4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

pathfinder throttle body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #1  
mastere954's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 477
From: pembroke pines, florida
pathfinder throttle body

hey guys for some odd reason the .org is not letting me search, i have a Mevi and was wondering if it would be better if i went with a pathfinder throttle body? waht is the diameter difference between the 4th gen TB and the pathfinder TB? and will it bolt right up with the same components?
thanks guys
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
4th gen TB is 60mm an pathy TB is 70mm and you'll feel a difference. They don't bolt up togetter, so I suggest to pm stephenmax for a TB adaptor plate. I did it and it fit like eom, trust me.

edit: BTW, I found out that the 2001 Infiniti QX4 TB fit better, cause it is a bit smaller from the outside.

Last edited by 97_Roadrunner; Jan 27, 2008 at 02:19 PM.
Old Jan 27, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #3  
rcintorino's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 64
From: Coram, NY
if you don't have mevi or 00vi, will you notice a difference with the larger throtttle body?
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 06:50 AM
  #4  
Flava_24/7's Avatar
Boosted Panda
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,475
From: Austin TX
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
4th gen TB is 60mm an pathy TB is 70mm and you'll feel a difference. They don't bolt up togetter, so I suggest to pm stephenmax for a TB adaptor plate. I did it and it fit like eom, trust me.

edit: BTW, I found out that the 2001 Infiniti QX4 TB fit better, cause it is a bit smaller from the outside.
I dont see how you felt a difference.
Most dont. Even us boosted guys. Im sure it helps, but only in the upper RPMS where us boosted guys begin moving a lot of air.
I have my MEVI port matched to my PF TB and I still cant say theres noticable gains. I wouldnt even think theres much for an NA motor to gain from it at all.
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #5  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
The only difference an NA motor might notice is in throttle response, and even then only very slightly, especially because the VQ30 at least has pretty decent throttle response to begin with.

Oh, and for the record, the VQ30 throttlebody is 62mm, if i remember right from my measurements. So it's not even a 10mm increase, it's only 8mm, even less
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #6  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Originally Posted by Flava_24/7
I dont see how you felt a difference.
Most dont. Even us boosted guys. Im sure it helps, but only in the upper RPMS where us boosted guys begin moving a lot of air.
I have my MEVI port matched to my PF TB and I still cant say theres noticable gains. I wouldnt even think theres much for an NA motor to gain from it at all.

Well, I'm 3.5, not mevi or boosted. But I can say that the VQ35 suck a with the 62 mm TB (thanks tatanko) of the 4th gen....
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 02:35 PM
  #7  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Originally Posted by rcintorino
if you don't have mevi or 00vi, will you notice a difference with the larger throtttle body?

Never tried...
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
Flava_24/7's Avatar
Boosted Panda
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,475
From: Austin TX
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
Well, I'm 3.5, not mevi or boosted. But I can say that the VQ35 suck a with the 62 mm TB (thanks tatanko) of the 4th gen....
Hmm, I wouldnt have imagined that the 3.5 would suck in more air then a boosted vehicle but if you say so.
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
matty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,163
From: Northern Jersey
Probably not worth the time, effort nor the money ($300 or so) for an N/A motor. Im sure if you have everything else on an N/A motor then might as well.

I think its ALOT more benifitial for boosted guys

-matt
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #10  
mastere954's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 477
From: pembroke pines, florida
thanks alot for the input guys.. i made up my mind and i am not going to go that route...
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #11  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Originally Posted by Flava_24/7
Hmm, I wouldnt have imagined that the 3.5 would suck in more air then a boosted vehicle but if you say so.
No man, you got me wrong...
I mean , well I did'nt want to say it like this at first, but I runned my 3.5 swap with the 4th gen TB for a while and it was sucking ***!
How bad was it?
Well I managed to run 15.8 in 2006 (VQ30) and last summer, I could'nt do better than 15.7 (VQ35)... 62mm was simply too small for the VQ35.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #12  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Doesn't sound like the throttlebody is the problem. An 8mm smaller throttlebody isn't much of a restriction. Many V8's come from the factory with smaller throttlebodies than the 4th gen one, MUCH smaller (i.e. Dodge 5.9).
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 02:48 PM
  #13  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Doesn't sound like the throttlebody is the problem. An 8mm smaller throttlebody isn't much of a restriction. Many V8's come from the factory with smaller throttlebodies than the 4th gen one, MUCH smaller (i.e. Dodge 5.9).
That wasn't the problem.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #14  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
So can anyone tell me why I felt an improvement right of the bat, WITHOUT CHANGING ANYTHING ELSE?

edit: Before someone ask, no dyno yet.

Last edited by 97_Roadrunner; Jan 29, 2008 at 11:21 PM.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 06:28 AM
  #15  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
So can anyone tell me why I felt an improvement right of the bat, WITHOUT CHANGING ANYTHING ELSE?

edit: Before someone ask, no dyno yet.
Because you have a 3.5L maybe? Not only that, but remember :
Originally Posted by Tatanko
The only difference an NA motor might notice is in throttle response
Which I also agree on this.

Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
edit: Before someone ask, no dyno yet.
Does that mean you have a back to back comparison re: different TB's? It's also hard to 'dyno' a change in throttle response.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #16  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
It's also hard to 'dyno' a change in throttle response.
Which is exactly why you can't prove and we can't refute any changes that throttlebody made to your car, more or less. Improved throttle response can give a false sense of additional power.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 12:13 PM
  #17  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Does that mean you have a back to back comparison re: different TB's? It's also hard to 'dyno' a change in throttle response.
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Which is exactly why you can't prove and we can't refute any changes that throttlebody made to your car, more or less. Improved throttle response can give a false sense of additional power.
I'll dyno for my a/f ratio. I dont plan to dyno for tb's.
I tried 3 different tb's: 4th gen stock, 4th gen ported and 01 QX4.
Stock and ported feel mostly identical, but the QX4 was simply better.
A friend of mine, max99 on the npclub.com, did dyno the 3.5 with a 62mm TB and could'nt go over 198whp. With a 70mm A33 TB, he is now at +/-210whp.

Honestly I dont think the TB is responsible for an 12 hp increase by itself on a n/a VQ35. It's a bit costly to make it happen ($250.00) and certainly not a bang for the buck as the y-pipe is but, I think it's still a must to have.

BTW: Glad to share here and argue in a constructive manner. I dont mind to be told wrong when I am.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #18  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
With a 70mm A33 TB
Did he custom fit the eGas? A33's do not have a 70mm TB, A33B's do, but it is electronic(hence the eGas comment )

Also, for all intents and purposes, our 'argument' is not really valid here since the OP most likely does not have a VQ35.

Last edited by NmexMAX; Jan 30, 2008 at 02:42 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #19  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Sorry, I forgot the "B". No, he did'nt fit the egas.
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #20  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
Sorry, I forgot the "B". No, he did'nt fit the egas.
So, he retrofitted it to be mechanical instead of electronic? Interesting. Did he use existing A32 hardware?
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #21  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Bingo! Just like me... the old fashion swap
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #22  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by 97_Roadrunner
Bingo! Just like me... the old fashion swap
You're using a QX4 (Essentially an 01 Pathy), and your friend has modified his A33B piece? Which one is easier/cheaper & overall more efficient?
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #23  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
You're using a QX4 (Essentially an 01 Pathy), and your friend has modified his A33B piece? Which one is easier/cheaper & overall more efficient?
Well, I would say they are as good, but the pathy cost $250.00 with stephenmax adaptor plate. The maxima tb cost $0 if it come with the engine.
You only need to spend few bucks to modify it. The pathy's tps is plug and play with the engine wiring, so it is the easiest to me.
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 06:27 AM
  #24  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Seems like the thing to do for swap candidates. I've been looking at some Mustang pieces on eBay to retrofit my eThrottle for my 03 on. 75mm
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #25  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Seems like the thing to do for swap candidates. I've been looking at some Mustang pieces on eBay to retrofit my eThrottle for my 03 on. 75mm
You would...
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #26  
97_Roadrunner's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 230
From: Laval, Québec (We speak french over here!)
You want to get rid of the egas?
75mm... sound promising!
Old Feb 1, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #27  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
No, can't get rid of it, but the servo motor on my unit looks fittable to that 'Stang unit.

Originally Posted by Tatanko
You would...
A special someone brought it to my attention, so like anything else that is said, I will explore it until I turn green.
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #28  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
No, can't get rid of it, but the servo motor on my unit looks fittable to that 'Stang unit.

A special someone brought it to my attention, so like anything else that is said, I will explore it until I turn green.
Dam* the all motor forum, dam*!
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #29  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
I'm actually working on an 82mm MAF adapter for my stock airbox. Berk's is a teency 70mm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
REDinLV
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
5
Aug 15, 2024 12:30 AM
trsandrew
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
17
Apr 8, 2016 06:45 PM
trsandrew
Group Deals / Sponsors Forum
2
Oct 25, 2015 02:47 PM
msellas
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 23, 2015 09:16 PM
bumpypickle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
Sep 20, 2015 08:22 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 PM.