Seriously considering a turbo.
Correct. That would explain the 3" catback statement. But then again, why refer to MT's info if that is the case. You don't need it for a Z31 na or turbo.
Originally Posted by masssmail
He never said he was putting in a maxima 
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Correct. That would explain the 3" catback statement. But then again, why refer to MT's info if that is the case. You don't need it for a Z31 na or turbo.
Originally Posted by DanNY
the T28 that came in the Z31 runs a T3 flange. looks like nissan left the flange and just used a smaller turbo.
Originally Posted by rosamax
I was just giving turdlett some info that included some of the details of his swap. I won't be needing anyone's info for my turbo motor. DanNY, I'll have to get a hold of a camera this weekend for pics
This Would Be Great. I Have Also Been Considering Turbo. I Have A 1993 GXE. Please Keep Me Updated! Thanks!
Chris
-DNE- VP
www.nissans.org
Chris
-DNE- VP
www.nissans.org
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 599
Originally Posted by MrGone
Use 2 turbos, have the compressor side of turbo 1 spin turbo 2.
like that kind of an idea?
like that kind of an idea?
July 1, 2004'
Last Activity : Today 01:18 PM
Last Activity : Today 01:18 PM
Originally Posted by DanNY
::drumming fingers::
ANY DAY NOWWWWW....c'mon...it's already 7/1 and no pics
unless......THERE IS NO TURBO AND PEOPLE ARE FOS?!!?
ANY DAY NOWWWWW....c'mon...it's already 7/1 and no pics
unless......THERE IS NO TURBO AND PEOPLE ARE FOS?!!?
since we're talking turbos... anyone know if there is a crossover point or a leveling to where the exhaust manifold pressure is less than or equal to the amount of pressure being put out? if so, that turbo spooling turbo idea would work at a certain point. if not, the turbo being spooled by the exhaust powered turbo would never be able to spin as fast as the exhaust powered one.
The exhaust manifold pressure tends to be a bit higher than the pressure being put out of the turbo. I just don't know if there is a crossover point. My guess would be it would never be less nor equal the output pressure. If so, you would have a 100% efficient turbo if I'm thinking about it correctly. More than likely I'm not since I'm incredibly tired and am thinking more about the VH45DE swap into my 280Z.
Lastly, I think FOS means full of 01110011011010000110100101110100
time for bed
The exhaust manifold pressure tends to be a bit higher than the pressure being put out of the turbo. I just don't know if there is a crossover point. My guess would be it would never be less nor equal the output pressure. If so, you would have a 100% efficient turbo if I'm thinking about it correctly. More than likely I'm not since I'm incredibly tired and am thinking more about the VH45DE swap into my 280Z.
Lastly, I think FOS means full of 01110011011010000110100101110100
time for bed
Thanks. Finally 18. Been soo busy in SC it's pitiful. Just got back Thursday. Being away from the max felt depressing. Now finding out my college dues was like whoa. So I will do the turbo in my spear time this fall and devote some much needed time to what's important. I still have to find somewhere to weld up some pipes. Can't wait for that loan overdraft
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post