobic_ ("dislikes water") tread compounds, better to evaculate the water away from the tread, because a thin layer of water sticking to the tread between you and the pavement (which is what happens when the tread compound "likes water") acts as a fair lubricant between the tire and the pavement, which is Not a Good Thing for traction.
Roll two cars, one with "all season" tires, and one with "summer" tires, through a puddle, then look at their respective treads. The tread of the "all season" tire will look shiny and wet, while the tread of the "summer" tire will look dry enough to light a match on. It is the summer tire you want under you on a wet road.
The Toyo Proxes 4 is an "all season" tire.
You don't need to take my word for it. The Tire Rack regularly runs comparison tests of the tires they stock. usually in groups of four, almost always with their pet BMW 330Ci (sorry, they don't test on Maximas). Tire Rack never tests Toyo tires because Tire Rack does not sell Toyo tires. The tests of the brands of tires that Tire Rack does sell are done by different people under different ambient weather conditions, which yields great variability, and would never pass peer review in a scientific journal, but they are useful enough within individual test groupings to get a feel for the respective tires' strengths and weaknesses. One of the most revealing tests, always conducted, is braking on a wet surface from 50 to 0.
Here are some Tire Rack test wet braking 50-0 results:
A "summer" tire (probably not the best designation for it, but we don't get to make the rules of language) is really an every-day-of-the-year-it-does-not-snow tire. Think of it as a three-and-a-half season tire. If you want traction on _wet_ roads, a "summer" tire will beat the beejeezus out of an "all season" tire just about every time, right across brands and price levels.
What makes a tire an "all season" or "M & S" tire is the rubber in the tread compound, nothing more. In fact, some manufacturers make some of their tires in two versions, "summer" and "all season." Look at the Pirelli P Zero Nero (a "summer" tire): the tread pattern is identical to the tread pattern of the P Zero Nero M & S (an "all season" tire), and in some sizes both versions are available. The "M & S" designated tire is called M & S ("mud and snow": another name for "all season) because it has a tread compound that in technical jargon is called _hydrophilic_ -- "hydrophilic" is Greek for "likes water." This means that, in snow, when the weight of the car compacts the snow and causes it to melt ever so slightly, the snow gets wet and sticks to the tread; the snow sticking to the tread then compacts with the snow on the pavement, as in packing a snowball, and the tire gains traction.
"Summer" tires, in contrast, are made with _hydrophobic_ ("dislikes water") tread compounds, better to evaculate the water away from the tread, because a thin layer of water sticking to the tread between you and the pavement (which is what happens when the tread compound "likes water") acts as a fair lubricant between the tire and the pavement, which is Not a Good Thing for traction.
Roll two cars, one with "all season" tires, and one with "summer" tires, through a puddle, then look at their respective treads. The tread of the "all season" tire will look shiny and wet, while the tread of the "summer" tire will look dry enough to light a match on. It is the summer tire you want under you on a wet road.
The Toyo Proxes 4 is an "all season" tire.
You don't need to take my word for it. The Tire Rack regularly runs comparison tests of the tires they stock. usually in groups of four, almost always with their pet BMW 330Ci (sorry, they don't test on Maximas). Tire Rack never tests Toyo tires because Tire Rack does not sell Toyo tires. The tests of the brands of tires that Tire Rack does sell are done by different people under different ambient weather conditions, which yields great variability, and would never pass peer review in a scientific journal, but they are useful enough within individual test groupings to get a feel for the respective tires' strengths and weaknesses. One of the most revealing tests, always conducted, is braking on a wet surface from 50 to 0.
Here are some Tire Rack test wet braking 50-0 results:
2003 July 7: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished third of four , best showing in all of the tests (see below).
2003 August 1: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 May 28: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 September 22: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 October 14: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 November 12: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 April 15: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 May 13: four "all season" tires. Interesting result is that the same tire (Goodyear RS-A) that had finished dead last in several of the above tests against "summer" tires, finished first of four -- by a comfortable margin -- against fellow "all season" tires.
2005 May 27: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
What does this say to you?2003 August 1: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 May 28: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 September 22: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 October 14: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2004 November 12: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 April 15: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
2005 May 13: four "all season" tires. Interesting result is that the same tire (Goodyear RS-A) that had finished dead last in several of the above tests against "summer" tires, finished first of four -- by a comfortable margin -- against fellow "all season" tires.
2005 May 27: three "summer" tires, one "all season." All season finished fourth of four.
That is all.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stealth Interceptor
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Jul 18, 2001 11:40 AM
MrBurner
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Feb 10, 2001 09:53 AM




