PR CAI Dyno Results
#1
PR CAI Dyno Results
Hey. I've finally gotten the Max dyno'd. The results of the PR CAI were as follows.
HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.
How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.
Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.89 @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 238.13 ft/lbs @ 3350 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E
Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results
Edit: The numbers have been adjusted slightly as I now have the results rounded to the nearest hundredth instead of tenth.
HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.
How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.
Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.89 @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 238.13 ft/lbs @ 3350 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E
Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results
Edit: The numbers have been adjusted slightly as I now have the results rounded to the nearest hundredth instead of tenth.
#5
Re: PR CAI Dyno Results
Originally posted by studman
Hey. I've finally gotten the Max dyno'd. The results of the PR CAI were as follows.
HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.
How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.
Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.0 @ 3300 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 239.7 ft/lbs @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E
Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results
Hey. I've finally gotten the Max dyno'd. The results of the PR CAI were as follows.
HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.
How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.
Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.0 @ 3300 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 239.7 ft/lbs @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E
Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results
#8
KL99SEA: Dislexia kicked in. I've fixed the numbers. Sorry about that.
Maximam: How is what?
The numbers are stated based on the dyno. I was very shocked to see the results as well. I thought that the HP was going to be higher than it was, and didn't think that the Torque was going to be as high. I think I may call PR and see if their dyno resulted in the same increase in torque. +20 ft/lbs of torque is a HUGE gain for just having a CAI and a Muffler. I'm also investigating other mufflers and cat-backs to see if there would be more gains there.
Maximam: How is what?
The numbers are stated based on the dyno. I was very shocked to see the results as well. I thought that the HP was going to be higher than it was, and didn't think that the Torque was going to be as high. I think I may call PR and see if their dyno resulted in the same increase in torque. +20 ft/lbs of torque is a HUGE gain for just having a CAI and a Muffler. I'm also investigating other mufflers and cat-backs to see if there would be more gains there.
#11
Maximam/VQMAN: To be honest, I don't know. I've got a call in to Place Racing to see if they yeilded the same gains as I did. If they didn't, then I don't know how to explain it. I do know this... I have a 2002 SE with the MAF from a 2003 SE. That could be part of the equation... but I'm not sure. The results were as much a shock to me as they are to you.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by studman
Maximam/VQMAN: To be honest, I don't know. I've got a call in to Place Racing to see if they yeilded the same gains as I did. If they didn't, then I don't know how to explain it. I do know this... I have a 2002 SE with the MAF from a 2003 SE. That could be part of the equation... but I'm not sure. The results were as much a shock to me as they are to you.
Maximam/VQMAN: To be honest, I don't know. I've got a call in to Place Racing to see if they yeilded the same gains as I did. If they didn't, then I don't know how to explain it. I do know this... I have a 2002 SE with the MAF from a 2003 SE. That could be part of the equation... but I'm not sure. The results were as much a shock to me as they are to you.
-vq
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 09:54 AM
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
04-16-2020 05:15 AM
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
03-12-2020 12:06 AM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
03-12-2018 06:48 PM