4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Those w/ stock resonator and aftermarket intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 09:24 PM
  #1  
hollaatchaboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,012
Those w/ stock resonator and aftermarket intake

I've seen in a couple of threads that the stock resonator is what aids to keep the throttle response in the max. however, do you still get the roaring sound of the intake?
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #2  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
if you just put a filter on the MAF with the stock resonator, you get a little growl. I plan on using the CAI part of the intake off the stock resonator, going that route youll get a growl. Otherwise just stick with a hacked air box
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 04:52 AM
  #3  
LeX's Avatar
LeX
Nissan by Nature
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,181
From: ATL
you get a nice growl
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #4  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
Got cold air piping on the end of the stock midpipe, it is a little louder than stock, nowhere as loud as the full CAI set up though and definitely better throttle response.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
hollaatchaboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,012
well im not rlly planning on putting the cold air part, just the filter on the end of the MAF. I feel with my current set up (Bomz ebay intake) ive lost a lot of throttle response. Therefore, i want to try using the stock resonator to see if it will help. But i love the sound and i don't want to lose it.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:06 AM
  #6  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
you'll lose a lot of that sound, since the short ram resonator is metal and stock is plastic. youll still have a little growl, but nowhere near what your short ram was
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
99grnmaxgxe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,705
From: Tucson, AZ
With an air filter and the stock resonator, you can't really hear anything under normal driving conditions, but if you go WOT, it growls really loud.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #8  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by hollaatchaboi
I've seen in a couple of threads that the stock resonator is what aids to keep the throttle response in the max. however, do you still get the roaring sound of the intake?
The roar won't be quite as loud since the air won't be as turbulent entering the TB, but your throttle response will go up for sure. IMO stock res.+CAI is the best setup.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
hollaatchaboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,012
Would this setup be considered a popcharger? I read this in maxmods:

"The popcharger is just a K&N type cone filter that bolts on to a velocity stack, which then bolts on the the end of the mass air flow sensor.....

...And while there never really will be an answer, it seems that the popcharger helps most in the high end RPM range but can acually cause a little lag in the lower RPMs which is more noticable on automatic cars."

I'm looking to get my low end back, not lose it. Am i better off keeping the HAI i have now?
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #10  
Haibert88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 181
I put my stock intake back on...you will get tired of the growl specially when it turns to a ricer type sound past 5K rpm...and I have a stick I30t and still felt the low end go down the drain. maybe i wasn't launching with high RPM but then again who wants to do that in an I30 lol
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #11  
hollaatchaboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,012
i think at this point.....i'm just gonna do the hacked intake box mod
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #12  
zander's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 500
Thats the one I've got, a little more sound, but not really that noticable. Way more quiet then the open filter.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
99Automagic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you do anything to the stock intake to introduce more air, you will lose low end. Even if you just remove the air box and replace it with a cone filter, you'll lose low end. If you put holes in the stock air box, you'll lose low end. It's not as bad as a full AF intake, but it's still noticable. Me likes the no sound/low end power/stock setup. No more foking with the intake for me.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #14  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
WRONG. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If you use the true PR style CAI, you will gain low end, but lose high end. If you use the CAI part into the fender with the stock resonator, that would be the best set up.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 05:58 AM
  #15  
99Automagic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by eckohb
WRONG. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If you use the true PR style CAI, you will gain low end, but lose high end. If you use the CAI part into the fender with the stock resonator, that would be the best set up.

That's the one type of intake I have not tried, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt. I would love to see some proof on this though. The stock box chokes at high end as it is, not to mention the annoying power drop at high rpms with a USIM. You mean to tell me the cai will just add to this qwerk? I would not call that the "best". The stocker would be the best all around performer.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:54 AM
  #16  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by eckohb
WRONG. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If you use the true PR style CAI, you will gain low end, but lose high end. If you use the CAI part into the fender with the stock resonator, that would be the best set up.
You are partially correct. The PR style CAI loses no high end. That's a myth. But i will vouch for you saying the PR CAI with stock resonator is the best.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:56 AM
  #17  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by 99Automagic
The stocker would be the best all around performer.
That's an urban legend. PR CAI with stock resonator is the best all-around. Clear-cut advantages to cooler air and clear-cut advantages to using the stock resonator.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #18  
hollaatchaboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,012
anyone w/ proof?
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #19  
chillin014's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,601
From: houston tx
how about this. i'll dyno my car before i add my PR cai.
i just need to find a place to do that....
and then i'll dyno afterwards.
i need some pictures on how people cut their hole in the fender.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #20  
99Automagic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by chillin014
how about this. i'll dyno my car before i add my PR cai.
i just need to find a place to do that....
and then i'll dyno afterwards.
i need some pictures on how people cut their hole in the fender.

Please do so we can see for ourselves.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #21  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
I'll do the same before the year is out. I was always under the assumption that due to the longer tubing of the CAI that high end power was lost, but ill take your word for it. I know low end isnt lost due to the air being available with a tap of the gas.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #22  
lexx426's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 490
The whole dyno story is BS. A true cold air intake will not show any gains from a dyno because it is so dependant on wind and air activity neer the fender. The best way to test is on the track. 1/4 times and 1/8 times will show how it gained. Of course that would take many runs and time to change a completly stock car to cold air and back to stock air box. IMO my PR CAI has given me low end gains and hasnt taken anything from high end. It is set up as ram air right now. Also intakes are ment to be coupled with exhaust. More flow is always better.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #23  
sdoherty_tjm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 639
a dyno isnt that great of an idea. at normal driving speeds the engine bay nears ambient temps so it is about the same as a fender CAI. i have the short ram intake and i didnt notice the supposed low end losses. it almost seemed easier to drive my 5spd with the new intake just because all downshifts were easier and faster. i like the way you can have a pretty loud car, but only when you want.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #24  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
if track numbers are your proof, i went from 15.994 to 15.448 at the track a week apart from installing my CAI. The 15.994 was with the hacked air box.
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #25  
sdoherty_tjm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 639
the fender style CAI or is it the crappy version?
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #26  
chillin014's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,601
From: houston tx
ok hmm..well i'll dyno anyways because i've never dynoed before and i want to see some numbers.
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #27  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
the fender style, why on earth would i waste time with an injen CAI
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 10:41 AM
  #28  
2 Da Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,009
lol dam guys do all do the same shiet. no point arguing over which intake setup does beter. low end highend, midrange...you guys will still be running the same numbers....
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #29  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
is that so? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 11:50 AM
  #30  
lexx426's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 490
W/E. I am verry happy that i got rid of the stock air box. It was ugly and took up too much room. I dont feel any losses (i think its better low end though), but if i lost 2 hp so be it. My VQ30 sounds how it should, nice and growly, and it looks sick. IMO it was way worth it. I have PR CAI.
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #31  
eckohb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,468
+1 on that lexx
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #32  
cefiro a32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 241
Place racing is the sh*t. F*** all of that ebay crap that is produced without any research and development .
Old Oct 16, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #33  
MaximA StyLeZ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 749
From: North, NJ
So is it safe to say that the best intake setup (performance wise), is to use stock resanator, and the portion of the PR CAI, that goes into the fender with the filter ?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
bumpypickle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Sep 20, 2015 08:22 AM
220k+ A32
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Sep 11, 2015 02:18 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
Sep 9, 2015 10:37 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 06:04 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 PM.