Mustang GT or Maxima
10-23-2002, 04:37 PM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,019
Originally posted by scmaxima2k
if ur gonna get a stang, at least get a cobra, or even a saleen or roush(the only stangs i would ever own), but in my opinion ,i hate fords... Id go with either an SS or WS6... But if u like the stangs, go for it
if ur gonna get a stang, at least get a cobra, or even a saleen or roush(the only stangs i would ever own), but in my opinion ,i hate fords... Id go with either an SS or WS6... But if u like the stangs, go for it
10-23-2002, 05:23 PM
#42
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 17
Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
I have been toying with the idea of trading my Maxima in for an 03 Mach 1 or GT. I really like my Maxima, but want something RWD and modable. I have driven a 00 GT a couple years back and liked it, but not the insurance costs. What do you guys think I should do?
BTW....Brian please do not post in here
I have been toying with the idea of trading my Maxima in for an 03 Mach 1 or GT. I really like my Maxima, but want something RWD and modable. I have driven a 00 GT a couple years back and liked it, but not the insurance costs. What do you guys think I should do?
BTW....Brian please do not post in here
10-23-2002, 06:37 PM
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,461
Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by gumbo
I just wrecked my 94' gt Mustang and bought a 02' se Maxima. The cabin is less crowded (I have 2 teen-agers) and it is faster than my stock 94'. It is quieter and I can't wait to take a long trip in it. It is your choice but power-wise you will be ahead with the Maxima.
I just wrecked my 94' gt Mustang and bought a 02' se Maxima. The cabin is less crowded (I have 2 teen-agers) and it is faster than my stock 94'. It is quieter and I can't wait to take a long trip in it. It is your choice but power-wise you will be ahead with the Maxima.
10-23-2002, 06:41 PM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Originally posted by jjames
Just torque? JUST torque? Dude, torque wins races. The Max is pretty much tapped (NA) at 255 hp. The GTs V8 ain't even close to being maxed out. Some headers, a cam, and a little more work, and you have a true performance car.
That said, I find it odd that someone is trying to make a decision between these cars? It's just a strange comparison. What I mean is, you don't go to a Pizzaria when you're hungry for steak. They both taste good, they're just way different and not comparable.
Just torque? JUST torque? Dude, torque wins races. The Max is pretty much tapped (NA) at 255 hp. The GTs V8 ain't even close to being maxed out. Some headers, a cam, and a little more work, and you have a true performance car.
That said, I find it odd that someone is trying to make a decision between these cars? It's just a strange comparison. What I mean is, you don't go to a Pizzaria when you're hungry for steak. They both taste good, they're just way different and not comparable.
You had some great points there. Ford and GM aren't going to put V8's on the road with too much power... we already have enough teenagers who can't control them as it is. So yeah, the V8 will have a lot more potential. I think it all comes down to what is more important. The low rumble of a V8 or being able to fit you and your friends/family in the car.
Has anyone mentioned getting a 300zx TT? That is a real sports car, beautiful interior, and of course there is huge potential there with mods. After intake, exhuast, and ECU you are pushing 400 HP
10-23-2002, 07:09 PM
#45
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Max2000JP,
Get the Mustang. That friend of mine w/the 2000 V6 5spd Mustang has the "sporty" package and even it has a nice interior. Of course every mustang will feel more plasticy then a Maxima, but it is styled very nice and has some nice touches and comfortable and attractive leather seats. It has a big enough back seat to fit two people. (not necissarily comfortably ) I also love the way the shifters are slanted.
I am on the verge of selling my Maxima for a 94-95 Cobra with the 5.0L V8. The interiors are very sweet, I suggest you take a look at the 94-95 Cobra's. You could find a MINT one w/low miles and still have like $7,500 to spare. The 5.0 engines are tried and true, cheap to fix and work on, and very modable. Very reliable as well.
There is just something about a Cobra that gets people's attention. It's not just another Mustang. The 96-98 4.6L Modular Cobra's aren't as torquey as the 5.0's down low, but have better mid-high end power. The '99 Cobra's as you probubly know where majorly overrated by Ford, but are still awesome and very modable.
I suggest you look into some Cobra's before you buy into a GT. GT's are a dime a dozen, but Cobra's are very rare and are big attention/respect getters. No matter how nice the GT is, it's still just another GT.
Good luck man.
Get the Mustang. That friend of mine w/the 2000 V6 5spd Mustang has the "sporty" package and even it has a nice interior. Of course every mustang will feel more plasticy then a Maxima, but it is styled very nice and has some nice touches and comfortable and attractive leather seats. It has a big enough back seat to fit two people. (not necissarily comfortably
) I also love the way the shifters are slanted.I am on the verge of selling my Maxima for a 94-95 Cobra with the 5.0L V8. The interiors are very sweet, I suggest you take a look at the 94-95 Cobra's. You could find a MINT one w/low miles and still have like $7,500 to spare. The 5.0 engines are tried and true, cheap to fix and work on, and very modable. Very reliable as well.
There is just something about a Cobra that gets people's attention. It's not just another Mustang. The 96-98 4.6L Modular Cobra's aren't as torquey as the 5.0's down low, but have better mid-high end power. The '99 Cobra's as you probubly know where majorly overrated by Ford, but are still awesome and very modable.
I suggest you look into some Cobra's before you buy into a GT. GT's are a dime a dozen, but Cobra's are very rare and are big attention/respect getters. No matter how nice the GT is, it's still just another GT.
Good luck man.
10-23-2002, 08:15 PM
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Max2000JP,
I am on the verge of selling my Maxima for a 94-95 Cobra with the 5.0L V8. The interiors are very sweet, I suggest you take a look at the 94-95 Cobra's. You could find a MINT one w/low miles and still have like $7,500 to spare. The 5.0 engines are tried and true, cheap to fix and work on, and very modable. Very reliable as well.
There is just something about a Cobra that gets people's attention. It's not just another Mustang. The 96-98 4.6L Modular Cobra's aren't as torquey as the 5.0's down low, but have better mid-high end power. The '99 Cobra's as you probubly know where majorly overrated by Ford, but are still awesome and very modable.
I suggest you look into some Cobra's before you buy into a GT. GT's are a dime a dozen, but Cobra's are very rare and are big attention/respect getters. No matter how nice the GT is, it's still just another GT.
Good luck man.
Max2000JP,
I am on the verge of selling my Maxima for a 94-95 Cobra with the 5.0L V8. The interiors are very sweet, I suggest you take a look at the 94-95 Cobra's. You could find a MINT one w/low miles and still have like $7,500 to spare. The 5.0 engines are tried and true, cheap to fix and work on, and very modable. Very reliable as well.
There is just something about a Cobra that gets people's attention. It's not just another Mustang. The 96-98 4.6L Modular Cobra's aren't as torquey as the 5.0's down low, but have better mid-high end power. The '99 Cobra's as you probubly know where majorly overrated by Ford, but are still awesome and very modable.
I suggest you look into some Cobra's before you buy into a GT. GT's are a dime a dozen, but Cobra's are very rare and are big attention/respect getters. No matter how nice the GT is, it's still just another GT.
Good luck man.
10-23-2002, 08:55 PM
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
It's all about what You want. If you are really liking the GT and can get it at a great price then go for it and don't look back. Just be sure to start modding that thing so you don't get picked on by any 4 door grocery getters
10-23-2002, 09:03 PM
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 539
Looks like he made his mind up even b4 he started the thread. Had we known that we would have been better off looking at other threads. Good luck with the Stanger. Again, as I stated last night, as a prior GT owner, YOU'LL BE SORRY, VERY SORRY. Happy modding, get some seat covers b4 you get that car, the leather will crack soon. Torquey engine, no refinement. Just like everything in life, it's all a matter of tradeoffs. Guess if I was young again, I'd probably be driving one too, no matter what.
10-23-2002, 09:44 PM
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Originally posted by pezking4
a modded 02 6 speed could pick on a stock 03 GT... you guys are waiting on your y pipes right?
a modded 02 6 speed could pick on a stock 03 GT... you guys are waiting on your y pipes right?
I havent made up mind if I want to keep the Maxima or get a new car yet. I would like a 350z, but havent driven one. Next on my list a GT. The reason that the GT is appealing is the price and modabilty. I can get a GT using Ford's X plan AND get the current rebate thats out($1000).
10-24-2002, 01:03 AM
#54
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 878
well ... from a dead stop the GT has a MUCH better chance against a 2k2 6spd, from a roll, the GT will lose, and i dont think ANYONE would argue with that, stock vs stock. Trap speeds dont lie. 350Z traps like 102mph, that would beat a stock GT.
10-24-2002, 03:00 PM
#55
Originally posted by SkylineGTR
well ... from a dead stop the GT has a MUCH better chance against a 2k2 6spd, from a roll, the GT will lose, and i dont think ANYONE would argue with that, stock vs stock. Trap speeds dont lie. 350Z traps like 102mph, that would beat a stock GT.
well ... from a dead stop the GT has a MUCH better chance against a 2k2 6spd, from a roll, the GT will lose, and i dont think ANYONE would argue with that, stock vs stock. Trap speeds dont lie. 350Z traps like 102mph, that would beat a stock GT.
10-24-2002, 03:15 PM
#56
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 878
races from a roll, trap speed indicates the winner, not torque. GTPs has more than 50ftlbs more than a 5spd pre 2k2 maxima and from a roll the maxima can usually pull away, stock vs stock. S2000 has 150ftlbs less torque than a Mustang GT, but from a roll all my money is on the S2000. Again traps speeds tell what the car is truly capable of.
10-24-2002, 04:03 PM
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Like I said before; horsepower wins a race, torque wins the burnout contest.
Looking at the trap speed is the best way to tell how the cars will compare from a roll. The Maxima being front wheel drive makes it difficult to be the best from a dead stop
Looking at the trap speed is the best way to tell how the cars will compare from a roll. The Maxima being front wheel drive makes it difficult to be the best from a dead stop
10-24-2002, 04:36 PM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 612
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by pezking4
Go with the Mach 1 or even better... a 03 Cobra
Go with the Mach 1 or even better... a 03 Cobra
10-24-2002, 05:06 PM
#61
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 23
Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
I have been toying with the idea of trading my Maxima in for an 03 Mach 1 or GT. I really like my Maxima, but want something RWD and modable. I have driven a 00 GT a couple years back and liked it, but not the insurance costs. What do you guys think I should do?
BTW....Brian please do not post in here
I have been toying with the idea of trading my Maxima in for an 03 Mach 1 or GT. I really like my Maxima, but want something RWD and modable. I have driven a 00 GT a couple years back and liked it, but not the insurance costs. What do you guys think I should do?
BTW....Brian please do not post in here
10-24-2002, 05:36 PM
#62
Re: Re: Actually A much better choice...
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Really? Not if you want any type of warranty.
Really? Not if you want any type of warranty.
10-24-2002, 06:17 PM
#63
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 84
Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by GLE02NJ
my friend owns a 2002 mustang gt and it's fast and everything, but it makes a lot of noise. If you can bare that, go for it. Also, the cabin feels a lot different than a maxima. If you have a family, this car is not for you because there virtually is no back seat! If you want something RWD have you considered the Infiniti G35? It costs less than a Mach 1 but more than a Mustang GT. You also get comfort and reliability with it unlike FORD.
But if you like that muscle car sound/grunt, a mustang gt is for you. You will feel every part of the road though, but you get power..until 30,000 miles when the engine fails
my friend owns a 2002 mustang gt and it's fast and everything, but it makes a lot of noise. If you can bare that, go for it. Also, the cabin feels a lot different than a maxima. If you have a family, this car is not for you because there virtually is no back seat! If you want something RWD have you considered the Infiniti G35? It costs less than a Mach 1 but more than a Mustang GT. You also get comfort and reliability with it unlike FORD.
But if you like that muscle car sound/grunt, a mustang gt is for you. You will feel every part of the road though, but you get power..until 30,000 miles when the engine fails
10-24-2002, 06:23 PM
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Re: Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by ford5litre
My 14-year-old Mustang GT convertible has had way fewer problems than my "high quality, Japanese made" Maxima.
My 14-year-old Mustang GT convertible has had way fewer problems than my "high quality, Japanese made" Maxima.
10-24-2002, 06:50 PM
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Actually A much better choice...
Originally posted by ghostwhisper
Would be to get a 95 M3 and throw a turbo charger on it.....
-GW
Would be to get a 95 M3 and throw a turbo charger on it.....
-GW
10-24-2002, 06:54 PM
#66
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 84
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by pezking4
Have you had that car for most of those 14 years? I think it's all about how well you maintain your car, besides the occasional lemon car.
Have you had that car for most of those 14 years? I think it's all about how well you maintain your car, besides the occasional lemon car.
paint chips
3 Bose stereos
paint chips
ever-increasing rattles
power sunroof sticks
sunroof visor cracking
3 recalls
did I say paint chips?
warped rotors
engine clatters on start up
I think I am forgetting one
10-24-2002, 06:57 PM
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by ford5litre
did I say paint chips?
did I say paint chips?
I wasn't saying your max was a lemon. I had a Ford Escort that was though. But my first car was a 1982 F150 and I still see it on the streets running fine even after I sold it. There's no reason to think every single domestic is going to break down after a few years.
10-24-2002, 06:57 PM
#68
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
A lot of people dont realize that Nissan Quality is below average. If you read the industry reports you will find Nissan at the bottom and Infinti near the top. Many domestic Brands were above Nissan. If I can find the article, I will give you more info.
10-24-2002, 07:18 PM
#70
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 84
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mustang GT or Maxima
Originally posted by pezking4
I wasn't saying your max was a lemon. I had a Ford Escort that was though. But my first car was a 1982 F150 and I still see it on the streets running fine even after I sold it. There's no reason to think every single domestic is going to break down after a few years.
I wasn't saying your max was a lemon. I had a Ford Escort that was though. But my first car was a 1982 F150 and I still see it on the streets running fine even after I sold it. There's no reason to think every single domestic is going to break down after a few years.
10-24-2002, 07:23 PM
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Re: wow
Originally posted by GLE02NJ
wow, this thread has turned into nissan bashing and ford praising.
What were the chances of this?
wow, this thread has turned into nissan bashing and ford praising.
What were the chances of this?
Over 160,000 miles and the engine is so strong. My uncles old 3rd gen was at 250,000 miles before he sold it. So Nissan does have some quality to their vehicles obviously.
10-24-2002, 08:15 PM
#72
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 68
nissan maxima has one of the top reliability ratings out of all mid-size sedans. Ford taurus and impalas? near the bottom but Ford's paint job sure beats nissans. I have paint falling off hood like its melting in small areas and the nissan dealership rapes you where I live. My mom's windstar still has perfect paint and it has 160,000 miles on it and the ford service department is the nicest people ever.
10-24-2002, 08:17 PM
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,208
Originally posted by nycmax2002
nissan maxima has one of the top reliability ratings out of all mid-size sedans. Ford taurus and impalas? near the bottom but Ford's paint job sure beats nissans. I have paint falling off hood like its melting in small areas and the nissan dealership rapes you where I live. My mom's windstar still has perfect paint and it has 160,000 miles on it and the ford service department is the nicest people ever.
nissan maxima has one of the top reliability ratings out of all mid-size sedans. Ford taurus and impalas? near the bottom but Ford's paint job sure beats nissans. I have paint falling off hood like its melting in small areas and the nissan dealership rapes you where I live. My mom's windstar still has perfect paint and it has 160,000 miles on it and the ford service department is the nicest people ever.
10-24-2002, 08:26 PM
#74
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Re: wow
Originally posted by pezking4
Oh I'll spend all day praising my Nissan, don't worry about that.
Over 160,000 miles and the engine is so strong. My uncles old 3rd gen was at 250,000 miles before he sold it. So Nissan does have some quality to their vehicles obviously.
Oh I'll spend all day praising my Nissan, don't worry about that.
Over 160,000 miles and the engine is so strong. My uncles old 3rd gen was at 250,000 miles before he sold it. So Nissan does have some quality to their vehicles obviously.
Any well maintained modern engine will last long.
10-24-2002, 08:33 PM
#75
Re: Re: Re: wow
I won't say a thing in regards to the typical Japanese made car VS the typical American made car. Just refer to any Consumer reports for automobile reliablity.
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
I love my Maxima, but people on this site dont realize the facts sometimes. Nissan's Quality is poor and isnt getting better.
Any well maintained modern engine will last long.
I love my Maxima, but people on this site dont realize the facts sometimes. Nissan's Quality is poor and isnt getting better.
Any well maintained modern engine will last long.
10-24-2002, 08:34 PM
#76
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Re: Re: Re: wow
Originally posted by Jeff92se
I won't say a thing in regards to the typical Japanese made car VS the typical American made car. Just refer to any Consumer reports for automobile reliablity.
I won't say a thing in regards to the typical Japanese made car VS the typical American made car. Just refer to any Consumer reports for automobile reliablity.
10-24-2002, 08:51 PM
#77
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow
JD powers is only customer satisfaction. Consumer reports is the car's reliability. There's a big difference. I was browsing GM's stats for the Camaro and Trans Am. Good lord, the whole damn page was full black dots. How can an automaker build crap that bad?
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
JD Power is the material to look at.
JD Power is the material to look at.
10-24-2002, 08:52 PM
#78
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow
Originally posted by Jeff92se
JD powers is only customer satisfaction. Consumer reports is the car's reliability. There's a big difference. I was browsing GM's stats for the Camaro and Trans Am. Good lord, the whole damn page was full black dots. How can an automaker build crap that bad?
JD powers is only customer satisfaction. Consumer reports is the car's reliability. There's a big difference. I was browsing GM's stats for the Camaro and Trans Am. Good lord, the whole damn page was full black dots. How can an automaker build crap that bad?
10-24-2002, 09:07 PM
#79
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow
Well I don't know what you are getting at but the consumer reports on most of the big 3 automaker is shamefull. You really think the JD power's survey is any different. For example for the Camaro, what's the difference between abosolutely dismal and slightly less dismal? I really don't think even if JD liked the Camaro(and any other domestic), could even be up to sub ave with the Japanese cars.
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
JD power also does Quality studies also....You have to read trade magazines to find them though.
JD power also does Quality studies also....You have to read trade magazines to find them though.
10-24-2002, 09:10 PM
#80
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,151
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: wow
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Well I don't know what you are getting at but the consumer reports on most of the big 3 automaker is shamefull. You really think the JD power's survey is any different. For example for the Camaro, what's the difference between abosolutely dismal and slightly less dismal? I really don't think even if JD liked the Camaro(and any other domestic), could even be up to sub ave with the Japanese cars.
Well I don't know what you are getting at but the consumer reports on most of the big 3 automaker is shamefull. You really think the JD power's survey is any different. For example for the Camaro, what's the difference between abosolutely dismal and slightly less dismal? I really don't think even if JD liked the Camaro(and any other domestic), could even be up to sub ave with the Japanese cars.
As a Company, Nissan is near the bottom in quality. It is no where near Honda or Toyota. And recently a few GM brands have surpassed Nissan in quality ratings, per JD power.