2k2 Dyno: Cattman's Headers vs Y-pipe
#43
Originally Posted by bgates1654
Fezzik you didnt happen to get your A/F ratio analyzed did you? Go for the SAFC-II next I would love to see the power you would be putting out with some tuning. Then get the L-spec TS ECU I am sure you will be in the 250whp range then.
#44
I do not think anyone else dynoed the same day. I got out of school early and was able to get there before anyone had a chance to get there. THere was an evo on there but he had dynoed it a few days back. It was producing 490whp. LOL wish i could do that right now. Ok, well i wasnt really thinking of doing the TS ECU cause it was a lot of money and some people were not getting gains. But now that I have headers which i originally hadnt plan to buy, so i may. If I get the TS ecu i do not know if i need the SAFC. I also have a spare 2k2 ecu that I would use to dupe my origial ecu onto. I truelly havent ever messed with this stuff. But I'd like to start workin with a SAFC II maybe. SO we shall see.... when i get more money. Uncle Sam is gonna want his money back soon.
#45
Check this out. TS ECU Dyno Read the entire thread though. Read about the L-Spec TS ECU HERE
L-spec TS ECU is $345+shipping and if you get it you will need SAFC-II for tuning the A/F and timing. You can get the SAFC off ebay for 250+shipping maybe less.
L-spec TS ECU is $345+shipping and if you get it you will need SAFC-II for tuning the A/F and timing. You can get the SAFC off ebay for 250+shipping maybe less.
#47
Still Here... IM me for more..
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley CALI
Posts: 2,129
i made huge gains with my cattman catback and headers on my 2K... of course I WAS supercharged back then... i can still feel a difference with the catback and headers on my 2K2 though...
#51
Still Here... IM me for more..
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley CALI
Posts: 2,129
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
SAFC only does fuel....you NEED an eManage for fuel and timing.
has anyone gotten the emanage to control the timing correctly yet? i thought dixit wasn't able to get it working...
#52
He got it working, but did have a pending code.
Other 4th geners have and many VQ35 350Zs have the timing working.
If you use the diodes and have the latest firmware version, it doesn't fry coils.
Other 4th geners have and many VQ35 350Zs have the timing working.
If you use the diodes and have the latest firmware version, it doesn't fry coils.
#54
Originally Posted by bgates1654
MJG, any bolt on part is just freeing up horsepower (unless you consider boost and/or juice a bolt on).
#55
01 Cali spec vehicles do not have EGR ports on the exhaust manifolds. You need a Air injection valve plug for a 94 Sentra SE-R. It is the same size as the EGR pipe bung, 91-93 SE-Rs had air injection valve which connected to the secondaries of the stock exhaust manifold, in 94 they removed the AIV from the SR20 engine and put a plug in the exhaust manifold secondaries- or the downpipe as some would call it.
#57
I have done a VIAS on my car and looked down at the manifold- nothing there, I also did my PR motor mounts and looked at the manifold to make sure, and my car has no EGR fitting on the rear bank- one manifold.
#58
Originally Posted by BlackBIRDVQ
I have done a VIAS on my car and looked down at the manifold- nothing there, I also did my PR motor mounts and looked at the manifold to make sure, and my car has no EGR fitting on the rear bank- one manifold.
#59
My car has a production date of April 01, which would make it a very late 01 cause 02s where already built in June. When I ordered up my VIAS I needed the VIN cause there are some production changes. As a matter a fact I get asked for the VIN alot when I go in for odd parts for my car- like bushings, gaskets etc. I know for a fact my front exhaust manifold I had on my car is the same one as the one used on a 3.5L cause the stampings on it. The front close coupled cat is the same as my friends 02 Maxima's. We compared them when I did headers on our cars.
#60
I just want to say thanks for the great comparison and it's good to see the headers made such great gains. I wish someone would do this comparo with a 4th gen. All us 4th geners have to go off of is track results and no one has shown any significant improvement in ET or MPH over just a standard y-pipe. Since the 4th gen Y-pipe removes the precats, the gains are far better with these y-pipes and it's probably why we aren't seeing measurable gains at the track.
#61
Ok here is the info about each dyno
Pre-headers: Barometric pressure 29.52 in.Hg; Vapor Pressure 0.16in.Hg; Intake temp 90.8F
Headers Installed: Barometric Pres 29.46.inHg. Vapor Pressure 0.12in.Hg; Intake temp 86.2F
Pre-headers: Barometric pressure 29.52 in.Hg; Vapor Pressure 0.16in.Hg; Intake temp 90.8F
Headers Installed: Barometric Pres 29.46.inHg. Vapor Pressure 0.12in.Hg; Intake temp 86.2F
#63
Thanks to Dave for this, although my neck is still sore from all the wiring I had to do! Dave's car showed GREAT gains immediately after the install. We were playing around on the highway and I was VERY impressed with how the car is running w/ the headers. Thanks again Dave. You need to borrow my slicks on your next trip to the track for sure.
#66
Originally Posted by Dave B
I just want to say thanks for the great comparison and it's good to see the headers made such great gains. I wish someone would do this comparo with a 4th gen. All us 4th geners have to go off of is track results and no one has shown any significant improvement in ET or MPH over just a standard y-pipe. Since the 4th gen Y-pipe removes the precats, the gains are far better with these y-pipes and it's probably why we aren't seeing measurable gains at the track.
Hmmm, I can't fully agree with what you've said. Gains of a little under or over 20hp are typical on 95-99 VQ30DEs and a few hp better on the 225hp 00-01 VQs (compared with a stock y-pipe). There are no y-pipes that make that power and any tests I've seen that suggest otherwise are clearly bogus (based on wierdly anaemic baseline runs, not strong y-pipe runs).
As I recall, Ceasar's Chariot added the headers during the summer and held the same track times at 90+ degrees that he was running w/o the headers when it was much cooler. Hardly a definitive test, but the headers had to add significantly more power than the cheap y-pipe they replaced for this to occur - nothing ambiguous about it, that's basic physics.
Hopefully we can get a good dyno from a VQ30DE owner (preferably showing the difference between a performance y-pipe and the headers) when the new headers come in later this week - we offer a $50 rebate for dyno fees if the customer contacts us ahead of time and has the test done and recorded the way I need it to be.
Agreed that the headers do better on the VQ35DE, but I suspect that has more to do with replacing stock exhaust manifolds than the pre-cats - precats don't typically rob that much power but every other stock exhaust component on the 02+ Maximas seems to.
Brian C Catts
Cattman Performance
#69
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the OC & Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,586
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
I had no fitment issues with my HS headers, and I can name a few more who didnt.
i forget if there are any HS dynos floating around...anoyone? i'd expect them to be slightly less if they didnt have intake, but if the power gains are very close then i can't justify the extra 275 bucks...that's like an intake right there!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 09:54 AM
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
10-17-2015 02:15 AM