Tire question
Tire question
I am running 215/55/16 on my 99 maxima so I need to get 2 tires in fair condition .. So I was looking at 215/65/16 to go on the rear and on the front 215/55/16 on the front .. So I was wondering about the the taller tires in the rear will work out? It will give a slight lean forward and the only reason because I am getting a good deal on them .. So any input would help thanks
Last edited by nissan99; Jun 28, 2015 at 08:37 PM.
The sidewall height of the 215/65/16 is .84 inch higher than the 215/55/16 tire, 4.66 inch vs 5.5 inch.
The circumference of the 215/65/16 tire is 6.69% larger. If put on the front drive wheels, the speedometer will read slow, when showing 65 mph, you would be going 69.3 mph.
The circumference of the 215/65/16 tire is 6.69% larger. If put on the front drive wheels, the speedometer will read slow, when showing 65 mph, you would be going 69.3 mph.
So my brain hurts now from so, reading your post, So.
So if you have ABS your controller will see different wheel speeds and start cycling pumps and solenoids... So If the sound of that appeals to you, So you could do it and be in a ditch upside down. So maybe you should try it an let us know how it works out for you ....So.
So if you have ABS your controller will see different wheel speeds and start cycling pumps and solenoids... So If the sound of that appeals to you, So you could do it and be in a ditch upside down. So maybe you should try it an let us know how it works out for you ....So.
Last edited by asand1; Jun 29, 2015 at 04:04 PM.
ABS won't like that probably, not sure what sort of a mismatch ABS will allow before it starts freaking out but i bet that'd do it. that is a significant difference, and will look ridiculous. it would technically "work" if you don't care about any of that. terrible idea though imho.
I question the ABS thing. If that were true, why doesn't the ABS go berserk when you have the little donut spare tire on the car? I think the main purpose of ABS is to prevent the wheels from locking up during braking, not match rotational speed.
Well had it done today and 2 tires at 215/65/16 in the rear and 2 tires at front are 215/55/16 the car drives awesome .. Like old school race car look and no problems at and the car feels stable .. Thanks for all the inputs
Last edited by nissan99; Jun 29, 2015 at 09:44 PM.
Member who somehow became The President of The SE-L Club
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 16,024
ABS will indeed set a code and disable itself. Used to happen all the time at NJ inspection back in the day when they actually tested the vehicles emissions on the rollers.
If your 99 has traction control like mine did, you'll get TCS and ABS lights on.
If your 99 has traction control like mine did, you'll get TCS and ABS lights on.
No abs for me thank god
I would think that this would due to the traction control, not ABS.
tons of them do, but it has nothing to do with width at all. detecting unexpected wheel speeds is the entire premise on which traction control systems work. maybe this difference isn't enough to cause a problem, but if you go extreme enough, it most certainly will cause a problem. also would likely have to do with how sophisticated the system is/how small the programmed tolerances are. our old ABS/TCS system might not be affected by this difference. i figured it would but that's why i put the caveat that i didn't know what the mismatch tolerances programmed in to the 4th gen is. i do know the mismatch tolerances of the trucks my company produces are programmed to accept, and it's on the order of 5.5% for the Bendix system we option, and it's 5% for the other system (name of which I'm forgetting right now). beyond that, you're going to start throwing BCM codes and having issues.
anyways, glad this difference wasn't enough to cause OP a problem.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MR2 T'd
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
6
Jul 9, 2021 05:06 AM




