5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

me v.s. monte ss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
maxgsxr1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
me v.s. monte ss

we were doing about 80 and both floored it. he was in front of me at the start and i closed up the gap and hit the brakes before bumping him at about 110 mph. if we started out side by side i would have walked him slowly. i think it was supercharged too . it had stock dual chrome tips and looked brand new.
Old Jun 27, 2003 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
MxdOut97's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 828
Re: me v.s. monte ss

Originally posted by maxgsxr1
i think it was supercharged too . it had stock dual chrome tips and looked brand new.
yes, the ss monte carlo and impala both have the same supercharded 3.8 liter engine ....w/ 240 hp and 280 lb-ft of torque
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 01:40 AM
  #3  
HitManSE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,965
I would hope it was S/C's the normal monte's are dogs. Ive taken one by several car lenghts be4. (lost count of how many, atleast 5-6 too far too tell) It basically needs the S/C to redeem itself, they are indeed alot slower then the GP's w/o a s/c
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 02:45 AM
  #4  
SilverChrome03's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 208
I don't think that the supercharged Montes and Impallas are out yet ? are they ? From what i had read, the're scheduled to be out sometime this fall.

The current version of the Monte SS has the 200 horsepower n/a 3.8. The Impalla has the same n/a 3.8 with 200 hp.

Bob
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 03:19 AM
  #5  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
Originally posted by SilverChrome03
I don't think that the supercharged Montes and Impallas are out yet ? are they ? From what i had read, the're scheduled to be out sometime this fall.

The current version of the Monte SS has the 200 horsepower n/a 3.8. The Impalla has the same n/a 3.8 with 200 hp.

Bob
...those things are dogs..
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 06:48 AM
  #6  
02MaximaSE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 816
Originally posted by HitManSE
I would hope it was S/C's the normal monte's are dogs. Ive taken one by several car lenghts be4. (lost count of how many, atleast 5-6 too far too tell) It basically needs the S/C to redeem itself, they are indeed alot slower then the GP's w/o a s/c


I've taken alot of the 3.8L SS monte carlo's and impalas.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 07:05 AM
  #7  
SilverChrome03's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 208
Originally posted by 02MaximaSE




I've taken alot of the 3.8L SS monte carlo's and impalas.
You are able to take "ALL" of them.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
jeepik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,232
there is no supercharged monte carlo

that SS pos has 200 HP and is heavy as ****.... it is slower then a 3rd Gen Maxima GXE...

edit just read on chevy.com the supercharged montecarlo will come out in the fall of this year( and it has the GTP tuned down engine) it will be no competition to 5th gen Max
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 09:59 AM
  #9  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by jeepik

edit just read on chevy.com the supercharged montecarlo will come out in the fall of this year( and it has the GTP tuned down engine) it will be no competition to 5th gen Max
...except when Monte guys upgrade that SC pulley, which makes them slightly quicker than VQ35 Maximas (at least it does with the GTP). But HEY!! It's still only a Chevy.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 10:31 AM
  #10  
jeepik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,232
Originally posted by F23A4


...except when Monte guys upgrade that SC pulley, which makes them slightly quicker than VQ35 Maximas (at least it does with the GTP). But HEY!! It's still only a Chevy.
we're talking stock to stock here

i could start listing pages of cheap mods to get the max much faster too
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 03:05 PM
  #11  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by jeepik


we're talking stock to stock here

i could start listing pages of cheap mods to get the max much faster too
HOWEVER, forced induction almost ALWAYS has an advantage when it comes to performance modification responsiveness.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 03:12 PM
  #12  
thrasher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 217
Originally posted by F23A4


HOWEVER, forced induction almost ALWAYS has an advantage when it comes to performance modification responsiveness.
3.8 S/C is easily modded, and will rape a pre 2k2, will handily beat a 2k2 Auto and even 6 sp. in some cases
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 07:46 PM
  #13  
00MaxSE's Avatar
Pointy Elbows
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,780
From: Cleveland, OH
What about a 2k 3.8 Impala vs me? 2k 5spd w/ intake, exhaust? My buddy with the Impala always wants to race me. I dunno, those 3.8's have alotta low end.

J.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #14  
mjg's Avatar
mjg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,554
Those things aren't even real montes, they are hunks of crap. I should know, i owned one (95 3.1 litre). A real monte SS, from the 80's with the right work would own up any maxima. My friends monte puts down over 450 to the wheels.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 08:40 PM
  #15  
Jaws's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 787
Originally posted by mjg
Those things aren't even real montes, they are hunks of crap. I should know, i owned one (95 3.1 litre). A real monte SS, from the 80's with the right work would own up any maxima. My friends monte puts down over 450 to the wheels.
The '80s Monte Carlos aren't real Monte Carlos. Yawn, 180hp 5L. POS.
Any car "with the right" work can own a stock car.
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 09:12 PM
  #16  
mjg's Avatar
mjg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,554
man please, are you comparing a FWD hunk of crap 3.8 litre monte carlo to the original car that was RWD v8 and although 180 HP stock, were some of the nastiest muscle cars of the 80s? You can't even say the same cars in the same sentence. I may lack some of the technical knowledge to really go one on with you here on why a monte carlo v8 from the 1980s utterly destroys any modern monte carlo in any shape and form. What are you going to say next, the GNX was a hunk of crap too? WHy don't you try racing one of those "stock".
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 10:40 PM
  #17  
02SEinStL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 278
Originally posted by mjg
man please, are you comparing a FWD hunk of crap 3.8 litre monte carlo to the original car that was RWD v8 and although 180 HP stock, were some of the nastiest muscle cars of the 80s? You can't even say the same cars in the same sentence. I may lack some of the technical knowledge to really go one on with you here on why a monte carlo v8 from the 1980s utterly destroys any modern monte carlo in any shape and form. What are you going to say next, the GNX was a hunk of crap too? WHy don't you try racing one of those "stock".
I would say don't even mention the GNX in the same sentence as ANY Monte...heck even a "regular" Grand National is in an altogether higher area of the food chain.
Those are just bad to tha bone Buicks, no 2 ways about it
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 10:42 PM
  #18  
02SEinStL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 278
PS-
The 3800 is not a "hunk of crap"...in fact it has made the 10 Best Engines in the World list along with a certain powerplant with initials VQ...
Old Jun 28, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #19  
thrasher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 217
Originally posted by mjg
man please, are you comparing a FWD hunk of crap 3.8 litre monte carlo to the original car that was RWD v8 and although 180 HP stock, were some of the nastiest muscle cars of the 80s? You can't even say the same cars in the same sentence. I may lack some of the technical knowledge to really go one on with you here on why a monte carlo v8 from the 1980s utterly destroys any modern monte carlo in any shape and form. What are you going to say next, the GNX was a hunk of crap too? WHy don't you try racing one of those "stock".
ummmmm...when the 3.8 s/c monte carlo comes out later this year, it will tear the "real muscle car of the 80's" monte carlo a new @sshole!
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 02:39 AM
  #20  
96_vqmax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,601
Originally posted by 00MaxSE
What about a 2k 3.8 Impala vs me? 2k 5spd w/ intake, exhaust? My buddy with the Impala always wants to race me. I dunno, those 3.8's have alotta low end.

J.
You will win for sure,those 3.8 are heavy as h**l,16.xx sec ET.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 05:05 AM
  #21  
C430's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 186
Originally posted by Jaws


The '80s Monte Carlos aren't real Monte Carlos. Yawn, 180hp 5L. POS.
Any car "with the right" work can own a stock car.
If you are talking about the 190-HP 305ci, stock, a VQ30 would be a close race, he has more torque, you have the weight advantage and the rev advantage - if you do it right.

If it was "worked," well you can do lotsa mods to a V-8 pushrod engine, and chevy owners do tend to cheat in that direction. He could have 400-500 HP, and you wouldn't know it until you lost. Edelbrock sells a 400 hp small block crate motor that can be slipped into the frame easily. More rubber on the road with RWD, also, for the launch.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 11:07 AM
  #22  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally posted by 02SEinStL
PS-
The 3800 is not a "hunk of crap"...in fact it has made the 10 Best Engines in the World list along with a certain powerplant with initials VQ...
I guess someone had to give GM some credit for repeatedly resurrecting a motor that should been declared deceased two decades ago.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #23  
vqman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by F23A4


I guess someone had to give GM some credit for repeatedly resurrecting a motor that should been declared deceased two decades ago.
exactly...Nissan's VQ made Wards in it's first year of production, and its been there every year since. But it took GM 30 years to get the 3800 into Wards...AHAHHAA
and I doubt it stays on the list for long.




on another note, the Supercharged SS Monte Carlos ARE NOT OUT YET.

that race was against a normally aspirated 3800....unless the guy dropped some serious cash into his Monte...(what a waste of money)

-vq
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 12:02 PM
  #24  
mjg's Avatar
mjg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,554
Originally posted by thrasher


ummmmm...when the 3.8 s/c monte carlo comes out later this year, it will tear the "real muscle car of the 80's" monte carlo a new @sshole!
let's see a boosted 3.8 monte versus a 1988 maxima with just a touch of work done, (after all, an s/c is a mod, if not a factory mod) In fact, i'd like you to go to any monte forum and blast such a foolish, ignorant comment, and see how far you get.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 12:02 PM
  #25  
vandy786's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 224
Originally posted by VQMAN


exactly...Nissan's VQ made Wards in it's first year of production, and its been there every year since. But it took GM 30 years to get the 3800 into Wards...AHAHHAA
and I doubt it stays on the list for long.




on another note, the Supercharged SS Monte Carlos ARE NOT OUT YET.

that race was against a normally aspirated 3800....unless the guy dropped some serious cash into his Monte...(what a waste of money)

-vq
Who or what is a "Wards"?
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 12:07 PM
  #26  
vqman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by vandy786


Who or what is a "Wards"?
"Wards" is this magazine that gives awards for different things, like the "10 Best Engines" The VQ engine has made the list every year its been produced in the states...or just about every year.

-vq
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #27  
SilverChrome03's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 208
Originally posted by mjg


let's see a boosted 3.8 monte versus a 1988 maxima with just a touch of work done, (after all, an s/c is a mod, if not a factory mod) In fact, i'd like you to go to any monte forum and blast such a foolish, ignorant comment, and see how far you get.
What does his comment RE: 80s Monte have to do with a 1988 Maxima ?

Bob
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #28  
thrasher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 217
Originally posted by mjg


let's see a boosted 3.8 monte versus a 1988 maxima with just a touch of work done, (after all, an s/c is a mod, if not a factory mod) In fact, i'd like you to go to any monte forum and blast such a foolish, ignorant comment, and see how far you get.
dude, you don't know what the h*ll you're talking about...just because a car has less displacement and FWD doesn't make it automaticaly slower than a big motor RWD from 20 years ago. my car, with 3.5 liters, would rape a whole lot of big name muscle cars. again, a 3.8 s/c monte carlo, which will get to 60 somewhere around 6.3-6.6 seconds, will destroy a 180 HP 5 liter 80's monte. throw on new pulleys, and we're talking a seriously fast car, for very cheap. and yes, a lightly modded s/c monte will smoke a lightly modded '98 max.
Old Jun 29, 2003 | 11:56 PM
  #29  
02SEinStL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 278
My buddy had an '88 Monte SS for years, and it was a DOG with the stock 4BB 5.0 "HO". I bet an '85 Maxima could tame it
Then again, after he slapped in a well-worked 5.7 it was a terrifying ride
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #30  
HitManSE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,965
With a 406 crate engine and a built tranny accompanied by a 200shot, its gonna be a monte haul @ss right into the 9's.....
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #31  
maximo-SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,734
monte carlos are chump change compared to a Ford Lightning... Omg those things are freakin FAST!!!! NAsty handle.
Old Jun 30, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #32  
MxdOut97's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 828
Originally posted by maximo-SE
monte carlos are chump change compared to a Ford Lightning... Omg those things are freakin FAST!!!! NAsty handle.
yea true, but this thread isnt about those
and besides they have boosted v-8's, of course they are much faster than a monte carlo
Old Jul 1, 2003 | 05:14 AM
  #33  
mjg's Avatar
mjg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,554
Originally posted by mjg


let's see a boosted 3.8 monte versus a 1988 maxima with just a touch of work done, (after all, an s/c is a mod, if not a factory mod) In fact, i'd like you to go to any monte forum and blast such a foolish, ignorant comment, and see how far you get.
btw just to correct myself here, hahaha, i ment monte not maxima : ]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
happyricefob
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Nov 18, 2002 02:25 PM
Polaco02
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
23
Jun 25, 2002 11:32 PM
DTR Maxima
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
Jun 23, 2002 05:35 PM
20thdriven
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
Feb 13, 2002 09:41 PM
ZuMBLe
General Maxima Discussion
2
Oct 28, 2000 03:53 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 PM.