Air Breathers
Guest
Posts: n/a
I think so. I would also cut off PCV system as well as EGR system. Those are parasites on the performance and dont affect emission that much. For PCV system simply cork in the intake ports and put the breather (with small filter) on the head port where it goes to the PCV, remove all PCV crap and hoses. Let your back pressure gases escape as soon as they build up, not as soon as PCV valve lets them escape. Also cork in intake ports for EGR system and exhaust port, remove EGR valve and all associated crap. Let more oxigen saturated air flow through the intake instead of exhaust gases diverted by EGR system and PCV system.
Originally posted by zaebis
I think so. I would also cut off PCV system as well as EGR system. Those are parasites on the performance and dont affect emission that much. For PCV system simply cork in the intake ports and put the breather (with small filter) on the head port where it goes to the PCV, remove all PCV crap and hoses. Let your back pressure gases escape as soon as they build up, not as soon as PCV valve lets them escape. Also cork in intake ports for EGR system and exhaust port, remove EGR valve and all associated crap. Let more oxigen saturated air flow through the intake instead of exhaust gases diverted by EGR system and PCV system.
I think so. I would also cut off PCV system as well as EGR system. Those are parasites on the performance and dont affect emission that much. For PCV system simply cork in the intake ports and put the breather (with small filter) on the head port where it goes to the PCV, remove all PCV crap and hoses. Let your back pressure gases escape as soon as they build up, not as soon as PCV valve lets them escape. Also cork in intake ports for EGR system and exhaust port, remove EGR valve and all associated crap. Let more oxigen saturated air flow through the intake instead of exhaust gases diverted by EGR system and PCV system.
"you'll need to richen the mixture from 1000 rpm to about 3000 rpm, which is the rpm range that the EGR is functional.
everyone thinks that recirculating burnt exhaust gas back into the combustion chamber is such a terrible thing - it's not. The burnt exhaust gas is inert, so by taking up space within the combustion chamber, it prevents a full usage of the space within. This space could've been filled with fresh intake charge. Since the gas is inert and fills up the space within, it keeps the combustion chamber's temperature lower. Lower temperatures result in two things: 1) lower oxides of nitrogen 2) less chances of detonation.
Detonation occurs when the cylinder pressures and temperatures are high. Since the EGR recirculates the burnt exhaust gas through and keeps the temps down, it lowers the detonation threshold. So why is it important to richen the a/f mixture? When the EGR is removed, the cylinder temps increase, increasing the detonation possibilities for two reasons: 1) detonation is most likely to occur where large amounts of torque is made in XXX rpm range 2) detonation occurs when the temps are high (as stated above). The Maxima engine makes a lot of torque in the 2000-3000 rpm range, so by removing the EGR system you're shooting yourself in the foot.
in summary, it's not worth it. the EGR is not active at wide open throttle or above 3000ish rpm. You will not find a performance gain by doing so."
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by sx7r
There was a post concerning the EGR system from about 6 months ago. i saved the important part. i'm not sure who wrote this, but i think it was phoung - correct me if i'm wrong. here's what he said:
"you'll need to richen the mixture from 1000 rpm to about 3000 rpm, which is the rpm range that the EGR is functional.
everyone thinks that recirculating burnt exhaust gas back into the combustion chamber is such a terrible thing - it's not. The burnt exhaust gas is inert, so by taking up space within the combustion chamber, it prevents a full usage of the space within. This space could've been filled with fresh intake charge. Since the gas is inert and fills up the space within, it keeps the combustion chamber's temperature lower. Lower temperatures result in two things: 1) lower oxides of nitrogen 2) less chances of detonation.
Detonation occurs when the cylinder pressures and temperatures are high. Since the EGR recirculates the burnt exhaust gas through and keeps the temps down, it lowers the detonation threshold. So why is it important to richen the a/f mixture? When the EGR is removed, the cylinder temps increase, increasing the detonation possibilities for two reasons: 1) detonation is most likely to occur where large amounts of torque is made in XXX rpm range 2) detonation occurs when the temps are high (as stated above). The Maxima engine makes a lot of torque in the 2000-3000 rpm range, so by removing the EGR system you're shooting yourself in the foot.
in summary, it's not worth it. the EGR is not active at wide open throttle or above 3000ish rpm. You will not find a performance gain by doing so."
There was a post concerning the EGR system from about 6 months ago. i saved the important part. i'm not sure who wrote this, but i think it was phoung - correct me if i'm wrong. here's what he said:
"you'll need to richen the mixture from 1000 rpm to about 3000 rpm, which is the rpm range that the EGR is functional.
everyone thinks that recirculating burnt exhaust gas back into the combustion chamber is such a terrible thing - it's not. The burnt exhaust gas is inert, so by taking up space within the combustion chamber, it prevents a full usage of the space within. This space could've been filled with fresh intake charge. Since the gas is inert and fills up the space within, it keeps the combustion chamber's temperature lower. Lower temperatures result in two things: 1) lower oxides of nitrogen 2) less chances of detonation.
Detonation occurs when the cylinder pressures and temperatures are high. Since the EGR recirculates the burnt exhaust gas through and keeps the temps down, it lowers the detonation threshold. So why is it important to richen the a/f mixture? When the EGR is removed, the cylinder temps increase, increasing the detonation possibilities for two reasons: 1) detonation is most likely to occur where large amounts of torque is made in XXX rpm range 2) detonation occurs when the temps are high (as stated above). The Maxima engine makes a lot of torque in the 2000-3000 rpm range, so by removing the EGR system you're shooting yourself in the foot.
in summary, it's not worth it. the EGR is not active at wide open throttle or above 3000ish rpm. You will not find a performance gain by doing so."
Originally posted by Nismo
is replacing the tube and putting breathers in its place any good? will it affect anything? what about putting a breather on the intake will that suck more air in?
is replacing the tube and putting breathers in its place any good? will it affect anything? what about putting a breather on the intake will that suck more air in?
Erik
Originally posted by zaebis
... It is not a goal but a side effect of the EGR system that it cools off your combustion chambers. ...
... It is not a goal but a side effect of the EGR system that it cools off your combustion chambers. ...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Nismo
instead of corking the intake ports, can I just put a breather there also?
instead of corking the intake ports, can I just put a breather there also?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Dec 20, 2021 06:57 PM



the air breathers i found locally were too small, the opening needs to be the size of my thumb or so.. i didnt feel like buyin a converter..

