4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

dyno results -- JWT ECU & Cattman Y-pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 11:47 AM
  #1  
farm boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
I had my 95 auto dynoed yesterday with a JWT ECU and a y-pipe(on a dynojet). This was my first dyno, so I don't have any way to compare horsepower gains. My best run was 156-157 hp??? This sounds extremely low to me, but the guy who did the test said that I am seeing a 20-25% loss due to my car being an auto. He estimated 210hp at the flywheel.(210 X .75 = 157.5) Is this BS? What do you guys think? I'm thinking about having it dynoed somewhere else for comparison.
The guy e-mailed the results to me, but I can't open them(there is a program that you have to download from dynojet.com to view them). I can't get it to work. If someone thinks that they can do it, i'll e-mail the results to you.

thanks
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,755
From: Lake Orion, MI
that is true autos due tend to loose more hp at the wheel then a stick
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 12:12 PM
  #3  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Yes auto's do lose more power in the drivetrain than a stick shift car, however I thought that stock 4th gen autos put down about 155hp stock. It's in someone's signature, I'm sure they'll post it on here. I think it was 155hp stock, not sure though.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 02:21 PM
  #4  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by Nealoc187
Yes auto's do lose more power in the drivetrain than a stick shift car, however I thought that stock 4th gen autos put down about 155hp stock. It's in someone's signature, I'm sure they'll post it on here. I think it was 155hp stock, not sure though.
Is an automatic less efficient than a 5-speed when the torque converter is in lockup mode? Is the torque converter unlocked at full throttle? Are dyno measurements made in an automatic gear other than 4th?

My Maxima is a stock 5-speed and I've never had a dyno measurement, so I'm unfamiliar with these details.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
XtremeHKS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Is an automatic less efficient than a 5-speed when the torque converter is in lockup mode? Is the torque converter unlocked at full throttle? Are dyno measurements made in an automatic gear other than 4th?

My Maxima is a stock 5-speed and I've never had a dyno measurement, so I'm unfamiliar with these details.
Would the VB Upgrade help the Drivetrain loss? like maybe drop 5% HP Loss due to drivetrain or no difference?
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 04:41 PM
  #6  
farm boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Is an automatic less efficient than a 5-speed when the torque converter is in lockup mode? Is the torque converter unlocked at full throttle? Are dyno measurements made in an automatic gear other than 4th?

My Maxima is a stock 5-speed and I've never had a dyno measurement, so I'm unfamiliar with these details.
The dyno was done in 1st and 2nd gear. the results in 1st gear were ignored because the wheels are accelerating too fast(the dyno can't get a good reading). 3rd gear and 4th are not used for dyno purposes simply because you would be spinning the dyno rollers at over 100 MPH. Therefore, 2nd gear(roughly 45-85 MPH) is used.

It is much easier to dyno a standard trans because you can put the transmission in 3rd and accelerate at WOT from 1000 RPM to redline.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 05:30 PM
  #7  
Washington DC Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,075
I've had my '96 Auto-->>

Dyno'd with a JWT intake and '96 SE rims and my results were 155.7hp/172.2tq.. I have an auto.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 05:39 PM
  #8  
Washington DC Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,075
I know it wasn't in Drive-->>

I think it was in 3rd since it was going over 100mph..

Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Is an automatic less efficient than a 5-speed when the torque converter is in lockup mode? Is the torque converter unlocked at full throttle? Are dyno measurements made in an automatic gear other than 4th?

My Maxima is a stock 5-speed and I've never had a dyno measurement, so I'm unfamiliar with these details.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 05:44 PM
  #9  
emax02's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by farm boy


The dyno was done in 1st and 2nd gear. the results in 1st gear were ignored because the wheels are accelerating too fast(the dyno can't get a good reading). 3rd gear and 4th are not used for dyno purposes simply because you would be spinning the dyno rollers at over 100 MPH. Therefore, 2nd gear(roughly 45-85 MPH) is used.

It is much easier to dyno a standard trans because you can put the transmission in 3rd and accelerate at WOT from 1000 RPM to redline.
You are supposed to dyno a maxima in 4th gear. If you do it in lower gears the transmission multiplys the power. BTW this is a fact. I had my car 125MPH on the dyno and everything was working fine.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 06:05 PM
  #10  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Hmmm, automatics are dynoed in THIRD gear, the gear closest to 1:1, 5 speeds are dynoed in FORTH gear, the gear closest to 1:1. There is little use to dyno in any other gear. The STOCK automatic should dyno at ~155 HP, 170 lb-ft. of TQ.
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 06:54 PM
  #11  
farm boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
From what you all are saying, the dyno that I did in 2nd gear is innacurate and I should do it again in 3rd?

BTW, I had this dyno done at Dave's Honda Haven in Memphis(should have known better than to take my car to a Honda shop!)
Old Sep 1, 2001 | 08:02 PM
  #12  
hokiemax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,154
Hey man, are you nuts?

Of course there is something wrong with your result. It should dyno 155HP stock. With your ECU and ypipe, you should get at least 165 at the wheels.
I say the people at the dyno shop dont know what the hell they're doing.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 12:44 AM
  #13  
guido_sst's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,148
My totally stock 1995 GLE dyno'd at 152HP and 176 fl/lbs. Either the dyno operator screwed something up, or your mods are doing a lot less for you than they should.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 01:18 AM
  #14  
MaxSE98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 544
theres an inumerable amount of factors that could contribute to poor dyno results, or results that arent up to par. it may not make much sense but two cars exact same year exact same options in two side by side dynos can dyno different sets of numbers. i used to work at a dealership we had about 200 cars on the lot at any given time , and some cars are just naturally faster then others. i cant give u a lengthy explanation because i dont know exactly why but ive seen it with my own eyes and driven the examples
-pete
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:31 AM
  #15  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by XtremeHKS
Would the VB Upgrade help the Drivetrain loss? like maybe drop 5% HP Loss due to drivetrain or no difference?
The VB modification helps acceleration by making faster shifts. It does nothing to reduce slippage in the torque converter, and that's where the losses occur.
Old Sep 2, 2001 | 09:36 AM
  #16  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by XtremeHKS
Would the VB Upgrade help the Drivetrain loss? like maybe drop 5% HP Loss due to drivetrain or no difference?
The VB modification helps acceleration by making faster shifts. It does nothing to reduce slippage in the torque converter, and that's where the losses occur.
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 04:47 PM
  #17  
StaindMaxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 175
Dyno Auto

I dynoed my 97 Auto SE a month ago with Stillen air intake, y-pipe and rear section exhaust. Dyno done in 3rd gear as I thought all were. Here are results:

Peak hp: 170.6
Torque: 189.1

If stock is 155 hp, then I guess my results weren't TOO bad. By the way, what the hell is a VB upgrade? I see this mod referred to everywhere, but I have no idea what it is.

thanx
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 04:58 PM
  #18  
farm boy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 48
Re: Dyno Auto

Originally posted by StaindMaxima
I dynoed my 97 Auto SE a month ago with Stillen air intake, y-pipe and rear section exhaust. Dyno done in 3rd gear as I thought all were. Here are results:

Peak hp: 170.6
Torque: 189.1

If stock is 155 hp, then I guess my results weren't TOO bad. By the way, what the hell is a VB upgrade? I see this mod referred to everywhere, but I have no idea what it is.

thanx
VB = transmission Valve Body
Old Sep 3, 2001 | 05:08 PM
  #19  
jran76's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 373
Re: Re: Dyno Auto

www.mobiletek.com (or net?), Don's VB upgrade or check out level 10 trans.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Aug 16, 2024 08:23 PM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
Mar 12, 2018 06:48 PM
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
Jan 6, 2017 06:05 PM
Quickywd01
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
3
Sep 21, 2016 09:36 PM
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM.