Which mod yields better (if any) performance gains?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 15, 2006 | 09:51 PM

#41

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2000

Posts: 34,576

From: Santa Fe, NM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frodosmaxima

with this do you have to take the stock airbox and ram air scoop thingy out?

... With a blow torch and paper clip.

Feb 15, 2006 | 09:56 PM

#42

mendon99

tastey wheat

iTrader: (15)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 4,773

From: WPB, FL

Nmex, enough already.. lol

ram air scoop thingy? is that a technical term?

Feb 16, 2006 | 06:40 AM

#43

99grnmaxgxe

Senior Member

iTrader: (11)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 5,705

From: Tucson, AZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by frodosmaxima

my bad. i dont know this stuff that well. i am a newbie at this. i didnt mean y pipe i meant stock intake pipe.
does anybody know how well a short ram intake works? with this do you have to take the stock airbox and ram air scoop thingy out? thanx

Read the Stickies for that, you do not have to take out the air scoop, but you have to take out at least the upper half of the airbox for the cone filter to fit.

Feb 16, 2006 | 10:23 AM

#44

zander

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 500

If you read some more you'll find that there is no intake setup that is "better", some just do different things, stock/hacked airbox will retain the smooth feel and quite sound, short ram/pop charger will get you more noise and possibly some top end power at the loss of low end (this set up is also prone to heat soak), and then there are the true CAIs (the one in the fender) this I have heard is the favorite, like a best of both worlds, it doesn't choke out at high rpms and you don't loose any noticable amount in the lower rpms. And on another note I don't know why NmexMAX posts at all.