Regular Gas (87) working the same as Premium (93) !!??
Originally posted by MiniRX7
I bet you, if you were to run the engine harder, you will experience loss of power, as the engine retards the timeing to compensate for the lower octane..
mind you the 3.5L engine and the 3.0L engines are of a higher compression requiring the higher octane to prevent from preignition or pinging..
Even if there was improved fuel economy, for the piece of mind, i would stick with the higher octane... Pinging is bad, and for the most part, to the untrained ear, you will not be able to detect this damage to your engine..
And to top it off.. if Nissan ever finds out that you run lower octane gas, and as a result damage your engine, it will not be covered under warranty as it is considered neglect, and not a manufacturers defect..
ED
WHY IS MY SIG NOT SHOWING UP?
I bet you, if you were to run the engine harder, you will experience loss of power, as the engine retards the timeing to compensate for the lower octane..
mind you the 3.5L engine and the 3.0L engines are of a higher compression requiring the higher octane to prevent from preignition or pinging..
Even if there was improved fuel economy, for the piece of mind, i would stick with the higher octane... Pinging is bad, and for the most part, to the untrained ear, you will not be able to detect this damage to your engine..
And to top it off.. if Nissan ever finds out that you run lower octane gas, and as a result damage your engine, it will not be covered under warranty as it is considered neglect, and not a manufacturers defect..
ED
WHY IS MY SIG NOT SHOWING UP?
Re: Re: THANK YOU!! The ignorance around here is AMAZING!!!
Originally posted by ABS
I tend to agree with what you are saying, but here's a possible explanation too . . . What would happen if we put in 93 octane, even though Nissan calls for 91 octane and the computer doesn't add sufficient advance? In that example spark will occur as dictated by the computer program, but peak power from the combustion of the air/fuel mix might not occur precisely at TDC. Instead, it might happen after TDC due to the slower burn from the higher octane fuel. This could definitely cause a loss of power since the piston would already be on its down stroke by the time the peak energy was being released . . .
We know the ECM can retard timing, but can it advance it too? If so, how much? Any thoughts?
I tend to agree with what you are saying, but here's a possible explanation too . . . What would happen if we put in 93 octane, even though Nissan calls for 91 octane and the computer doesn't add sufficient advance? In that example spark will occur as dictated by the computer program, but peak power from the combustion of the air/fuel mix might not occur precisely at TDC. Instead, it might happen after TDC due to the slower burn from the higher octane fuel. This could definitely cause a loss of power since the piston would already be on its down stroke by the time the peak energy was being released . . .
We know the ECM can retard timing, but can it advance it too? If so, how much? Any thoughts?
OEM engineers want to squeeze out every degree of advance possible, so the ECU is going to be tuned for MAXIMUM performance/emissions within a SAFETY margin. If you run lower ocatane, you are just playing with that little safety margin that's been designed into the system.
Lower octane allows faster/longer flame propagation, which with the same advance will produce more power to a point. However, if ANY condition causes enough detonation, like going up hill on a hot day with the A/C on, that bish is going to ping and lose power baaaaad. I'm not saying it will hurt anything mechanically, but the ECU will retard the timing and your performance will suck.
Re: 2003 user's manual sez 87 ok
Originally posted by code_slinger
The 2003 SE user's manual says it is OK to use as low as 87 octane gasoline, but they _recommend_ premium fuel. I will look up the page no tomorrow for those who want it.
The 2003 SE user's manual says it is OK to use as low as 87 octane gasoline, but they _recommend_ premium fuel. I will look up the page no tomorrow for those who want it.

so all that other crap is

I am halfway thru my 'test' tank of 89 octane... so far, just a little bit more mileage than using 93.
-R
Re: Re: 2003 user's manual sez 87 ok
Originally posted by 255HP_03_SE

so all that other crap is
I am halfway thru my 'test' tank of 89 octane... so far, just a little bit more mileage than using 93.
-R

so all that other crap is

I am halfway thru my 'test' tank of 89 octane... so far, just a little bit more mileage than using 93.
-R
I also checked my owner's manual and it too states that you can use 87 octane but for improved performance, to use 91 octane. I have tried premium, 93 octane, for about a month and did not notice any difference between 93 and 87 octance. Actually my mileage decreased with premium gas. I get about 25mpg driving in the suburbs without any highway driving.
I think too many people are worried about all of this octane stuff. Since the manual states that 87 octance if fine, why send more for something you don't need.
I think too many people are worried about all of this octane stuff. Since the manual states that 87 octance if fine, why send more for something you don't need.
If you don't push the car too hard into the upper RPM band (or total engine load w/ accessories on), then you will get slightly better mileage with the 87 octane. Our engine doesn't make it's peak power at a low RPM, so for maximum performance, you have to use the higher octane stuff.
If you do all your shifting and driving at or below 3500 RPM, then the low ocatane gas will give you better gas mileage (due to it's burn characteristics vs. the 91+ octane gas). The flash points for 87 octane and 93 octane are different (IIRC), so that in and of itself should lead you all to the same thought process that I am currently on. If you have the patience, try driving like "grandma" for a month on the 87, and then drive like "grandma" again on the 93. I bet 87 gets you better mileage.
If you do all your shifting and driving at or below 3500 RPM, then the low ocatane gas will give you better gas mileage (due to it's burn characteristics vs. the 91+ octane gas). The flash points for 87 octane and 93 octane are different (IIRC), so that in and of itself should lead you all to the same thought process that I am currently on. If you have the patience, try driving like "grandma" for a month on the 87, and then drive like "grandma" again on the 93. I bet 87 gets you better mileage.
Originally posted by Quicksilver
If you don't push the car too hard into the upper RPM band (or total engine load w/ accessories on), then you will get slightly better mileage with the 87 octane. Our engine doesn't make it's peak power at a low RPM, so for maximum performance, you have to use the higher octane stuff.
If you do all your shifting and driving at or below 3500 RPM, then the low ocatane gas will give you better gas mileage (due to it's burn characteristics vs. the 91+ octane gas). The flash points for 87 octane and 93 octane are different (IIRC), so that in and of itself should lead you all to the same thought process that I am currently on. If you have the patience, try driving like "grandma" for a month on the 87, and then drive like "grandma" again on the 93. I bet 87 gets you better mileage.
If you don't push the car too hard into the upper RPM band (or total engine load w/ accessories on), then you will get slightly better mileage with the 87 octane. Our engine doesn't make it's peak power at a low RPM, so for maximum performance, you have to use the higher octane stuff.
If you do all your shifting and driving at or below 3500 RPM, then the low ocatane gas will give you better gas mileage (due to it's burn characteristics vs. the 91+ octane gas). The flash points for 87 octane and 93 octane are different (IIRC), so that in and of itself should lead you all to the same thought process that I am currently on. If you have the patience, try driving like "grandma" for a month on the 87, and then drive like "grandma" again on the 93. I bet 87 gets you better mileage.

I'm thinking 87-octane would shine more during winter driving also, but the summer vs. winter blend would make that impossible to test.
I know 91-octane is a must for summers here. You can hear cars ping baaaad out of stoplights. Higher octane will help performance AND fuel economy during hot stop-n-go driving.
Originally posted by IceY2K1
Good point! Never thought about that.
I'm thinking 87-octane would shine more during winter driving also, but the summer vs. winter blend would make that impossible to test.
I know 91-octane is a must for summers here. You can hear cars ping baaaad out of stoplights. Higher octane will help performance AND fuel economy during hot stop-n-go driving.
Good point! Never thought about that.

I'm thinking 87-octane would shine more during winter driving also, but the summer vs. winter blend would make that impossible to test.
I know 91-octane is a must for summers here. You can hear cars ping baaaad out of stoplights. Higher octane will help performance AND fuel economy during hot stop-n-go driving.
Originally posted by Quicksilver
I had to learn the hard way on my T/C'ed '70 Beetle (hybrid). Turbos and carbs don't always work very well together (lots of money on dyno time). The engine could rev to 8K RPM, but on the street I set the limiter to 5500 and used only 87 octane. When I took her to the strip, it was 93 (or sometimes AVGas, 100 octane) and set the limit to the mechanical safe max of 8K RPM. Made some mad power, even past 6K RPM. Nothing like the old school aircooled VW engines...cheap, easy to work on, and tons of power per liter!
I had to learn the hard way on my T/C'ed '70 Beetle (hybrid). Turbos and carbs don't always work very well together (lots of money on dyno time). The engine could rev to 8K RPM, but on the street I set the limiter to 5500 and used only 87 octane. When I took her to the strip, it was 93 (or sometimes AVGas, 100 octane) and set the limit to the mechanical safe max of 8K RPM. Made some mad power, even past 6K RPM. Nothing like the old school aircooled VW engines...cheap, easy to work on, and tons of power per liter!
That's sick!A guy I knew in college had a TC'd beetle and that thing was MEAN. It would break traction at full boost. FUNNY to see the azz end kick out.
Originally posted by IceY2K1
That's sick!
A guy I knew in college had a TC'd beetle and that thing was MEAN. It would break traction at full boost. FUNNY to see the azz end kick out.
That's sick!A guy I knew in college had a TC'd beetle and that thing was MEAN. It would break traction at full boost. FUNNY to see the azz end kick out.
2nd tank of 87 octane in my 2000 se
Originally posted by Quicksilver
I switched from 91 octane two tanks ago to 87 octane. 1st tank was fine with no noticable effects. 2nd tank pinging from stop lights with a/c on and under acceleration whether it be slow or hard. going back to 91 next tank.
Thanks,
Coen
Yeah...scare the crap out of any car on the road! I also liked the instant wheelie when DOT's were on the back. I couldn't keep the front wheels down on launches over 3000 RPM. That tends to distract the guy in the lane next to you
I switched from 91 octane two tanks ago to 87 octane. 1st tank was fine with no noticable effects. 2nd tank pinging from stop lights with a/c on and under acceleration whether it be slow or hard. going back to 91 next tank.
Thanks,
Coen
Yeah...scare the crap out of any car on the road! I also liked the instant wheelie when DOT's were on the back. I couldn't keep the front wheels down on launches over 3000 RPM. That tends to distract the guy in the lane next to you
Originally Posted by sascuderi
Three weeks ago the gas station attendant (Yes I live in NJ where self-serve is still illegal!) by mistake filled my 2000 I30 with Regular gas! Since my 95 Max I have always used premium to get the best performance and gas milage, as has been discussed here before.
I was all ready to pump the tank dry, and was ready for a week of slow performance and pings. Well surprise... the car is running better! I couldn't belive it, so after the tank was dry I filled it up with regular again!
On Regular, no unusal pings, acceleration seems faster, and MPG is the same, if not alittle better (On mixed driving I got 28.8MPG, usually I get 25)
I know this is not supposed to happen. All I can figure is that maybe the premium gas is "older" than the regular since it likely sits longer becasue it isn't sold as quickly as the less expensive regular.I have read that if gas sits too long it begins to break down.
So, we should all switch to regular this summer and post our performance results and MPG. Maybe we can all save, without hurting our VQ's! Anyone else using 87 on a regular basis?
I was all ready to pump the tank dry, and was ready for a week of slow performance and pings. Well surprise... the car is running better! I couldn't belive it, so after the tank was dry I filled it up with regular again!
On Regular, no unusal pings, acceleration seems faster, and MPG is the same, if not alittle better (On mixed driving I got 28.8MPG, usually I get 25)
I know this is not supposed to happen. All I can figure is that maybe the premium gas is "older" than the regular since it likely sits longer becasue it isn't sold as quickly as the less expensive regular.I have read that if gas sits too long it begins to break down.
So, we should all switch to regular this summer and post our performance results and MPG. Maybe we can all save, without hurting our VQ's! Anyone else using 87 on a regular basis?
I agree with you, I found the same problem that premium is "older" than other grade fuel. For not to be extreme, I am using #89
Originally Posted by 00Max00
I agree with you, I found the same problem that premium is "older" than other grade fuel. For not to be extreme, I am using #89
Heh heh...then you're in for a nasty shock when I tell you that 89 is a mix of 87 and 93 (or whatever octane is your highest)...so you're still getting the "older" gas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VQ'ed
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
69
Aug 27, 2020 12:29 PM
jerrod99_se-l
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
Aug 27, 2015 08:27 PM





