4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

30 mpg !!! Yea !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2001 | 11:08 PM
  #1  
matty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,166
From: Northern Jersey
Finally,

My house to Saratoga NY and back constent 72-76 some time on cruize

341 miles for 11.3 gallons of Mobil 93 Octane
Comes to 30.16 mpg

Flame on

Old 09-01-2001 | 11:33 PM
  #2  
TurDz's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,241
stupid 5-speed!! grrr!





j/k Man, autos suck for good gas mileage.
Old 09-02-2001 | 12:44 AM
  #3  
MDr's Avatar
MDr
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 165
93 octane ? Damn....
Most places in south CA premium is 91 octane.
Old 09-02-2001 | 02:23 AM
  #4  
MaxSE98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 544
congrats dude, ive havnt filled up my tank all week!!!!!!!!
havent driven anywhere either , damn tranny
Old 09-02-2001 | 04:41 AM
  #5  
Maury's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 246
From: Coaldale, PA
what are you automatic drivers seeing?

i have a 95 gle and everytime my car rolls around to 1/4 tank i think i almost near 300 miles on the odo. i could swear it was better than that with my last fuel filter
just curious where your odometer is at 1/4 tank on average. btw i have 111K miles and no performance mods.
thanks
maury
Originally posted by MaxSE98
congrats dude, ive havnt filled up my tank all week!!!!!!!!
havent driven anywhere either , damn tranny
Old 09-02-2001 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
lucky i get 20-22 mpg, hopfully when i get ma fuel filter it will improve
Old 09-02-2001 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by matty
Finally,

My house to Saratoga NY and back constent 72-76 some time on cruize

341 miles for 11.3 gallons of Mobil 93 Octane
Comes to 30.16 mpg ...
It can be done. Maxima owners who get substandard mileage on the highway may have a correctable defect in the car. The EPA/DOT fuel usage estimates are not advertising puffery, they are realistic and achievable numbers.

Automatic owners need not huff and puff. Their cars can do just as well thanks to the torque converter lockup feature.
Old 09-02-2001 | 01:04 PM
  #8  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by Turd Ferguson
stupid 5-speed!! grrr!
j/k Man, autos suck for good gas mileage.
The '99 Maxima EPA mileage estimates are:
5-speed... 22 city / 27 highway
automatic... 21 city / 28 highway

EPA numbers are realistic and achievable. However, you will not enjoy 30+ miles per gallon if ...
- you drive too fast
- you use fuel with less than the recommended 91 AKI
- your car has a mechanical or electrical defect
Old 09-02-2001 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
NZ Max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 556
autos all the way

Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
The '99 Maxima EPA mileage estimates are:
5-speed... 22 city / 27 highway
automatic... 21 city / 28 highway

EPA numbers are realistic and achievable. However, you will not enjoy 30+ miles per gallon if ...
- you drive too fast
- you use fuel with less than the recommended 91 AKI
- your car has a mechanical or electrical defect
these figures stand to reason, autos witht their taller top gear and the lock up torque converter will enjoy better fuel consumption. not in town though where all they do is rev.
Old 09-02-2001 | 07:13 PM
  #10  
Eric L.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,835
Re: Re: what are you automatic drivers seeing?

Originally posted by Murphy_TX_Mike
I average 33 mpg on the highway with an automatic.
AC on, set on cruise around 75-78 miles per hour
I have dons vb mod, udp, cai, y pipe, high flow cat, b pipe and a stock muffler. In the city (back and forth to work), I average 22.

Grrr!!! I can drive all freeway and still get in the low 20's (if I am lucky). Even though I "overmaintain" my car, fuel economy still seems to be in the pits. I don't think I have a lead foot, but oh well.

How do you get 22mpg in the city?? What RPM's do you rev to normally when accelerating?
Old 09-02-2001 | 07:40 PM
  #11  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Excessive fuel consumption

Originally posted by Eric L.
Grrr!!! I can drive all freeway and still get in the low 20's (if I am lucky). ...
Something is wrong with your car. I'm not teasing, not poking fun. Excessive fuel consumption is a trouble symptom, just as much as hard starting or a rough idle. The cause may be the combination of several small problems. You might start by testing the Oxygen Sensors and fuel rail pressure. Search for tiny fuel leaks. Make sure your brakes aren't dragging.
Old 09-02-2001 | 09:22 PM
  #12  
dwapenyi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,016
Re: Re: Re: what are you automatic drivers seeing?

Ha! May be your POP charger sucks in too much hot air!! j/k

On a serious note, I wonder if the warm air intake of the POP charger could be a drawback to feul consumption.

As another suggestion, I know you said you "over-maintain" you car, but when was the last time you changed your feul filter or your air filter?? I just cleaned my CAI K&N filter after a year of use and my highway MPGs jumped from 24 to 26 mpg. I once got 30 mpg sometime back, but I know I'll never do that again, I was feathering the throttle for an unusually long time, not normal for me, usually the lead in my foot takes over after a while

DW
Originally posted by Eric L.



Grrr!!! I can drive all freeway and still get in the low 20's (if I am lucky). Even though I "overmaintain" my car, fuel economy still seems to be in the pits. I don't think I have a lead foot, but oh well.

How do you get 22mpg in the city?? What RPM's do you rev to normally when accelerating?
Old 09-03-2001 | 01:52 AM
  #13  
NZ Max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 556
Re: Re: Re: Re: what are you automatic drivers seeing?

I don't know how the snow mode works for you guys but my max was an ex japan and the snow mode wont let revs over 2500 in first second. third will rev right out as will 4th and overdrive. also shift points are really low in 3rd Ive seen another max where the snow mode wont let you use 1st gear unless its selected.
Old 09-03-2001 | 03:08 AM
  #14  
1/3There2/3ToGo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,804
Originally posted by matty
Finally,

My house to Saratoga NY and back constent 72-76 some time on cruize

341 miles for 11.3 gallons of Mobil 93 Octane
Comes to 30.16 mpg

Flame on

436 miles on 13.2 gallons of Mobil 91 octane = 33.03 mpg with a heavly modified automatic!

Kirk
Old 09-03-2001 | 03:11 AM
  #15  
NZ Max's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 556
kirk

did you ge my message yet?
Old 09-03-2001 | 03:21 AM
  #16  
1/3There2/3ToGo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,804
Re: kirk

Originally posted by NZ Max
did you ge my message yet?
Yep, did you get my reply?
Old 09-03-2001 | 08:05 AM
  #17  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
Originally posted by 1/3There2/3ToGo


436 miles on 13.2 gallons of Mobil 91 octane = 33.03 mpg with a heavly modified automatic!

Kirk

dang that is hella good gas mileage
Old 09-03-2001 | 06:28 PM
  #18  
chris j vurnis's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 577
You all with 92+ octane with no additional additive non-sense should be happy.

California is now stuck with Ethanol blend 91 octane --
Why is that? Something the Federal EPA mandated on California as a purely political ploy to subsidize farmers in the midwest since ethanol is derived from corn. Why California? Because we are the most populous state in the country and we don't get to vote on it either.

Obviously, the Federal EPA never bothered to read the owners manuals of several popular automobiles on the road that recommend against ethanol usage.
Old 09-04-2001 | 02:04 AM
  #19  
1/3There2/3ToGo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,804
Originally posted by kevlo911



dang that is hella good gas mileage
Thanks

Kirk
Old 09-04-2001 | 09:24 AM
  #20  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Huh,,,

Originally posted by chris j vurnis
You all with 92+ octane with no additional additive non-sense should be happy.

California is now stuck with Ethanol blend 91 octane --
Why is that? Something the Federal EPA mandated on California as a purely political ploy to subsidize farmers in the midwest since ethanol is derived from corn. Why California? Because we are the most populous state in the country and we don't get to vote on it either.

Obviously, the Federal EPA never bothered to read the owners manuals of several popular automobiles on the road that recommend against ethanol usage.

I dont think there is anywhere around here with 91 octane. I am out in Ma and never seen it. I always though it was wierd it said 91 or better because we go 87 - 89 - 93. Was this somethign new or been going on for a while over there?

SuDZ
Old 09-04-2001 | 09:30 AM
  #21  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Re: Huh,,,

Originally posted by SuDZ
I dont think there is anywhere around here with 91 octane. I am out in Ma and never seen it. I always though it was wierd it said 91 or better because we go 87 - 89 - 93. Was this somethign new or been going on for a while over there?

SuDZ
Nissan recommends fuel with 91 Anti-Knock Index. Most stations (outside California) sell three grades of gasoline: 87, 89, and 93 AKI. I fill with equal amounts of 89 and 93. That's the economical way to buy 91 AKI.
Old 09-04-2001 | 09:35 AM
  #22  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Not sure on milage

Not sure what I get but probably decent i spend alot of time in 5th even on back roads or waht not. Will keeping RPM's down around 1200 help milage much? Also is it okay to do that? Doesnt hurt or wear engine right?

SuDZ
Old 09-04-2001 | 09:44 AM
  #23  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Re: Not sure on milage

Originally posted by SuDZ
Not sure what I get but probably decent i spend alot of time in 5th even on back roads or waht not. Will keeping RPM's down around 1200 help milage much? Also is it okay to do that? Doesnt hurt or wear engine right?

SuDZ
The tachometer doesn't have a "minimum speed red line" but perhaps it should. Keep your engine speed above 1,500 rpm. If you want to optimize fuel economy keep your engine speed below 3,000 rpm and always accelerate moderately. Use your Cruise Control as much as practical.
Old 09-04-2001 | 10:13 AM
  #24  
Curt Deiner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 443
From: Minnesota
Re: Huh,,,

Originally posted by SuDZ



I dont think there is anywhere around here with 91 octane. I am out in Ma and never seen it. I always though it was wierd it said 91 or better because we go 87 - 89 - 93. Was this somethign new or been going on for a while over there?

SuDZ
We have 91 octane here in Minnesota. It also is 10% ethanol. I usually get 24 mpg. On road trips, out of state, I've filled with 87 and gotten same or better mileage. I suspect it's the ethanol.
Old 09-04-2001 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Re: Re: Huh,,,

Originally posted by Curt Deiner
We have 91 octane here in Minnesota. It also is 10% ethanol. I usually get 24 mpg. On road trips, out of state, I've filled with 87 and gotten same or better mileage. I suspect it's the ethanol.
Ethanol has a lower heat density than gasoline. The government says that gasohol (gasoline/ethanol blend) may result in a 3% loss of miles per gallon. Actual owner experience says the true number is closer to 10%.
Old 09-04-2001 | 01:33 PM
  #26  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
I do about 90 percent highway driving, and usually get 370 mile from one tank of gas (~17.5 gal. per refill). In the last 2 fills that I have had, I have been breaking 480 miles, and that is with some 'spirited' driving. Nothing done to the car at all in the last two fills.
Old 09-04-2001 | 03:35 PM
  #27  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by medicsonic
I do about 90 percent highway driving, and usually get 370 mile from one tank of gas (~17.5 gal. per refill). In the last 2 fills that I have had, I have been breaking 480 miles, and that is with some 'spirited' driving. Nothing done to the car at all in the last two fills.
Miles per tank is not an accurate measure of fuel usage. Miles per gallon is.
Old 09-04-2001 | 03:38 PM
  #28  
Eric L.'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,835
Re: Huh,,,

Originally posted by SuDZ



I dont think there is anywhere around here with 91 octane. I am out in Ma and never seen it. I always though it was wierd it said 91 or better because we go 87 - 89 - 93. Was this somethign new or been going on for a while over there?

SuDZ
91 octane must be in CA only then. I was quite surprised when my 92 dropped to 91. But then gas prices are down too so I can't complain.
Old 09-04-2001 | 04:08 PM
  #29  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Originally posted by Daniel B. Martin
Miles per tank is not an accurate measure of fuel usage. Miles per gallon is.
You missed the ~17.5 gallons per refill I guess.
Old 09-04-2001 | 04:16 PM
  #30  
Daniel B. Martin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,601
Originally posted by medicsonic


You missed the ~17.5 gallons per refill I guess.
I did see that. The tilde character stands for "approximately".
Old 09-04-2001 | 04:35 PM
  #31  
97GreenMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 850
I got 20 mpg on my last tank in my auto, and I was happy compared to my usual 15.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
10-02-2022 03:13 PM
spencerwh1
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
4
06-30-2016 06:44 AM
Maximan190
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
4
12-16-2015 07:01 AM
ef9
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
10-04-2015 09:43 AM
220k+ A32
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
09-22-2015 04:08 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 AM.