Another new NA Maxima record. E.T. and trap speed
Originally Posted by blubyu2k2
he left out the part where he needs a good driver
jk mang
jk mang
Headers are required too and everyone knows that expense.
Originally Posted by speedemn
Nice 13.1 slip!
WTF did the Mustang that was in the other lane run tho??? That thing was flew and sounded like a bat outta hell!
WTF did the Mustang that was in the other lane run tho??? That thing was flew and sounded like a bat outta hell!
IIRC he ran 9.8xx @ 135
I obviously didn't want to run beside him.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Someone needs to bring me another 6 speed so I can put another car into that catagory.
Actually, there may be hope for the MEVI.
Actually, there may be hope for the MEVI.
don't tease me.
Originally Posted by bk2kmax
The downloads that SR20den provided won't play for me, I tried to open them up under every player I have.
They opened under the DivX but there was a picture with sound but nothing moving on the screen.
They opened under the DivX but there was a picture with sound but nothing moving on the screen.
Originally Posted by MrGone
Hey Matt, try to break 12's again, NA
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Im drawing up the plans now. I think that if I focus on the suspension and weight of the car it can be done because there probably isn't much power left to be squeezed out without making a sheet metal IM or getting cams.
GREAT job Matt!!! And the conditions weren't even quite perfect. I figured the air density elevation equivalent was 250 feet above sea level. That's not bad considering Rockingham dragway is 375 feet above sea level.
Now if you happened to race on a night that was mid 40s with the same humidity and barometric pressure, then the air density equivalent will be around 900 feet BELOW sea level. That's 2 tenths you can shave just due to weather.
I ran 14.83 in Fayetteville with 500 feet below sea level air density.
In Vegas and California, you will never see those kind of cold track conditions.
The best I've seen personally, on the west coast was 500 feet above sea level air density and that was Carlsbad, CA a couple months ago.
The best I've seen in Vegas is 2000 feet above sea level and that only happens in mid 40 degree weather.
Once again, AWESOME job Matt. You too Matt. Yall keep it up. Oh yeah, Jon, you've got your work cut out for you to keep up with these guys.
Now if you happened to race on a night that was mid 40s with the same humidity and barometric pressure, then the air density equivalent will be around 900 feet BELOW sea level. That's 2 tenths you can shave just due to weather.

I ran 14.83 in Fayetteville with 500 feet below sea level air density.
In Vegas and California, you will never see those kind of cold track conditions.
The best I've seen personally, on the west coast was 500 feet above sea level air density and that was Carlsbad, CA a couple months ago.The best I've seen in Vegas is 2000 feet above sea level and that only happens in mid 40 degree weather.
Once again, AWESOME job Matt. You too Matt. Yall keep it up. Oh yeah, Jon, you've got your work cut out for you to keep up with these guys.
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I get severely p!$$ed off when people call me a liar directly or indirectly.
I love people who get angered easily, makes my job that much easier.
by the way, it's "Honda".
ps. good times, just put the AC back in and the other stuff... I'm more curious what the car would run as full weight.
Originally Posted by Driven EF9
that's actually really funny.
I love people who get angered easily, makes my job that much easier.
I love people who get angered easily, makes my job that much easier.
Overall Im not angered easily. But everyone has something that pulls the pin from their grenade and I merely gave an example of mine.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Uh, yeah.... not sure how I wasn't aware of this thread. Max2000JP told me about it on the phone tonight. 107.33 is just retarded. What was your race weight?
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
How much lighter than stock is that?
Those are some kick *** times man! I love the 13.3 video of the Honda Del Sol or what ever it was was missing 3rd gear and then the dumb **** couldn't even find 4th gear. That was priceless! Good work bro.
Dave
02 Maxima SE
85 El Camino w/Turbo V6 swap
Dave
02 Maxima SE
85 El Camino w/Turbo V6 swap
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Finally, saw them....1.6MB/sec.
Anyways, what time did the 350z RIGHT AFTER your Del Sol 13.3 run do?
That's your yard stick to BEAT OVER NON-BELIEVERS heads.

Anyways, what time did the 350z RIGHT AFTER your Del Sol 13.3 run do?
That's your yard stick to BEAT OVER NON-BELIEVERS heads.

Listen Blu I am going to the track tomorrow and if I don't get times close to yours I am coming after you. I have copied all the stuff you did so it better go fast like your factory freak.
Originally Posted by takkar
just out of curiosity...what times do you think you can get if you replace your hood and trunk with CF and gets CF fenders and the whole deal....
hood = very very minor/minute gain. you'd see better times from running on a 70 degree day vs 80 degree day.
trunk = if it's a spoilerless CF trunk, then this would be a slightly better gain, but, still minor
fenders = little.
think about it this way.
hood weighs what, 10lbs? CF hood weighs maybe 4lbs?
CF trunk may be a 6lb difference, fenders, 1.5lbs for both.
11lbs in a 3280lb car is a whopping .3%. a THIRD of a percentage point... that's not going to mean anything, unless he's really trying to reduce his ET by thousandths. He MAY gain a MPH. running two gallons of gas (12lbs) vs. a full tank (90lbs).
people only buy CF hoods for the bling factor... as the weight savings is soooooooo minor.
Originally Posted by Driven EF9
hmm, very little.
hood = very very minor/minute gain. you'd see better times from running on a 70 degree day vs 80 degree day.
trunk = if it's a spoilerless CF trunk, then this would be a slightly better gain, but, still minor
fenders = little.
think about it this way.
hood weighs what, 10lbs? CF hood weighs maybe 4lbs?
CF trunk may be a 6lb difference, fenders, 1.5lbs for both.
11lbs in a 3280lb car is a whopping .3%. a THIRD of a percentage point... that's not going to mean anything, unless he's really trying to reduce his ET by thousandths. He MAY gain a MPH. running two gallons of gas (12lbs) vs. a full tank (90lbs).
people only buy CF hoods for the bling factor... as the weight savings is soooooooo minor.
hood = very very minor/minute gain. you'd see better times from running on a 70 degree day vs 80 degree day.
trunk = if it's a spoilerless CF trunk, then this would be a slightly better gain, but, still minor
fenders = little.
think about it this way.
hood weighs what, 10lbs? CF hood weighs maybe 4lbs?
CF trunk may be a 6lb difference, fenders, 1.5lbs for both.
11lbs in a 3280lb car is a whopping .3%. a THIRD of a percentage point... that's not going to mean anything, unless he's really trying to reduce his ET by thousandths. He MAY gain a MPH. running two gallons of gas (12lbs) vs. a full tank (90lbs).
people only buy CF hoods for the bling factor... as the weight savings is soooooooo minor.
Originally Posted by Jime
Listen Blu I am going to the track tomorrow and if I don't get times close to yours I am coming after you. I have copied all the stuff you did so it better go fast like your factory freak.


let me know what you run



