4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

RSX type S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2002 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
SlowJoeMax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 270
RSX type S

hey just wondering how fast the rsx type -s is, can a 4th gen keep up? whats the stats on them, i know they have 200 horse, so can they smoke a stock max?
Old May 31, 2002 | 07:02 PM
  #2  
4GRookie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 292
From: SGV, CA
I believe it runs a 14.8 1/4 mile. So I figure a 4th gen 5 speed with basic mods should keep up with it no problem...that is if the RSX is bone stock. I may be wrong though.
Old May 31, 2002 | 07:06 PM
  #3  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Re: RSX type S

Originally posted by SlowJoeMax
hey just wondering how fast the rsx type -s is, can a 4th gen keep up? whats the stats on them, i know they have 200 horse, so can they smoke a stock max?
welcome to the internet. you can find anything you want if you SEARCH FOR IT



Edmunds.com
From: "2001-2002 Sport Coupe Comparison Test, First Place - 2002 Acura RSX Type-S"
Author: Brent Romans & Liz Kim

"The RSX dominated the acceleration tests, earning a 0-to-60 time of 6.7 seconds and going past the quarter-mile mark in 15.2 seconds at 92.7 mph."


So you might run a 15.2 stock in the quarter mile. But you might get your a$$ handed to you as well
Old May 31, 2002 | 07:08 PM
  #4  
4GRookie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 292
From: SGV, CA
Re: Re: RSX type S

Originally posted by bags533


welcome to the internet. you can find anything you want if you SEARCH FOR IT



Edmunds.com
From: "2001-2002 Sport Coupe Comparison Test, First Place - 2002 Acura RSX Type-S"
Author: Brent Romans & Liz Kim

"The RSX dominated the acceleration tests, earning a 0-to-60 time of 6.7 seconds and going past the quarter-mile mark in 15.2 seconds at 92.7 mph."


So you might run a 15.2 stock in the quarter mile. But you might get your a$$ handed to you as well
Interesting...I thought I had read it ran a 15.2. I just checked car-stats.com and it said 14.8. I think 15.2 is more accurate.
Old May 31, 2002 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Re: Re: Re: RSX type S

Originally posted by 4GRookie

Interesting...I thought I had read it ran a 15.2. I just checked car-stats.com and it said 14.8. I think 15.2 is more accurate.
Well you know tracks vary and one time might be corrected for sea level. BUT they never tell you elevation or outside temp, they just put a number in your face.

But that's funny how we both came up with different times. But I guess that is real world, cars will run different times for different reasons.
Old May 31, 2002 | 08:09 PM
  #6  
SeBlackMax97's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 141
i raced a type s at the track when i was bone stock and he was getting 15.6 all night. why does everyone hype these cars up????? i think they are fugly!!
Old May 31, 2002 | 08:18 PM
  #7  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
I am not impressed w/ the RSX. Their #'s are similar to a 4th gen 5-speed max, the only difference is they are ugly. The integra was a better looking car. I raced one before any mods and we were dead even. He had some kind of exhaust. I would expect more from a light two door "sports car".
Old May 31, 2002 | 09:05 PM
  #8  
NotNew!!NewSN!!'s Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,078
Originally posted by I30tMikeD
I am not impressed w/ the RSX. Their #'s are similar to a 4th gen 5-speed max, the only difference is they are ugly. The integra was a better looking car. I raced one before any mods and we were dead even. He had some kind of exhaust. I would expect more from a light two door "sports car".
the thing that surprises me is i think i remember reading they are about 2750 pounds, thats only like over 250 less then us. they shoulda skimmed off some. i figure if i lose some weight ill smoke some in the 1/4
Old May 31, 2002 | 09:26 PM
  #9  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
If your correct about the weight then that is some bad engineering. The one thing about the Honda and Acura is they are great tuner cars. You'll get a lot more response to mods out of them.
Old May 31, 2002 | 10:01 PM
  #10  
JMAXIMA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 808
Re: RSX type S

Originally posted by SlowJoeMax
hey just wondering how fast the rsx type -s is, can a 4th gen keep up? whats the stats on them, i know they have 200 horse, so can they smoke a stock max?
i've seen them run an 1/8 consistenly between 10.1 and 10.4... pretty slow... same night i was running consistent 9.9's and my friend ran one 9.8 in his max
Old May 31, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #11  
Iron Lung's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 484
In the June Edition of Sport Compact Car they did a test of seven tuners for the RSX. They ran a 15.0@94.5 stock. Did anyone notice that on the DC sports rsx it had a intake, header and exhaust and it only ran a 14.9
Old May 31, 2002 | 10:29 PM
  #12  
Supermachoman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 689
Re: Re: RSX type S

Originally posted by bags533
welcome to the internet. you can find anything you want if you SEARCH FOR IT
Old May 31, 2002 | 11:55 PM
  #13  
97GLE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 647
Originally posted by I30tMikeD
If your correct about the weight then that is some bad engineering. The one thing about the Honda and Acura is they are great tuner cars. You'll get a lot more response to mods out of them.
Says who?

My friends Civic has Intake, Headers, Exaust and it didn't make all that much of a difference. $1000 bucks worth of parts made him about as fast as an SI.
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 02:16 AM
  #14  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Go to www.clubRSX.com and look at their OFFICIAL FASTEST 1/4 MILE TIMES thread.

14.61 is the quickest MODDED N/A RSX out there. Thats weaksauce if you ask me... give me an ITR any day.
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 03:43 AM
  #15  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Well I have seen a slow one, which I beat in a race on the superstreet tour last year. I have also seen one that had a FMIC and a smaller pulley.

Don't know what it ran in the 1/4 but it was fast.


Supermachcoman- I just clicked your sig pic and that was the funny and worthwhile
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 08:51 AM
  #16  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Originally posted by 97GLE


Says who?

My friends Civic has Intake, Headers, Exaust and it didn't make all that much of a difference. $1000 bucks worth of parts made him about as fast as an SI.

You know what, you might me right. My brother is huge into Hondas for a while now. I have heard him say this for years. I just recently started tuning my I30t so am new to this myself. He has put a lot of dough int to his 94 accord EX and I still blow his doors off. You hear something enough and you start to believe it. The more I learn about Hondas the less I like them, some exceptions, the S2000 and NSX.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trsandrew
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
17
Apr 8, 2016 06:45 PM
trsandrew
Group Deals / Sponsors Forum
2
Oct 25, 2015 02:47 PM
NismoMaxi02
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
1
Oct 4, 2015 09:09 PM
MichMaxFan
General Maxima Discussion
10
Sep 30, 2015 09:18 AM
TheMafia
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 08:26 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 AM.