Yo mtcooksen, you gots 280hp now??
In 1990 they did?? How much do their engines cost? Just like finding a 350z motor.
Anyway, I don't think the Q45 motor put out over 300hp. It's more like 280hp.
Anyway, I don't think the Q45 motor put out over 300hp. It's more like 280hp.
Originally Posted by MrGone
Bimmer has a 4.4L engine that puts out roughly the same, if not more than that. 
1. 350z 6spd like I said before
2. no 4.56 no care
3. carbon fiber

1. 350z 6spd like I said before
2. no 4.56 no care
3. carbon fiber

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
In 1990 they did??
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
How much do their engines cost?
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Just like finding a 350z motor.
Originally Posted by MrGone
dunno, I dont care much about krautwagons
dunno, hope it never comes to that
what, are they hard to find?
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Then why did you bring them up?

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Your dad should hope too. Try probably $10,000+ if it comes to that w/ labor

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
What? How much do they cost?
i wonder if the bimmer 4.4 has two power spikes like Q engine does...
feels awesome in the Q when it puts you in the seat twice... i couldn't imagine that feeling in a car that is 1000 lbs less, has a 5 speed tranny with parts that weigh less on the crank, and a much better rear diff.
350Z tranny has been having some issues for people. hard shifting seems to be a common problem after a while on a lot of them. also, gearing wise it seems the TTZ 5-speed's gearing matches better for the Q engine. i've not looked into that myself too much but other Q guys are saying that.
hp and torque rating on the Q engine was based on the japanese version that did not have the vvt so they didn't go over the 280 hp limitation set by the "gentleman's agreement" or something like that. the US engines got the vvt and the Q guys believe that bumped the bhp up in the 300-305 area and torque a bit higher than that. when they got the Q's on the dyno it seemed to prove that even more by the numbers they were getting but since its very hard to find out how much drivetrain loss there truly is no one knows for absolute sure.
carbon fiber driveshafts > *
feels awesome in the Q when it puts you in the seat twice... i couldn't imagine that feeling in a car that is 1000 lbs less, has a 5 speed tranny with parts that weigh less on the crank, and a much better rear diff.350Z tranny has been having some issues for people. hard shifting seems to be a common problem after a while on a lot of them. also, gearing wise it seems the TTZ 5-speed's gearing matches better for the Q engine. i've not looked into that myself too much but other Q guys are saying that.
hp and torque rating on the Q engine was based on the japanese version that did not have the vvt so they didn't go over the 280 hp limitation set by the "gentleman's agreement" or something like that. the US engines got the vvt and the Q guys believe that bumped the bhp up in the 300-305 area and torque a bit higher than that. when they got the Q's on the dyno it seemed to prove that even more by the numbers they were getting but since its very hard to find out how much drivetrain loss there truly is no one knows for absolute sure.
carbon fiber driveshafts > *
Originally Posted by Spipedong90
Sigh. Those *******s make me embearassed to own a supra and be a member of that forum.
quick OT question, what can cause an oil leak between the oil line to the turbo and the CPS, but it isnt the valve cover?
I are a pro at removing the intake tubing
Originally Posted by 92graymax
i finished reading the thread and have come to the conclusion that they have some of the dumbest members ever, thank God for maxima.org.
Originally Posted by MrGone
I was working on a friends Supara today 88 GTE
quick OT question, what can cause an oil leak between the oil line to the turbo and the CPS, but it isnt the valve cover?
I are a pro at removing the intake tubing
quick OT question, what can cause an oil leak between the oil line to the turbo and the CPS, but it isnt the valve cover?
I are a pro at removing the intake tubing

Also, there's an O-Ring on the CPS that can leak a good amount. Mine was leaking from there
Originally Posted by Spipedong90
Are you certain it's not the valvo cover? If he hasn't retrofitted bolts in place of the screws then it's probably still leaking.

Originally Posted by Spipedong90
Also, there's an O-Ring on the CPS that can leak a good amount. Mine was leaking from there
Makes me want a supara now
kinda hehehhee
I believe earlier VH45DE's had closer to 300hp due to NVCS I think the later VH45 had 280 due to no NVCS because of tighter emissions. dont quote me on that but I believe I read that before. Heres a site I found awhile back that has a 240z with the VH swapped in twin turboed and its VERY nicely done. 240z VH45DETT
and god bless america! i have two friends from school who both own '88 supras. one is turbo, one is NA, but they both kick it pretty good. but theyre both cool with my maxima too. It is true what automart said, sometimes after school, we just take my maxima and go for lunch, because we have so much space, we look damn sexy to the GSR owning females when we are stopped at a light, and after couple hours of driving, no one from the backseat had to stretch their neck back to vertical position.
Im personally not all about perfomance, if i wanted performance, id get a fast car. Maximas are speed demons when theyre needed to be, but mostly, were just cruizers in style. and did i mention we look damn sexy? those 'nits from supra forums arent really talking straight here. theyre basically comparing leopards which were created to be fast to tigers, which werent created to be fast but they look damn sexy.
id like to see them compare their soysauce to a stock chrysler 300
. that monster will kick em in the head. If theyre doing the comparing, let them compare their cars to cars that were created to be fast as well, like skyline, or a 300zx, or mitsubishis for that matter. My point is, we shouldnt care what they think about our cars. We all know that Nissans takes Yodas to school. its not like were comparing our 300zx to their damn camrys
:
Im personally not all about perfomance, if i wanted performance, id get a fast car. Maximas are speed demons when theyre needed to be, but mostly, were just cruizers in style. and did i mention we look damn sexy? those 'nits from supra forums arent really talking straight here. theyre basically comparing leopards which were created to be fast to tigers, which werent created to be fast but they look damn sexy.
id like to see them compare their soysauce to a stock chrysler 300
. that monster will kick em in the head. If theyre doing the comparing, let them compare their cars to cars that were created to be fast as well, like skyline, or a 300zx, or mitsubishis for that matter. My point is, we shouldnt care what they think about our cars. We all know that Nissans takes Yodas to school. its not like were comparing our 300zx to their damn camrys
:
Originally Posted by chrgdRapa
and god bless america! i have two friends from school who both own '88 supras. one is turbo, one is NA, but they both kick it pretty good. but theyre both cool with my maxima too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





