3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

Raising the compression ratio on VE?.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
burhan92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,355
From: Surrey, B.C
Raising the compression ratio on VE?.

I was thinking of this since so many days but wasn't sure due to lack of experience yet......is there a way we can resurface the cylinder heads of VE to increase compression ratio?....
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #2  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by burhan92SE
I was thinking of this since so many days but wasn't sure due to lack of experience yet......is there a way we can resurface the cylinder heads of VE to increase compression ratio?....
you can use VG30DE pistons for 10.5:1 (unsure what rods or whatever else to use) like matt93SE did but you'll have to use a retuned ECU to do it. runnong more compression on the stock ECU will not work right, and might even reduce power, or perhaps hurt the engine.
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #3  
burhan92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,355
From: Surrey, B.C
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
you can use VG30DE pistons for 10.5:1 (unsure what rods or whatever else to use) like matt93SE did but you'll have to use a retuned ECU to do it. runnong more compression on the stock ECU will not work right, and might even reduce power, or perhaps hurt the engine.
if i have to use VG30DE pistons i m sure i will have to use connecting rods from VG30DE too or other way around..

and do we have any kind of info of boring the cylinders to fit bigger pistons to make a more than 3.0 litter VE......( if i dont make sense ignore the second paragraph lol )
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 02:01 AM
  #4  
BenStoked's Avatar
Jesus was a Zombie.
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,962
From: OKC, OK
actually, this is one of the few threads where I totally understand what you are saying, and trying to do.
just a thought: to "resurface" the original heads would require removal of material, thus lowering compression.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #5  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by BenStoked
actually, this is one of the few threads where I totally understand what you are saying, and trying to do.
just a thought: to "resurface" the original heads would require removal of material, thus lowering compression.
no, removing material from the head surface would create a smaller combustion chamber which raises compression.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #6  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Originally Posted by internetautomar
no, removing material from the head surface would create a smaller combustion chamber which raises compression.
Yet, doing this on a interference engine wouldn't be very smart.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #7  
Wiking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,323
From: EU Scandinavia
Originally Posted by Greeny
Yet, doing this on a interference engine wouldn't be very smart.
Like pullin u head into 2small helmet: headache sooner/later.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #8  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Greeny
Yet, doing this on a interference engine wouldn't be very smart.
exactly.

conversely, burhan, have you considered upgrading your camshafts for better airflow? port and polish your heads? wsp ypipe? the latter two don't even require a retuned ECU... but give pretty respectable gains. the first one gives even better gains, so i've heard, but you will need to retune to adapt to it.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by burhan92SE
I was thinking of this since so many days but wasn't sure due to lack of experience yet......is there a way we can resurface the cylinder heads of VE to increase compression ratio?....
While you were thinking...did you ever think about how that head shaving would adversely affect the valve timing? You would never get the timing right unless you used some adjustable cam gears which don't exist for the VE and is hard as hell to find for the VG, but do exist!
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 10:03 AM
  #10  
BenStoked's Avatar
Jesus was a Zombie.
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,962
From: OKC, OK
Originally Posted by internetautomar
no, removing material from the head surface would create a smaller combustion chamber which raises compression.

HEADS!!!
I was thinking pistons































4:01 in the morning is not a good time to try and pretend I can think....
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 12:21 PM
  #11  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
interference happens when pistons hit valves, the shaving of 1mm off the head should not cause it, assuming the car is timed correctly.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #12  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by internetautomar
interference happens when pistons hit valves, the shaving of 1mm off the head should not cause it, assuming the car is timed correctly.
but shaving 1mm off the head will cause slack in the chain, which, taken up by the tensioner, will end up causing the timing to be off.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #13  
burhan92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,355
From: Surrey, B.C
Originally Posted by CMax03
You would never get the timing right unless you used some adjustable cam gears which don't exist for the VE and is hard as hell to find for the VG, but do exist!
thats where the problem comes....limited to sources..
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #14  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by burhan92SE
thats where the problem comes....limited to sources..
use other pistons, rather than shaving stuff, and that won't be an issue.
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #15  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
I would go with N/a 10.5 to 1 forged pistons from CP, JE, Arias, with high perf rods and call it the day....then call JWT for the appropiate tune...
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #16  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
but shaving 1mm off the head will cause slack in the chain, which, taken up by the tensioner, will end up causing the timing to be off.
um no. the chain overall length does not change, therefore timing is unaffected.
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #17  
Thanatos's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 651
From: Tn.
you can get a .040 over at 12.0:1 from Wiseco on special order for $155.oo a piston.
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 05:02 PM
  #18  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by internetautomar
um no. the chain overall length does not change, therefore timing is unaffected.
wait.... i was thinking there was just 1 tensioner. it has twin tensioners doesn't it? on a VG shaving the head would cause the cams to roll back a little bit. but twin tensioners on the long part of the chain would indeed fix that slack without changing timing... cuz it would still be symmetrical
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #19  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Thanatos
you can get a .040 over at 12.0:1 from Wiseco on special order for $155.oo a piston.
holy crap man! 12:1! on a VE? That's pushing it, at least for someone like burhan anyways.
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #20  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
wait.... i was thinking there was just 1 tensioner. it has twin tensioners doesn't it? on a VG shaving the head would cause the cams to roll back a little bit. but twin tensioners on the long part of the chain would indeed fix that slack without changing timing... cuz it would still be symmetrical
any motor will stay in time as long as the slack created in the timing drive is less than the adjustability of it's tensioner(s).
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #21  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,322
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by internetautomar
any motor will stay in time as long as the slack created in the timing drive is less than the adjustability of it's tensioner(s).
well the VG belt has one straight edge and one tensioned edge.. so all the slack will be taken up on one side. so it will roll the cams back a little bit if you shaved the head. see what i mean? if you shaved the head so much as to be the length of a full tooth-and-valley... just time it one tooth retarded and it will end up being right... but the VE has twin symmetrical tensioners, so they would not go out of time.

see how the asymmetrical one, if you move the sprocket down, it rolls?

reason being, if you shave the heads 1mm, then the belt route is smaller... but you have the same size belt. so that makes the belt oversize to the application. same with a chain if you only have one tensioner.

Last edited by CapedCadaver; Nov 29, 2008 at 06:56 PM.
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #22  
Thanatos's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 651
From: Tn.
On a VE would it be worth it though. Considering the lower intake having to be milled also.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:49 AM
  #23  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by internetautomar
any motor will stay in time as long as the slack created in the timing drive is less than the adjustability of it's tensioner(s).
That's to a certain extent! On the bottom of all OHC heads are shave markers to warn the machine shop that you've now gone beyond the designed envelope for this engine. Think about it; the more you shave an OHC head the closer the cam sprocket gets to the crank. The only cure is more an adjustable tensioner, shorter belt/chain, and adjustable cam sprockets! B4 you do this you may wanna talk to a machine shop or experiment with some spare heads or a spare engne...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
pears
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Sep 18, 2015 05:25 AM
Serotta33
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Sep 17, 2015 12:14 PM
AT978
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Sep 6, 2015 10:31 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 AM.