CAI cause rich A/F mixture????
Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????
Originally posted by MaxTuner
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???
Thanks
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???
Thanks
Re: Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
Well when I had my Cai I was running lean on both Bank1 & Bank2 O2 sensors... I was running a stock cat. Since then I've switched to a PR Cai Upper Tube/JWT combo with the addition of a RT Cat...
Well when I had my Cai I was running lean on both Bank1 & Bank2 O2 sensors... I was running a stock cat. Since then I've switched to a PR Cai Upper Tube/JWT combo with the addition of a RT Cat...
Re: Re: Re: CAI cause rich A/F mixture????
Originally posted by Keh mon
Did the switch change your lean condition?
Did the switch change your lean condition?
PCGuru
How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?
Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.
Dixit
How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?
Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.
Dixit
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
PCGuru
How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?
Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.
Dixit
PCGuru
How did you know it was running lean? Did you check it with the OBDII or did you take it to the dealer?
Only reason I ask is because I just bought me a PRCAI and will be installing it this weekend. BTW, I dont have a Cat, got a straight pipe and also got a Cattmany SS Ypipe.
Dixit
Cat failure == Y-pipe...
Originally posted by MaxTuner
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???
Thanks
Could the CAI be the culprit that causes rich A/F mixture in our engines? that possibily leads to Cat failure(meltdown)???
Thanks
It's the Y-pipe. If you remove the precats you allow the heat build up/cooling effect to move downstream to the main cat, which causes it to overheat and thus fail.
This is NOT a 100% guarantee, but it does happen.
I plan on going with Dixit's straight pipe BEFORE I get my Y-pipe installed, therefore eliminating the chance of having to replace that EXPENSIVE pos.
Flame away!
Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...
Originally posted by IceY2K1
I know I'm going to get FLAMED for this one, but what the hell.
It's the Y-pipe. If you remove the precats you allow the heat build up/cooling effect to move downstream to the main cat, which causes it to overheat and thus fail.
This is NOT a 100% guarantee, but it does happen.
I plan on going with Dixit's straight pipe BEFORE I get my Y-pipe installed, therefore eliminating the chance of having to replace that EXPENSIVE pos.
Flame away!
I know I'm going to get FLAMED for this one, but what the hell.
It's the Y-pipe. If you remove the precats you allow the heat build up/cooling effect to move downstream to the main cat, which causes it to overheat and thus fail.
This is NOT a 100% guarantee, but it does happen.
I plan on going with Dixit's straight pipe BEFORE I get my Y-pipe installed, therefore eliminating the chance of having to replace that EXPENSIVE pos.
Flame away!
Originally posted by PCGuRu2K
I knew I was running lean because I took it to a shop and they used a scanner tool to diag my ecu error code.. Nope, I didn't replace and O2's...
I knew I was running lean because I took it to a shop and they used a scanner tool to diag my ecu error code.. Nope, I didn't replace and O2's...
Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...
Originally posted by TellschMax02
Wouldn't getting a high-flow cat help to fix this?
Wouldn't getting a high-flow cat help to fix this?
I don't understand why people think adding a RT cat is worth the money.
I argue that until you have at least a Y-pipe and catback FIRST you won't gain ENOUGH from an aftermarket cat to justify the cost and that the minimal gain is NOT noticeable. Peple have reported noticeable gains, but it's argueable that it's in their head. I too have added mods and the car feels faster, when actually it's that your just paying more attention, driving harder than normal, or it's just the added sound effects. Once you add a SC/turbo/NOS, you can see some noticeable/measureable gains.
Again, why not just spend $70 on a straight pipe to replace the cat vs. $200+ for a RT Cat? Performance wise there would be minimal difference, if not better performance from the straight pipe.
Re: Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...
Originally posted by IceY2K1
The RT high-flow cats SEEM able to handle it, but WHY spend $200+ vs. $50-70 on something that's NOT going to make you pass an emissions test anyways.
I don't understand why people think adding a RT cat is worth the money.
I argue that until you have at least a Y-pipe and catback FIRST you won't gain ENOUGH from an aftermarket cat to justify the cost and that the minimal gain is NOT noticeable. Peple have reported noticeable gains, but it's argueable that it's in their head. I too have added mods and the car feels faster, when actually it's that your just paying more attention, driving harder than normal, or it's just the added sound effects. Once you add a SC/turbo/NOS, you can see some noticeable/measureable gains.
Again, why not just spend $70 on a straight pipe to replace the cat vs. $200+ for a RT Cat? Performance wise there would be minimal difference, if not better performance from the straight pipe.
The RT high-flow cats SEEM able to handle it, but WHY spend $200+ vs. $50-70 on something that's NOT going to make you pass an emissions test anyways.
I don't understand why people think adding a RT cat is worth the money.
I argue that until you have at least a Y-pipe and catback FIRST you won't gain ENOUGH from an aftermarket cat to justify the cost and that the minimal gain is NOT noticeable. Peple have reported noticeable gains, but it's argueable that it's in their head. I too have added mods and the car feels faster, when actually it's that your just paying more attention, driving harder than normal, or it's just the added sound effects. Once you add a SC/turbo/NOS, you can see some noticeable/measureable gains.
Again, why not just spend $70 on a straight pipe to replace the cat vs. $200+ for a RT Cat? Performance wise there would be minimal difference, if not better performance from the straight pipe.
How do you solve this?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cat failure == Y-pipe...
Originally posted by MaxTuner
Wouldn't straight pipe trigger SEL on cars that have sensor behind the main Cat(Fed Emission)????
How do you solve this?
Wouldn't straight pipe trigger SEL on cars that have sensor behind the main Cat(Fed Emission)????
How do you solve this?
If it does trigger a MIL(SEL), then it is possible to trick the rear 02 sensor(s). You just have to make it read a difference, either by putting a shield around it or possibly by adding a resistor to the wires. Not sure, but it can easily be done.
The rear 02 sensor(s) are ONLY used for monitoring cat or upstream 02 sensor failures by measuring a LARGE difference, so there isn't any ECU calculations to worry about messing up.
I'll look into it a little more. Maybe that's why people pay out for the RT cat. If so, that's a VERY expensive solution to a simple problem. Hmmmmmmmmm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A32goldylocks
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Sep 16, 2015 01:33 PM
ballerchris510
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:35 PM





