I found the perfect suspension setup
#41
In general, dampers will not totally change the behavior of the car. They will just make the car better (or worse) at doing what it does. Even with Koni Yellows, which make the car MUCH better, you wouldn't forget that you're still driving a Maxima.
Of course, it'd be a different story if we were talking about switching out stockers for a $10,000 set of Motons or something. But I don't think anyone's doing that, so....
Of course, it'd be a different story if we were talking about switching out stockers for a $10,000 set of Motons or something. But I don't think anyone's doing that, so....
#42
idk i just have H tech springs, tokico non adjustables, suspension techniques rear sway bar, fstb, rstb. the ride is actually still very smooth and i still can hang turns just as good if not better than the highly overpriced g35
#43
I have the S (suck) Techs with AGXs, the ride is crappy and the handling is only better on super smooth surfaces. Transition was better than stock but that's about it. I ran the car at an autoX stock (225/50 z tires) lots of understeer and inside wheel lifting. I ran it again on the current setup and the car was much better, good enough for 2nd in DSP ( I sure the 255/40 "R" compounds helped..lol) I really wish I had just spent the extra money for coilovers. On a positive note, the current Maxima setup convinced me to do the Z right.
#44
Originally Posted by trialt
idk i just have H tech springs, tokico non adjustables, suspension techniques rear sway bar, fstb, rstb. the ride is actually still very smooth and i still can hang turns just as good if not better than the highly overpriced g35
#45
Originally Posted by trialt
idk i just have H tech springs, tokico non adjustables, suspension techniques rear sway bar, fstb, rstb. the ride is actually still very smooth and i still can hang turns just as good if not better than the highly overpriced g35
#48
Originally Posted by trialt
idk i just have H tech springs, tokico non adjustables, suspension techniques rear sway bar, fstb, rstb. the ride is actually still very smooth and i still can hang turns just as good if not better than the highly overpriced g35
ummmmmm.....NO.....only if a 70 yr old man was driving...put one of us on that overpriced G35 and all u will be seeing is the bright LED tails of that G35
#50
Originally Posted by devilz05
can someone link me to the maxima suspension page where it lists all the suspension mods...
Formatted my HD and lost the link. Thanks
Formatted my HD and lost the link. Thanks
#51
Originally Posted by d00df00d
Not at all. Eibachs are the best springs... not necessarily the best suspension setup. Good coilover kits can be much, much better if you set them up right.
#52
Originally Posted by mzmtg
Without some kind of shortened strut body, any lowering of the car takes away badly needed compression travel in the suspension.
I've run many different spring/strut combos and none of them handle as well as the stock spring/AGX/addco bar combo I have now. Konis or Illuminas may ride a bit better, but that's about it. Keeping stock springs is the key.
A "stiff" feel does not equate to truly improved handling in all conditions.
I've run many different spring/strut combos and none of them handle as well as the stock spring/AGX/addco bar combo I have now. Konis or Illuminas may ride a bit better, but that's about it. Keeping stock springs is the key.
A "stiff" feel does not equate to truly improved handling in all conditions.
I'm still in a quandry about whether to get a Tockico suspension (springs and Illuminas), Eibachs and Illuminas, or stock springs and Konis or Illuminas. I didn't want the extra hassle the Konis (cartridge) brings when installing, but....
Koni Yellows are what I had on my old CRX when I used to run ITA, and along with 500lb springs on the back, I could still drive the car on the street (yes, it was still street legal).
Keeping the stock springs may be just what the doctor ordered, but IF there was track use involved, maybe lowering springs would still have a small advantage. However, I've seen some French and Italians cars on track, and while they lean like crazy, they stay planted in the corners.
#53
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
i am thinking about going Eibachs...
If I did that, wouldn't the Stillen body kit look funny on the Max with stock SE springs?
I'd only go back to the Eibachs to get the lowered look but I can do without the teethgrinding ride.
#56
Originally Posted by Blackwind
so how do you feel about the h&r kyb gr2 combo?
Originally Posted by BlackCat
You can do that? How's it done?
I've never ever seen anyone post here about doing that to the front struts.
I've never ever seen anyone post here about doing that to the front struts.
#57
Originally Posted by d00df00d
Good springs, bad struts (for lowering). AGX is a minimum, Illumina is better, Koni is best by far.
You can only do it with Konis.
You can only do it with Konis.
#58
Originally Posted by Fr33way™
I really want some Tein Basic guys to chime in.
Funny this thread came up. After ruining a set of raxles in less than a year, I recently raised my car a bit and noticed an improvement both in ride quality and handling. I'm now sitting at a ride height of 26.25". It's about a 2 finger gap (barely). Before I raised it up, it was less than a 1 finger gap. Looked cool, but I'm over it. Tired of going through axles and having to avoid every pothole/speed bump on the road.
#59
Originally Posted by njmaxseltd
I installed a set of 5 speed SE front springs in my automatic SE, kept the stock SE springs my 99 came with. The result was about a 3/4 inch drop up front making the front gap matching, if not smaller then the rear fender gap. The car actually looks good on 17" rims. I'm running Illuminas for strut/shocks. The ride is nothing short of amazingly smooth and the car handles as well as any other sport sedan on the road today. I think it actually out handles my stock BMW 330. I'll never lower any other car I'll ever own, the ride suffers to much.
For some reason, 4th genners have a vastly different opinion of Eibachs than 5th genners. I think I want them to be my next springs, but I'm not sure. I think my car will smooth them out a bit with the SFC's. I would also love to try the shortened Konis.
I thought this was a great thread about Konis.....
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....shortened+koni
But I'm also confused about shortening 3rd vs 4th gen Koni Yellows. You said it would be possible to gain about 1" travel by cutting the 4th gen yellows, but about 1.5" but doing the same to 3rd gen yellows. Is cutting the 4th gen yellows more difficult?
[Dreaming]
Shortened 3rd gen Yellows up front
4th gen Yellows in rear
Eibachs? H-Techs?
foam chassis
My SFCs, LTB, TB's, bushings, FSTB......
[/Dream sequence]
#61
Originally Posted by 95maxrider
I'm confused. You put on SE springs, and they lowered your car? I remember in an old PM you recommended Eibachs as an alternative to my H&R's. Has your opinion changed?
For some reason, 4th genners have a vastly different opinion of Eibachs than 5th genners. I think I want them to be my next springs, but I'm not sure. I think my car will smooth them out a bit with the SFC's. I would also love to try the shortened Konis.
I thought this was a great thread about Konis.....
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....shortened+koni
But I'm also confused about shortening 3rd vs 4th gen Koni Yellows. You said it would be possible to gain about 1" travel by cutting the 4th gen yellows, but about 1.5" but doing the same to 3rd gen yellows. Is cutting the 4th gen yellows more difficult?
[Dreaming]
Shortened 3rd gen Yellows up front
4th gen Yellows in rear
Eibachs? H-Techs?
foam chassis
My SFCs, LTB, TB's, bushings, FSTB......
[/Dream sequence]
For some reason, 4th genners have a vastly different opinion of Eibachs than 5th genners. I think I want them to be my next springs, but I'm not sure. I think my car will smooth them out a bit with the SFC's. I would also love to try the shortened Konis.
I thought this was a great thread about Konis.....
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....shortened+koni
But I'm also confused about shortening 3rd vs 4th gen Koni Yellows. You said it would be possible to gain about 1" travel by cutting the 4th gen yellows, but about 1.5" but doing the same to 3rd gen yellows. Is cutting the 4th gen yellows more difficult?
[Dreaming]
Shortened 3rd gen Yellows up front
4th gen Yellows in rear
Eibachs? H-Techs?
foam chassis
My SFCs, LTB, TB's, bushings, FSTB......
[/Dream sequence]
#63
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
Yea u have to cut the threaded part of the cartridge and drill the bolt hole larger so it pops thru the houseing....and u get 1" of travel....it my winter project
#65
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
Yea u have to cut the threaded part of the cartridge and drill the bolt hole larger so it pops thru the houseing....and u get 1" of travel....it my winter project
#67
Originally Posted by BlackCat
So that's the trick? Using the 4th gen 5-speed springs all around?
Btw I'm already on Konis.
Btw I'm already on Konis.
#70
These are gross oversimplifications, but they get the point across.
You can think of understeer as resulting from the rear having more grip than the front. So, in short, Maximas understeer heavily because the rear has much more grip than the front.
In those terms, a rear sway bar is as a way to take grip away from the rear and add it to the front. Theoretically your total grip reserves are lower because the RSB will take more than it adds. But, in a car like the Maxima, the rear has so much more grip than the front that you never get to use it all because the front slides so easily. It's like you have a ton of reserves that you'll never use. A RSB simply takes those reserves and adds them to the front: you can corner faster because the front is gripping better, and you still have enough rear grip that it won't easily run out.
So, the net effect is that you theoretically have less total grip but more usable grip.
Of course, things might be slightly different if you're not on stock suspension. But that's another discussion.
You can think of understeer as resulting from the rear having more grip than the front. So, in short, Maximas understeer heavily because the rear has much more grip than the front.
In those terms, a rear sway bar is as a way to take grip away from the rear and add it to the front. Theoretically your total grip reserves are lower because the RSB will take more than it adds. But, in a car like the Maxima, the rear has so much more grip than the front that you never get to use it all because the front slides so easily. It's like you have a ton of reserves that you'll never use. A RSB simply takes those reserves and adds them to the front: you can corner faster because the front is gripping better, and you still have enough rear grip that it won't easily run out.
So, the net effect is that you theoretically have less total grip but more usable grip.
Of course, things might be slightly different if you're not on stock suspension. But that's another discussion.
#71
Originally Posted by Delvin
I would have loved have seen how this thread would have started if you did hit the brakes hard on a turn like that when you are pushing it.
#73
Originally Posted by Eyemfaster
+1, hitting the brakes transferred weight to the front end.
BTW, I started this thread just to show how relatively cheap it could be to have a car that doesn't handle like a FWD grocery getter at all...for a few hundred dollars, I was able to turn an understeering monster into something a lot more neutral feeling.
#74
the rear isnt breaking loose....its comming around in a controled movement...most people just dont know how to handle it....and most f is caused by lifting the throttle...Its called throttle lift oversteer.....although i sure ur car Rides pretty good.... and handles a little better....but its no where near great handling.....i know thats not what ur getting at....but i jsut wanted to say that
#75
Alright, so what symptoms would shortening front Konis solve? From what I've seen, they bottom out before the car reaches the bumpstops, so "shortening" them would entail shortening the rod and doing something to let it extend down further? I'm on Progress springs right now, it seems like I'd probably see a benefit...?
And I'd be surprised if they made Motons for A32s, or any year Maxima really.
And I'd be surprised if they made Motons for A32s, or any year Maxima really.
#76
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
Alright, so what symptoms would shortening front Konis solve? From what I've seen, they bottom out before the car reaches the bumpstops, so "shortening" them would entail shortening the rod and doing something to let it extend down further? I'm on Progress springs right now, it seems like I'd probably see a benefit...?
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
And I'd be surprised if they made Motons for A32s, or any year Maxima really.
......
But yeah, I was just using them as an example.
#77
ok to shorten Koni's u essentailly relocate the cartridge in the housing about an inch lower bu enlarging the bolt hole and trimming the cartrige...thus allowing the shaft to actually have an inch more o extension when al assemble on the car...kind of like increasing stroke on con rods
#79
Progress springs are about a 2" drop, so let's use that: When you're at rest, your damper piston actually has 2" more compression than it would have at rest with stock springs, which means it has 2" less travel before it bottoms out. Shortening the strut by moving the cartridge downward effectively raises the spring perch in relation to the piston stroke, recovering some of that lost travel.
...Does that make sense?
...Does that make sense?
#80
Originally Posted by '96 B-rad
Yeah, although when I bough the car it already had both on so I dont know the benefits of one over the other. I just know it handles like a different car compared to my old one. But it sounds like it was installed wrong..