i have never ever known this..
lol oh but i have...
but you know how all these car rating sites are..they're a joke

-----------------------------------------
1-21-04: 1997 Pearl White Maxima SE (AUTO)**RIP**
11-3-04: 2002 Black/Black Maxima SE...Love the 255 hp 3.5 VQ.
but you know how all these car rating sites are..they're a joke


-----------------------------------------
1-21-04: 1997 Pearl White Maxima SE (AUTO)**RIP**
11-3-04: 2002 Black/Black Maxima SE...Love the 255 hp 3.5 VQ.
Originally Posted by dustrman03
lol oh but i have...
but you know how all these car rating sites are..they're a joke
.
but you know how all these car rating sites are..they're a joke
.

Time to distance is a better indication of performance, or at least if you must use time to speed, try 0-100 mph.
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
An auto 3.0 could do that 

Originally Posted by phobix
My estimate is conservative and more representitive of a non transmission damaging run. If you want to brutalize your autotragic by holding the brake revving and letting her loose, maybe shave half a second off the time.
Just for your information. Jime is probably the fasted auto maxima on this board. He doen't have to brake torque his auto 3.0 from what I read. So I don't quite know what you are getting at.
Originally Posted by phobix
My estimate is conservative and more representitive of a non transmission damaging run. If you want to brutalize your autotragic by holding the brake revving and letting her loose, maybe shave half a second off the time.
That's not the Phast or Phurrist way. Someone blow my floorboards yO!
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Just curious, why do you care? 1/4 mile trap & ET is better IMO, and you can easily test that out on YOUR own car, and not a test mule that a magazine used.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
areX
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
18
Dec 31, 2002 08:56 AM
04 maxse
General Maxima Discussion
6
May 13, 2002 06:03 AM




