Rough idle at startup
#1
Did a search could not find it. My question is has anyone had this problem and if so know how to fix it.
Regardless of the temp or if the car is warm or cold when I start up the Max it misfires for about 15 seconds then smooths out. I talked to the dealer and they said that was normal. That never happend to our '96 GLE and I find it hard to believe a $28K car is suppose to misfire.
Has anyone had this problem, and do you know how I can fix it or what I should tell the dealer?
Mark
Regardless of the temp or if the car is warm or cold when I start up the Max it misfires for about 15 seconds then smooths out. I talked to the dealer and they said that was normal. That never happend to our '96 GLE and I find it hard to believe a $28K car is suppose to misfire.
Has anyone had this problem, and do you know how I can fix it or what I should tell the dealer?
Mark
#2
Try this:
Rather than sticking the key in and cranking the engine right away. Turn the key to the on position and wait for the diagnostic lights to go out before starting up the engine (~5-7 seconds). Waiting that amount of time will allow the fuel pump to pressurize fully. Then crank it up, and see if the engine is still rough.
Rather than sticking the key in and cranking the engine right away. Turn the key to the on position and wait for the diagnostic lights to go out before starting up the engine (~5-7 seconds). Waiting that amount of time will allow the fuel pump to pressurize fully. Then crank it up, and see if the engine is still rough.
#3
alot of us have that problem
so I guess that makes it "normal". I have been on diag twice for that. There were no stored error codes so the dealer couldnt do anything (or wouldnt). Although they said I might have fuel fouled plugs. They said that as rich as the car runs at startup, it was easy to foul them. They offered to replace them. But where all weird about it, saying the dealership would pay for it because Nissan wouldnt. The car stopped doing it for awhile so I never rescheduled (actually this was at 2000 miles and I think they asked me to wait til 4000 as they thought it would go away with breakin... and I kinda forgot to go back).
Generally, it only happens if you start the car for a short time, then park it for 30 mins or more. My car also does this if it sits more than 72 hours. It doesnt do it on every startup. Most of the time its ok. Almost everyone agrees it gets better as the car gets broken in. Mine did. It was almost non existant past 7500 miles. but the 72 hour startups are still pretty rough.
if you see a 'service' light on the dash while this is happening, then the dealer has codes and can investigate. if not, then their hands are tied (by Nissan)
Generally, it only happens if you start the car for a short time, then park it for 30 mins or more. My car also does this if it sits more than 72 hours. It doesnt do it on every startup. Most of the time its ok. Almost everyone agrees it gets better as the car gets broken in. Mine did. It was almost non existant past 7500 miles. but the 72 hour startups are still pretty rough.
if you see a 'service' light on the dash while this is happening, then the dealer has codes and can investigate. if not, then their hands are tied (by Nissan)
#4
Thanks Tim/UMD
I will see if it goes away, I hate bringing the car into the dealer, they usually mess something else up trying to fix it. My car has 7000 miles on it now, I will wait and see what happends.
UMD, I'll try that, it just concerns me because my 96 GLE never missed a beat in 95,000 miles. I wonder why I would have to treat the 2k1 GLE any different? I sometimes wonder if the quality is better in a '96-'99 Max.
Mark
UMD, I'll try that, it just concerns me because my 96 GLE never missed a beat in 95,000 miles. I wonder why I would have to treat the 2k1 GLE any different? I sometimes wonder if the quality is better in a '96-'99 Max.
Mark
#5
there are alot of differences from 96...
like intake, exhaust, emissions, and compression ratio...
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
#6
Re: there are alot of differences from 96...
Originally posted by TimW
like intake, exhaust, emissions, and compression ratio...
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
like intake, exhaust, emissions, and compression ratio...
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
Mark
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: there are alot of differences from 96...
You are not supose to run lower than 91+ Octane. That is a main cause why your car will run rough.
Originally posted by Maximam
I run 87 octane at 5200 ft. The 91 octane just burns too slow up here in Colorado.
Mark
Originally posted by TimW
like intake, exhaust, emissions, and compression ratio...
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
like intake, exhaust, emissions, and compression ratio...
also, check the obvious.. bad gas. Change stations and wait 2 tanks to decide. and of course get the good stuff 91+. If youre running lower than 91, than your just asking for that roughness (retarded timing).
Mark
#9
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Re: Re: Re: there are alot of differences from 96...
Originally posted by Russ2kSE
You are not supose to run lower than 91+ Octane. That is a main cause why your car will run rough.
You are not supose to run lower than 91+ Octane. That is a main cause why your car will run rough.
FUEL RECOMMENDATION
Unleaded premium gasoline with an octane rating of at least 91 AKI (Anti-Knock Index) number (Research octane number 96).
If unleaded premium gasoline is not available, unleaded regular gasoline with an octane rating of at least 87 AKI (Research octane number 91) can be used.
However, for maximum vehicle performance, the use of unleaded premium gasoline is recommended.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: Re: there are alot of differences from 96...
Right but its not recommened. I used it for a short period to try out, and the car got extremly weak as well as when it started it knocked, also seemed to have a little more trouble to start.
Never again I will do that....hehee...
Never again I will do that....hehee...
Originally posted by y2kse
Not true, Russ. Here's what the owner's manual says:
FUEL RECOMMENDATION
Unleaded premium gasoline with an octane rating of at least 91 AKI (Anti-Knock Index) number (Research octane number 96).
If unleaded premium gasoline is not available, unleaded regular gasoline with an octane rating of at least 87 AKI (Research octane number 91) can be used.
However, for maximum vehicle performance, the use of unleaded premium gasoline is recommended.
Originally posted by Russ2kSE
You are not supose to run lower than 91+ Octane. That is a main cause why your car will run rough.
You are not supose to run lower than 91+ Octane. That is a main cause why your car will run rough.
FUEL RECOMMENDATION
Unleaded premium gasoline with an octane rating of at least 91 AKI (Anti-Knock Index) number (Research octane number 96).
If unleaded premium gasoline is not available, unleaded regular gasoline with an octane rating of at least 87 AKI (Research octane number 91) can be used.
However, for maximum vehicle performance, the use of unleaded premium gasoline is recommended.
#11
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Posts: 4,728
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: there are alot of differences from 96...
Originally posted by Russ2kSE
Right but its not recommened. I used it for a short period to try out, and the car got extremly weak as well as when it started it knocked, also seemed to have a little more trouble to start.
Never again I will do that....hehee...
Right but its not recommened. I used it for a short period to try out, and the car got extremly weak as well as when it started it knocked, also seemed to have a little more trouble to start.
Never again I will do that....hehee...
Go figure.
#12
Octane
here in Colorado is 2 points lower than say California because it burns slower with the lack of pressure and oxygen density. We have 85-87-91 octane instead of 87-89-93. I would assume using 87 octane here is the same as using 89 at sea level. But then I read this and feel 87 octane in the Rockys is ok:
The higher the altitude above sea level, the lower the octane requirement. Modern computer-controlled engines adjust spark timing and air-fuel ratio to compensate for changes in barometric pressure, and thus the effect of altitude on octane requirement is smaller in these vehicles.
But I am still in question. Maybe I should use 91 octane and that would be like using 93 octane at sea level?
What do you think?
Mark
The higher the altitude above sea level, the lower the octane requirement. Modern computer-controlled engines adjust spark timing and air-fuel ratio to compensate for changes in barometric pressure, and thus the effect of altitude on octane requirement is smaller in these vehicles.
But I am still in question. Maybe I should use 91 octane and that would be like using 93 octane at sea level?
What do you think?
Mark
#13
Re: Octane
Originally posted by Maximam
here in Colorado is 2 points lower than say California because it burns slower with the lack of pressure and oxygen density. We have 85-87-91 octane instead of 87-89-93. I would assume using 87 octane here is the same as using 89 at sea level. But then I read this and feel 87 octane in the Rockys is ok:
The higher the altitude above sea level, the lower the octane requirement. Modern computer-controlled engines adjust spark timing and air-fuel ratio to compensate for changes in barometric pressure, and thus the effect of altitude on octane requirement is smaller in these vehicles.
But I am still in question. Maybe I should use 91 octane and that would be like using 93 octane at sea level?
What do you think?
Mark
here in Colorado is 2 points lower than say California because it burns slower with the lack of pressure and oxygen density. We have 85-87-91 octane instead of 87-89-93. I would assume using 87 octane here is the same as using 89 at sea level. But then I read this and feel 87 octane in the Rockys is ok:
The higher the altitude above sea level, the lower the octane requirement. Modern computer-controlled engines adjust spark timing and air-fuel ratio to compensate for changes in barometric pressure, and thus the effect of altitude on octane requirement is smaller in these vehicles.
But I am still in question. Maybe I should use 91 octane and that would be like using 93 octane at sea level?
What do you think?
Mark
Dave
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
01-04-2024 07:01 PM
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
04-02-2016 05:42 AM