5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2002 stillen headers are on.........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #41  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by mad_maxx03
Lemme ask you something.. You say you plan on getting the "power loss" fixed... How can you hide them nice, shiny headers from the dealership? hehe

i am also good buddies with a few techs at nissan i can/have get them to help me on the side!

will
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #42  
mad_maxx03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 275
good going
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 06:20 PM
  #43  
skandalouz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,681
From: duluth, ga
damn.. that's sweet... i'm from atl too... hopefully i'll see u around so i can check out those headers...
we should have a meet jus so u can show them off... haha
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #44  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
lol... PM me so we can arrange a time you can check em out!!!!

will
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #45  
studman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,687
From: Charlotte, NC
P0507 - Idle Speed Control System RPM is higher than expected

1) Check for Intake Air Leak
1a) Start engine and let it idle
1b) Listen for an intake air leak after the mass air flow sensor

2) If step one is ok, replace ECM

That's all the diagnostics that the service manual gives.

I would also try to reset the ECU and relearn the Idle Air Volume.

The resetting the ECU procedure is available at:

http://maxima.theowensfamily.com/reset-ecm.jpg

To relearn the Idle Air Volume, here is the procedure:

NOTE: Make sure the car is in Park/Neutral and the Emergency Brake is on. Also, it is extremely helpful to use a stopwatch to help with the timing. Timing is 100% critical.

1) Start engine and let it warm up to normal operating temps
2) Turn off the A/C
3) Then turn off car
4) Wait at least 10 seconds
5) Turn car IGNITION on (but don't start it)
6) Wait 3 seconds
7) Do the following 5 times within 5 seconds
7a) Press the gas pedal all the way down
7b) Release the gas pedal completely
8) Wait 7 seconds
9) Press the gas pedal all the way down for at least 20 seconds until the SES/MIL light goes off
10) Release the gas pedal within 3 seconds of the SES/MIL light going off
11) Start the engine
12) Wait 20 seconds
13) Rev the engine 2 or 3 times up to 3500 RPMs or so as if you were accelerating - Once you reach 3500 RPMs, release the gas pedal and wait for it to return to idle before doing it again
14) Check the idle speed
14a) For a manual, it should be 625 RPMs +/-50 RPMs
14b) For an automatic, it should be 675 RPMs +/-50 RPMs
Old Oct 5, 2003 | 09:35 PM
  #46  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
thanks man! i tried all of it.... nothing..... but then i put my old air filter back on (that small A$$ frankencar one) and reset it one more time and for some reason its running fine........ WTF!!!!! i dont understand someone please explain y the tiny frankencar intake filter is making my car run better? when i say run better the idle isnt at 900 rpms.... now its right under 700 where it should be... no more rough idle the needle stays put..... the 5k power loss problem has slightly gone away.... please help me understand!

will
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 12:29 AM
  #47  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by maximadave
sweet setup Will

thanks bro!
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 04:49 AM
  #48  
hombre's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 104
Originally Posted by WILLSE
before the headers my very last dyno was 228hp and 234tq at the wheels SAE corrected..... hoping for 245hp 250ishtq! think its possible?

If u guys want me to dyno please please please help me fix this 5k rpm power loss. the ECU throws the SES lgith and the code is P0507 Idle control unit...... any help fixing this will be greatly appriciated and will also get the dyno numbers for u guys!!!! thanks in advance!!!!!

i dont go to the dealership.... screw them! i have the 100k warrenty and they denied me warrenty work so **** EM!!!

thanks for all the positive feed back guys!

will


Wow...228hp with an intake and some exhaust work? That's amazing. Or have you not updated your sig? I figure the 6spd stock at around 207 then intake will add maybe 7 and the exhaust maybe 3 NA for a total of like 217 or so. What other mod's do you have?
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 06:02 AM
  #49  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
I wouldn't pay as much attention to the peak numbers as the baseline. SCC has proven a 20hp tolerance for 4 different dynos on the same 350Z.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 06:16 AM
  #50  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I wouldn't pay as much attention to the peak numbers as the baseline. SCC has proven a 20hp tolerance for 4 different dynos on the same 350Z.
the track is the only true dyno.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 06:59 AM
  #51  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
need a new clutch and rear motor mount before i even think about hittin the 1/4mile...

will
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 07:11 AM
  #52  
studman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,687
From: Charlotte, NC
Will: I'm not sure why changing the filter would cause an extra 200 RPMs, unless the "bad" filter needs to be cleaned. You could also try this... run to a local auto parts store and buy one of those Ractive 3" air filters. I know you don't want to use it indefinitely, but see if the Frankencar and the Ractive filters are ok. If so, you know that your current filter is bad. You can then return the Ractive filter back to the auto parts store.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 07:47 AM
  #53  
bigdo26's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,223
for those wondering about dynos, Nissan Performance Mag just installed Hotshot headers on their 3.5 Altima: 17 WHP gains. They said it was really, really loud before putting in a resonator too. check their website
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 07:52 AM
  #54  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
approx gains for headers/ecu combo 30whp peak and god knows how much throughout the powerband. Im ready to see some 3rd party dynos
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:21 AM
  #55  
ICULookN's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,086
From: Baltimore MD
I know where my federal tax refund is going.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:34 AM
  #56  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
....
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 01:39 PM
  #57  
MaxSE03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,148
Anyone know why Stillen didn't produce it as equal length like Cattman is for the 3.0l?
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 01:44 PM
  #58  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by MaxSE03
Anyone know why Stillen didn't produce it as equal length like Cattman is for the 3.0l?

i was wondering the same thing........

will
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #59  
studman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,687
From: Charlotte, NC
Just out of curosity... before you put the headers on, did you have a Y pipe? I saw the picture of the stock Y pipe and assume that you didn't. I know that the sound in my setup dramatically increased when I installed my WSP Y pipe on my car. I was just curious to see if it was the headers themselves, or the combination of the headers and Y pipe that was causing the excess noise.

I do agree with you that the noise was absolutely obnoxious when I installed the Cat-Back system. The MagnaFlow muffler was removed 2 days later because the noise was so unbearable.

I'm just interested to see if it's the actual headers that make the noise, or if the Y pipe makes most of the noise.
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 08:47 PM
  #60  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
its a combination of both..... the stillen headers wont go on with out the y-pipe and vice versa unless you but the cattman one that has just recently come out. i had a y pipe on my 2k1 and the sound increase was not nearly as much as the header/y-pipe combo ... so to be honest with you i couldnt really answer ur question 100%!

will
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 09:32 PM
  #61  
Triple8Sol's Avatar
I miss the .org!
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,928
From: Seattle, WA
Very nice!
Old Oct 6, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #62  
Audtatious's Avatar
Bandwagon Lover
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,023
Originally Posted by MaxSE03
Anyone know why Stillen didn't produce it as equal length like Cattman is for the 3.0l?
I noticed the same thing. Wasn't this one of the main issues peeps here complained about the WSP Y-Pipes?
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 05:27 AM
  #63  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
They had time to do plenty of R&D on this thing so I guess we have to wait to see the gains on the Cattman headers to answer that question. I expect the Cattman headers to sound better than the Stealin headers regaurdless of output.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 06:16 AM
  #64  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 630
Wait I'm confused....do the Stillen headers come with their own Y-pipe?
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 08:21 AM
  #65  
studman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,687
From: Charlotte, NC
Wait I'm confused....do the Stillen headers come with their own Y-pipe?
Yes

its a combination of both..... the stillen headers wont go on with out the y-pipe and vice versa unless you but the cattman one that has just recently come out. i had a y pipe on my 2k1 and the sound increase was not nearly as much as the header/y-pipe combo ... so to be honest with you i couldnt really answer ur question 100%!
The reason I asked was because I already have a WSP Y, WSP B, Cat, and FlowMaster 60 Series installed. The sound increase was very dramatic from the stock Y to the WSP Y. I know that my WSP Y would be removed in order to install the headers. I was just curious about whether the increase in noise was due to the headers themselves or more due to the Y pipe.

No big deal.... any idea of when you'd be getting a dyno?
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 08:57 AM
  #66  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by studman
The reason I asked was because I already have a WSP Y, WSP B, Cat, and FlowMaster 60 Series installed. The sound increase was very dramatic from the stock Y to the WSP Y. I know that my WSP Y would be removed in order to install the headers. I was just curious about whether the increase in noise was due to the headers themselves or more due to the Y pipe.
Im curious also. The HKS might have to go if the shorty header portion of the setup increases the exhaust noise dramatically.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #67  
WILLSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by studman
Yes



The reason I asked was because I already have a WSP Y, WSP B, Cat, and FlowMaster 60 Series installed. The sound increase was very dramatic from the stock Y to the WSP Y. I know that my WSP Y would be removed in order to install the headers. I was just curious about whether the increase in noise was due to the headers themselves or more due to the Y pipe.

No big deal.... any idea of when you'd be getting a dyno?
dyno should be within the next week.... i dont want to dyno wit ha broken motor mount.... car still seems to hang around 5k rpms a lil... so i dunno!

will
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #68  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Any fart can straight through exhaust like HKS, Greddy, etc. will be loud as hell with a Y-pipe alone. Headers will add to that.

I'd drop a 50 or 60-series FM muffler to quite things down a bit.

Originally Posted by blubyu2k2
Im curious also. The HKS might have to go if the shorty header portion of the setup increases the exhaust noise dramatically.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #69  
MyownNismo's Avatar
Future Camaro SS owner
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,204
From: MN
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Any fart can straight through exhaust like HKS, Greddy, etc. will be loud as hell with a Y-pipe alone. Headers will add to that.

I'd drop a 50 or 60-series FM muffler to quite things down a bit.

Lets see some pics on the car.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #70  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 630
another ?

Why would installing headers cause the car to run a little more lean?
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 05:31 PM
  #71  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by 02MaximizedVQ
Why would installing headers cause the car to run a little more lean?
Because of the increase exhaust flow allows for increased intake flow. The injectors already hit about 80% on a stock motor. There isn't much left to compensate for the increased throughput even though the ECU sees the extra air flow.
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 06:12 PM
  #72  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 630
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Because of the increase exhaust flow allows for increased intake flow. The injectors already hit about 80% on a stock motor. There isn't much left to compensate for the increased throughput even though the ECU sees the extra air flow.
I thought the way headers made power was from allowing exhaust to escape with less resistance on the upstroke of the piston, reducing parasitic drag (pumping losses) on the motor. During the upswing the intake valve is closed in a typical conservative factory camshaft timing configuration. If there is too much overlap, exhuast gas can be pushed out the intake valve causing reverberation. Is this wrong?


Jesse
Old Oct 7, 2003 | 07:40 PM
  #73  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by 02MaximizedVQ
I thought the way headers made power was from allowing exhaust to escape with less resistance on the upstroke of the piston, reducing parasitic drag (pumping losses) on the motor. During the upswing the intake valve is closed in a typical conservative factory camshaft timing configuration. If there is too much overlap, exhuast gas can be pushed out the intake valve causing reverberation. Is this wrong?


Jesse
That is the main part of it, i was just trying to answer your question.
Old Oct 10, 2003 | 06:06 PM
  #74  
studman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,687
From: Charlotte, NC
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=255053
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fbana41
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
3
Aug 29, 2016 12:18 PM
05RLS2
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Apr 14, 2016 11:49 AM
Nv2dmaxmd
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
6
Oct 19, 2015 05:37 PM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM
Socalstillen
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
Sep 26, 2015 12:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:03 PM.