alright, seriuosly, why is the 95 faster?
#42
Heh....
Originally posted by PejMax97SE
Their NOTT faster for the last time. Not even by a little bit. Not even by .1 second. Infact, a stock 95 5sp would be theoretically slower than a stock 98 or 99 5sp since the engine will have more miles.
Their NOTT faster for the last time. Not even by a little bit. Not even by .1 second. Infact, a stock 95 5sp would be theoretically slower than a stock 98 or 99 5sp since the engine will have more miles.
#44
Originally posted by iregula
sorry guys..but i have to =( on the 95-96....the back trunk is just naaaaaasty....taht groove in the back of the trunk just ruins the car. can't beat the trunk of the 97-99 that is what made maxima the maxima if you think about it...thats why 5th gen was misdesigned because that nice expensive looking trunk was ruined IMO
sorry guys..but i have to =( on the 95-96....the back trunk is just naaaaaasty....taht groove in the back of the trunk just ruins the car. can't beat the trunk of the 97-99 that is what made maxima the maxima if you think about it...thats why 5th gen was misdesigned because that nice expensive looking trunk was ruined IMO
#45
Yeah who cares about this minimal speed difference? The 97+ rear is so much better IMO. I like the way Maxima emblem is together instead of all spread out and the way the tail lights are set up is a lot more sharp looking than the fatness of the 95-96. Just my opinion though
#48
Re: Heh....
Originally posted by Aaron95SE
Ok. I'll race ya with my 88k mile 95 SE I'll even give you a head start.
Ok. I'll race ya with my 88k mile 95 SE I'll even give you a head start.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HerpDerp1919
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
2
09-29-2015 02:02 PM