3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

ve vq swap out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:18 PM
  #161  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by benstoked
I wouldnt consider the 240sx, stanza, or altima trucks...
where was it used first?
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:32 PM
  #162  
BenStoked's Avatar
Jesus was a Zombie.
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,962
From: OKC, OK
Originally Posted by internetautomar
where was it used first?
according to wikipedia, the 240sx, axxess, and pintura/ford corsair all in 89.
otherwise, I don't know.
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #163  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by sleepyvg30e
other than the actual size and shape of the engine wat makes a vq so powerful and cant all the special additions just be mimiced on the ve and vg without goin through the whole swap
That's what I would think. Dandymax made 270whp NA on a vq30. I don't understand why I wouldn't be able to get close to that with my ve, an 00VI, headers, cams, and a good tune. My engine has already put down 205 whp...

Last edited by 505max94se; Jul 1, 2008 at 12:16 AM.
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #164  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by benstoked
according to wikipedia, the 240sx, axxess, and pintura/ford corsair all in 89.
otherwise, I don't know.
You're correct, but I think people say that it's a truck motor it came in the nissan hardbody, it's power band is designed for a truck, and IMO, it's based off of the Z24 nissan truck engine. I could be wrong.

On the other side of the argument, why does it matter if it's a truck engine or not? An engine is an engine, some are better for specific reasons, but almost any engine can be reworked for more power. Power is power, right?
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #165  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
The KA was designed as a long-stroke motor for good low end torque and midrange response. It's also not balanced very well (has a half-counterweight crank) and simply doesn't rev. peak torque is in the 3500-4500rpm range, not 5000-6000 as usually seen in higher revving engines like the SR and the newer VQ-HR and the VR engines.
They're great for driving around town, but not for high-revving performance. my KA will stay running at 20mph in 5th gear... it dosn't have any pull of course, but it still runs. Try doing that with an SR..

The good thing about the KA is torque, and lots of it. you can make upwards of 700hp on it, but it involves some veyr major block and head work to make the head stay on it. (above 500whp, they have a tendency to lift the head and blow gaskets) making 300-400hp reliably is no problem- you just have to build it right.

Doing the same with a VG, VE, VQ, or SR is same deal. they can all support 300hp on the stock engine for a little while (some longer than others), but all have been known to hold over 1000hp in race applications. all depends on how deep your pockets are and what your goals are at the end of the day.

Last edited by Matt93SE; Jun 30, 2008 at 09:09 PM.
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #166  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Matt93SE
The KA was designed as a long-stroke motor for good low end torque and midrange response. It's also not balanced very well (has a half-counterweight crank) and simply doesn't rev. peak torque is in the 3500-4500rpm range, not 5000-6000 as usually seen in higher revving engines like the SR and the newer VQ-HR and the VR engines.
They're great for driving around town, but not for high-revving performance. my KA will stay running at 20mph in 5th gear... it dosn't have any pull of course, but it still runs. Try doing that with an SR..

The good thing about the KA is torque, and lots of it. you can make upwards of 700hp on it, but it involves some veyr major block and head work to make the head stay on it. (above 500whp, they have a tendency to lift the head and blow gaskets) making 300-400hp reliably is no problem- you just have to build it right.

Doing the same with a VG, VE, VQ, or SR is same deal. they can all support 300hp on the stock engine for a little while (some longer than others), but all have been known to hold over 1000hp in race applications. all depends on how deep your pockets are and what your goals are at the end of the day.
that post should be a "read this n00bs before asking stupid-**** questions about fantastical engine swaps and massive HP goals" sticky
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #167  
sleepyvg30e's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 418
yeah but which engine is better
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #168  
mrkanda's Avatar
Taking my Maxima to the Max!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,096
From: Alachua, FL 32615
Originally Posted by mrkanda
So, where's the guy with the VQ3.5 swap anyway!? Is he coming back to give us any videos or updates of it running and driving right? If not, maybe I should ask my friend if I can get her totaled '02 Max as a donor car and do it up myself.
Well, I got a little update from our friend through PM: I asked him if he had it going yet and had an update for us. His answer:

"Not yet, I'm waiting for some parts im building my motor because i'm going boost."

So, we shall see if the best of both worlds (VQ and Turbo) will be able to successfully meet up inside the bay of a 3rd gen Max! Can't wait
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 04:27 AM
  #169  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by sleepyvg30e
yeah but which engine is better
it depends where you want your powerband to be. do you want power up front and shift at lower rpms? do you want a to sacrifice lowend but get killer top end? do you want a fairly similar level of power throughout the rev range with neither a spectacular low end nor top end?

pick your poison.
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #170  
sleepyvg30e's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 418
well then which ones better for each decision......
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #171  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by sleepyvg30e
well then which ones better for each decision......
... i figured it was obvious. in the order described in the post:

vg, then ve, then 4th gen vq. i don't know as much about the powerbands of DEK and newer.
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #172  
505max94se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,220
From: my garage
Originally Posted by sleepyvg30e
well then which ones better for each decision......
the one with more displacement
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
57
Oct 14, 2025 05:16 PM
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Oct 2, 2022 02:13 PM
JonBlz
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
2
Oct 5, 2015 06:02 PM
ef9
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Oct 4, 2015 08:43 AM
HerpDerp1919
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
2
Sep 29, 2015 02:02 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 PM.