4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

1998 Maxima Gear Ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2005, 07:27 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Bobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6,190
Perhaps your speedometer is out of whack somewhat as a result of the wheels and tires. I suspect it reads faster than you are actually going, but not significantly.-
Bobo is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:39 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
the reason why he gets lower rpms with same speed after the mods is because he's got an auto.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:41 PM
  #43  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by jvelos3
the reason why he gets lower rpms with same speed after the mods is because he's got an auto.
... ... ...
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:43 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
an auto does not have direct power to the wheels. That is why if you floor it there is no direct relationship between mph and rpm. Just like if you break torque...you can rev your engine to 2000 rpm but still read 0 mph.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:49 PM
  #45  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
It's all mechanically related, so breathing mods wont change a thing, only different gear ratios or tire sizes will.

And you're referring to stall speed when talking brake torquing....not 'direct relationship '

I agree that an MT is mechanical and an AT is more clutch packs, tranny fluid But still has direct relation (RPM/SPEED)
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:52 PM
  #46  
Member
 
JUS10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 32
I Dont Know
JUS10 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 03:58 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
why is it then that depending on elevation, at 2k rpm I can going anywhere from 45mph to 60mph when in the last gear? or if you quickly push down the gas there will be a jump in rpm but not in speed?

edit...after i saw edit of nmexmax.

I see what your saying about a relationship between rpm/speed but I do not believe it is a direct relationship as in a set multiple between the two. I could see why after the mods an auto can go the same speed a lower rpms, not sure how big difference is but there could be a difference since with the mods at lower rpms you have higher horsepower and torque which could negate the huge powerloss in the auto drivetrain and acheive the same speed at a slightly lower rpm.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:02 PM
  #48  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Oh god......
JClaw is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:13 PM
  #49  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
I see what your saying about a relationship between rpm/speed but I do not believe it is a direct relationship as in a set multiple between the two. I could see why after the mods an auto can go the same speed a lower rpms, not sure how big difference is but there could be a difference since with the mods at lower rpms you have higher horsepower and torque which could negate the huge powerloss in the auto drivetrain and acheive the same speed at a slightly lower rpm.
Once again ... ... ...
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:15 PM
  #50  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
My intake lets me reach 114 mph in first gear.
JClaw is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:19 PM
  #51  
Member
 
Chapman99SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 60
in a manual transmissoned car, the speed displayed on the speedo is directly related to the rpms on the tach, theres no question about it, ever hit a patch of ice in second gear and spun the speedo up to 65mph when your really only doing 15, its because they are directly connected
Chapman99SE is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:34 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
yeah in a manual transmission car...not an auto. In an auto hitting an ice patch would just make the rpm gauge go crazy...not the speedometer.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 04:46 PM
  #53  
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
pmohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
Posts: 14,331
Not true. There's a big *** hill going up to my house, and in the rain if I floor it and break traction (auto), I've been able to get the speedo to go up to around ~45 MPH before, when my actual speed on the ground is 15 or 20.

****, I'll make a video of it if you want.

Or, just do this - pour some sort of lubricant under the front wheels (water, oil, etc), pull the ebrake, and floor it. The speedo will rise even though you're sitting still.
pmohr is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 05:25 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
MDeezy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 33,720
. . . . .
MDeezy is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 05:57 PM
  #55  
I like Maximas
iTrader: (10)
 
vipervadim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 831
ok here's what headers do for you:

your rpm will still be the same, however you will notice the engine revs slightly freer (but still keeps the same rpms as before) your speedometer will show you how much faster the car is,
i.e. to go from 60-80 takes much faster with headers than without, because you're making more power
but you still keep the same RPMs as before, just picks up speed faster because there's less restrictions.

before you rip into your tranny get a 00vi, trust me on this one.
vipervadim is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 06:09 PM
  #56  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
lol at this thread. part of it is legit and part of it is pure craziness.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 06:24 PM
  #57  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
pure craziness.
My headers gave me 2800 RPMS ...











NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 09:55 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
you know what...i reread my last post and just realized it didnt make sense...

my train of thought is that in an auto the speedometer looks at wheel rpm not engine rpm. This is why with an auto if you tap on the gas quickly...the rpms shoot up but not the speed. for example if im going 2k rpm and hit the gas it will shoot up to 2.5k which is an engine speed that is 25% faster. This should translate to 25% faster speed but if you look at the speedometer, the speed did not jump by 25%. This shows that there is no direct connection between speed of car and rpm of engine.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 10:08 PM
  #59  
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Fr33way™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,520
Those fractions do not take into account gear ratio, transmission . . . .

Are you serious man?
Fr33way™ is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 10:09 PM
  #60  
fwd gone rwd cr00
iTrader: (27)
 
tavarish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 3,327
Originally Posted by wadecarlson
yep - before the headers ypipe and intake it was around 30k
less stress on motor = less rpm
30,000 rpms?
tavarish is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 10:57 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
Originally Posted by Fr33way
Those fractions do not take into account gear ratio, transmission . . . .

Are you serious man?

This is in the 4th gear for an auto. If you are in the same gear, 25% higher rpm will equal 25% higher mph if you have direct power to the wheels ie a manual transmission car. If you have an auto its not direct so the road speed lags the engine speed.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:11 PM
  #62  
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Fr33way™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,520
So what are you saying? That the wheel and tire rotates at the same speed in 4th gear as the engine? It doesn't, it's not a 1:1 ratio dude.
Fr33way™ is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:41 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jvelos3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
not at same speed but there is a ratio. THis means that if you go 60mph at 3k rpm then at 6k rpm your gonna go 120mph. THis is true in a manual transmission but in an auto I can be going 50mph at 2k rpm and at 2.5k rpm in the same gear depending on a variety of factors.

If I put cruise control once I reach 50mph Im at about 1.8k rpm...
but If Im at 50mph and I press the gas half way somewhat quickly but not enough to cause a downshift, I shoot up to about 2.5k rpm but only at like 55mph.

so here are two instances of different speeds at different rpm
50/1.8 = 27.8
55/2.5 = 22

At this point I can keep my rpm at 2.5k but the speed will gradually increase and at some speed it will stop increasing...this shows a definite lag between engine speed and wheel speed. This happens in an auto since autos dont have direct power to the wheel. This shows that the engine rpm does not matter much but the power at that rpm does. By putting mods, the engine is able to put out more power at lower rpm.

There will be a difference in rpm at a set speed but I am not sure if the difference is that big. I am expecting to get my y pipe sometime this week or next week so I will post my before y pipe rpm tomorow once I confirm my rpm at 60mph using cruise control on a fairly flat road. Once I put on my y pipe I will post up new rpm at 60mph. I beleive there will be a change but not sure how much.
jvelos3 is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 12:24 AM
  #64  
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Fr33way™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,520
No, there wont.

With the same auto trans. and wheel/tire combo a bone stock Maxima will be at the same RPM in 4th gear at 60mph as one with 400hp.

I can't wait for the follow up thread . . .
Fr33way™ is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 01:34 AM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
killerVQ30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,108
I have a RS5F50V FG41 which I've been told has a 4.1:1 (I guess hence the code) it is from a VQ20DE.. what advantage/disadvantage will there be over the standard maxima 5 speed vq30de ratios? IRC I heard I will accelerate quicker but loose top end speed? (I have MEVI with no extended rev limiter)

Anyone know?
killerVQ30DE is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 04:37 AM
  #66  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Top speed is 160 mph. I went up there once and will never do it again. Your top speed will be decreased to 148 mph, which is still more than fast enough.
JClaw is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 02:41 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
killerVQ30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,108
Originally Posted by JClaw
Top speed is 160 mph. I went up there once and will never do it again. Your top speed will be decreased to 148 mph, which is still more than fast enough.
Hey was that answering my post JCLAW? So i'm right better acceleration but lower topspeed?
killerVQ30DE is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:40 PM
  #68  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Yes, but the decrease in top speed is pretty irrelevant IMO. I went above 135 only once or twice.
JClaw is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:41 PM
  #69  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by killerVQ30DE
Hey was that answering my post JCLAW? So i'm right better acceleration but lower topspeed?
Yeah but who needs to go to 160 mph?

In the real world, it would mean better acceleration at the expense of gas mileage.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:48 PM
  #70  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Highway gas mileage. From what I've read, around town gas mileage doesn't go down much if at all because your motor is straining less to pull the car with the more aggressive gearing. 4.1:1 or 4.4:1 gears (both available) would turn even a stock 4g into a torquey little **** around town.
JClaw is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:50 PM
  #71  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
Originally Posted by JClaw
Highway gas mileage.
You know that's what I meant.
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:52 PM
  #72  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Yes







JClaw is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 03:56 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
killerVQ30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,108
Originally Posted by JClaw
Highway gas mileage. From what I've read, around town gas mileage doesn't go down much if at all because your motor is straining less to pull the car with the more aggressive gearing. 4.1:1 or 4.4:1 gears (both available) would turn even a stock 4g into a torquey little **** around town.
Can't wait then.. I was going to do the install myself.. but a local motorsport place is going to do the install for a pretty cheap price
killerVQ30DE is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 04:05 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
NightRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,502
There arent any kits available to change gear ratios in an auto, but that doesnt mean it cant be done. The auto has gear plates that determine the gear ratios in each gear, these gear plates are available in other auto transmissioned cars as well. By counting the teeth in the plate you can calculate a drive ratio in each gear. More teeth = higher ratio. When I had my trans rebuilt, I altered the ratios by putting in gear plates with more teeth. The stock gear ratio on an auto 4g Maxima is a 3.23:1. My new gear ratio is 3.91:1. I only lost 4 mph on the top end, but it gets there much quicker. The stock gear ratio on a 4g 5mt is 3.62:1 respectively.
NightRider is offline  
Old 11-29-2005, 04:30 PM
  #75  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
JClaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 5,437
Originally Posted by NightRider
By counting the teeth in the plate you can calculate a drive ratio in each gear. More teeth = higher ratio..
Maybe on an auto but on a manual there are two constantly meshing gears for each set of gear. To obtain the ratio of a gear you need to divide the one on the mainshaft by the one on the striker rod. For example 4th gear in a 5 MT is 0.954. One gear has 42 teeth and its meshing gear has 44 teeth. 42 divived by 44 = 0.9545454545.

Same goes for the final drive ratio. Divide the amount of teeth on the final drive gear by the amount of teeth on the mainshaft. In a 5MT there are 65 teeth on the final drive gear and 17 teeth on the mainshaft. Thus 65 divided by 17 = 3.823529412 is the final drive ratio.

Originally Posted by NightRider
More teeth = higher ratio. When I had my trans rebuilt, I altered the ratios by putting in gear plates with more teeth.
You didn't fork out the cash to have custom machined gear ratios. Gimme a break.

Originally Posted by NightRider
The stock gear ratio on an auto 4g Maxima is a 3.23:1.
Wrong. It is 3.619:1.

Originally Posted by NightRider
My new gear ratio is 3.91:1. I only lost 4 mph on the top end, but it gets there much quicker.
Wrong. If you had really gone from 3.23:1 to 3.91:1 you would only be able to reach 82% of your previous top speed, which is certainly far more than a 4 mph difference. Simple math.

Originally Posted by NightRider
The stock gear ratio on a 4g 5mt is 3.62:1 respectively.
Wrong again. The stock 5MT final drive ratio is 3.823. I had the differencial in my hands and counted all the teeth individually on the mainshaft and final gear. As I said, 65 teeth on the final gear and 17 on the mainshaft. 65 / 17 = 3.823.


With that said, I'm gonna need a timeslip or a video of you pulling on R1's. Good day.
JClaw is offline  
Old 12-02-2005, 11:12 PM
  #76  
Senior Member
 
killerVQ30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,108
Originally Posted by killerVQ30DE
I have a RS5F50V FG41 which I've been told has a 4.1:1 (I guess hence the code) it is from a VQ20DE.. what advantage/disadvantage will there be over the standard maxima 5 speed vq30de ratios? IRC I heard I will accelerate quicker but loose top end speed? (I have MEVI with no extended rev limiter)

Anyone know?
IIRC there was a chart that showed the Maxima standard gear ratios per gear and with another column showing the 4.1:1 ratio .. I hope its a good ratio as I have a feeling I'm going to have really short gears
killerVQ30DE is offline  
Old 12-03-2005, 11:06 AM
  #77  
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
venompwr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,434
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
a launch shot of N2O ..
This is what you get with a nitrous launch an the auto unless you have slicks


These are photos from MY car, with the auto launching on a 50shot....I did measure it, and it was over 100feet of rubber that got laid down. Following this, I lost 1st and 2nd. Now I have a 5spd. It was a good lesson
venompwr2 is offline  
Old 12-03-2005, 11:10 AM
  #78  
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
NmexMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 34,588
That's why I was hiding behind the wall ....
NmexMAX is offline  
Old 12-03-2005, 12:45 PM
  #79  
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
venompwr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,434
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
That's why I was hiding behind the wall ....
It would have been an amazing photo while it was happening, or video..but not worth the ultimate cost considering there's nothing wrong with it. From inside, it was just pooring smoke out of the wheel wells.
venompwr2 is offline  
Old 12-03-2005, 03:41 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
killerVQ30DE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,108
Originally Posted by killerVQ30DE
IIRC there was a chart that showed the Maxima standard gear ratios per gear and with another column showing the 4.1:1 ratio .. I hope its a good ratio as I have a feeling I'm going to have really short gears
..bump bump for me ..
killerVQ30DE is offline  


Quick Reply: 1998 Maxima Gear Ratio



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:20 PM.