alright, seriuosly, why is the 95 faster?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 6, 2002 | 07:16 PM

#41

brianw

Supporting Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 1,392

Yes, OBD-II was implemented for the 1995 model year, but it wasn't mandated until the 1996 model year.

May 6, 2002 | 07:24 PM

#42

Aaron

Langley AFB Sux

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 1,428

Heh....

Quote:

Originally posted by PejMax97SE
Their NOTT faster for the last time. Not even by a little bit. Not even by .1 second. Infact, a stock 95 5sp would be theoretically slower than a stock 98 or 99 5sp since the engine will have more miles.

Ok. I'll race ya with my 88k mile 95 SE

I'll even give you a head start.

May 6, 2002 | 08:15 PM

#43

CitrusSpeed

Member

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 185

gotta respect the 95 gotta respect the 95

May 6, 2002 | 10:09 PM

#44

JetBlackMax

Donating Maxima.org Member

iTrader: (12)

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 1,035

Quote:

Originally posted by iregula
sorry guys..but i have to =( on the 95-96....the back trunk is just naaaaaasty....taht groove in the back of the trunk just ruins the car. can't beat the trunk of the 97-99 that is what made maxima the maxima if you think about it...thats why 5th gen was misdesigned because that nice expensive looking trunk was ruined IMO

LMAO, as im reading this whole thread, i was thinking the same thing the whole time. The *** on the 95-96's are just to FAT lol. Thats why I like my 98's nice Tight ***, it gives it that more "Sporty" look.

May 6, 2002 | 10:31 PM

#45

ReichMax97

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 354

Yeah who cares about this minimal speed difference? The 97+ rear is so much better IMO. I like the way Maxima emblem is together instead of all spread out and the way the tail lights are set up is a lot more sharp looking than the fatness of the 95-96. Just my opinion though

May 6, 2002 | 11:36 PM

#46

Altimat

ActiveTuning Partner

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 157

I agree on the ugliness of the '95-'96 tails, and the '97-'99's aren't much better. Anybody ever consider shaving the portion of the taillights on the decklid? How do you think it would look?

May 7, 2002 | 02:00 AM

#47

SLC I30t

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: May 2001

Posts: 6,012

Well it isn't weight

I just went to Edmunds.com and they seem to have reported a whoping 9 lbs difference between cars. So lets go back to the drawing board after scratching the weight issue.

May 7, 2002 | 06:43 AM

#48

96SE5Spd

Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2002

Posts: 454

Re: Heh....

Quote:

Originally posted by Aaron95SE
Ok. I'll race ya with my 88k mile 95 SE I'll even give you a head start.

I wouldn't speak so soon, I have a 96 se 5spd with mods, I raced a 97 se Auto that was stock, I thought that my car would be able to beat it even if I gave it a head start and i couldn't catch up, I only gave it like a half a car length. I think that It was my Venom 400 that was causing the problem.