5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2002 | 11:19 PM
  #1  
MaxTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 601
CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???

Thanks
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 04:53 AM
  #2  
PCGuRu2K's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,006
From: NY, NY
Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Originally posted by MaxTuner
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???

Thanks
Well when I had my Cai I was running lean on both Bank1 & Bank2 O2 sensors... I was running a stock cat. Since then I've switched to a PR Cai Upper Tube/JWT combo with the addition of a RT Cat...
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 08:56 AM
  #3  
Keh mon's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 637
Re: Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Originally posted by PCGuRu2K


Well when I had my Cai I was running lean on both Bank1 & Bank2 O2 sensors... I was running a stock cat. Since then I've switched to a PR Cai Upper Tube/JWT combo with the addition of a RT Cat...
Did the switch change your lean condition?
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
PCGuRu2K's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,006
From: NY, NY
Re: Re: Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Originally posted by Keh mon


Did the switch change your lean condition?
Yes it did.. Since then I've switched over it's been running normal..
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
MaxTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 601
Re: Re: Re: Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????

Originally posted by PCGuRu2K


Yes it did.. Since then I've switched over it's been running normal..
So you didn't change any O2 sensors rite?

Thanks
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
BigDogJonx's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
PCGuru

How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?

Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.

Dixit
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
PCGuRu2K's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,006
From: NY, NY
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
PCGuru

How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?

Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.

Dixit
I knew I was running lean because I took it to a shop and they used a scanner tool to diag my ecu error code.. Nope, I didn't replace and O2's...
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 06:45 PM
  #8  
Dario's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,021
i have the CAI and an A/F ratio gauge, im never running lean and run rich on WOT
Old Feb 21, 2002 | 08:47 PM
  #9  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Cat failure == Y-pipe...

Originally posted by MaxTuner
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???

Thanks
I know I'm going to get FLAMED for this one, but what the hell.


It's the Y-pipe. If you remove the precats you allow the heat build up/cooling effect to move downstream to the main cat, which causes it to overheat and thus fail.

This is NOT a 100% guarantee, but it does happen.

I plan on going with Dixit's straight pipe BEFORE I get my Y-pipe installed, therefore eliminating the chance of having to replace that EXPENSIVE pos.

Flame away!
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 07:01 AM
  #10  
TellschMax02's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 424
Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...

Originally posted by IceY2K1


I know I'm going to get FLAMED for this one, but what the hell.


It's the Y-pipe. If you remove the precats you allow the heat build up/cooling effect to move downstream to the main cat, which causes it to overheat and thus fail.

This is NOT a 100% guarantee, but it does happen.

I plan on going with Dixit's straight pipe BEFORE I get my Y-pipe installed, therefore eliminating the chance of having to replace that EXPENSIVE pos.

Flame away!
Wouldn't getting a high-flow cat help to fix this?
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 07:30 AM
  #11  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K


I knew I was running lean because I took it to a shop and they used a scanner tool to diag my ecu error code.. Nope, I didn't replace and O2's...
... but you were at idle when they ran they pulled the code, right? Or did they take your car to redline with the scan tool still connected?
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 08:09 AM
  #12  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...

Originally posted by TellschMax02


Wouldn't getting a high-flow cat help to fix this?
The RT high-flow cats SEEM able to handle it, but WHY spend $200+ vs. $50-70 on something that's NOT going to make you pass an emissions test anyways.

I don't understand why people think adding a RT cat is worth the money.

I argue that until you have at least a Y-pipe and catback FIRST you won't gain ENOUGH from an aftermarket cat to justify the cost and that the minimal gain is NOT noticeable. Peple have reported noticeable gains, but it's argueable that it's in their head. I too have added mods and the car feels faster, when actually it's that your just paying more attention, driving harder than normal, or it's just the added sound effects. Once you add a SC/turbo/NOS, you can see some noticeable/measureable gains.

Again, why not just spend $70 on a straight pipe to replace the cat vs. $200+ for a RT Cat? Performance wise there would be minimal difference, if not better performance from the straight pipe.
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
MaxTuner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 601
Re: Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...

Originally posted by IceY2K1


The RT high-flow cats SEEM able to handle it, but WHY spend $200+ vs. $50-70 on something that's NOT going to make you pass an emissions test anyways.

I don't understand why people think adding a RT cat is worth the money.

I argue that until you have at least a Y-pipe and catback FIRST you won't gain ENOUGH from an aftermarket cat to justify the cost and that the minimal gain is NOT noticeable. Peple have reported noticeable gains, but it's argueable that it's in their head. I too have added mods and the car feels faster, when actually it's that your just paying more attention, driving harder than normal, or it's just the added sound effects. Once you add a SC/turbo/NOS, you can see some noticeable/measureable gains.

Again, why not just spend $70 on a straight pipe to replace the cat vs. $200+ for a RT Cat? Performance wise there would be minimal difference, if not better performance from the straight pipe.
Wouldn't straight pipe trigger SEL on cars that have sensor behind the main Cat(Fed Emission)????

How do you solve this?
Old Feb 22, 2002 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...

Originally posted by MaxTuner


Wouldn't straight pipe trigger SEL on cars that have sensor behind the main Cat(Fed Emission)????

How do you solve this?
I don't think so. Nobody has done a Y-pipe and straight pipe?

If it does trigger a MIL(SEL), then it is possible to trick the rear 02 sensor(s). You just have to make it read a difference, either by putting a shield around it or possibly by adding a resistor to the wires. Not sure, but it can easily be done.

The rear 02 sensor(s) are ONLY used for monitoring cat or upstream 02 sensor failures by measuring a LARGE difference, so there isn't any ECU calculations to worry about messing up.

I'll look into it a little more. Maybe that's why people pay out for the RT cat. If so, that's a VERY expensive solution to a simple problem. Hmmmmmmmmm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 AM
msellas
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 23, 2015 09:16 PM
A32goldylocks
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Sep 16, 2015 01:33 PM
ballerchris510
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:35 PM
AT978
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Sep 6, 2015 10:31 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 AM.