Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

Pipe diameters (t/c)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
|Bijan|'s Avatar
Thread Starter
UCF Lexus
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,845
From: Colorado
Pipe diameters (t/c)

Can you please post what size pipes you have.

Reverse Y, up, down, charge, I/C pipes....
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #2  
Boosted Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 296
Off the stock exhaust manifolds I used 2" on each pipe till they merged into a single 2.5" up-pipe to the turbo. I then used a 3" section for the down pipe tapering down to a 2.5" exhaust with a Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler.

Intercooler piping is 2.5" untill just before the elbow to the throttlebody which increases to 3".

Before the MAF I used 3.5" inlet piping pulling cold air from the cowel panel where I welded in 3.5" piping.
Hope this helps, Scott~
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #3  
choray911's Avatar
The Crazy Azz Cracka
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,035
From: Chattanooga, TN
ditto
Choray
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #4  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
What boosted max listed is the most common and what I have
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #5  
wunfstmax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,175
What kinda of problem would occur if you used 3" i/c piping the whole way
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #6  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by wunfstmax
What kinda of problem would occur if you used 3" i/c piping the whole way
I would not cause problems really, just change the velocity of the air. Higher boost levels would have to be in your plans to want to go with 3". I don't even know if 2.5" is optimal for us, but it is what most guys use and it seems to work just fine. Going from 2.5"-3" creates alot more area than you would think.
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #7  
DA-MAX's Avatar
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,978
from what I've seen and read concensus is that 2.5" is more than sufficient for up to 500whp
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
|Bijan|'s Avatar
Thread Starter
UCF Lexus
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,845
From: Colorado
2.5" downpipe....and straight thru exhaust. How would that work with 10psi or less
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 10:13 AM
  #9  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by bijangxe
2.5" downpipe....and straight thru exhaust. How would that work with 10psi or less
The discussion is intercooler piping, but with the down pipe you really want 3". Even at lower boost levels. At 5psi, running an open 3" down pipe is dramatically different than having the cat back connected...like 3-4 mph trap difference dramatic. The difference between a 2.5" down pipe and a 3" down pipe would probably be similar.
Old Jun 29, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #10  
|Bijan|'s Avatar
Thread Starter
UCF Lexus
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,845
From: Colorado
HM....so Mike your downpipe is 3" and goes to 2.5" catback?

3" I/C, charge, and down pipes seem like theyd fit easy - w/ the up pipe 2.5"

Ahhh, so many options :bangheadL:
Old Jun 30, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #11  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by bijangxe
HM....so Mike your downpipe is 3" and goes to 2.5" catback?

3" I/C, charge, and down pipes seem like theyd fit easy - w/ the up pipe 2.5"

Ahhh, so many options :bangheadL:
Yes, 3" down pipe, 3" CM test pipe, 2.5" Greddy SP2.

Just go with 2.5" charge piping. It has been proven to work fine. 3" would probably be OK but I would not do it unless I knew of a Maxima who was running 3" and their results. And I don't know if it would exactly fit easily. The way my intercooler piping is routed, 3" would cause me fitment problems in 3 or 4 places.
Old Jul 2, 2005 | 08:07 AM
  #12  
massfastmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 485
From: southeast ma
does any one want to post pics of their piping i think this would also help out the thread
Old Jul 2, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #13  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332


Old Jul 2, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #14  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
You want the least restriction on the exhaust side as possible with a turbo, period. You need to evacuate the gasses from the turbine housing as fast as possible. If you could run no downpipe at all, that would be ideal but of course that's not really possible.
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #15  
massfastmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 485
From: southeast ma
thanks mike these pictures atleast give me an idea of what i have to get my pipes lookin like
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #16  
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 24
Did you powder-coat the charge-piping? They look really nice.

Rogue
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 12:43 PM
  #17  
96sleeper's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,756
From: Chattanooga, TN
Originally Posted by I30tMikeD
Yes, 3" down pipe, 3" CM test pipe, 2.5" Greddy SP2.

Just go with 2.5" charge piping. It has been proven to work fine. 3" would probably be OK but I would not do it unless I knew of a Maxima who was running 3" and their results. And I don't know if it would exactly fit easily. The way my intercooler piping is routed, 3" would cause me fitment problems in 3 or 4 places.

someone look up the dyno for ramius83's turbo setup. His dyno was amazing(around 400whp I believe), and he had 3 inch intercooler and intake piping, and a 3 inch exhaust.
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 12:49 PM
  #18  
|Bijan|'s Avatar
Thread Starter
UCF Lexus
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,845
From: Colorado
Yea I remember Erik's dyno......him and Jay had the same kit - only difference I know of was 3" IC piping.

Compared to Jays dyno it was about +45whp and +25 wtq IIRC.....

But then again, Erik had major issues with his motor
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #19  
Shadow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,145
When Erik made 400whp, his boost was spiking. It was a messed up looking dyno plot because the EBC (Apexi I believe) wasn't holding constant boost. It would spike, then it would drop, then spike again. His motor sounded like it was surging that day. So I'm pretty sure that he made his power on a couple of pounds more boost than Jay.

My piping setup is as follows, 1.75" off each bank to a 2.25" merge (modified Stillen Y-Pipe). The 2.25" is then expanded to a 2.5" pipe that feeds the turbo. The end of the 2.5" pipe was pressed into the T3 flange for a smooth merge. Out of the turbo, the downpipe is 2.5" into a 3" test pipe and full 3" mandrel bent exhaust.

The IC piping is 2.5" and then we expanded it to 3" at the MAF and then it is 3" into the TB.

We're about to start a new setup and I'm hoping to be able to fit a 4" downpipe in there. The Honda guys are showing amazing gains w/ 4" piping, and I've seen the Supra guys with huge gains going from 3" to 4" or 4" to 5". Plus, it's more of an experiment.

I'd like to run 3" IC piping because the new IC I want has 3" inlets, but I'm worried about clearances, the 2.5" piping is already cutting it close and touching in some areas.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
Quickywd01
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
3
Sep 21, 2016 09:36 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 PM.