Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

Built VQ35 Progress!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #441  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
A 2.1 or 2.2 60' is good but a 2.650 with 6.55 330' and 9.5 1/8 @ 83mph is just sad.
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #442  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Lol wow yeah that's pretty bad. Forget street tires heh they are retarded with a turbo max.
Old Sep 12, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #443  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by MardiGrasMax
A 2.1 or 2.2 60' is good but a 2.650 with 6.55 330' and 9.5 1/8 @ 83mph is just sad.

Makes my 2.49 60' on street tires look pretty good.
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 06:00 AM
  #444  
Confused's Avatar
Permanent Maxima.org Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,715
Congrats Mattsy! Finally making the dream a reality!
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #445  
gtr_rider's Avatar
192.168.1.1
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,617
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Brett
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #446  
cardana24's Avatar
Blown
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 9,762
From: Charlottesville, VA
http://www.stfu-n-race.com/events/i...edfactor_11.MPG

right click and save as

this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #447  
HNDA ETR's Avatar
Still Here... IM me for more..
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,129
From: San Fernando Valley CALI
Originally Posted by dima87
can you put the aps 350z turbo kit on the 02 maximas with the vq35de engines? shouldm's it be the same as the 350? and is there anyone who makes FI for the 02-03 maximas?
See this thread:

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=378986
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #448  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by cardana24
http://www.stfu-n-race.com/events/i...edfactor_11.MPG

right click and save as

this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
Not working for me, says site cannot be found???
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #449  
gtr_rider's Avatar
192.168.1.1
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,617
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
http://www.stfu-n-race.com/events/im...dfactor_11.MPG

edit: faster server..
http://www.vqpower.com/vids/speedfactor_11.MPG
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #450  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Thanks gtr_rider...that worked for me.

Mardi
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #451  
stephenlc's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,216
nice vid, you probably have the civic in power but not in weight.
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #452  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Pretty nice vid...way to keep up with him
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 06:31 PM
  #453  
sleeper's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 993
with A 1.6 60', 10's are possible, with speed of close to 120mph.
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #454  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by sleeper
with A 1.6 60', 10's are possible, with speed of close to 120mph.
Mmmm...10's
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #455  
larryseibel's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 601
Originally Posted by sleeper
with A 1.6 60', 10's are possible, with speed of close to 120mph.

he is almost trapping at 120mph w/ a 12 flat.
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #456  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
wow what was that Civic's 60'? 11.0 at only 105 mph
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #457  
subs1000w's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,371
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
wow what was that Civic's 60'? 11.0 at only 105 mph
11.0 @ 105 is imposible the civic must of let off early probobly around the 1000ft mark

and the civic probobly has about a 1000lb weight advantage so its really not a "even" race
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #458  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by subs1000w
11.0 @ 105 is imposible the civic must of let off early probobly around the 1000ft mark

and the civic probobly has about a 1000lb weight advantage so its really not a "even" race
A race is a race...the civic may weigh 1800lbs but Mardi has two more cylinders, you could go on all day going back and forth like that. It really doesn't matter, he has what he has and you have what you have.
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 06:30 AM
  #459  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
No doubt he let off, thats a 9sec car in NHRA trim, I talked with the driver for a few minutes in the staging lanes. I have the slip at home from that race and will get you the details. He put down deep 10's in qualifing, he was the #1 qualifier.

Soooooo Clutchnet cant help me. The only thing that looks like it might work is the ACT Extreame PP and six puck solid hub. I might get that ACT PP and Clutchnet sprung hub disk. I had a long talk with ACT and they insist that the sprung hub is only to dampen vibration. He said at idle it will make a whiring noise like a twin disk. Other than that it is no harder on the drive train than the sprung hub and the springs in the sprung hub are just another thing that can fail. This set up is rated to hold up to 572ft-lb, I think that should do me for a while. They have an even heavier PP that will hold 667ft-lbs, but is race only. I want the car to still be streetable, even bairly so, but streetable. Corey has talked to Clutchmasters and we are waiting to hear back from them.

I guess the question is how much TQ am I putting down. Perhaps 450 with the 35shot and 525 with the 75 shot on top of the boost. Maybe I can set the nitrous window switch to only engage after 5500 rpm to the torque is less but power is still their up top. This shold still help on the big end of the track. I would think the ACT 576ft-lb set up would hold, but I guess you never know till you try, what other coice do I have? Or it might be time for a dyno.
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #460  
MaxInProgress's Avatar
Proud of his GroceryGetter!!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 925
I would say dyno it then do the clutch so you at least know your numbers,.
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 08:04 AM
  #461  
stephenlc's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,216
dyno is cheaper than $500+ clutch
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #462  
subs1000w's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,371
if you think the clutch will hold on the dyno do it
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #463  
larryseibel's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 601
usually their torque numbers are a little conservative so you should be good...but i want to give you an excuse for the dyno too so better check the tq. #'s first.
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #464  
96_vqmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,601
dyno,dyno... Why not just dyno her,instead of guessing.
Old Sep 14, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #465  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
I'm curious as to why you believe you'll only be putting down 450ish wtq on the spray? My car (when it was hal's) put down 505ft lb on a t3/t4 at 10psi with 65 shot and 603ft-lb with an SP66 at 14.5psi and a 65 shot. You didn't specify a boost level but given what I've read in this thread you are thinking of as much as 17psi + 100 shot? That should be worlds more than 450ft-lb unless something is majorly wrong...
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 05:46 AM
  #466  
stephenlc's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,216
i think something is wrong with his car.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #467  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
I'm curious as to why you believe you'll only be putting down 450ish wtq on the spray? My car (when it was hal's) put down 505ft lb on a t3/t4 at 10psi with 65 shot and 603ft-lb with an SP66 at 14.5psi and a 65 shot. You didn't specify a boost level but given what I've read in this thread you are thinking of as much as 17psi + 100 shot? That should be worlds more than 450ft-lb unless something is majorly wrong...
SP66 is a ~600"W"hp turbo, Turbonetics 60-1 is a ~500"B"hp turbo. Im way outa turbo. 9.4CR hurts a bit, but the extra displacement should off set this, No control over ignition timing is a big issue. We all know the JWT ECU is soft, I need it for the 740's. Once I get the clutch straight thats my next thing. If the EU works to increase the revlimit thats an option or JWT/LightningMAF/100oct tune. It maybe 500 as it sits with the 75shot, but it couldnt be much more , it should be dynoed late next week sometime.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #468  
SonicDust187's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,950
From: Brooklyn, NY
Why did you build your engine with such compression?
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #469  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by SonicDust187
Why did you build your engine with such compression?
You're kidding right?
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 07:00 AM
  #470  
SonicDust187's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,950
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by Blu←
You're kidding right?
Im not kidding, he should have done 8.5-9:1 comp.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 07:11 AM
  #471  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by SonicDust187
Im not kidding, he should have done 8.5-9:1 comp.

Per his webpage, he wanted to keep the off throttle response.

If he was having detonation issues or if he had already broke the motor then you might be right. Why do you think he should have gone lower?
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #472  
SonicDust187's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,950
From: Brooklyn, NY
This way, he wouldn't need the 100 oct program, and the his engine would be that much more heat/detonation resistant.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #473  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by SonicDust187
This way, he wouldn't need the 100 oct program, and the his engine would be that much more heat/detonation resistant.
He is getting the 100 oct program for more aggressive timing, it has nothing to do with his compression ratio.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #474  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Ignition timing with the JWT ecu is pretty conservative and takes care of detonation issues. Not only that, but Mardi is using J&S Safeguard to further retard timing if detonation is detected. Lowering compression down to 9 or below is unneeded for the amount of boost Mardi is running, and like Mike said, hurts engine response.

I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #475  
C MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,041
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Ignition timing with the JWT ecu is pretty conservative and takes care of detonation issues. Not only that, but Mardi is using J&S Safeguard to further retard timing if detonation is detected. Lowering compression down to 9 or below is unneeded for the amount of boost Mardi is running, and like Mike said, hurts engine response.

I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
i was thinking the same thing stephen. with my other motors i was spending too much time and money lowering the compression so after blowing another one, i decided just to rebuild a stock 130 motor with new internals thats it and the car is running really nice. i dont plan on going over 11lbs with s/c so the lower compression means nothing to me right now. but for once and all im going with the j&s safegaurd immediately to avoid blowing my motors again. mardi can you please pm me on who to talk to and which unit to get for my 97 im ready to order today thanks. p.s and why the i30 motor is because i had a low mielage one hanging around so put it to use.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #476  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
Just call J&S for the information.
Old Sep 15, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #477  
stephenlc's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,216
oh i forgot he is running a teenie weenie turbo.
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 01:39 AM
  #478  
maximariceboi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,354
what size turbo are you running?
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 05:38 AM
  #479  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
How about people try reading the thread before asking questions
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 05:52 AM
  #480  
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
It seams that Clutchnet can do a double diaphram pressure plate that will have 2900lbs of pressure. If I send them my current PP that is already seated from my current disk they will do the modifications to that so I dont have to get a new clutch etc. For reference the ACT HD is 2260lbs and the ACT XT is 2700lbs. The ACT XT will hold 576fltbs so I'd bet the Clutchnet double will hold ~600ftlbs. But boy-o-boy will it be heavy



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 AM.