Ideal rim/tire configuration
Ideal rim/tire configuration
Forget about looks for a second and think about performance.
If I wanted to get the best gas mileage possible and best acceleration times as well (I know...this seems like an oxymoron), what would be the best tire/rim combination?
If I wanted to get the best gas mileage possible and best acceleration times as well (I know...this seems like an oxymoron), what would be the best tire/rim combination?
As said above, as light as possible. Unfortunately performance tires are usually heavy unless they are shaved. The "17 rims on my WRX are very light at around 14 lbs.
The wheels on my I35 weigh like 55lb with tires. WRX wheel and tire is more like 35.
So my answer would be a set of these and some pzero corsa tires
http://www.koseijp.co.jp/engfl/n_p5_k1.htm
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....el=PZero+Corsa
The wheels on my I35 weigh like 55lb with tires. WRX wheel and tire is more like 35.
So my answer would be a set of these and some pzero corsa tires

http://www.koseijp.co.jp/engfl/n_p5_k1.htm
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....el=PZero+Corsa
Best acceleration and gas mileage?
1. Get a REALLY skinny rear wheels/tires with high pressure
2. For the front wheels, I think lightweight is the only thing that would benefit this without tradeoff in either.
3. Manual Transmission but that doesnt have to do with wheels tires
1. Get a REALLY skinny rear wheels/tires with high pressure
2. For the front wheels, I think lightweight is the only thing that would benefit this without tradeoff in either.
3. Manual Transmission but that doesnt have to do with wheels tires
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
Best acceleration and gas mileage?
1. Get a REALLY skinny rear wheels/tires with high pressure
2. For the front wheels, I think lightweight is the only thing that would benefit this without tradeoff in either.
3. Manual Transmission but that doesnt have to do with wheels tires
1. Get a REALLY skinny rear wheels/tires with high pressure
2. For the front wheels, I think lightweight is the only thing that would benefit this without tradeoff in either.
3. Manual Transmission but that doesnt have to do with wheels tires
Originally Posted by Pizatt
Please tell me how you are going to drift a front wheel drive car... Say you were joking!
Sure you can drift a FWD car...just not the rear end.
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
I was visualizing what REALLY skinny tires (as mentioned above) might be, and all I could imagine was a Max going full-bore around a turn with two temporary spare tires on the rear.
Sure you can drift a FWD car...just not the rear end.
Sure you can drift a FWD car...just not the rear end.
thats called crashing
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
Nohing like having your rear wheels locked in place to make for great traction. Looked like the last time I drove on snow!!!
Tire diameter will also have an effect on a vehicle's final drive ratio. As tire diameter changes, so will engine rpm at a given speed. We can demonstrate this with the simplified formula: rpm = (mph x final gear ratio x 336*) / tire diameter (*see "Formulas for Success" sidebar). For example, given 65 mph, a tire diameter of 30 inches, and a final gear ratio of 4.10, the engine speed will be approximately 2,984 rpm--(65 mph x 4.10 final gear ratio x 336) / 30-inch diameter tire. If we reduce the tire diameter to 25 inches, the engine speed increases to 3,581 rpm. By installing shorter tires, the vehicle will accelerate as though it has a 4.73 (higher numerically) gear without the expense of gear swapping.
From http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...148_0208_gear/
From http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/te...148_0208_gear/
here's better
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....56436&kw=6&p=2
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....56436&kw=6&p=2
Damn I just found this one in the maxima forums. Who says maxima's cant drift?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=J--JLhGYL5g
http://youtube.com/watch?v=J--JLhGYL5g
OK...can we get back on topic here, please?
From what I've read, the smaller the tire, the larger the final gear ratio, and the higher the RPM's for a given speed. A large final gear ratio would be good for acceleration, but poor for gas mileage.
Conversely, larger tires would yield a lower final ratio, fewer RPMs per MPH, and thereforee better gas mileage.
Am I correct?
From what I've read, the smaller the tire, the larger the final gear ratio, and the higher the RPM's for a given speed. A large final gear ratio would be good for acceleration, but poor for gas mileage.
Conversely, larger tires would yield a lower final ratio, fewer RPMs per MPH, and thereforee better gas mileage.
Am I correct?
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
yes... but ur greedy, u want both... however, larger tires will also give you a higher top speed
Yeah, the Dr. is greedy! Meet my other love in my other love...
I'm leaning to getting a set of 17" wheels/tires, so I have another question:
I found a tire diameter calculator on the Net (actually I found a few), that let's you compare up to 5 tire sets at a time.
From what I calculated the 225/45/17 are the closest match-- the stock 205/60/15 are 24.7" in diameter, while the 225/45/17 are 25" in diameter.
Now, I read somewhere that getting tires/wheels that had more than 5% difference in diameter was bad for the car's brkes, and possibly unsafe.
Have you (or anyone else) heard about this?
Also, what would be the largest 17" tire I could put on my 98 I30 assuming that I gedt the speedo recalibrated to match the change in gear ratios?
I found a tire diameter calculator on the Net (actually I found a few), that let's you compare up to 5 tire sets at a time.
From what I calculated the 225/45/17 are the closest match-- the stock 205/60/15 are 24.7" in diameter, while the 225/45/17 are 25" in diameter.
Now, I read somewhere that getting tires/wheels that had more than 5% difference in diameter was bad for the car's brkes, and possibly unsafe.
Have you (or anyone else) heard about this?
Also, what would be the largest 17" tire I could put on my 98 I30 assuming that I gedt the speedo recalibrated to match the change in gear ratios?
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
no stock is 205/65R15 the closest match is 215/55/R17 and no you dont have to recalibrate anything
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Yeah...sort of wanting to have a main squeeze whose not only drop-dead gorgeous, great in the kitchen and other rooms, but who is also smart and well-educated.
Yeah, the Dr. is greedy! Meet my other love in my other love...

Yeah, the Dr. is greedy! Meet my other love in my other love...

Sry its 215/50R17, if speedo read 65 it is 64.92. id say thats pretty damn close I use discounttire's calc
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
You're right on the stock size, but way off on the 17" size. A 215/55/17 tire has a diameter of 26.31" compared to a diameter of 25.49" for the 205/65/15 stock size -- or a 3.12% difference. With those tires, you'd be doing 58mph when your speedo says 60mph. The closest match would be 235/45/17, which has a diameter of 25.32", or a 0.67% difference versus stock.
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
haha but u are even worse off on speed, how does a larger diameter tire result in a lower real speed?
My boss often drops in on me unexpectedly, and I have to rush through my posts.
BTW, here's my calculator:
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
Sry its 215/50R17, if speedo read 65 it is 64.92. id say thats pretty damn close I use discounttire's calc
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
http://www.discounttire.com/dtcs/infoTireMath.dos
Originally Posted by 96i30azn
If you plug in 215 60 R15 (i30t) itll be less than 215 50 R17. So I conclude you don't have to be that close and can go with the 235's if you want mroe rubber.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
umnitza
Group Deals / Sponsors Forum
0
Sep 1, 2015 01:03 PM
cash94
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
0
Aug 27, 2015 08:09 AM





