PR CAI Dyno Results

Subscribe
Jan 9, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
Hey. I've finally gotten the Max dyno'd. The results of the PR CAI were as follows.

HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.

How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.

Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.89 @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 238.13 ft/lbs @ 3350 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E

Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results

Edit: The numbers have been adjusted slightly as I now have the results rounded to the nearest hundredth instead of tenth.
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 03:52 PM
  #2  
thats alot of torque
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #3  
Good amount of torque for sure.,
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #4  
Are you sure you stated the RPM's correctly? Peak HP is at 5000 and peak tourqe is at 3000 I hope. Peak HP at 3000 is not right.
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 05:41 PM
  #5  
Re: PR CAI Dyno Results
Quote:
Originally posted by studman
Hey. I've finally gotten the Max dyno'd. The results of the PR CAI were as follows.

HP was increased +4 HP.
Torque was increased +20 ft/lbs.

How this happened? I dunno. I don't have the stock dynos available anymore, so I can't post the actual dynos for the stock run, but you can compare them with other runs just for a rough guestimate.

Results from the best of 3 runs:
Max HP = 209.0 @ 3300 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Max Torque = 239.7 ft/lbs @ 5000 RPM (SAE Adjusted)
Temperature = 74.3 °F
Barometric Pressure = 29.92-0.39 in.Hg.
Altitude = 96 ft
Correction Factor = 0.99
DynoJet Model = 248E

Click here for a link to the scanned images of the results
so how does this measure up to the nissan hp/tq ratings?
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #6  
That's a ton of torque!!!

It is surprising how flat HP stays from 5000-6100rpms and then falls off like an anvil.


Dave
Reply
Jan 9, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #7  
How is that?
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 08:09 AM
  #8  
KL99SEA: Dislexia kicked in. I've fixed the numbers. Sorry about that.

Maximam: How is what?

The numbers are stated based on the dyno. I was very shocked to see the results as well. I thought that the HP was going to be higher than it was, and didn't think that the Torque was going to be as high. I think I may call PR and see if their dyno resulted in the same increase in torque. +20 ft/lbs of torque is a HUGE gain for just having a CAI and a Muffler. I'm also investigating other mufflers and cat-backs to see if there would be more gains there.
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 09:41 AM
  #9  
Quote:
Originally posted by studman


Maximam: How is what?

That big of a torque gain from just a muffler/intake?
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 09:41 AM
  #10  
is that a normal torque gain for CAI?

-vq
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #11  
Maximam/VQMAN: To be honest, I don't know. I've got a call in to Place Racing to see if they yeilded the same gains as I did. If they didn't, then I don't know how to explain it. I do know this... I have a 2002 SE with the MAF from a 2003 SE. That could be part of the equation... but I'm not sure. The results were as much a shock to me as they are to you.
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 10:09 AM
  #12  
Keep us posted
Reply
Jan 10, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #13  
Quote:
Originally posted by studman
Maximam/VQMAN: To be honest, I don't know. I've got a call in to Place Racing to see if they yeilded the same gains as I did. If they didn't, then I don't know how to explain it. I do know this... I have a 2002 SE with the MAF from a 2003 SE. That could be part of the equation... but I'm not sure. The results were as much a shock to me as they are to you.
if that's a normal gain, I might break down and buy one...

-vq
Reply
Subscribe