5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Review of Timing Advance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #41  
jeff5347's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,124
From: Leicester, Ma
i dug a little deeper and see you can do that. I also found out the scanner he has is not a consult but a snap on. Would the snap on be able to do this as well?
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #42  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
pretty sure only the consult can.. but if someone knows differently let me know cuz my buddy has a snap-on scan tool i could use lol..pretty sure the tool can only clear ur codes and tell u ur codes ect.. but let me know
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #43  
PhalC1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 219
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by mist max2000
pretty sure only the consult can.. but if someone knows differently let me know cuz my buddy has a snap-on scan tool i could use lol..pretty sure the tool can only clear ur codes and tell u ur codes ect.. but let me know
The Consult isnt the only one that can

And it depends on which Snap-On it is. They have like 4 or 5 different models available, but they are all expensive as **** still
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 05:01 AM
  #44  
jeff5347's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,124
From: Leicester, Ma
he has the snap on modis or solus im not sure. im gonna try to get there tonight and see what i can do. i need it anyway to diag a p1456 code i have and see what is leaking. ill write back and let ya know if it can advance timing oo. keeping my fingers crossed
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 11:49 AM
  #45  
Bjs470's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,733
From: Chicago, IL
Well looking at this thread I decided to give it a try. I found a place that will do it for $45 near Chicago. Looking forward to it
Old Sep 25, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #46  
jeff5347's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,124
From: Leicester, Ma
well it was a solus pro. tried the ign. advance and you can test it but not set it. so i need to find someone in the mass area that can do it
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #47  
maxximaa's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 847
From: MB, Canada
teach a newbie please

from 15 to 17, what is it?

thanks
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #48  
PhalC1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 219
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by maxximaa
teach a newbie please

from 15 to 17, what is it?

thanks
In a nutshell its where the spark plugs ignite the a/f mixture. They are set at a 15 degree angle after top dead center of the crank to ignite, and setting it to 17 yields more power
Old Sep 27, 2008 | 06:02 AM
  #49  
maxximaa's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 847
From: MB, Canada
wouldnt that make the car feels like ....say...3.7 instead of 3.5?
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #50  
johnnyd2k2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
From: Uxbridge MA
So I dynoed the max today and was very happy with the results after the timing advance my first dyno run yeilded 210whp & 186tq (before) and the results after the advance were quite suprising 208whp and 213tq. Now I know that it seems like I lost whp but out of my first 5 runs 210 seemed to be an anomoly probably because the IM was much cooler, my other 4 runs were in the 200-205whp range. Today when I ran my IM was rippin hot but still put down good #s. The most amazing was the TQ increase over 27lbs which blows my mind. It could have been the differences in the dynos or conditions but still thats quite an increase just to atribute just to those slight differences. I should have my runfiles from today soon so I will post them up. I can now say this was probably one of the best mods I've done.
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #51  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by johnnyd2k2
So I dynoed the max today and was very happy with the results after the timing advance my first dyno run yeilded 210whp & 186tq (before) and the results after the advance were quite suprising 208whp and 213tq. Now I know that it seems like I lost whp but out of my first 5 runs 210 seemed to be an anomoly probably because the IM was much cooler, my other 4 runs were in the 200-205whp range. Today when I ran my IM was rippin hot but still put down good #s. The most amazing was the TQ increase over 27lbs which blows my mind. It could have been the differences in the dynos or conditions but still thats quite an increase just to atribute just to those slight differences. I should have my runfiles from today soon so I will post them up. I can now say this was probably one of the best mods I've done.
Was it the same dyno? I also had the timing advance done today. My base timing was 14 degrees and he added +2 but was able to get it to 17. Can't really tell a differnce on the but dyno but the real dyno will tell.
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #52  
Bjs470's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,733
From: Chicago, IL
I Did mine last week and was very satisfied. Only 40 bucks. Great mod for little cash...Did not feel like 27lb ft of torque for sure..

Last edited by Bjs470; Oct 12, 2008 at 11:12 AM.
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #53  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
a 2 degree timing advance would not yield 27 lb ft of torque. Torque is determined by the tach signal and I would have to say the signal was bad.

I'll be the first one to say it. Post the graphs please. I wouldn't be surprised if the 27 lb ft was a small spike cause by the tach signal pickup.
Old Oct 11, 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #54  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by PhalC1
In a nutshell its where the spark plugs ignite the a/f mixture. They are set at a 15 degree angle after top dead center of the crank to ignite, and setting it to 17 yields more power
Actually, it is before top dead center. You fire the plugs after top dead center and the car probably won't run.
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 09:31 AM
  #55  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
weren't the dynos different as well?
Old Oct 12, 2008 | 02:15 PM
  #56  
MattyBlacc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 962
From: Gwinnett (GA)
Originally Posted by johnnyd2k2
$99 flat rate for hooking up the consult so while it's hooked up they will do anything you want that was all I had them do beside clearing any stored codes
wow. thats alot. got mine done for 10 bucks. but then again...im all the way in GA. but i will agree with you. it does show a big improvement.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #57  
321VQ35MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,436
From: Sanford, FL
On my 03 6MT, is 17 as far as I should go? Only other mod I have is CAI.
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #58  
jd885's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42
Im thinking of doing it ... but im always worried about pinging... i would have to see some decent gains on a dyno to do it
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #59  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
I think 19 would be too lean, and it would ping like a ****
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 06:35 AM
  #60  
CorollaULEV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 423
From: Bristol, VA
Alright. Despite my screen name, I actually own a 2007 Altima 3.5SE 6MT.

Soooo ... firstly, the Cipher, Consult II/III and the Autoenginuity w/ Nissan-enhanced package can access and perform the timing advance.

Secondly - the timing advance is a diagnostic test built into the ECM to help a tech diagnose problems. The MAX is a 4deg advance. So, a 0-4 deg advance possible. Technically, this is suppose to be a temporary change, for diagnosing problems in the vehicle. However, a 1 or 2 deg advance actually "sticks" in the ECM once disconnecting the Consult/Cipher/AE and restarting the engine. Anything higher than 2 gets restored to stock timing of *ZERO CORRECTION* when restarting the engine.

Don't know what you mean by 19 being too LEAN. Advancing timing has very little to do with running rich or lean. It might ping, but it won't run lean.

All we have around here is 93 octane. I have the Autoenginuity w/ Nissan-enhanced package and have the 2 deg advance done on my car by the AE. Have never pinged to my knowledge.

Late,
Trav

Last edited by CorollaULEV; Oct 14, 2008 at 06:39 AM.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #61  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by CorollaULEV

Don't know what you mean by 19 being too LEAN. Advancing timing has very little to do with running rich or lean. It might ping, but it won't run lean.
I was going to post the same thing. Timing has nothing to do with how rich or lean the air/fuel mixture is but everything to do when the spark plugs ignite with respect to the engine's location to top dead center.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #62  
johnnyd2k2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
From: Uxbridge MA
Here's the graph blue before red after
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #63  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
So are those 2 different dynos?
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 06:42 PM
  #64  
SmokinMax02's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 283
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by Zack342
So are those 2 different dynos?
Yes sir!

Old Oct 14, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #65  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
What I meant was it would run too hot, and a lean condition would cause it to ping like crazy. And most likely fail drive clean or e-test. And I still call BS on the 27 lb ft of torque. My timing advance is 2* base and another 6* at >70 % throttle so by those numbers I should have around 400 lb ft of torque at the crank.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #66  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally Posted by johnnyd2k2
So I dynoed the max today and was very happy with the results after the timing advance my first dyno run yeilded 210whp & 186tq (before) and the results after the advance were quite suprising 208whp and 213tq. Now I know that it seems like I lost whp but out of my first 5 runs 210 seemed to be an anomoly probably because the IM was much cooler, my other 4 runs were in the 200-205whp range. Today when I ran my IM was rippin hot but still put down good #s. The most amazing was the TQ increase over 27lbs which blows my mind. It could have been the differences in the dynos or conditions but still thats quite an increase just to atribute just to those slight differences. I should have my runfiles from today soon so I will post them up. I can now say this was probably one of the best mods I've done.

I knew something was not right here. You made 9 runs, the first run is number 4 and then the best run was 169?
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #67  
SmokinMax02's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 283
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
DoublePost

Last edited by SmokinMax02; Oct 14, 2008 at 08:56 PM.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #68  
SmokinMax02's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 283
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by knight_yyz
a 2 degree timing advance would not yield 27 lb ft of torque. Torque is determined by the tach signal and I would have to say the signal was bad.

I'll be the first one to say it. Post the graphs please. I wouldn't be surprised if the 27 lb ft was a small spike cause by the tach signal pickup.
Oh, so there was no spike on the dyno graphs from a bad tach signal, but still call BS b/c the numbers are not to your likeing...

Interesting

Originally Posted by knight_yyz
And I still call BS on the 27 lb ft of torque.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:11 AM
  #69  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
you did not do 169 runs on the dyno. you are full of ****. And anyone who thinks your car got 27 lb/ft of torque from 2 degrees timing is an idiot
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:52 AM
  #70  
johnnyd2k2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 690
From: Uxbridge MA
169 is just the # the computer gave the file. I went back and looked at all my runs and 27lb gain was from my best run from the 1st dyno but on one other pull from the first set my highest was 196bs wtq and all the others were either 185 or 186lbs. Like I said it could be from using 2 different dynos or conditions but there is a noticable gain when driving.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:17 AM
  #71  
SmokinMax02's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 283
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by knight_yyz
you did not do 169 runs on the dyno. you are full of ****. And anyone who thinks your car got 27 lb/ft of torque from 2 degrees timing is an idiot
First of all, dumb**, Im not the OP, nor do I know him.

Second, if you had any clue as to what you were talking about, you'd understand the computer program automatically generates an individual file # at random. Therefor, file #169. Not 169 runs, lol.

And last but not least, you asked for a dyno graph and predicted there was gonna be a spike on the graph cause by a bad tach signal.

Well guess what, YOU WERE WRONG!

That's the point that you continue to miss.

And yet you still call BS like you have any ground to stand on.




Originally Posted by CorollaULEV
Dont know what you mean by 19 being too LEAN. Advancing timing has very little to do with running rich OR lean. It might ping, but it wont run lean


Oops!

Originally Posted by knight_yyz
What I meant is that it would run too hot, and cause a lean condition.


By the way, nice recovery!

Hard to be wrong twice in one thread....but you managed to pull it off....





Old Oct 15, 2008 | 07:43 AM
  #72  
taaron39's Avatar
Trakrunna
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 40
Yes This is a great MOD........ I just got this down a few weeks ago... Wow I'm impressed. Better throttle reponse from a dig, up/down shifting. Pretty cool for a few burnouts too.... Definitely recomended oh and cheap HP gains only $30... can't beat that......FTW
My friend even noticed the difference after driving it the other day
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #73  
Dynasty47x1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 333
From: Tampa
Got mine done today for 20 at the dealership it feels good tires spin a little now not to much though.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #74  
dizmax96's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 548
i needa get on this bandwagon of timing advance. lol looks like everyone is lovin this little mod
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #75  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by travof2008
Well since here in Cali our premium gas is 91 octane will I still be ok to get the timing advance done to my vehicle.
Progress drop? Nice!
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #76  
Bjs470's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,733
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by dizmax96
i needa get on this bandwagon of timing advance. lol looks like everyone is lovin this little mod
It's worth it...good bang for your buck
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ben2003GLE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
31
Jul 17, 2016 08:13 AM
Starrider
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
4
Sep 17, 2015 07:26 AM
rbaker100
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
Aug 31, 2015 11:09 AM
305head
Infiniti I30/I35
2
Aug 26, 2015 09:03 PM
kirkhilles
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Aug 8, 2015 10:53 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.