beat a 2002 maxima
#1
beat a 2002 maxima
very simple story i was on my way to work in the city of coto de caza
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
travis
zero tolerance
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
travis
zero tolerance
#2
Re: beat a 2002 maxima
Originally posted by flipmode_cali
very simple story i was on my way to work in the city of coto de caza
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
travis
zero tolerance
very simple story i was on my way to work in the city of coto de caza
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
travis
zero tolerance
some people dont race their cars while in break-in period...is there a chance he limited his revs to 4000 like it says in the manual?
#3
Re: Re: beat a 2002 maxima
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Y2KMaxGXE-R
some people dont race their cars while in break-in period...is there a chance he limited his revs to 4000 like it says in the manual? [/QU
he could of been out of the break in period since it was him to provoke the race. and if he limited his revs to 4000 i would have walked away from him like crazy i have about the same power as him so you tell me. i dont know.
travis
zero tolerance
some people dont race their cars while in break-in period...is there a chance he limited his revs to 4000 like it says in the manual? [/QU
he could of been out of the break in period since it was him to provoke the race. and if he limited his revs to 4000 i would have walked away from him like crazy i have about the same power as him so you tell me. i dont know.
travis
zero tolerance
#5
good news
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
#6
Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
#8
Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
or 2002 3.5 Altima manual vs 2000 manual?
#9
Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by Ludacris
Sorry for this stupid question but does that mean that auto Maxs only have 160 useable bhp?
Sorry for this stupid question but does that mean that auto Maxs only have 160 useable bhp?
#10
Re: Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
#11
Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by Y2KMaxGXE-R
i dont bewieve it how 'bout 2002 6spd vs. 2000 5 spd?
or 2002 3.5 Altima manual vs 2000 manual?
i dont bewieve it how 'bout 2002 6spd vs. 2000 5 spd?
or 2002 3.5 Altima manual vs 2000 manual?
The 2k2 stick should dyno 216hp to the wheels but may differ with the different gearing ratios. (sounds like the peak hp may will be lower but have more in the lower rpms)
#12
Re: beat a 2002 maxima
Originally posted by flipmode_cali
very simple story i was on my way to work in the city of coto de caza
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
very simple story i was on my way to work in the city of coto de caza
so i was coming up on the 241 pay booth and there was a 2002 in another booth he pays his toll and goes on, I think nothing of it but he was like waiting on me, so when i start accelerating away from the booth he like swurves next me and start accelerating back and forth. so he punched i down shift to 3rd he started a half car in front of me by 135 i was about a little more than a car on him. SURPRISING
#13
Re: Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
#16
Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
#17
Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by c5hardtop
Thats a big difference there...C5 corvettes lose 15% with manuel and 18% with automatic
Thats a big difference there...C5 corvettes lose 15% with manuel and 18% with automatic
2000 corvette(not c5) stick 0-60 is 4.8 and auto is 5.2 (only .4 secs slower)
2000 max stick 0-60 is 6.7 and auto is more like 8 (over 1 sec slower)
The calculations I did are just estimates assuming everything is the same. They apply to 5th gen only but the same can be done to 4th gen if you look at a few stock dyno plots. I think this is a good estimate because not a lot has changed in the 2k2 max. We'll just have to see when the first 2k2 gets dyno'd to see if the tranny is better/worse.
#19
The VQ may have gotten bigger and better, but the automagic is still the same 4 speed auto. The 5 speed has grown to a 6 speed on the SE though, which is ALL good
DW
DW
Originally posted by CoolMax
Therefore, more hp means slower car.
Therefore, more hp means slower car.
#21
Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
i've been thinking...
2K max stick dynos at 190hp of 222 = 85% useful hp (15% drivetrain loss)
2K max auto dynos at 160hp of 222 = 72% useful hp (28% drivetrain loss)
2K2 max auto at 255 with 72% is 183 hp
therefore a 2k stick max with little or no mods will out dyno a 2k2 max and may beat it!!!!
160 fwhp is where most stock Accord V6's dyno at with our mandatory auto tranny. 28% drivetrain loss is ridiculous. I thought most automagic Maxima's dynoed at around 170 fwhp stock, only 20 below the stick.
Both cars weigh about the same and I know a stock Maxima/auto is a little faster (if powershifted at redline) so there's no way it only has 160 fwhp stock. It's gotta be 170 fwhp or so... Even 170 sounds a little low.
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by theMax
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
yep, 160 wheel HP, sorry to say but most auto max's on this board dyno 30hp less than sticks, not to mention even less if they are 2001, cali emmissions.
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: good news
My auto stock dynoed 164...hp for a 2000 auto fed.
Originally posted by SteVTEC
whoa....
160 fwhp is where most stock Accord V6's dyno at with our mandatory auto tranny. 28% drivetrain loss is ridiculous. I thought most automagic Maxima's dynoed at around 170 fwhp stock, only 20 below the stick.
Both cars weigh about the same and I know a stock Maxima/auto is a little faster (if powershifted at redline) so there's no way it only has 160 fwhp stock. It's gotta be 170 fwhp or so... Even 170 sounds a little low.
whoa....
160 fwhp is where most stock Accord V6's dyno at with our mandatory auto tranny. 28% drivetrain loss is ridiculous. I thought most automagic Maxima's dynoed at around 170 fwhp stock, only 20 below the stick.
Both cars weigh about the same and I know a stock Maxima/auto is a little faster (if powershifted at redline) so there's no way it only has 160 fwhp stock. It's gotta be 170 fwhp or so... Even 170 sounds a little low.
#24
true and not true
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
The calif emission cars do not dyno any less than the fed..this was proven.
The calif emission cars do not dyno any less than the fed..this was proven.
#25
Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by SteVTEC
whoa....
160 fwhp is where most stock Accord V6's dyno at with our mandatory auto tranny. 28% drivetrain loss is ridiculous. I thought most automagic Maxima's dynoed at around 170 fwhp stock, only 20 below the stick.
Both cars weigh about the same and I know a stock Maxima/auto is a little faster (if powershifted at redline) so there's no way it only has 160 fwhp stock. It's gotta be 170 fwhp or so... Even 170 sounds a little low.
whoa....
160 fwhp is where most stock Accord V6's dyno at with our mandatory auto tranny. 28% drivetrain loss is ridiculous. I thought most automagic Maxima's dynoed at around 170 fwhp stock, only 20 below the stick.
Both cars weigh about the same and I know a stock Maxima/auto is a little faster (if powershifted at redline) so there's no way it only has 160 fwhp stock. It's gotta be 170 fwhp or so... Even 170 sounds a little low.
#26
Re: Re: Re: good news
Originally posted by Y2KMaxGXE-R
my friend has a stock 95 GLE he beats any Accord, auto or stick. Maximas are much faster.
my friend has a stock 95 GLE he beats any Accord, auto or stick. Maximas are much faster.
Your friend's 95 GLE ought to be mighty quick. 190 HP VQ and it weighs 300lb less than my Accord V6.
I respect the Max
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nintensity
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
08-13-2015 05:41 PM
yat70458
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
08-03-2015 01:16 PM