4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Aackshun's Current MPG Thread

Old Jul 14, 2011 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Aackshun's Current MPG Thread

I guess I never posted this as a thread, I've said it multiple times before in other threads but now I have a direct link to point to cause I'm tired of explaining it....



Current figures are at

30 MPG city/34 MPG Highway

Current Setup:
6spd Manual w/ HLSD RS6F51H out of a '03 Sentra Spec V w/ 107k miles.
Lightweight (For a 6spd but not overall) FW from Fidanza
Unorthodox UDP
Bomz SRI
OBX 3.5 Headers for the 02-03
Magnaflow High Flow Cat
Cattman 3" Catback
17" G35C Rims 225/50f 235/45r
Full interior (Sortof )
No O2 Sensors
P/N Sensor Disconected
Gear Sensor thingy (forgot the name) disconnected

I've achieved up to 36 with this setup, but not consistent enough for me to say I get 36 highway (matter in fact it was before my O2 sensor wiring ate it I got 36, maybe I'll re-do it? Nahhhh, car runs more consistently w/o them).

I've been getting 35esque lately and higher city mpg, this may be due to the JWT pop charger, I need to take another mini road trip to confirm this.

I still have the record of 38mpg which has never been repeated, I drove 6hrs on less than a half of tank on gas (From OKC->Manhattan, KS), on a previous setup (25/27 one)

Previous Setups and their MPG

25/27mpg
Stock 5mt RS5F50A
Warpspeed Y-pipe+Exhaust leak mod
Magnaflow High Flow Cat
Bomz SRI
Unorthodox Racing UDP
Same Wheels.

27/29mpg
(Note: I was on this setup for an extremely short amount of time, these figures are guesses based on a few full tanks of gas)
RS5F50A
OBX 3.5 Headers
High Flow Cat
3" Catback
Bomz SRI
UDP
same wheels

So, you should go 6spd w/ your 4th gen and get that MPG yo
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
mista0406's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,392
From: New Orleans,La.
not bad numbers bro, thats really hard to achieve with a 12 year old ride very impressive my best numbers were 28/30
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 07:23 PM
  #3  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by mista0406
not bad numbers bro, thats really hard to achieve with a 12 year old ride very impressive my best numbers were 28/30
Awesome w/ the city mileage for an auto!!! That SC helpin out quite a bit I see!
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
mista0406's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,392
From: New Orleans,La.
Originally Posted by aackshun
Awesome w/ the city mileage for an auto!!! That SC helpin out quite a bit I see!
oh yes sir and no complaints at all until I floor it then it drops dramatically but overall my milage is tons better with this setup
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
schmellyfart's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,816
From: AZ
What rpms do you typically cruise at for both city and highway?
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 08:23 PM
  #6  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Highway 2.7-2.9k (77-83mph)

City I keep it around 2k, rarely go over 2.5, I do 2-4-6th (40mph+) or 2-4-5th(below 40mph) pending on the speed I plan on holding.

Last edited by aackshun; Jul 14, 2011 at 08:26 PM.
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 10:51 PM
  #7  
VQ'rInWLA's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,655
From: West Los Doin Tha Most
Biggest difference maker is that 6th gear!!

Last edited by VQ'rInWLA; Jul 14, 2011 at 11:21 PM.
Old Jul 14, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #8  
ef9's Avatar
ef9
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 689
From: Keaau, Hawaii
Did you factor in a correction for different diameter tires between stock and your current setup?
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:22 AM
  #9  
Snypa's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 7,389
From: I-75 4th_Laud
Originally Posted by VQ'rInWLA
Biggest difference maker is that 6th gear!!
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #10  
mightyMax95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 981
From: Houston, TX
i've gotten 34ish freewaywith only a y-pipe when i was still auto
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:34 AM
  #11  
mightyMax95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 981
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by VQ'rInWLA
Biggest difference maker is that 6th gear!!
meh. we have the short geared 6mt; 4.144, not 3.817. so the cruising benefits of gear 6 is minimal. what's helping out the most is the efficiency of a well built 6mt vs a 4auto.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 04:44 AM
  #12  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by VQ'rInWLA
Biggest difference maker is that 6th gear!!
I don't think so, see below.

Originally Posted by ef9
Did you factor in a correction for different diameter tires between stock and your current setup?
What'chu talkin about willis?

Originally Posted by mightyMax95
i've gotten 34ish freewaywith only a y-pipe when i was still auto
I've gotten 38 w/ only a y-pipe while I was 5mt

Originally Posted by mightyMax95
meh. we have the short geared 6mt; 4.144, not 3.817. so the cruising benefits of gear 6 is minimal. what's helping out the most is the efficiency of a well built 6mt vs a 4auto.
Now this is where I think the effieciency comes out, because of the short geared 6mt I have a lot of room to play with rpms keeping them at 2k while in the city.

Just think of it like this, while cruising around in your 5mt, remember I'm ALWAYS 500rpm lower, yet the gears are still shorter, so I'm not bogging the car.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:12 AM
  #13  
VQ'rInWLA's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,655
From: West Los Doin Tha Most
I need more revs to keep 70 on the freeway than you. 2.8 or so while 2.8 gets you to near 80.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:20 AM
  #14  
VisciousMo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 803
From: SATX-HTX
I envy your mileage
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:24 AM
  #15  
cashoit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,005
From: Worcester, MA
Originally Posted by aackshun

So, you should go 6spd w/ your 4th gen and get that MPG yo

Only if u promise to help me install .

But with the different gear ratios for the 6spd...i believe those numbers. THats pretty sweet Aack
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:27 AM
  #16  
VQ'rInWLA's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,655
From: West Los Doin Tha Most
I wants that mpg too. This may make me wanna do a 6mt swap when I 35 swap
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:27 AM
  #17  
IslandMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 608
From: NYC
Nice milage man. Jealous. You have sims for all of your o2s?
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:38 AM
  #18  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by VQ'rInWLA
I need more revs to keep 70 on the freeway than you. 2.8 or so while 2.8 gets you to near 80.
I think 2.8 is pretty much 80 lol. 3k is 85, I know that.

Originally Posted by VisciousMo
I envy your mileage
I mean well we have this 6spd from a sentra here... It has something written in arabic, I think in english its VICIOUS MO'S TRANNY.

Originally Posted by cashoit
Only if u promise to help me install .

But with the different gear ratios for the 6spd...i believe those numbers. THats pretty sweet Aack
Sure, if you'll house me up if I get lucky enough to buy that SE-L for sale in your area.

Originally Posted by VQ'rInWLA
I wants that mpg too. This may make me wanna do a 6mt swap when I 35 swap
DO EEET

Originally Posted by IslandMax
Nice milage man. Jealous. You have sims for all of your o2s?
No, I have CEL's for all of them though (Heater fuse is blown because of the fried wiring thanks to my headers)
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #19  
IslandMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 608
From: NYC
Haha and you still have great mileage, im about to burn mine too lol.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 10:49 AM
  #20  
felorojas14's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 309
From: South FL via NJ
Originally Posted by ef9
Did you factor in a correction for different diameter tires between stock and your current setup?

What he's saying is...

When we change our wheel/tire combo, we should try to match the same overall diameter as the stock setup. Otherwise, they'll be a marginal error in the speedometer reading.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 11:12 AM
  #21  
cashoit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,005
From: Worcester, MA
^^ there is a tire size calculator online that will tell u how muich differenece in speed vs speedometer when u change tire size.

I forget what the website name is
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 11:46 AM
  #22  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by ef9
Did you factor in a correction for different diameter tires between stock and your current setup?
Originally Posted by felorojas14
What he's saying is...

When we change our wheel/tire combo, we should try to match the same overall diameter as the stock setup. Otherwise, they'll be a marginal error in the speedometer reading.
And did either of you guys check my tire setup with the current rims? Or just post that to be saying that
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #23  
felorojas14's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 309
From: South FL via NJ
What'chu talkin about willis?



Originally Posted by aackshun
And did either of you guys check my tire setup with the current rims? Or just post that to be saying that

You asked Willis what he's was talking about, so I figured I'd to clear it up for him..lol..No I havent checked into your setup. However, it is one of many factors in reading mileage accurately. And this is what we're all are doing here, looking at every possible factor that could be affecting your mileage.

Correct me if I'm wrong but our cars are programmed to read miles based on the revolutions of our stock wheel diameter. And if it is altered by either bigger or smaller wheel diameter, the reading will not be accurate. That being said, your numbers could be even higher if your wheel diameter size is larger than stock because the odometer will read lower. Theres a mathematical formula out there that gives you the multiplication factor to get a mileage reading based off the diameter difference from stock to lets call it aftermarket wheels...
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #24  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by felorojas14
What'chu talkin about willis?






You asked Willis what he's was talking about, so I figured I'd to clear it up for him..lol..No I havent checked into your setup. However, it is one of many factors in reading mileage accurately. And this is what we're all are doing here, looking at every possible factor that could be affecting your mileage.

Correct me if I'm wrong but our cars are programmed to read miles based on the revolutions of our stock wheel diameter. And if it is altered by either bigger or smaller wheel diameter, the reading will not be accurate. That being said, your numbers could be even higher if your wheel diameter size is larger than stock because the odometer will read lower. Theres a mathematical formula out there that gives you the multiplication factor to get a mileage reading based off the diameter difference from stock to lets call it aftermarket wheels...
I'm kind of messing with you guys, I know what you guys all meant, just shocking that neither of you actually checked the tire sizes before even posting it.... 225/50/17 is slightly taller than stock, making my speedo read slower than it is, so in reality I'm getting better MPG than I state, but it's only off by so very little that I negate it.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:37 PM
  #25  
max_dreamer's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 987
From: Dallas, Texas
you suck... nuff said...
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #26  
QT1 5MT AE's Avatar
Gram Lights addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,528
From: CA
yo that 6th gear should have been granted with the introduction of DEK, nissan really slacked off in that department. everytime i hit 90mph it clearly feels like the powerband calls for another gear. sadly there is none to slam into @ 100mph like a true bad **** street racer LOL........... this is all stock too !

epic numbers. i know my stock 5th gen is easily capeable of 30mpg highway but to get that in the city is crazy.

Last edited by QT1 5MT AE; Jul 15, 2011 at 01:45 PM.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:45 PM
  #27  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by max_dreamer
you suck... nuff said...
Bring it bish, July 29th, or Early august, pick your poison....

Originally Posted by QT1 5MT AE
yo that 6th gear should have been granted with the introduction of DEK, nissan really slacked off in that department. everytime i hit 90mph it clearly feels like the powerband calls for another gear. sadly there is none to slam into @ 100mph like a true bad ***........... epic numbers. i know my stock 5th gen is easily capeable of 30mpg highway but to get that in the city is crazy.
Maybe with the 5.5's gearing, my gearing will not benefit the DE-K's lack of tq @ redline.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #28  
QT1 5MT AE's Avatar
Gram Lights addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,528
From: CA
thought the spec v 6spd was same as 5.5?
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:50 PM
  #29  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by QT1 5MT AE
thought the spec v 6spd was same as 5.5?
No, same as the 6th gen.

5.5s 6mt gearing is pretty much a 5MT w/ a 6th gear (cept 3rd is short and 4th is long)

6th gen/spec v gearing is close to your typical Honda with a taller 6th.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 01:53 PM
  #30  
QT1 5MT AE's Avatar
Gram Lights addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,528
From: CA
no experience with any of them. STI 6spd is where its at for me. shortttttttttt
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #31  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by QT1 5MT AE
no experience with any of them. STI 6spd is where its at for me. shortttttttttt
Just looked it up, I'm a tad bit longer than STI's but only a few mph per gear.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:23 PM
  #32  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
The most accurate mpg data is based on using up a full tank of gas. When the needle is on 1/2 tank quite a bit more than 1/2 tank has been consumed.

Op, do you have data based on several tankfuls of gas where the tank has been almost emptied. There is too much error involved in partial tank estimates given the variability on how full the tank is.

When I go on road trips I fill up to the point that the tank is right full, just not the 1st click and then I run it very low if I can. I have achieved more than 550 miles to a tank, ie. 31 mpg, several times.

My car is a Canadian model, a 95SE, 5-speed, with 87,333 mostly highway miles. It runs on the stock sawblades and the performance mods are a Budget stainless steel y-pipe and K&N panel filter. I used 0w30 synthetic oil and synthetic gear oil and over inflate my tires by 2 or 3 psi.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 02:40 PM
  #33  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Bobo
The most accurate mpg data is based on using up a full tank of gas. When the needle is on 1/2 tank quite a bit more than 1/2 tank has been consumed.

Op, do you have data based on several tankfuls of gas where the tank has been almost emptied. There is too much error involved in partial tank estimates given the variability on how full the tank is.

When I go on road trips I fill up to the point that the tank is right full, just not the 1st click and then I run it very low if I can. I have achieved more than 550 miles to a tank, ie. 31 mpg, several times.

My car is a Canadian model, a 95SE, 5-speed, with 87,333 mostly highway miles. It runs on the stock sawblades and the performance mods are a Budget stainless steel y-pipe and K&N panel filter. I used 0w30 synthetic oil and synthetic gear oil and over inflate my tires by 2 or 3 psi.
After driving to Manhattan, KS from Houston, TX over 15 times I've ascertained the accuracy of my needle and I know what MPG I'm getting based on my location and how much gas I've filled up with.

I knew there were going to be doubters, this is why i did not ask a question in my original post, it was a mere statement.

You can argue the numbers but you can not argue the facts, I can drive over 8hrs on one tank of gas (Houston, TX-> Wichita, KS used a smidge over 16 gallons and on my way back didn't get so good mpg Manhattan, KS to Ferris, TX used nearly 17.5 gallons), this was not possible when I had a 5mt (except that one fluke incident of nearly 38mpg, drove about 8hrs on that tank), I could only go from Houston->OKC and be on fumes (or Manhattan to Norman, OK)

Last edited by aackshun; Jul 15, 2011 at 02:44 PM.
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 04:39 PM
  #34  
maxxxdout's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 503
From: landofmakebelieve,nj
I need that MPG. I do alot of driving and right now my MPG suck a$$ compared to the numbers you guys are posting. Right now I'm gettin about 23 MPG on the highway. And the most I've ever gotten is 26 on the highway. The most I'll manage is around 360 on a tank of gas and it annoys me because when I had my 99 se-l auto I could get 450-500 depending on how much I put my right foot down.

I have warpspeed y, fidanza flywheel, stock exhaust, SRI, and right now I'm running my stock se 5 spokes.. I don't get it
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #35  
Haishun Boi Max's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 154
From: Geronimo, OK
I need to figure out y im not gettin that
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 09:24 PM
  #36  
Bobo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,187
So what distances are you quoting on those drives and gallons? What is the farthest you have driven on a tankful of gas? How many miles was the smidge over 16 gallons and the nearly 17.5 gallons? What is the terrain like?

My 550+ miles involves going from sea level to 6,000 feet in elevation, back down to 1,200 feet and the reverse coming home.

QUOTE=aackshun;8122584]After driving to Manhattan, KS from Houston, TX over 15 times I've ascertained the accuracy of my needle and I know what MPG I'm getting based on my location and how much gas I've filled up with.

I knew there were going to be doubters, this is why i did not ask a question in my original post, it was a mere statement.

You can argue the numbers but you can not argue the facts, I can drive over 8hrs on one tank of gas (Houston, TX-> Wichita, KS used a smidge over 16 gallons and on my way back didn't get so good mpg Manhattan, KS to Ferris, TX used nearly 17.5 gallons), this was not possible when I had a 5mt (except that one fluke incident of nearly 38mpg, drove about 8hrs on that tank), I could only go from Houston->OKC and be on fumes (or Manhattan to Norman, OK)[/QUOTE]
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #37  
italianbonez718's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 68
From: Westchester, NY
i get about 20 mpg in mixed city/highway driving. the farthest i went on a tank was 320 miles, and that was all highway.
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #38  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by italianbonez718
i get about 20 mpg in mixed city/highway driving. the farthest i went on a tank was 320 miles, and that was all highway.
you got some problems 4th Gens and 00-01 usually get 450-500+/tank....My modded 5.5th Gen can get 375-450 on the freeway depending on traffic, accidents, or cruisining speed usually 75-85 mph....
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 08:28 PM
  #39  
TreizeRXH's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 86
From: South Florida
Something else a lot of people need to consider when talking about gas mileage is the size of their rims. Lot's of people are not factoring in basic physics when it comes to rim sizes and tire sizes. The larger you go and the more physical tread that has to be pushed, the lower your mpg's are gonna be. Simply saying cause I know we got many people on these forums throwing 18's and up on cars that were designed to operate on 16's.

(of course I am aware that other set-ups, i.e. headers and exhaust, may negate this a bit, but it's something to consider)
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #40  
aackshun's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,398
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by Bobo
So what distances are you quoting on those drives and gallons? What is the farthest you have driven on a tankful of gas? How many miles was the smidge over 16 gallons and the nearly 17.5 gallons? What is the terrain like?

My 550+ miles involves going from sea level to 6,000 feet in elevation, back down to 1,200 feet and the reverse coming home.
it was like 580 miles, again these are rough guesses based on google maps because I did not write down the exact mileage and I do not remember where I got gas in Wichita.

On the way back down it was 540ish, again didn't write it down, I only kept track of it at the time.

The elevation in Manhattan, KS is 1,020 feet.

Houston is pretty much sea level.

I always get better MPG going up than going back (damn 91 octane? It's the only thing I can think of is the problem).

As for the rim thing....

I didn't drive on my mustang 16s that much but I did not notice an increase in MPG, maybe it was 1mpg at the MOST, I wish I coudl take a road trip on my other set of rims but I'm sure my drag radials won't like it too much....

Last edited by aackshun; Jul 16, 2011 at 09:56 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 AM.