5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2002 compression test results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #1  
shaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 588
2002 compression test results

I have a 2002 with 88,000 miles on it. I've had oil loss issues for a while now but basically ignored it. I lose about 1qt/1k. Anyways I brough my car into a shop to get a wheel bearing replaced and decided to have them check the motor out. Dry compression came back around 180 per cylinder. Then they ran the wet test and it jumped to about 240! This happened for all cylinders, about the same numbers. The mechanic says my rings are shot and to just deal with it and keep adding oil when needed. Anyone with any experience with this issue let me know what you think. A rebuilt motor installed is probably, what, 4500-5000 right? Not worth it...thanks

shaz
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #2  
hotstartup's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 507
From: vancouver
just pick up a low mileage motor and have that swapped in. should run you about half that. or rebuild your motor instead of buying a rebuilt motor
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #3  
shaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 588
I dont understand how motors work that well but this doesnt really make sense to me. All of the rings are bad yet its creating 180 pressure? Isnt the point of doing a compression test to find a bad cylinder, then run the wet test on that cylinder to see if the pressure comes up? If they were all bad wouldnt they all register lower pressure that 180?

If I do have to go the new/rebuilt or rebuild motor route where's a good place to find one?

thanks
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #4  
sunstream453's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 213
to be honest, 240 sounds too high. he probly just got too much oil in there and it increased the compression number. as far as i have seen, 180 is about what everyone gets on a healthy 3.5. obviously, if youre burning oil its not healthy, but the rings can be bad and still have good compression, since the oil scraper ring, or w/e you prefer to call it, doesnt carry compression
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
I'd just go with a low mileage used engine if you decide to replace yours, saw one with 42,000 miles with transmission for $1300 and another (transmission included also) with 57,000 miles for $1000 on my local craigslist.
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #6  
shaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 588
just picked the car up. the guy says that the increased pressure is creating blowby? the oil is being forced up to the PCV, does that make sense?
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #7  
oldngivout's Avatar
Willing to learn
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,277
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Really, I would just regularly check the oil level on an engine that uses oil. Do it every week or when you fuel up. If it runs fine, then leave it alone. You can buy a lot of oil over time for the $1000 or so that it will take to cure this problem.
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #8  
wyche89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,898
From: Philadelphia, PA
i say just add oil as needed... a quart every 1k isnt gonna kill you.. and at $5 a quart, it'll be waay cheaper over the lifespan of the car to keep adding oil than to buy a new engine and pay to have it swapped in... or even pay to have new rings put in your old engine
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #9  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Check on shortblock prices! A whole engine isn't needed @ 88,000 miles. Are you the original owner? How long did you break-in your engine, when you first bought your car? What kinda oil did you use most of the time? How often did you perform oil/filter changes?
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 11:55 PM
  #10  
RacerX1320's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 584
I agree, at least search around a few junk yards in your area an see if you can catch a good low mile motor. Run a carfax on it to prove mileage. And in the mean time put in the oil as needed. Evantually youll find a good deal and you can buy it.
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #11  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by CMax03
Check on shortblock prices! A whole engine isn't needed @ 88,000 miles.
True but it would still be cheaper to go with a low mileage used engine than have the old one pulled, torn down, shortblock rebuilt, re-assembled and re-installed vs just swapping in another engne. Only problem is even with low mileage, it is best to hear a used engine run and do a compression check before doing all that work. On the plus side of a rebuild, if money allows, you can bore the block and stroke it for more displacement.
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #12  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
^^

But,

I'd rather do some top end work. Not that it is better, but stroker kits & pistons for th VQ are insanely expensive, more so the stroker kits.

For used engines www.car-part.com.
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #13  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by Scottwax
True but it would still be cheaper to go with a low mileage used engine than have the old one pulled, torn down, shortblock rebuilt, re-assembled and re-installed vs just swapping in another engne. Only problem is even with low mileage, it is best to hear a used engine run and do a compression check before doing all that work. On the plus side of a rebuild, if money allows, you can bore the block and stroke it for more displacement.
That's all nice and dandy! But the turn around time is much quicker going with a ready to install shortblock or if you can afford it... longblock assembly! I've done all that tearing down and rebuilding on several cars! Overall less time and money with a rebuilt S/B or L/B! Yall probably have the same concerns I had...using what kind of parts (rings,seals,bearings,etc)! Sometimes it's cheaper and far more efficient
getting a rebuilt S/B and upgrading the rod bolts, rings and bearings to your liking(brand) after you do a little dimensional inspecting the of S/B assembly components!
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #14  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
I built a couple short blocks for my Chevelle so I understand what you are saying. For fast turnaround, you need an already built shortblock and I am not sure how readily available they are for our cars.
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 09:42 AM
  #15  
shaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 588
thanks for all the suggestions but the issue thats bothering me is the fact that I'm told my rings are bad because my psi went from 190 to 240. That just doesnt make sense, isnt a 190 reading really good? How could I have bad rings and get compression results that high?
Old Jul 30, 2008 | 11:03 AM
  #16  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by shaz
thanks for all the suggestions but the issue thats bothering me is the fact that I'm told my rings are bad because my psi went from 190 to 240. That just doesnt make sense, isnt a 190 reading really good? How could I have bad rings and get compression results that high?
Perform the test again. 190 is fine, but, in order to keep the consistency, perform it again.
Old Jul 31, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #17  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
The FSM/Haynes manual I referred to says 185 psi is standard 142psi is minimum and the most important thing, psi differential between cylinders is 14 psi! So I don't think it's your rings either. Get a leakdown tester and your find your leak source I'm sure it's one of those crystalized valve stem seals more than likely on the intake side.
That wet test didn't really prove anything was wrong, it just seals everything up. So there will an increase in PSI. Make sure your testing each cylinder with the same amount of compression strokes to get a consistent actual reading. This will show if there are any strong cylinders and if there are any weak cylinders. Otherwords if you crank one with 6 compression strokes crank them all with 6 compression strokes.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tarun900
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Dec 20, 2021 06:57 PM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
mkaresh
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
Mar 12, 2018 06:48 PM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM
hez8813
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
Sep 27, 2015 08:37 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:39 PM.