General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.
View Poll Results: What grade of gasoline do you put in your Maxima?
87 Octane
80
11.56%
89 Octane
87
12.57%
92 Octane
213
30.78%
over 92 Octane
303
43.79%
diesel: Are car takes gasoline?
9
1.30%
Voters: 692. You may not vote on this poll

What brand and grade of gas do you put in your Maxima?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2001 | 08:35 PM
  #1  
MarcJD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 97
The poll is for the grade, but I don't know about all of the brands around the world.
Old Jul 14, 2001 | 10:24 PM
  #2  
MarcJD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 97
I put Texaco 92 Octane in.
Old Jul 14, 2001 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
GoLdEn MaX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 292
Super either mobil, exxon or aamco.
Old Jul 14, 2001 | 11:36 PM
  #4  
SmoothMax's Avatar
OG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,594
From: Jersey
Conoco 92 octane only. The hottest brand going!
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 07:09 AM
  #5  
bert's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,361
Shell 91, that's high octane here.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:10 AM
  #6  
The_quorum's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 384
Exxon 87 octane...

My company pays for it and dictates what brand/grade I can get. And at $80-100/week in gas, I'll let them. No problems so far.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:27 AM
  #7  
PRINCE NISMO
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I always use 92 octane and over, as for brands Mobil or Amoco......PEACE....
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:40 AM
  #8  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Chevron 93 only
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 09:02 AM
  #9  
90maximaSE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
......

Premium...........enough said
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 10:25 AM
  #10  
AndyXXL's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,363
92 Mobil only.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 10:31 AM
  #11  
Paul6speed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,915
I would use 91 if were available in my area. We have 87, 89, and 93. I use 93 and I usually buy at Crown, sometimes Shell.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 10:32 AM
  #12  
ny96max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,808
on occasion i throw in Sunoco 94 octane , but always use Mobil 93
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 10:50 AM
  #13  
Maxstilln's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 435
Amoco Ultimate if I can't get that either Shell's 94 or Mobil 92 nothing less. Maybe Cam 2 if it wasn't so much $$$
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
Newman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
shell 93 unless i go to a different shell and pick up the wrong hose and dont realize it until it's already pumping.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 11:34 AM
  #15  
GXE Spoiler's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 248
Amoco Ultimate since the beginning!
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 12:33 PM
  #16  
ximama's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 22
over here we only get 91 octane now. i think that really sucks. they still even charge the same!!!btw that would be in the bay area (west coast s.f. area)

ximama
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 01:44 PM
  #17  
Coldboot-SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
Does it matter?

80-90% of the Gas you buy comes out of the same tank farm and is delievered to Mobil, Exxon, Texaco, Chevron, etc in the same trucks where additives are added at the station.

Other "off the wall" brands are bought as "odd-lot" and sold through brokers and may be refined by a number of Petro companies.

A Good rule of Thumb is if it don't ping at 89 Octane you gain nothing by going higher, For the higher Octane gases Don't burn HOTTER just LONGER, as the octane increases they retard the burn as not to have predetonation, this becoomes a concern in higher compression engines.

Dave
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 01:51 PM
  #18  
Coldboot-SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 144
Does it matter?

80-90% of the Gas you buy comes out of the same tank farm and is delievered to Mobil, Exxon, Texaco, Chevron, etc in the same trucks where additives are added at the station.

Other "off the wall" brands are bought as "odd-lot" and sold through brokers and may be refined by a number of Petro companies.

A Good rule of Thumb is if it don't ping at 89 Octane you gain nothing by going higher, For the higher Octane gases Don't burn HOTTER just LONGER, as the octane increases they retard the burn as not to have predetonation, this becoomes a concern in higher compression engines.

Dave
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 04:27 PM
  #19  
TarHeelMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 400
Re: Does it matter?

Originally posted by Coldboot-SE
A Good rule of Thumb is if it don't ping at 89 Octane you gain nothing by going higher...
I respectfully disagree. Performance is gained when an engine is fed its recommended AKI/RON fuel. Any higher than recommended, and you're wasting your money because the engine is already running the optimal timing program and fuel map and cannot take advantage of a more burn-resistant fuel index. Any lower, and a modern high compression engine will compensate (without knocking) by retarding timing. The VQ, for example, is one such engine with digital knock management. It won't ping if you feed it 86 octane, but you sure as heck aren't getting optimal performance out of the engine. Whether this is noticeable or worth the extra savings incurred by using a lower AKI/RON fuel, is up to the individual.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 04:41 PM
  #20  
Eric L.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,835
Originally posted by ximama
over here we only get 91 octane now. i think that really sucks. they still even charge the same!!!btw that would be in the bay area (west coast s.f. area)

ximama
I have been trying to figure this out as well, the mysterious switch from 92 to 91 octane. I think it is the removal of MTBE oxygenate from the mixture, which I recall increased octane rating. MTBE was found to pollute ground water sources, leaking through most station tanks, so many stations have had their tanks replaced over the past few years. Oh well, I'm willing to give up 1 octane rating for clean water I suppose.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 04:56 PM
  #21  
matt calder's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,382
I try and use 93 Texaco Premium. sometimes shell premium
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 05:20 PM
  #22  
JDwyer2821's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,085
From: CT
89+ it all depends on how much money I have
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 06:09 PM
  #23  
Sarah99GXE's Avatar
Maxima Princess
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,059
93 Octane, Usually Chevron or Shell, but lately it's been Costco gas because it's $1.59/ gallon ofr 93
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 06:56 PM
  #24  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
is there a big difference between 91 vs 92? I can either get 91 from all the stations here or Sunoco ultra 94 which I think is like .5c more a liter (I live in canada)
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 07:24 PM
  #25  
ßaller's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,186
I use Sunoco Ultra 94. I know my car, it runs much faster than my 2nd best, Shells 93. For people who always goes by the book, reading whatever, or been told by people "In the industry or those know it all types" that's great for you.

I did my own comparison and by far Sunoco Ultra 94 is right for me.

In the words of Mick Foley, "Have a nice day."
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:06 PM
  #26  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
ok I'll try it soon
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:16 PM
  #27  
MarcJD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 97
I know that a few years back when I had my '69 Mustang and used some cheap gas it did not run near as well as it did with Texaco. The difference in feel and actual power was very noticeable.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 08:23 PM
  #28  
s1rch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 346
Amoco 93, but when I need a car wash I get EXXON. I like their wash better.
Old Jul 15, 2001 | 09:10 PM
  #29  
MaxRU's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 101
Texaco 91 .The highest gas here in Colorado.
Peace
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 09:16 AM
  #30  
legend1180's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 85
i use 94
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 10:28 AM
  #31  
KyMAXSE's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 202
Chevron or BP brand 93 octane has always worked for me.
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 11:28 AM
  #32  
BlancMax's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 361
i always use the highest 92 or 93?
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 02:37 PM
  #33  
SunMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 954
Do you notice any difference (between Chevron and Costco)? I always use Chevron also, but the gas price is so high and $1.59/gal is too attractive.

Originally posted by Sarah99GXE
93 Octane, Usually Chevron or Shell, but lately it's been Costco gas because it's $1.59/ gallon ofr 93
Old Jul 16, 2001 | 05:18 PM
  #34  
mbcp_tdogg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,087
Chevron Premium 92 only.
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 01:50 AM
  #35  
nodoubt711's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 588
the highest octane i ever find in oklahoma city is 91 or 93. does anybody know where i can find higher octane gas?
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 07:27 AM
  #36  
PrinzII's Avatar
OG and counting...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 12,839
Normally: Mobil 89
At times: Mobil 93

Alternate: Shell 93
Second Alternate: Shell 89

I rarely use Amoco because it tends to burn a little too fast for my taste (probably the oxygenated crap).
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 08:53 AM
  #37  
matt92gxe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 536
Originally posted by SunMax
Do you notice any difference (between Chevron and Costco)? I always use Chevron also, but the gas price is so high and $1.59/gal is too attractive.

dang! $1.59/gal? i use chevron 93 octane here in kentucky and i only pay usualy around $1.33/gal. i always use chevron 93 octane gas. and every 2 or 3 months i add some fuel injector cleaner to it.
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 09:20 AM
  #38  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
In Kansas City and much of the upper Midwest we've only got 91. Amaco carries 92, but my car doesn't seem to like it much. I've tried Amaco, Phillips, Texaco, and recently Conoco. I don't know what it is, but the Conoco fuel makes my car more responsive. I've even changed between brands just to make sure. It's been well into the 90s lately and my car feels very quick. I can't wait until things cool down.

MTBE is Methyl Tert Butyl Ether which is very nasty stuff. I do environmental engineering and we deal with this stuff on a regular basis. The problem with MTBE is that it is extremely hard to get out of water once it's in. When you spill gasoline, most of it evaporates, but the MTBE is left on the surface and gets washed away. Usually it goes into a water body or the soil. When it gets in the spoil, it goes straight into the groundwater. One gallon of MTBE can make 1 million gallons of water taste funny. MTBE was added in fuel to make cars cleaner burning. As it turns out it makes little difference in emissions, makes for worse performance, and is a nasty contaminant. This was one of those little government emission band-aids that didn't work....like most. As far as I know, MTBE is being phased out. From what I've been told, MTBE messes with octane ratings. This is why you see 93-94 octane in the more smog riden cities. 94 in a smog riden city is like 91 in a clean city. I rarely see the MTBE label at the pumps here. However in St. Louis, Atlanta, and New Orleans I see then at nearly every pump.


Dave
Old Jul 17, 2001 | 11:12 AM
  #39  
Mark96SE's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 91
Diamond Shamrock or Exxon 93... its down to $1.23 now.. (:
Old Jul 18, 2001 | 08:26 AM
  #40  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
92 Octane from Exxon, Mobil and Texaco.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.