Frankencar Intake Temperature Test - Long but informative!!!!
Frankencar Intake Temperature Test - Long but informative!!!!
I have the Frankencar intake on my 2000 GXE 5 speed. These results should be the same with any other under hood filter (Stillen, Berk). Keep in mind that I still have the front scoop connected and the lower scoop/tube from my OSCAI attached. These let significant air flow to the filter area while moving. I am sure if these where not there, the temps would have been much higher. I may block these off on my way home to see the results/differences, although the outside temps will be higher then.
I used a digital thermometer that had a long wire with a sensor on it. I attached the sensor to the Monster Flow filter, and had the display with me in the car. The outside temp this morning was 48*. My commute to downtown Pittsburgh was 11.5 miles.
Miles 0-3 from my house were mostly traffic free. While I was moving (25-40mph) the temps were from about 49*-53*. Stopping at a stoplight for 10-15 seconds, the temps would get around 66*.
Miles 4-6 where mostly residential streets, with several stop signs and mostly 15 mph driving. Temps were steady around 55* going up to about 64* while stopping for stop signs.
Miles 7-8 very heavy stop and go traffic, many red lights and speeds between 0-10mph. The highest temp recorded while sitting in traffic during this time was 104.9*. Once I would start moving, after 20-30 seconds of 10mph driving, the temps would hover around 75*-80*, but once I would stop, they would quickly go up to 93*-96* and over 100* if I stopped for more than 20 seconds or so.
Mile 9 was in a tunnel leading into the city. Never got above 5-7 mph for the next mile. Temps peaked at 113* and pretty much stayed there for the entire tunnel.
Mile 10-11 after the tunnel was across 2 bridges and then onto a short stretch of highway a minute or so after the 113* temps, the temps were back down to 54.5*. Once I got to work there was about a ½ mile of 15-20 mph with a couple of stop signs. The temps got up to about 65* at the stop signs and then to about 56*-58* while driving.
So the highest temp increase was 65* while stopping, I am not sure how much more it would have been had it been warmer today. So the much hotter air at rest could be responsible for the low end power loss that some claim with underhood filters. I have not experienced this, will the underhood temps more than double like they did when it was 48*. If so, you could see temps of over 200* while stopped. I will do this test again this weekend as temps should be closer to the 70’s.
I did not try this on the stock setup, but wish I would have. I think stage 3 of the Frankencar will be very beneficial as it will always be drawing cool air through the front-mounted scoop.
--Ray
I used a digital thermometer that had a long wire with a sensor on it. I attached the sensor to the Monster Flow filter, and had the display with me in the car. The outside temp this morning was 48*. My commute to downtown Pittsburgh was 11.5 miles.
Miles 0-3 from my house were mostly traffic free. While I was moving (25-40mph) the temps were from about 49*-53*. Stopping at a stoplight for 10-15 seconds, the temps would get around 66*.
Miles 4-6 where mostly residential streets, with several stop signs and mostly 15 mph driving. Temps were steady around 55* going up to about 64* while stopping for stop signs.
Miles 7-8 very heavy stop and go traffic, many red lights and speeds between 0-10mph. The highest temp recorded while sitting in traffic during this time was 104.9*. Once I would start moving, after 20-30 seconds of 10mph driving, the temps would hover around 75*-80*, but once I would stop, they would quickly go up to 93*-96* and over 100* if I stopped for more than 20 seconds or so.
Mile 9 was in a tunnel leading into the city. Never got above 5-7 mph for the next mile. Temps peaked at 113* and pretty much stayed there for the entire tunnel.
Mile 10-11 after the tunnel was across 2 bridges and then onto a short stretch of highway a minute or so after the 113* temps, the temps were back down to 54.5*. Once I got to work there was about a ½ mile of 15-20 mph with a couple of stop signs. The temps got up to about 65* at the stop signs and then to about 56*-58* while driving.
So the highest temp increase was 65* while stopping, I am not sure how much more it would have been had it been warmer today. So the much hotter air at rest could be responsible for the low end power loss that some claim with underhood filters. I have not experienced this, will the underhood temps more than double like they did when it was 48*. If so, you could see temps of over 200* while stopped. I will do this test again this weekend as temps should be closer to the 70’s.
I did not try this on the stock setup, but wish I would have. I think stage 3 of the Frankencar will be very beneficial as it will always be drawing cool air through the front-mounted scoop.
--Ray
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Good work. Sounds like it's time for some sort of heat shield... or route a shop-vac hose from outside the engine bay to the filter.
Good work. Sounds like it's time for some sort of heat shield... or route a shop-vac hose from outside the engine bay to the filter.
thanks for the info.--I may do the same thing this summer--anyone have ideas for a heat shield? I wouldn't know where to start on making one
I still have my OSCAI hooked up, so air from outside still blows into the engine compartment right where the stock scoop would meed the stock airbox. I am going to block that off at lunch and take a drive to see what happens.
--Ray
--Ray
when the temp was high during the stop and go traffic
did u observe any torque loss at low end? or it is too packed to floor it?
good job on the research
thx for the info
did u observe any torque loss at low end? or it is too packed to floor it?
good job on the research
thx for the info
Originally posted by raynist
I still have my OSCAI hooked up, so air from outside still blows into the engine compartment right where the stock scoop would meed the stock airbox. I am going to block that off at lunch and take a drive to see what happens.
--Ray
I still have my OSCAI hooked up, so air from outside still blows into the engine compartment right where the stock scoop would meed the stock airbox. I am going to block that off at lunch and take a drive to see what happens.
--Ray
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
when the temp was high during the stop and go traffic
did u observe any torque loss at low end? or it is too packed to floor it?
good job on the research
thx for the info
when the temp was high during the stop and go traffic
did u observe any torque loss at low end? or it is too packed to floor it?
good job on the research
thx for the info
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
A couple of observations.
First, it's apparent that once the vehicle gets moving with any sort of speed, the underhood temperature drops significantly. That's because there's plenty of air flow under the hood to accomplish that when the vehicle is moving at speeds as low as 15 to 20 mph.
Second, although I'm also keeping my scoop and OSCAI connected . . . principally so that I don't have to relocate my sensors . . . I doubt that doing so is adding anything significant to my air flow. Without the vacuum created by the intake, there's nothing to draw air through the scoop/OSCAI. And by the time you're moving fast enough to push air through them, you've already got plenty of air flow under the hood to cool things down.
Third, the only advantage of a true CAI is that it provides cool air for the initial launch. Thereafter, it provides no cooler air than an underhood intake does.
Comments? Criticism? Epithets?
First, it's apparent that once the vehicle gets moving with any sort of speed, the underhood temperature drops significantly. That's because there's plenty of air flow under the hood to accomplish that when the vehicle is moving at speeds as low as 15 to 20 mph.
Second, although I'm also keeping my scoop and OSCAI connected . . . principally so that I don't have to relocate my sensors . . . I doubt that doing so is adding anything significant to my air flow. Without the vacuum created by the intake, there's nothing to draw air through the scoop/OSCAI. And by the time you're moving fast enough to push air through them, you've already got plenty of air flow under the hood to cool things down.
Third, the only advantage of a true CAI is that it provides cool air for the initial launch. Thereafter, it provides no cooler air than an underhood intake does.
Comments? Criticism? Epithets?
Update
I blocked off the stock air scoop and my OSCAI air scoop, and driving on the highway at 65 mph the temps were basically the same (62*-63*) with the outside temp around 55*-56*.
Driving at lower steady speeds of 30-40mph, having the scoops blocked raised temps about 7*-9* above keeping the scoops open. Having the scoops open also seemed to cool it down faster after sitting at a red light for an extended period of time.
I thought there would have been a bigger temp difference. I did not get a chance to mount the sensor in the stock scoop, but I would assume that the temps would be very close to the air temp of 55*.
--Ray
Driving at lower steady speeds of 30-40mph, having the scoops blocked raised temps about 7*-9* above keeping the scoops open. Having the scoops open also seemed to cool it down faster after sitting at a red light for an extended period of time.
I thought there would have been a bigger temp difference. I did not get a chance to mount the sensor in the stock scoop, but I would assume that the temps would be very close to the air temp of 55*.
--Ray
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Re: Update
Originally posted by raynist
I blocked off the stock air scoop and my OSCAI air scoop, and driving on the highway at 65 mph the temps were basically the same (62*-63*) with the outside temp around 55*-56*.
Driving at lower steady speeds of 30-40mph, having the scoops blocked raised temps about 7*-9* above keeping the scoops open. Having the scoops open also seemed to cool it down faster after sitting at a red light for an extended period of time.
I thought there would have been a bigger temp difference. I did not get a chance to mount the sensor in the stock scoop, but I would assume that the temps would be very close to the air temp of 55*.
--Ray
I blocked off the stock air scoop and my OSCAI air scoop, and driving on the highway at 65 mph the temps were basically the same (62*-63*) with the outside temp around 55*-56*.
Driving at lower steady speeds of 30-40mph, having the scoops blocked raised temps about 7*-9* above keeping the scoops open. Having the scoops open also seemed to cool it down faster after sitting at a red light for an extended period of time.
I thought there would have been a bigger temp difference. I did not get a chance to mount the sensor in the stock scoop, but I would assume that the temps would be very close to the air temp of 55*.
--Ray
I'm surprised that blocking the air scoop and OSCAI made so much of a difference in temperature at 30 to 40 mph. I would have thought that plenty of air flow existed at those speeds to provide identical temperature readings with or without the scoop/OSCAI. Now I'm glad I left them connected.

Good work, raynist.
Re: Re: Update
Originally posted by y2kse
Kul! I withdraw my second point. Now I'm glad I left my air scoop and OSCAI connected.
Good work, raynist.
Kul! I withdraw my second point. Now I'm glad I left my air scoop and OSCAI connected.

Good work, raynist.
If you really wanted to get exteme, to test removal of hot air from the engine bay. Take the rear hood seal OFF and leave the CAI installed. See if the temp moves quicker. That way you have provided a "intake" and an "exit" for the hot air that has risen to the top. Not sure how much turbulance in in the engine bay at operating speeds to remove air. You'll have to be careful of hood flutter at this point.
Another point I would like to measure and not sure if it has been addressed yet is ambient temp versus what is going through the intake? How cool is the air in the TB vs engine bay? How quick does each cool down? I have a FC intake and extra rubber hosing that I just might experiment with...drill a hole and insert probe.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Re: Re: Re: Update
Originally posted by Colonel
What I want to know is why people are trying to make fact out of fiction? Dont we all just want to argue and assume what makes things better than others?
If you really wanted to get exteme, to test removal of hot air from the engine bay. Take the rear hood seal OFF and leave the CAI installed. See if the temp moves quicker. That way you have provided a "intake" and an "exit" for the hot air that has risen to the top. Not sure how much turbulance in in the engine bay at operating speeds to remove air. You'll have to be careful of hood flutter at this point.
Another point I would like to measure and not sure if it has been addressed yet is ambient temp versus what is going through the intake? How cool is the air in the TB vs engine bay? How quick does each cool down? I have a FC intake and extra rubber hosing that I just might experiment with...drill a hole and insert probe.
What I want to know is why people are trying to make fact out of fiction? Dont we all just want to argue and assume what makes things better than others?
If you really wanted to get exteme, to test removal of hot air from the engine bay. Take the rear hood seal OFF and leave the CAI installed. See if the temp moves quicker. That way you have provided a "intake" and an "exit" for the hot air that has risen to the top. Not sure how much turbulance in in the engine bay at operating speeds to remove air. You'll have to be careful of hood flutter at this point.
Another point I would like to measure and not sure if it has been addressed yet is ambient temp versus what is going through the intake? How cool is the air in the TB vs engine bay? How quick does each cool down? I have a FC intake and extra rubber hosing that I just might experiment with...drill a hole and insert probe.
Hmm.. good point. It might be worth something, with Houston weather going up to 90's already i did notice that the car was a bit more responsive in stop-go traffic with the A/C on.
Originally posted by Dave B
Do me a favor and crank on the A/C while your stopped. I want to know if the radiator fans cool the compartment down much (fans come on when the A/C is engaged).
Dave
Do me a favor and crank on the A/C while your stopped. I want to know if the radiator fans cool the compartment down much (fans come on when the A/C is engaged).
Dave
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Dave B
Do me a favor and crank on the A/C while your stopped. I want to know if the radiator fans cool the compartment down much (fans come on when the A/C is engaged).
Dave
Do me a favor and crank on the A/C while your stopped. I want to know if the radiator fans cool the compartment down much (fans come on when the A/C is engaged).
Dave
AC? You guys are
!
With AC on, the ecu automatically bumps the base idle. Think about that.
AC is a heat pump. So cold air in car means what in the engine bay. Hmmmm
Also, AC automatically kicks in the radiator fans, why?? Hmmmmm
Sheesh
! With AC on, the ecu automatically bumps the base idle. Think about that.
AC is a heat pump. So cold air in car means what in the engine bay. Hmmmm
Also, AC automatically kicks in the radiator fans, why?? Hmmmmm
Sheesh
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Jeff92se
AC? You guys are
!
With AC on, the ecu automatically bumps the base idle. Think about that.
AC is a heat pump. So cold air in car means what in the engine bay. Hmmmm
Also, AC automatically kicks in the radiator fans, why?? Hmmmmm
Sheesh
AC? You guys are
! With AC on, the ecu automatically bumps the base idle. Think about that.
AC is a heat pump. So cold air in car means what in the engine bay. Hmmmm
Also, AC automatically kicks in the radiator fans, why?? Hmmmmm
Sheesh
Then why would they turn on at all? Run them all the time??? Even when you first start the car?
Methinks you are not understanding me posts.
Methinks you are not understanding me posts.

Originally posted by y2kse
In other words, do the fans reduce heat in the engine compartment when they're on WHETHER THE A/C IS RUNNING OR NOT? If they do, would it make sense to wire them so that they run all the time if we've installed an underhood intake?
In other words, do the fans reduce heat in the engine compartment when they're on WHETHER THE A/C IS RUNNING OR NOT? If they do, would it make sense to wire them so that they run all the time if we've installed an underhood intake?
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Then why would they turn on at all? Run them all the time??? Even when you first start the car?
Methinks you are not understanding me posts.
Then why would they turn on at all? Run them all the time??? Even when you first start the car?
Methinks you are not understanding me posts.

That is your question?? If yes, yes and it's been answered. 

Originally posted by y2kse
In other words, do the fans reduce heat in the engine compartment when they're on WHETHER THE A/C IS RUNNING OR NOT? If they do, would it make sense to wire them so that they run all the time if we've installed an underhood intake?
In other words, do the fans reduce heat in the engine compartment when they're on WHETHER THE A/C IS RUNNING OR NOT? If they do, would it make sense to wire them so that they run all the time if we've installed an underhood intake?
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Jeff92se
That is your question?? If yes, yes and it's been answered.
That is your question?? If yes, yes and it's been answered.

No way. You wanted controversy right? 
Here is another kicker, when the fans are blowing, it drawing hot air from where and blowing it where??

Here is another kicker, when the fans are blowing, it drawing hot air from where and blowing it where??
Originally posted by y2kse
At the risk of appearing unable to locate the answer for myself, would you please be so good as to reiterate it? I'd be forever in your debt!
At the risk of appearing unable to locate the answer for myself, would you please be so good as to reiterate it? I'd be forever in your debt!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Jeff92se
No way. You wanted controversy right?
Here is another kicker, when the fans are blowing, it drawing hot air from where and blowing it where??
No way. You wanted controversy right?

Here is another kicker, when the fans are blowing, it drawing hot air from where and blowing it where??
:spock voice: logic would dictate that if one considers the design of the fan and what it's purpose is, one should be able to come to a decent theory. Especially when temperatures regarding CAI and HAI have been discussed in length. :spock voice:
Originally posted by y2kse
So what you're saying is that when the fans are on, the engine compartment gets hotter?
So what you're saying is that when the fans are on, the engine compartment gets hotter?
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Jeff92se
:spock voice: logic would dictate that if one considers the design of the fan and what it's purpose is, one should be able to come to a decent theory. Especially when temperatures regarding CAI and HAI have been discussed in length. :spock voice:
:spock voice: logic would dictate that if one considers the design of the fan and what it's purpose is, one should be able to come to a decent theory. Especially when temperatures regarding CAI and HAI have been discussed in length. :spock voice:
Intelligent guesses only, please.
Are you deaf?! I answered that! The answer was intelligent, mabye too intelligent. hehe
Originally posted by y2kse
Thanks for your input, Jeff. Now back to my original question. If the fans reduce underhood temperatures, would it make sense to hook them up so that they're on all the time in order to (1) increase air flow and (2) cool the air being fed to an underhood intake?
Intelligent guesses only, please.
Thanks for your input, Jeff. Now back to my original question. If the fans reduce underhood temperatures, would it make sense to hook them up so that they're on all the time in order to (1) increase air flow and (2) cool the air being fed to an underhood intake?
Intelligent guesses only, please.
Originally posted by y2kse
Thanks for your input, Jeff. Now back to my original question. If the fans reduce underhood temperatures, would it make sense to hook them up so that they're on all the time in order to (1) increase air flow and (2) cool the air being fed to an underhood intake?
Intelligent guesses only, please.
Thanks for your input, Jeff. Now back to my original question. If the fans reduce underhood temperatures, would it make sense to hook them up so that they're on all the time in order to (1) increase air flow and (2) cool the air being fed to an underhood intake?
Intelligent guesses only, please.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Anachronism
The fans draw air through the radiator and would only add more hot air to the engine compartment.
The fans draw air through the radiator and would only add more hot air to the engine compartment.
PS: I appreciate the fact that you're willing to take time to explain things, Anachronism. Your maturity is noted.
Originally posted by y2kse
Then if that's the case, why are they there? I was under the impression that a fan is designed to cool things down, not heat things up. Or is it simply an air flow issue?
PS: I appreciate the fact that you're willing to take time to explain things, Anachronism. Your maturity is noted.
Then if that's the case, why are they there? I was under the impression that a fan is designed to cool things down, not heat things up. Or is it simply an air flow issue?
PS: I appreciate the fact that you're willing to take time to explain things, Anachronism. Your maturity is noted.
And in some cars (not sure if it applies to Maxima's), the radiator also has the ability to cool down the transmission fluid.
As in Anachroism's post above, would it make sense to put a heatshield behind the radiator fan to funnel that hot air out elsewhere instead of hitting the engine directly?
As in Anachroism's post above, would it make sense to put a heatshield behind the radiator fan to funnel that hot air out elsewhere instead of hitting the engine directly?
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Anachronism
The fans are there to cool the engine coolant (IE Antifreeze) when the car is not moving by drawing air through the radiator.
The fans are there to cool the engine coolant (IE Antifreeze) when the car is not moving by drawing air through the radiator.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxima30
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Sep 7, 2015 06:13 PM
lux97Max
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
1
Sep 4, 2015 05:42 PM




