Adjusting Air/Fuel in closed loop (interesting discovery)
#1
Adjusting Air/Fuel in closed loop (interesting discovery)
Well after having problems with the car running and leaning out on me, we found out it was a bad o2. Now I have been driving with both bank o2 sensors disconnected. Ofcourse the car runs really rich specially with stock maf and z32 injectors, and the fact that its running of the safe map or w/e. a/f at idle and below 3k (or cloosed loop) is in the 11's.
Now, I have VAFC2. I figured since the o2 sensors are not connected, the ECU is not going to try and fight what ever correction I make in closed loop since it dosnt know where the a/f is at and its running of a predetermined map. So what I did is get into the narrow mapon the vafc2. go to the 1500RPM mark, rev the car in idle to 1500 and remove fuel. When I did this right away I saw the a/f start going up till it passed the 14.7 range, then I made less correction till I got almost near perfect 14.7. Also my throttle %'s are set to 10% and 90%. I started driving observing my a/f. at idle the a/f is now at high 13's(since I didnt have any rpm point below 1500rpm). As soon as you accelerate a/f goes to mid 14's and stays there no matter what throttle position. Basically while driving its at near 14.7 it even fluctuates less than having working o2 and letting ecu make corrections. When RPMs go above 3k ofcourse it goes into the Wide map and thats the normal tuning we always do above 3k. [The correction I made at 1500 rpm is -13.]
The only thing I think might be of some concern is the timing. With o2's disconnected and ECU running of the safe map or w/e it is. Timing gets retarded. Now by making the corrections I did, timing gets advanced back. The thing is, how much does timing get advanced? and is it more advanced than if the ECU was running with o2's?
I think this is a great discovery (i havent read anyone do this before at least) specially for those with large injectors, and SPECIALLY for those with smaller turbos that start to show boost below 3k.
I think depending on the fuel system setup on boosted application, If boost starts coming in at for example 2k or below, that is still in cloosed loop at 14.7 and underboost thats not good at all!!, so now with what i found, i think this can be a great thing that way you can tune for when boost comes in. Thing is, its going to give out o2 codes (Which i dont mind since i permanently have codes, iacv)
Now, I have VAFC2. I figured since the o2 sensors are not connected, the ECU is not going to try and fight what ever correction I make in closed loop since it dosnt know where the a/f is at and its running of a predetermined map. So what I did is get into the narrow mapon the vafc2. go to the 1500RPM mark, rev the car in idle to 1500 and remove fuel. When I did this right away I saw the a/f start going up till it passed the 14.7 range, then I made less correction till I got almost near perfect 14.7. Also my throttle %'s are set to 10% and 90%. I started driving observing my a/f. at idle the a/f is now at high 13's(since I didnt have any rpm point below 1500rpm). As soon as you accelerate a/f goes to mid 14's and stays there no matter what throttle position. Basically while driving its at near 14.7 it even fluctuates less than having working o2 and letting ecu make corrections. When RPMs go above 3k ofcourse it goes into the Wide map and thats the normal tuning we always do above 3k. [The correction I made at 1500 rpm is -13.]
The only thing I think might be of some concern is the timing. With o2's disconnected and ECU running of the safe map or w/e it is. Timing gets retarded. Now by making the corrections I did, timing gets advanced back. The thing is, how much does timing get advanced? and is it more advanced than if the ECU was running with o2's?
I think this is a great discovery (i havent read anyone do this before at least) specially for those with large injectors, and SPECIALLY for those with smaller turbos that start to show boost below 3k.
I think depending on the fuel system setup on boosted application, If boost starts coming in at for example 2k or below, that is still in cloosed loop at 14.7 and underboost thats not good at all!!, so now with what i found, i think this can be a great thing that way you can tune for when boost comes in. Thing is, its going to give out o2 codes (Which i dont mind since i permanently have codes, iacv)
#4
Originally Posted by streetzlegend
With o2's disconnected and ECU running of the safe map or w/e it is. Timing gets retarded.
Where'd you get this info. I've never read that anywhere. I had no working O2 sensors on my old 96 maxima and that car did not show any signs of having timing pulled. It went almost 99mph on the stock ECU with only I/Y/MEVI...
#5
Originally Posted by nismology
Cool beans. Why do you think the timing is getting retarded as a result of the o2's being disconnected though?
If timing does not get retarded from disconnecting the plugs, then by me doing the corrections in closed loop I am adding even more timing to the already advanced timing the ECU is doing. I know that at part throttle and below certain RPM maybe 3k (not sure of this) the ECU advances the timing so that there is better response. So maybe its not a good idea that I am advancing it on top of that. I have to get my hands on a logger and check it.
#11
Originally Posted by Tatanko
So if they're in open loop all the time, that does indeed mean tuning below 3000 is possible without interference from the ECU's pre-set tables?
#12
Originally Posted by xnyc
all your doing basically would be adjusting the ecus preset calculations
#14
Originally Posted by nismology
Well, in reference to your original question, there are no "preset tables" in closed loop. It's based solely on o2 sensor feedback.
#17
Originally Posted by 93turbo gxe
Thats great. When I had my 3rd gen I had no o2 sensors. ANd it was no problem with airfuel. Well i can check this out with the eu after I unplug them.
Kevlo, well you still will get a CEL since they are unplugged. in mycase I dont care because my CEL is always on for other codes i cant do nothing about, so i dont mind it.
#18
I gotcha. I tried a lil bit of tuning in closed loop and the ecu did not throw a code or try to go back to 14:7 af.
It would hold steady in the 13's w/o problems. But I have yet to try it long term.
It would hold steady in the 13's w/o problems. But I have yet to try it long term.
#19
Originally Posted by streetzlegend
What are you refering as "no problem with a/f", you mean your a/f did not get rich at idle and cruising from havin o2's unplugged?
Kevlo, well you still will get a CEL since they are unplugged. in mycase I dont care because my CEL is always on for other codes i cant do nothing about, so i dont mind it.
Kevlo, well you still will get a CEL since they are unplugged. in mycase I dont care because my CEL is always on for other codes i cant do nothing about, so i dont mind it.
#21
Originally Posted by gtr_rider
I told you it was a bad O2 from the beginning, wanna buy mine?
BTW all, i just went on a trip. 4 hour drive to Tampa. while driving i was monitoring a/f. went the whole way in the mid low 14's. so far no problems or anything. So this is a success.
#22
Originally Posted by streetzlegend
meh no need, point of the thread is to delete the o2's.
BTW all, i just went on a trip. 4 hour drive to Tampa. while driving i was monitoring a/f. went the whole way in the mid low 14's. so far no problems or anything. So this is a success.
BTW all, i just went on a trip. 4 hour drive to Tampa. while driving i was monitoring a/f. went the whole way in the mid low 14's. so far no problems or anything. So this is a success.
#23
Originally Posted by streetzlegend
meh no need, point of the thread is to delete the o2's.
BTW all, i just went on a trip. 4 hour drive to Tampa. while driving i was monitoring a/f. went the whole way in the mid low 14's. so far no problems or anything. So this is a success.
BTW all, i just went on a trip. 4 hour drive to Tampa. while driving i was monitoring a/f. went the whole way in the mid low 14's. so far no problems or anything. So this is a success.
#25
Originally Posted by 95BLKMAX
just out of curiosity, how many miles did you get on the tanks to and from Tampa? and how do they compare to your previous NA highway tank?
#26
oh man, thats perfect! If I made that same trip right now I would probably get there puffing on fumes with my bad o2 sensor. Sounds like the WB o2 closed-loop tuning is in deed a success. Congrats Majan! Amberbach for j00 FTW!
#29
Well I dont have emanage hooked up. but yea you can pull timing with it.. i havent filled up tank and driven in the city till it was empty yet. But i did go on a trip and got good gas mileage. as if the o2's were in good shape. ill fill up the tank and daily drive it around city till its low n see wat kind of mileage i get.
#31
Originally Posted by dfownz
Can the same be done with a safc, or does only vafc have the capability to do this?
DF
DF
#32
Well I tried this today since my car's been running rich in closed loop. With the front O2s unplugged I was not able to make any adjustments to AFR via EU either by injector or airflow adjustment. Actually I didn't see any difference in AFRs with the front O2s connected vs. unplugged.
May try to force open loop with the EU eventually but figured I'd try this due to ease and simplicity.
May try to force open loop with the EU eventually but figured I'd try this due to ease and simplicity.
#35
thats weird man, try adjusting a/f only with maf signal. the ECU shouldnt be fighting it if it dosnt have signal. I dont see how the ECU is going to not adjust if it dosnt even kno what the a/f is in the 1st place.
#36
Well usually the ECU will try to adjust the a/f back to stoich using the rear o2 if the front o2's aren't sending a proper signal. But he doesn't have the rear o2 connected so it should definitely be in open loop.
And even in closed loop a/f changes are possible at idle with the EU. Hmmm...
And even in closed loop a/f changes are possible at idle with the EU. Hmmm...
#38
Use the regular injector adjustment map. You should be able adjust the a/f to the point of engine stumbling at idle. A put 1 and then 2 in the very first cell and my friend's car damn near shut off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
12-20-2021 06:57 PM