Built VQ35 Progress!
Originally Posted by MardiGrasMax
A 2.1 or 2.2 60' is good but a 2.650 with 6.55 330' and 9.5 1/8 @ 83mph is just sad.
Makes my 2.49 60' on street tires look pretty good.
http://www.stfu-n-race.com/events/i...edfactor_11.MPG
right click and save as
this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
right click and save as
this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,129
From: San Fernando Valley CALI
Originally Posted by dima87
can you put the aps 350z turbo kit on the 02 maximas with the vq35de engines? shouldm's it be the same as the 350? and is there anyone who makes FI for the 02-03 maximas?
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=378986
Originally Posted by cardana24
http://www.stfu-n-race.com/events/i...edfactor_11.MPG
right click and save as
this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
right click and save as
this is matt racing the civic corey is talking about. They obviously are there to film for the civic so matts ET and mph are not on the screen in the end.
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
wow what was that Civic's 60'? 11.0 at only 105 mph 

and the civic probobly has about a 1000lb weight advantage so its really not a "even" race
Originally Posted by subs1000w
11.0 @ 105 is imposible the civic must of let off early probobly around the 1000ft mark
and the civic probobly has about a 1000lb weight advantage so its really not a "even" race
and the civic probobly has about a 1000lb weight advantage so its really not a "even" race
No doubt he let off, thats a 9sec car in NHRA trim, I talked with the driver for a few minutes in the staging lanes. I have the slip at home from that race and will get you the details. He put down deep 10's in qualifing, he was the #1 qualifier.
Soooooo Clutchnet cant help me. The only thing that looks like it might work is the ACT Extreame PP and six puck solid hub. I might get that ACT PP and Clutchnet sprung hub disk. I had a long talk with ACT and they insist that the sprung hub is only to dampen vibration. He said at idle it will make a whiring noise like a twin disk. Other than that it is no harder on the drive train than the sprung hub and the springs in the sprung hub are just another thing that can fail. This set up is rated to hold up to 572ft-lb, I think that should do me for a while. They have an even heavier PP that will hold 667ft-lbs, but is race only. I want the car to still be streetable, even bairly so, but streetable. Corey has talked to Clutchmasters and we are waiting to hear back from them.
I guess the question is how much TQ am I putting down. Perhaps 450 with the 35shot and 525 with the 75 shot on top of the boost. Maybe I can set the nitrous window switch to only engage after 5500 rpm to the torque is less but power is still their up top. This shold still help on the big end of the track. I would think the ACT 576ft-lb set up would hold, but I guess you never know till you try, what other coice do I have? Or it might be time for a dyno.
Soooooo Clutchnet cant help me. The only thing that looks like it might work is the ACT Extreame PP and six puck solid hub. I might get that ACT PP and Clutchnet sprung hub disk. I had a long talk with ACT and they insist that the sprung hub is only to dampen vibration. He said at idle it will make a whiring noise like a twin disk. Other than that it is no harder on the drive train than the sprung hub and the springs in the sprung hub are just another thing that can fail. This set up is rated to hold up to 572ft-lb, I think that should do me for a while. They have an even heavier PP that will hold 667ft-lbs, but is race only. I want the car to still be streetable, even bairly so, but streetable. Corey has talked to Clutchmasters and we are waiting to hear back from them.
I guess the question is how much TQ am I putting down. Perhaps 450 with the 35shot and 525 with the 75 shot on top of the boost. Maybe I can set the nitrous window switch to only engage after 5500 rpm to the torque is less but power is still their up top. This shold still help on the big end of the track. I would think the ACT 576ft-lb set up would hold, but I guess you never know till you try, what other coice do I have? Or it might be time for a dyno.
I'm curious as to why you believe you'll only be putting down 450ish wtq on the spray? My car (when it was hal's) put down 505ft lb on a t3/t4 at 10psi with 65 shot and 603ft-lb with an SP66 at 14.5psi and a 65 shot. You didn't specify a boost level but given what I've read in this thread you are thinking of as much as 17psi + 100 shot? That should be worlds more than 450ft-lb unless something is majorly wrong...
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
I'm curious as to why you believe you'll only be putting down 450ish wtq on the spray? My car (when it was hal's) put down 505ft lb on a t3/t4 at 10psi with 65 shot and 603ft-lb with an SP66 at 14.5psi and a 65 shot. You didn't specify a boost level but given what I've read in this thread you are thinking of as much as 17psi + 100 shot? That should be worlds more than 450ft-lb unless something is majorly wrong...
Originally Posted by SonicDust187
Im not kidding, he should have done 8.5-9:1 comp.
Per his webpage, he wanted to keep the off throttle response.
If he was having detonation issues or if he had already broke the motor then you might be right. Why do you think he should have gone lower?
Originally Posted by SonicDust187
This way, he wouldn't need the 100 oct program, and the his engine would be that much more heat/detonation resistant.
Ignition timing with the JWT ecu is pretty conservative and takes care of detonation issues. Not only that, but Mardi is using J&S Safeguard to further retard timing if detonation is detected. Lowering compression down to 9 or below is unneeded for the amount of boost Mardi is running, and like Mike said, hurts engine response.
I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Ignition timing with the JWT ecu is pretty conservative and takes care of detonation issues. Not only that, but Mardi is using J&S Safeguard to further retard timing if detonation is detected. Lowering compression down to 9 or below is unneeded for the amount of boost Mardi is running, and like Mike said, hurts engine response.
I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
I reach 14.5 psi non-intercooled (supercharged) with stock 10:1 compression (about 13.2 psi with the FMIC), and I have never detected any detonation at WOT with the JWT ecu. Would I make more power at that boost level with more aggressive timing and lower CR? Maybe, I don't know, but I really like retaining the crisp response of the VQ when I'm not boosting.
It seams that Clutchnet can do a double diaphram pressure plate that will have 2900lbs of pressure. If I send them my current PP that is already seated from my current disk they will do the modifications to that so I dont have to get a new clutch etc. For reference the ACT HD is 2260lbs and the ACT XT is 2700lbs. The ACT XT will hold 576fltbs so I'd bet the Clutchnet double will hold ~600ftlbs. But boy-o-boy will it be heavy




Brett

Mardi

Why not just dyno her,instead of guessing.