Impressions on Apexi Filter.....
#41
Originally posted by Jakester
Kloogy and all, I see a lot of posts about these CAI's, most seem to be put in SE's. I have a GXE and wonder if the same setup will fit in mine, I would like the Frankencar/Apexi combo.
Kloogy and all, I see a lot of posts about these CAI's, most seem to be put in SE's. I have a GXE and wonder if the same setup will fit in mine, I would like the Frankencar/Apexi combo.
#42
I've run my car with and without a filter and there is NO measureable difference in ET or MPH. Period. It's all in your head. A filter is a filter.
Kloogy, wasn't your 60' siginificantly worse with the Injen? A .3 seconds difference in 60' can account for a solid .5-.6 seconds and 2-3mph difference in the 1/4 mile, especially if the car short shifted in 2nd. What was your 60' with the Injen and then with the other intake?
*EDIT*
Nevermind, I found it. Your 14.8@94 had a 2.25 60' and the Injen 15.3@90 had a 2.39 60'. The 60' difference in 60' alone will suck out .3 seconds and a good 1-2mph. With the same 60 foots, the performance between the two intakes is within .2 and 2mph which is within reason between hot-lapping runs, especially with an auto (harder to get consistent shifts). Unfortunately you never ran twice with the Injen so we'll never know if it truely was the fault of the Injen. There just isn't enough data here to say that the Injen is truely junk.
Dave
Kloogy, wasn't your 60' siginificantly worse with the Injen? A .3 seconds difference in 60' can account for a solid .5-.6 seconds and 2-3mph difference in the 1/4 mile, especially if the car short shifted in 2nd. What was your 60' with the Injen and then with the other intake?
*EDIT*
Nevermind, I found it. Your 14.8@94 had a 2.25 60' and the Injen 15.3@90 had a 2.39 60'. The 60' difference in 60' alone will suck out .3 seconds and a good 1-2mph. With the same 60 foots, the performance between the two intakes is within .2 and 2mph which is within reason between hot-lapping runs, especially with an auto (harder to get consistent shifts). Unfortunately you never ran twice with the Injen so we'll never know if it truely was the fault of the Injen. There just isn't enough data here to say that the Injen is truely junk.
Dave
#43
Originally posted by Dave B
There just isn't enough data here to say that the Injen is truely junk.
Dave
There just isn't enough data here to say that the Injen is truely junk.
Dave
#44
Hey, cali speedway opens this saturday if you want to check out your times. When are you getting nitroused again?
Originally posted by kloogy
I never said it was junk. My car felt like **** when I ran it . Well, I just posted my opinions.... to each his own... we settle these things at the strip anyway !
I never said it was junk. My car felt like **** when I ran it . Well, I just posted my opinions.... to each his own... we settle these things at the strip anyway !
#46
Originally posted by Neal728
For those of you who have this filter where did you buy it and what was the price? I am tired of my K&N, it doesn't have the same kick it did 5k ago.
For those of you who have this filter where did you buy it and what was the price? I am tired of my K&N, it doesn't have the same kick it did 5k ago.
#47
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
#48
Originally posted by Virus
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
#49
Originally posted by Hobert
Whats wrong with an Elantra??
Whats wrong with an Elantra??
#51
Originally posted by Virus
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
I still dispute that the Apexi gives any hp over a K&N or JWT. Removing your filter at the track does nothing, so how can a different filter do anything (unless it is dirty)?
#52
well after reading all of this, i think i might get the filter and pipe. quick ? before I do, are the "supposed" HP gains going to be there with stock exhaust. Also, it seems in the pics that most people have removed the funnel that brings air into the air box. wouldn't it be better to leave it in place to bring in colder air?
#53
I posted this link quite awhile back. Why do you think FrankenCar offers this filter
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
Filters are very comparable....so basically "a filter is a filter". K&N is the leader in aftermarket automotive filtration systems and basically started the craze. I would like to see some second party data stating that the Apexi filters air better. I personally would trust K&N over Apexi because of their years of experience in racing, particularly in Off Roading(Baja).
I still dispute that the Apexi gives any hp over a K&N or JWT. Removing your filter at the track does nothing, so how can a different filter do anything (unless it is dirty)?
Filters are very comparable....so basically "a filter is a filter". K&N is the leader in aftermarket automotive filtration systems and basically started the craze. I would like to see some second party data stating that the Apexi filters air better. I personally would trust K&N over Apexi because of their years of experience in racing, particularly in Off Roading(Baja).
I still dispute that the Apexi gives any hp over a K&N or JWT. Removing your filter at the track does nothing, so how can a different filter do anything (unless it is dirty)?
#54
Originally posted by Neal728
Does anyone remember the site that had K&N filters on the cheap? I remember a site a while back for filters that was a ton less than @ a store. Anyone?
Does anyone remember the site that had K&N filters on the cheap? I remember a site a while back for filters that was a ton less than @ a store. Anyone?
http://www.ajusa.com/cgi-bin/knfilte..._num=33-2031-2
#55
If K&N floats your boat then I think you should stick with them. I've had both and the Apexi is a considerably better made filter. I'm not doing the search here to find the links to the comparisons from 3rd parties, but if you so wish to there are several reviews here that show more hp and better filtration.
#56
Originally posted by Virus
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
Steve did do dyno runs and the Apexi gave 4hp more than the K&N. As far as "a filter is a filter", that's got to be the dumbest statement I've heard in quite some time. The Apexi filters out considerably more dirt than the K&N. A car is just a car so why not buy a Hyundai Elantra?
When good filters are compared to one another, a filter is just a filter. K&N, HKS, APEXI, Greddy, etc are all good filters. Some filter better than others, but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
#58
Originally posted by Dave B
but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
#59
Originally posted by Dave B
Guess you've never dynoed a car before. I've seen swings in power of 5hp between back to back runs if the motor isn't cooled fully. How someone can honestly say that a difference in 2-3hp on the dyno with a different filter can be called a gain is beyond me. When looking at the final numbers, we're talking about a difference of less than 1% in power. There is a thing called dyno error and heat soak.
When good filters are compared to one another, a filter is just a filter. K&N, HKS, APEXI, Greddy, etc are all good filters. Some filter better than others, but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
Guess you've never dynoed a car before. I've seen swings in power of 5hp between back to back runs if the motor isn't cooled fully. How someone can honestly say that a difference in 2-3hp on the dyno with a different filter can be called a gain is beyond me. When looking at the final numbers, we're talking about a difference of less than 1% in power. There is a thing called dyno error and heat soak.
When good filters are compared to one another, a filter is just a filter. K&N, HKS, APEXI, Greddy, etc are all good filters. Some filter better than others, but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
#60
Originally posted by Virus
Agreed. I had problems with my K&N, resulting in a horrible drone, kinda like a ricer civic with a oil barrel muffler and it was under all rpms. The car also seem to give out of hmmfff around 5-5k rpm. The K&N only had 5k or so miles on it and the filter wasn't very dirty. After installing the Apexi, these problems went away and MY car feels like it pulls a tad harder all the way up to redline without any of the drone sound. It just sounds great and it's not oiled!
Agreed. I had problems with my K&N, resulting in a horrible drone, kinda like a ricer civic with a oil barrel muffler and it was under all rpms. The car also seem to give out of hmmfff around 5-5k rpm. The K&N only had 5k or so miles on it and the filter wasn't very dirty. After installing the Apexi, these problems went away and MY car feels like it pulls a tad harder all the way up to redline without any of the drone sound. It just sounds great and it's not oiled!
Dave
#61
Originally posted by Dave B
Maybe the Apexi has a better resonance-reducing design or better internal velocity stack? Did the K&N have a velocity stack?
Dave
Maybe the Apexi has a better resonance-reducing design or better internal velocity stack? Did the K&N have a velocity stack?
Dave
Neal728 RR-3003 is the K&N with the velocity stack in it, i dont remember the number for the on that came with my berk intake.
http://www.ajusa.com/cgi-bin/knfilte...rt_num=RR-3003
#63
Huh? K&N air filters don't need replacing. You clean, reoil and reinstall.
Originally posted by Neal728
Thanks for the info. I think for 50 bucks for the K&N that needs replacing every 12k or so, or the Apexi that needs replacing every 30k for 110 bucks, I'll go with the Apexi when I replace my K&N, which is in about 4k.
Thanks for the info. I think for 50 bucks for the K&N that needs replacing every 12k or so, or the Apexi that needs replacing every 30k for 110 bucks, I'll go with the Apexi when I replace my K&N, which is in about 4k.
#65
Originally posted by Dave B
Maybe the Apexi has a better resonance-reducing design or better internal velocity stack? Did the K&N have a velocity stack?
Dave
Maybe the Apexi has a better resonance-reducing design or better internal velocity stack? Did the K&N have a velocity stack?
Dave
#66
Vibrant air filter
Just reveived my intake order from FirmFabrication and notice that the filter is manufactured by Vibrant Performance.
http://www.stylincompacts.com/parts....rtfamilyid/647
They Vibrant performanace filter also have a similar Funnel Ram Filter like the Apexi filter and is warranty for 100,000 miles.
http://www.stylincompacts.com/parts....rtfamilyid/646
You guys should try this brand out!
http://www.stylincompacts.com/parts....rtfamilyid/647
They Vibrant performanace filter also have a similar Funnel Ram Filter like the Apexi filter and is warranty for 100,000 miles.
http://www.stylincompacts.com/parts....rtfamilyid/646
You guys should try this brand out!
#67
Re: Re: Re: Re: Impressions on Apexi Filter.....
Originally posted by 02MaximizedVQ
Does anyone know if an Injen CAI setup has ever caused an MAF failure in a 2k2. I postulate that with the filter further down stream of the maf, there was be a lower incidence of failure. I have had my injen for about 4000 miles now and no problems. But the filter does look awfully small.
The Apexi filter will fit an Injen CAI, but according to an email Steve sent me it will cost about $110 for filter and brackets. Plus as previously stated, there were 2 MAF failures during the use of this filter. I'm beginning to think it may be b/c of vibration instead of oil.
Jesse
Does anyone know if an Injen CAI setup has ever caused an MAF failure in a 2k2. I postulate that with the filter further down stream of the maf, there was be a lower incidence of failure. I have had my injen for about 4000 miles now and no problems. But the filter does look awfully small.
The Apexi filter will fit an Injen CAI, but according to an email Steve sent me it will cost about $110 for filter and brackets. Plus as previously stated, there were 2 MAF failures during the use of this filter. I'm beginning to think it may be b/c of vibration instead of oil.
Jesse
#68
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Impressions on Apexi Filter.....
Originally posted by Bulldawg
Has anyone installed the Apexi on the Injen yet. I know you "say it will fit" but has anyone actually done it
Has anyone installed the Apexi on the Injen yet. I know you "say it will fit" but has anyone actually done it
#69
The performance gain you feel is probably a placebo effect, unless your original filter was dirty. I have done some G-tech testing with my JWT vs No Filter and there was no measureable difference.
To those of you with a JWT or Stillen and have access to a dyno, try to dyno your car with just a 3" inlet tube and no filter, then again with a velocity stack attached with no filter, there might be a difference.
Personally, I would buy the apexi. 1) In theory, there should be gains...+/- 1hp? 2) It has the best filtration according to the test on the web site. 3) Everytime I pick up a car magazine in japanese, guess what filter I see in front of turbos on R34s, RX7s, etc. most of the time...the apexi.
Has anyone installed the Apexi on the Injen yet. I know you "say it will fit" but has anyone actually done it
#71
I thought I remembered reading that the 00-01 MAFs were of better quality. A few other things I've seen...
1) people switching from K&N to Apexi on the Frankencar setup have had MAF failures...
2) buying a 00-01 MAF as the replacement is a possible solution...
What I haven't found is the price for a replacement, or if it's still under warranty, I assume we can just throw back on the stock airbox and everything and limp our way back to the dealer, yeah?
I do like the long time BTW changes of the Apexi, and the good reports from some .org members, but the MAF failure scares me.
1) people switching from K&N to Apexi on the Frankencar setup have had MAF failures...
2) buying a 00-01 MAF as the replacement is a possible solution...
What I haven't found is the price for a replacement, or if it's still under warranty, I assume we can just throw back on the stock airbox and everything and limp our way back to the dealer, yeah?
I do like the long time BTW changes of the Apexi, and the good reports from some .org members, but the MAF failure scares me.
#72
I've run my car with and without a filter and there is NO measureable difference in ET or MPH. Period.
#73
Does anyone know if any other car line has experienced blown MAFs like our Maximas? Are our MAF's unbelieveably cheap? None of this makes sense
#74
Originally posted by Dave B
Guess you've never dynoed a car before. I've seen swings in power of 5hp between back to back runs if the motor isn't cooled fully. How someone can honestly say that a difference in 2-3hp on the dyno with a different filter can be called a gain is beyond me. When looking at the final numbers, we're talking about a difference of less than 1% in power. There is a thing called dyno error and heat soak.
When good filters are compared to one another, a filter is just a filter. K&N, HKS, APEXI, Greddy, etc are all good filters. Some filter better than others, but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
Guess you've never dynoed a car before. I've seen swings in power of 5hp between back to back runs if the motor isn't cooled fully. How someone can honestly say that a difference in 2-3hp on the dyno with a different filter can be called a gain is beyond me. When looking at the final numbers, we're talking about a difference of less than 1% in power. There is a thing called dyno error and heat soak.
When good filters are compared to one another, a filter is just a filter. K&N, HKS, APEXI, Greddy, etc are all good filters. Some filter better than others, but their performance in terms of HP/TQ is the pretty much the same.
Dave
Originally posted by MichaelAE
A half second with a filter change? That's ri-god-damn-diculous actually. Kloogy...I like you my man...but that is REALLY hard to believe.
A half second with a filter change? That's ri-god-damn-diculous actually. Kloogy...I like you my man...but that is REALLY hard to believe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
James92SE
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
142
01-02-2024 10:23 AM
Dasmith
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
09-23-2015 09:28 PM