Phenolic Spacer Development for VQ35s
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by maxspeed96CT
Can we at least get some teaser pics


Sure, why not?The only thing I changed between the prototypes and the production spacers is how the TB spacer looks. I made the bottom of that spacer look identical to the top. So it will be a better looking TB spacer. But it's not symmetrical between the top and bottom. There is still only one way the spacer will properly match up.
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by Theyears02
any idea when the dyno charts will be up?
Hey arron,
I was wondering, Would I be able to cut the spacer that goes between the elbow and the IM? Cause I have the SSIM which I cut the metal spacer. Would it be possible and would there be any problems?
I was wondering, Would I be able to cut the spacer that goes between the elbow and the IM? Cause I have the SSIM which I cut the metal spacer. Would it be possible and would there be any problems?
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by The Law
Would I be able to cut the spacer that goes between the elbow and the IM? Cause I have the SSIM which I cut the metal spacer. Would it be possible and would there be any problems?
I highly recommend wearing a face mask b/c of the very fine dust created by cutting or porting this material.
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
That won't be a problem at all. These spacers can be ported also to match your intake runners if you have a custom IM or have custom port work.
I highly recommend wearing a face mask b/c of the very fine dust created by cutting or porting this material.
I highly recommend wearing a face mask b/c of the very fine dust created by cutting or porting this material.
When do you think the dyno numbers will be up?
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by roro
so which pieces will actually need to be revised/modified to accomodate the EGR tube/valve on the 6th gens?
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Nissan Works Intake Spacer Results are in!!
Thank you everybody's patience! Since there was a LOT of data to compile and average out, it took me a little time to get every organized.
As was mentioned above, me and Blackmaxx96 met and installed the prototype spacer kit on his 2002 6spd Maxima. The fitment and testing went very smooth.
The first thing that was done is make sure Home Dyno will work on his car. After making some changes to my hardware, I got the dyno system working. So we proceeded to start the testing procedure. Both the before and after testing was done exactly the same to produce the most accurate results.
Each testing procedure consists of allowing the car to idle with hood closed for exactly 45 minutes while taking over 150 temperature measurements from the Heads, Lower and Upper Intake Manifold, Elbow, and the Throttle Body. This allows the car to get as heat soaked as possible before any dyno tests are done. This also allows enough time for all the manifold temperatures to level off and stop rising. Then we hop in the car and do the dyno runs. After those are complete, we come back and allow the car to run for an additional 15 minutes. This allows enough time for the temperatures to rise back up and level off again. During cruising speeds, the temperatures are greatly reduced due to the added airflow in the engine bay and radiator. So we allowed the car to idle after the dyno runs to record the temperatures after the motor has been put under racing conditions. We conducted this exact procedure before and after the installation of the Nissan Works Phenolic Intake Spacers during the same day and exact same weather conditions.
The results? Without spacers installed, the following average temp readings were recorded. Please note that these are the average temperatures after the engine temps have stopped rising and is as heat soaked as possible.
Temp Results without Spacers
Heads: 188.25*F
LIM: 176.4*F
UIM: 146.0*F
Elbow: 119.75*F
TB: 115.25*F
Temp Results WITH Spacers
Heads: 189.0*F
LIM: 144.8*F
UIM: 104.8*F
Elbow: 89.8*F
TB: 89.2*F
These spacers show over a 30 degree temp decrease in Lower Intake Manifold Temps and over a 40 degree temp decrease in Upper Intake Manifold Temps! The upper intake manifold is NOTICABLY cooler with these spacers installed!
Now for the dyno results:
These gains are not the gains you hear from most performance shops (they take the worst "before" dyno and the best "after" dyno to give you bogus power gains). With the dyno chart you see below, 6 dyno runs were logged in order to figure the average gains found at each 100rpm increment for HP and TQ.

Notice the huge gain in low end and midrange torque without sacrificing ANY top end power! Also, noticed the huge gain before AND after the VIAS release point. Between 3800 and 4600 rpm, there is a 5-10hp and 8-12ft-lb gain after the VIAS release point (which seems to be around 3800rpm). And below 3300rpm, there is a consistant 5-7ft-lb gain in torque not counting the initial spike you see below 2600rpm (17-28ft-lbs).
These spacers seem to really put out some decent consistant gains below 5K rpm!
As was mentioned above, me and Blackmaxx96 met and installed the prototype spacer kit on his 2002 6spd Maxima. The fitment and testing went very smooth.
The first thing that was done is make sure Home Dyno will work on his car. After making some changes to my hardware, I got the dyno system working. So we proceeded to start the testing procedure. Both the before and after testing was done exactly the same to produce the most accurate results.
Each testing procedure consists of allowing the car to idle with hood closed for exactly 45 minutes while taking over 150 temperature measurements from the Heads, Lower and Upper Intake Manifold, Elbow, and the Throttle Body. This allows the car to get as heat soaked as possible before any dyno tests are done. This also allows enough time for all the manifold temperatures to level off and stop rising. Then we hop in the car and do the dyno runs. After those are complete, we come back and allow the car to run for an additional 15 minutes. This allows enough time for the temperatures to rise back up and level off again. During cruising speeds, the temperatures are greatly reduced due to the added airflow in the engine bay and radiator. So we allowed the car to idle after the dyno runs to record the temperatures after the motor has been put under racing conditions. We conducted this exact procedure before and after the installation of the Nissan Works Phenolic Intake Spacers during the same day and exact same weather conditions.
The results? Without spacers installed, the following average temp readings were recorded. Please note that these are the average temperatures after the engine temps have stopped rising and is as heat soaked as possible.
Temp Results without Spacers
Heads: 188.25*F
LIM: 176.4*F
UIM: 146.0*F
Elbow: 119.75*F
TB: 115.25*F
Temp Results WITH Spacers
Heads: 189.0*F
LIM: 144.8*F
UIM: 104.8*F
Elbow: 89.8*F
TB: 89.2*F
These spacers show over a 30 degree temp decrease in Lower Intake Manifold Temps and over a 40 degree temp decrease in Upper Intake Manifold Temps! The upper intake manifold is NOTICABLY cooler with these spacers installed!
Now for the dyno results:
These gains are not the gains you hear from most performance shops (they take the worst "before" dyno and the best "after" dyno to give you bogus power gains). With the dyno chart you see below, 6 dyno runs were logged in order to figure the average gains found at each 100rpm increment for HP and TQ.

Notice the huge gain in low end and midrange torque without sacrificing ANY top end power! Also, noticed the huge gain before AND after the VIAS release point. Between 3800 and 4600 rpm, there is a 5-10hp and 8-12ft-lb gain after the VIAS release point (which seems to be around 3800rpm). And below 3300rpm, there is a consistant 5-7ft-lb gain in torque not counting the initial spike you see below 2600rpm (17-28ft-lbs).
These spacers seem to really put out some decent consistant gains below 5K rpm!
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by blackmaxx96
Number one cylinder..
He could barely get a signal off of it, and i'm really starting to notice it drop off in power, and the idle is slowly getting worse and worse
He could barely get a signal off of it, and i'm really starting to notice it drop off in power, and the idle is slowly getting worse and worse
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Were you able to get ambient temps? How about IAT's?
Sunny
Ambient Temp: 59*F
Humidity: 27%
Barometric Pressure: 29.87
I was not able to record IATs. But there are several people on the org that can record that easily on the 5.5 gen.
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
there are several people on the org that can record that easily on the 5.5 gen.
Although the IAT signal reading is taken from the MAF sensor, it's still should be cooler due to that 'area' of the engine being considerably cooler.
Also, to add to that cylinder coil noise issue, perhaps this may have played a role.
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...5&postcount=22
Aaron
Incredible quality.
Based on the temps and #'s I am seeing, would it be safe to say that we would see similiar results without installing the intake manifold spacers? Just installing the MAF and the upper and lower intake collectors?
Since some of us might not want to remove the intake mani, it would be nice to know what we might expect with a lesser kit when they become available.
Incredible quality.
Based on the temps and #'s I am seeing, would it be safe to say that we would see similiar results without installing the intake manifold spacers? Just installing the MAF and the upper and lower intake collectors?
Since some of us might not want to remove the intake mani, it would be nice to know what we might expect with a lesser kit when they become available.
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
I certainly plan on getting a set of your spacers and I will post before and after IAT's.
Although the IAT signal reading is taken from the MAF sensor, it's still should be cooler due to that 'area' of the engine being considerably cooler.
Also, to add to that cylinder coil noise issue, perhaps this may have played a role.
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...5&postcount=22
Although the IAT signal reading is taken from the MAF sensor, it's still should be cooler due to that 'area' of the engine being considerably cooler.
Also, to add to that cylinder coil noise issue, perhaps this may have played a role.
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...5&postcount=22
The VE has the same coil pack design as the VQ35. My system needs a high voltage signal in order to get a clean run file. So I am not able to connect up to the wires on top of the coil pack. What I do is unplug the coil pack, attach and high voltage plug wire between the spark plug and the coil pack. Then I attach to that for a very clean signal.
Originally Posted by NiZMo1o1
are you working on the 6th gen soon ?
Originally Posted by Epacy
How involved was it to put the spacers on that go to the heads?
Originally Posted by nismopc
Based on the temps and #'s I am seeing, would it be safe to say that we would see similiar results without installing the intake manifold spacers? Just installing the MAF and the upper and lower intake collectors?
Since some of us might not want to remove the intake mani, it would be nice to know what we might expect with a lesser kit when they become available.
Since some of us might not want to remove the intake mani, it would be nice to know what we might expect with a lesser kit when they become available.
I would not recommend going with anything other than the full kit. Those LIM spacers really do make a difference when you combine them with the rest of the kit. Keep in mind that removing the LIM is VERY easy! If you remove the UIM, the hard part is over b/c you had to worry about electrical connections and vacuum and breather hoses. But with the LIM, you just unbolt it and lift it straight up. There is no need to release the fuel pressure.
Originally Posted by soonerfan
My car is taken apart waiting for this. 
Actually I did my spark plug (now that ive taken all this apart, i can speak from experience - this kit will be easy to install)
[IMG]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/soonerfan1/DSC01425.jpg

Actually I did my spark plug (now that ive taken all this apart, i can speak from experience - this kit will be easy to install)
[IMG]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/soonerfan1/DSC01425.jpg
Originally Posted by Epacy
Sooner, I don't see the LIM off. You doing that part I assume?







