Interesting part change from cali-fed
Interesting part change from cali-fed
Some of you may or may not know this....I didnt know till I took it off
But, the lower intake plenum on a cali-spec has butterfly fins/valves (whatever) - controlled by the big apple size vacuum canister type thing right in front of the TB.
Well, we had a spare, but it was a FED-spec plenum. We switched it out, along w/ a new gasket.....and everything works better. It had a VERY hesitant cold idel before-hand....and now it's fixed.
We put a small bolt in the hose that fed to the pressure canister thing. No codes....yet?
Anyone else done this?
But, the lower intake plenum on a cali-spec has butterfly fins/valves (whatever) - controlled by the big apple size vacuum canister type thing right in front of the TB.
Well, we had a spare, but it was a FED-spec plenum. We switched it out, along w/ a new gasket.....and everything works better. It had a VERY hesitant cold idel before-hand....and now it's fixed.

We put a small bolt in the hose that fed to the pressure canister thing. No codes....yet?
Anyone else done this?
you should have dynoed the car before and after to dispell the myth of the butterfiles. some think they cause a restiction and rob power.
any noticable difference in driving, or is it too early to tell.
any noticable difference in driving, or is it too early to tell.
Originally Posted by JSutter
you should have dynoed the car before and after to dispell the myth of the butterfiles. some think they cause a restiction and rob power.
any noticable difference in driving, or is it too early to tell.
any noticable difference in driving, or is it too early to tell.
i have only seen the butterflies open and close when the engine is cold. When the engine is hot, they stay open all the time.
the front precat really doesnt do much power wise. the area under the curve is similar with no peak gains, acctually a loss in the peak tq. gains are minimal from 4k-6krpm. not worth the time.
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/Fed_YPipe.html
look at the low end loss! especially the tq. may as well keep the precat. hell the stock y pipe made more low end torque.
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/Fed_YPipe.html
look at the low end loss! especially the tq. may as well keep the precat. hell the stock y pipe made more low end torque.
Originally Posted by JSutter
the front precat really doesnt do much power wise. the area under the curve is similar with no peak gains, acctually a loss in the peak tq. gains are minimal from 4k-6krpm. not worth the time.
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/Fed_YPipe.html
look at the low end loss! especially the tq. may as well keep the precat. hell the stock y pipe made more low end torque.
http://www.desertpearlmax2.homestead.com/Fed_YPipe.html
look at the low end loss! especially the tq. may as well keep the precat. hell the stock y pipe made more low end torque.
the butt dyno on my end tells a different story.. but i did replace my knock sensor, did the fed spec manifold, and replaced my stillen y pipe which had a collapsed flex section with my cattman..
Originally Posted by 1FSTMAX
yes i know.. did he remove the front precat too? that would be better than taking the swirl control system out..
thats next on his list
he got a straight pipe this past weekend...(vortechpower)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vingodine
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
45
May 21, 2016 12:46 PM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
Aug 10, 2015 04:29 PM
RealityCheck
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Aug 5, 2015 06:18 AM




