5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Issues running 45 sidewalls?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #1  
FRZ251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 164
Issues running 45 sidewalls?

I'm currently running the stock TI edition 17'' wheels (225/50/17) Any .org members out there running 225/45/17 tires? Would there be any issues running that size, reason is I found tires for a good price but they are in 45 sidewall hight. Thanks guys.
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #2  
Unklejoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,147
From: Gloucester County NJ
I believe you would be OK, but your speedometer would be slightly off. There are calculators on the internet that can tell you the percent difference. Also, do a quick search, as I remember reading some threads about this before.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 04:19 AM
  #3  
nismopc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,806
From: Lewis Center, OH
Tiny...


...I wouldn't.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 05:01 AM
  #4  
vball_max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,799
From: North Shore, MA
You could go 235/45/17 instead. That would be the better option.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 05:20 AM
  #5  
Mizike's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 630
From: Rochester, NY
^+1
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 05:21 AM
  #6  
bob-lee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 82
WHAT'S THE HEIGHT OF YOUR CAR IT'S JUST ANOTHER THING TO WORRY ABOUT EH.............
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 06:48 AM
  #7  
mandyfig's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,222
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by Unklejoe
I believe you would be OK, but your speedometer would be slightly off. There are calculators on the internet that can tell you the percent difference. Also, do a quick search, as I remember reading some threads about this before.
Check your speed versus your GPS.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #8  
FRZ251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by kgallerie
You could go 235/45/17 instead. That would be the better option.
I believe this was the case with only a select firestone firehawk tire?
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
HotshotVQ35's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 930
From: LI, NY
who told you that? i was running 235/45/17 toyos 4s no issues.

Originally Posted by FRZ251
I believe this was the case with only a select firestone firehawk tire?
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:45 AM
  #10  
vball_max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,799
From: North Shore, MA
Originally Posted by FRZ251
I believe this was the case with only a select firestone firehawk tire?
When I was looking at alternatives for the 225/50/17 stock size, i found a much better selection in the 235/45/17 size.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 11:11 AM
  #11  
nismopc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,806
From: Lewis Center, OH
235/45-17 are shorter than stock in overall height. No doubt about that.

I did run a set of Nexen N7000 in the 235 because the price was much cheaper than 25/50-17, but they never did look right. Just could tell they were too small.

After those ran out, I went to a 245/45-17 Firehawk GT. Almost identical circumference as 225/50-17.

I also now have G35 coupe rims, so the wider tire fits much nicer than it would on the 17x7 stockers.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 11:12 AM
  #12  
nismopc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,806
From: Lewis Center, OH
Originally Posted by kgallerie
When I was looking at alternatives for the 225/50/17 stock size, i found a much better selection in the 235/45/17 size.
235 are priced much lower too. Not sure why...
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
5 ltr. beater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,756
From: Fontana, CA
im running 225/45's right now on the factory 17" wheel. i thought that was the factory spces but i just checked under the center console and it says factory specs are 225/50. go figure.
i was running the wrong tire this whole time. and my speedometer is accurate as far as i can tell. courtesy police scanners on those roads reflected my speed back at me and it was down to the T.
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #14  
tobe2be's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
From: NYC
im runnin 235 55 right now and hate it due to the look, was looking at 225 50 but they are much pricer and not a big selection so i was thinking 235 45 as well. just worried about ride quality due to the street condition in nyc
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #15  
FRZ251's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 164
hmm didnt know our wheels were wide enough for 235...guess I will consider that size now, 45 sidewall still too thin looking on stock rims?
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #16  
junglee Z's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 133
From: Houston-SW
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

Old Jun 30, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
vinco's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 284
From: Hot Springs, AR
I'm running 245/45-17 Eagle GT's on my wife's '03 GLE at stock ride height on 350Z 7-spokes. No issues whatsoever. I ran the same setup on my '00 SE (swapped 'em out to wife's car before I sold my '00). Just personal opinion, based on personal experience, but I think the 245/45-17 is the ideal size tire for the Maxima, in terms of wear characteristics. I've gotten 20K so far on the setup, and the tires are only worn 2/32" from new.
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #18  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
My speedometer is actually more accurate with 225/45/17s than with the stock 225/50/17s. I was reading 3 mph fast at 85, now it reads 1 mph slow (verified with my GPS) with the 45 series tires, and the odometer is even better. With the stock tires, for every 100 miles my odometer showed, I was actually traveling 104 miles. Now for every 100 miles it shows, I actually went 99.7 miles.
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:01 PM
  #19  
cjandura's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,622
From: WestChester,PA.19380
im running 245/45/17 right now and its about a half % different then OEM they fit fine and no rubbing
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #20  
perkman87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 737
From: West Palm Beach
Originally Posted by Scottwax
My speedometer is actually more accurate with 225/45/17s than with the stock 225/50/17s. I was reading 3 mph fast at 85, now it reads 1 mph slow (verified with my GPS) with the 45 series tires, and the odometer is even better. With the stock tires, for every 100 miles my odometer showed, I was actually traveling 104 miles. Now for every 100 miles it shows, I actually went 99.7 miles.
Ha thats funny! figures silly nissan and their specs.
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 04:47 PM
  #21  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Originally Posted by FRZ251
hmm didnt know our wheels were wide enough for 235
They aren't.

We must have gone down that road a dozen times for the 5th Gen back around 2001 - 2003. 235/45 is slightly out of spec on 7" wide wheels.


I wouldn't have any problem running 225/45-17, although I would run the pressure up slightly to compensate for the 225/45 being slightly smaller with lower load capacity at any given psi than 225/50. 3 or 4 psi ought to be enough.

If you're heavily concerned about appearance, you might not like this combination.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; Jul 2, 2010 at 04:01 AM.
Old Jul 1, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #22  
Nelsito65's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 897
From: Brandon, FL
I'm running 235/45-17 on the front and 245/45-17 on the rear with G35 staggered rims. No issues whatsoever.
Old Jul 2, 2010 | 03:52 PM
  #23  
Blacklighting's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12
From: Ajax, Ontario, Canada
I have to 235 45 17, and it is ok, but if I was to do it again I would go with the 245 45 17, the extra side wall will take more of the road shock.
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #24  
Rods03Max619's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,946
From: Diego,California
Highly doubt there will be a problem with 45's instead of 50's not that big of a difference see if you went to 40's then maybe!!
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #25  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson


I wouldn't have any problem running 225/45-17, although I would run the pressure up slightly to compensate for the 225/45 being slightly smaller with lower load capacity at any given psi than 225/50. 3 or 4 psi ought to be enough.
The load rating on the Falken and Michelin 225/50/17s I had were 93, my 225/47/17 Bridgestone 760 sports are 94! Go figure!
Old Aug 2, 2010 | 04:38 AM
  #26  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Those B'stones are Load Index 94 with an XL ("extra load") rating.

I'm not entirely sure what the difference is between Standard Load (SL), Extra Load, and Light Load (LL) other than the LI number is affected. But I imagine that it involves the structural design of the tire carcass.


Norm
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAXSE5SPD
General Maxima Discussion
33
Sep 17, 2022 04:00 AM
Finkle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
13
Sep 27, 2015 09:53 PM
cruce91
Infiniti I30/I35
6
Sep 20, 2015 10:23 AM
paulpearl
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Sep 2, 2015 07:50 AM
acw
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Aug 13, 2015 12:50 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 PM.