5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Who has a NWP VIAS block plate on their 5.5 gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 08:36 PM
  #81  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by Rochester
Mods are incremental.
This is a 1, maybe 1.5 car length mod. Enough to show a stock 5.5 gen your tail lights but not disappear from them.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:37 PM
  #82  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
not to be a downer or jack the thread, but has anyone noticed any mpg differences between having the plate installed vs the VIAS? I know, don't mod your car if you want fuel economy and whatnot...but I was just curious if anyone noticed a difference. I feel as though mine went down, however that could be due to the more aggressive use of the throttle haha. But over the course of time I do feel as if my mpg's decreased. Anyone care to comment?
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:37 PM
  #83  
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
sparks03max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 3,468
Originally Posted by Rochester
I wonder if I'll feel the low end loss, seeing as I've got spacers and a light crank pulley? What RPM range are you considering low-end and high-end?
Low end loss is primarily in the 1400-3200 rpm range. Midrange is all gains.
sparks03max is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:38 PM
  #84  
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
sparks03max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 3,468
Originally Posted by byrdman164
not to be a downer or jack the thread, but has anyone noticed any mpg differences between having the plate installed vs the VIAS? I know, don't mod your car if you want fuel economy and whatnot...but I was just curious if anyone noticed a difference. I feel as though mine went down, however that could be due to the more aggressive use of the throttle haha. But over the course of time I do feel as if my mpg's decreased. Anyone care to comment?
Mine definitely went down 2-3 mpg. Probably because our cruise range (2000-2500ish rpms) is within the range of the loss from stock.
sparks03max is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:41 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
Yeah, that's what I figured. I put the VIAS back in and all seems better. Too bad because I think it's a cool thing to have. Although once I get a job and don't have to pinch every tank I'll probably put it back in haha
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 09:14 PM
  #86  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by byrdman164
Yeah, that's what I figured. I put the VIAS back in and all seems better. Too bad because I think it's a cool thing to have. Although once I get a job and don't have to pinch every tank I'll probably put it back in haha
You actually confirmed the MPG loss by putting the valve back in? That's the first I'd read that. I thought the point of the VIAS was to tweak airflow so there was more power in the lower RPM's. Following that line of thought, if you're reducing the power low-end, wouldn't you be increasing mileage?

That is, as long as you never drive over 4000 to 6500 RPM's. (Which isn't realistic, if you're modding the car.) In which case, yeah, I could see your mileage go south.

I don't think it's the VIAS-delete that's reducing your mileage. More likely that's happening because you're driving in the upper RPM's without the VIAS.

It's the whole "guns don't kill people" argument.
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 09:52 PM
  #87  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Cruising range is under the 2800 rpms where the VIAS system improves power (look at the dyno chart) and power is actually a touch higher with the block-off plate under 2800 rpm. Theoretically, with a bit more low end power, you don't have to use as much gas to maintain a steady speed. However, since the difference is very small, you probably wouldn't notice any improvement.

First few tankfuls after an engine mod really aren't representative of your normal driving habits since you do a lot of "testing" to confirm to yourself the mod did increase power and you got your money's worth.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 10:01 PM
  #88  
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
knight_yyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 3,711
if you are tuned after the mod it definitely won't affect mileage
knight_yyz is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 04:50 AM
  #89  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
QNO_A32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,107
idk why anyone would want to delete there VIAS guess ill try it spring cuz its so cheap...
QNO_A32 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 06:15 AM
  #90  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
idk why anyone would want to delete there VIAS guess ill try it spring cuz its so cheap...
http://www.nissanclub.com/forums/eng...-vs-stock.html

My thoughts on the VIAS delete vs Stock.

-3800rpm seems to be the magic number in this comparison. Below 3800 the Stock setup is better but after that its all gains with the NWP Blockplate and the VIAS delete!!!
-From 3800 all the way to redline with the VIAS delete I showed an average 8hp gain across the board with a peak of 10.5hp at 6000.
-From 2700 until 3800 the Stock setup was good for an average of 8hp over the VIAS delete with a peak of 9hp at 3400.
-From 3800 until redline the VIAS delete made an average of 8tq more with a peak of 10.5tq at 4200.
-From 2800 until 3800 the Stock setup was good for an average of 10tq more with a peak of 16tq more at 3400.

The verdict..... Its really just up to what you want to drive with, I am choosing the NWP Block plate with an unmodifed IM for now.
-I like the power from 3800rpm until redline rather than power below 3800rpm, I feel the losses down that low are worth the gains I see up high. When I stomp on the gas I dont stay below 3800 for very long, this makes the VIAS delete a beneficial mod IMHO.
That's why.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 06:38 AM
  #91  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Scott, what's that metallic film underneath your FSTB? It almost looks like it's a part of it... I don't get that.

Rochester is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 06:58 AM
  #92  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charlotte Nc
Posts: 1,224
I'm not sure if this was discussed before... But i was just curious, no I wouldn't go ghetto but Isn't the block off plate Just a plate correct? If so couldn't you just modify the stock one to do the same thing? cutt or break everything on the inside off and then re-aply the plate? Or am I missing something...
e-subliminal-2 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:06 AM
  #93  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by e-subliminal-2
I'm not sure if this was discussed before... But i was just curious, no I wouldn't go ghetto but Isn't the block off plate Just a plate correct? If so couldn't you just modify the stock one to do the same thing? cutt or break everything on the inside off and then re-aply the plate? Or am I missing something...
You could hack at the VIAS, cut out the valve, weld the holes, etc. Of course, you couldn't go back, and it would look like crap.

But yes, it's just a plate on the end of the upper IM. The plate isn't the mod per se; it's the VIAS-delete that's the mod.
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:33 AM
  #94  
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
knight_yyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 3,711
if you have a belt sander and a die grinder you can make your own

Welding the existing one is a MAJOR PITA. The japanese aluminum is the lowest quality they can make. It pits and resists welding something fierce. I ruined mine trying to weld it up. So I came up with these. They still have to be polished up for the marks on the outside. Then I will soak them in a bath of water and draino to make it look stock.

knight_yyz is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 07:44 AM
  #95  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by knight_yyz
if you have a belt sander and a die grinder you can make your own

Welding the existing one is a MAJOR PITA. The japanese aluminum is the lowest quality they can make. It pits and resists welding something fierce. I ruined mine trying to weld it up. So I came up with these. They still have to be polished up for the marks on the outside. Then I will soak them in a bath of water and draino to make it look stock.
I seem to remember reading somewhere here that you were making your own block plates. Looking good, knight!

Between these, and your short-ram intakes, it looks like you're gearing up for a small niche business.
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:03 AM
  #96  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by Rochester
Scott, what's that metallic film underneath your FSTB? It almost looks like it's a part of it... I don't get that.
Not sure if I am seeing what you are, but it is the reflection off the FSTB from the camera flash.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:36 AM
  #97  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
crazy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St Paul MN
Posts: 1,174
Originally Posted by Scottwax
With regards to the modest power loss between 2800-3800, I read a post where the person had the timing changed to 17 degrees and that eliminated the loss in that rpm range. For sure the intake spacers would more than cover any loss in the midrange from the block plate.
Wouldnt the NWP spacers balance out any loss from the plate?
crazy97 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 09:44 AM
  #98  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by Scottwax
Not sure if I am seeing what you are, but it is the reflection off the FSTB from the camera flash.
No, not that. There like this plastic sheath around your bar. (think condom)

Originally Posted by crazy97
Wouldnt the NWP spacers balance out any loss from the plate?
Yes. More so.
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:15 AM
  #99  
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
knight_yyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 3,711
I don't have a CNC machine so everything I do is done by hand. The block off plate is pretty easy if time consuming. Just clamp your old plate to a piece of aluminum, drill the 3 holes, bolt the two pieces together and sawcut/sand/grind whatever until you almost touch your original piece. Undo the bolts and polish your new plate.
knight_yyz is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 12:22 PM
  #100  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by Rochester
No, not that. There like this plastic sheath around your bar. (think condom)
The bar is coated.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 04:54 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
QNO_A32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,107
roc, i see what your saying, but look at the bar towards the top of the pic. (think I beam)
QNO_A32 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 05:05 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by QNO_A32
roc, i see what your saying, but look at the bar towards the top of the pic. (think I beam)
Never mind... doesn't matter, anyway. Just couldn't figure out what I was looking at.

I'm OT in my own thread!
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 06:22 PM
  #103  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
Originally Posted by Rochester
You actually confirmed the MPG loss by putting the valve back in? That's the first I'd read that. I thought the point of the VIAS was to tweak airflow so there was more power in the lower RPM's. Following that line of thought, if you're reducing the power low-end, wouldn't you be increasing mileage?

That is, as long as you never drive over 4000 to 6500 RPM's. (Which isn't realistic, if you're modding the car.) In which case, yeah, I could see your mileage go south.

I don't think it's the VIAS-delete that's reducing your mileage. More likely that's happening because you're driving in the upper RPM's without the VIAS.

It's the whole "guns don't kill people" argument.
Originally Posted by Scottwax
Cruising range is under the 2800 rpms where the VIAS system improves power (look at the dyno chart) and power is actually a touch higher with the block-off plate under 2800 rpm. Theoretically, with a bit more low end power, you don't have to use as much gas to maintain a steady speed. However, since the difference is very small, you probably wouldn't notice any improvement.

First few tankfuls after an engine mod really aren't representative of your normal driving habits since you do a lot of "testing" to confirm to yourself the mod did increase power and you got your money's worth.
Also realize, that dyno's are conducted under WOT, which means airflow velocity would be at it's highest (fully open throttle plate allowing the most airflow it can). Under cruise, it's a light load, low throttle opening. I think the reason the fuel mileage went down is because there's no VIAS to help TUNE the airflow. I'm having a hard time explaining it but try to follow along. Seeing as how the air has more places to go, it'd become more scattered, causing it to be less effective when entering the combustion chamber, reducing effective power and thus creating the need to push the accelerator further. Pushing the accelerator further opens increases airflow, thus creating more load and increasing fuel pulse width. Now, that being said, under cruise with light load, the MAF is still pulling in X amount of air, but it's now being scattered. The fuel pulse width would theoretically remain the same because it's seeing the same amount of air, but it isn't being "tuned" by the VIAS. So, wouldn't you think slightly more fuel may be entering the combustion chamber, creating more fuel consumption? I know, it's a long shot, but it all might be in my head too lol. Does anyone see where I'm going with this, or should I just give up haha. Feel free to criticize, I thought I was heading somewhere with it, but I lost my train of thought at this point....
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 08:35 PM
  #104  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by byrdman164
Also realize, that dyno's are conducted under WOT, which means airflow velocity would be at it's highest (fully open throttle plate allowing the most airflow it can). Under cruise, it's a light load, low throttle opening. I think the reason the fuel mileage went down is because there's no VIAS to help TUNE the airflow. I'm having a hard time explaining it but try to follow along. Seeing as how the air has more places to go, it'd become more scattered, causing it to be less effective when entering the combustion chamber, reducing effective power and thus creating the need to push the accelerator further. Pushing the accelerator further opens increases airflow, thus creating more load and increasing fuel pulse width. Now, that being said, under cruise with light load, the MAF is still pulling in X amount of air, but it's now being scattered. The fuel pulse width would theoretically remain the same because it's seeing the same amount of air, but it isn't being "tuned" by the VIAS. So, wouldn't you think slightly more fuel may be entering the combustion chamber, creating more fuel consumption? I know, it's a long shot, but it all might be in my head too lol. Does anyone see where I'm going with this, or should I just give up haha. Feel free to criticize, I thought I was heading somewhere with it, but I lost my train of thought at this point....
I understand what you are saying, sort of like when people gut the precats and it hurts flow because the exhaust expands and than gets squeezed down again. I don't think it is the case with the block plate. Part throttle response so far has been very good so it doesn't seem that deleting the VIAS system has slowed air flow velocity through the intake manifold. I will be monitoring my gas mileage to see for sure if there is a change or not.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-21-2009, 10:56 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
I was afraid it wasn't going to be easy to follow haha
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 05:35 AM
  #106  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by byrdman164
I was afraid it wasn't going to be easy to follow haha
Well, you lost me half way through.

Honestly, I think we're over analyzing the VIAS-delete. It seems pretty simple:
  1. WOT at high RPM requires more air
  2. The VIAS valve gets in the way under those conditions, particularly on a modded engine (intake, spacers, exhaust).
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 10:14 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
Originally Posted by Rochester
Well, you lost me half way through.

Honestly, I think we're over analyzing the VIAS-delete. It seems pretty simple:
  1. WOT at high RPM requires more air
  2. The VIAS valve gets in the way under those conditions, particularly on a modded engine (intake, spacers, exhaust).
Nooooo...I was actually referring to cruise and light load lol. Conditions when you're not romping on it haha. I was trying to see if it'd be worthwhile on a car that's not revved up constantly (ex: low rpms, low load). I mean obviously, if you're worried about fuel economy, don't mod your engine, but still. Just wondering what everyone else thought
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 03:13 PM
  #108  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
CMax03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 9,541
Most ppl lose MPG a use they're staying in the throttle more reaping the benefits of thier labor/mods....I'm personally not sold on the VIAS delete kit....and I can't wait to see Scottwax's observation on the part throttle operation and MPG....
CMax03 is offline  
Old 11-22-2009, 09:38 PM
  #109  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by CMax03
Most ppl lose MPG a use they're staying in the throttle more reaping the benefits of thier labor/mods....I'm personally not sold on the VIAS delete kit....and I can't wait to see Scottwax's observation on the part throttle operation and MPG....
My trip computer was showing the about the same mileage (28-30 mpg) I always get at a steady 70 mph on the freeway, may actually be a touch better because several long stretches are slightly uphill. I'll have to keep doing the math to check my mileage because of how optimistic our trip computers are when it comes to mileage. Probably need 4-5 tanks to determine if there has been a change.

Throttle response is definitely better, been spinning the tires from a 15-20 mph roll when I romp on it. Temperatures have been a bit cool (which always worsens traction for me) and I also swapped out the precats and a test tube for the main cat the day after I did the VIAS block plate so it is hard to say how much of the wheel spin is due to the block plate, better exhaust flow and cooler temperatures.

Leaving a light at part throttle and just tooling around, throttle response is crisper.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:34 AM
  #110  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Not for nothing, Scott, but we're all noticing crisper throttle response with the cooler temperatures. It's just about the only pleasant thing about the start of Winter. In a few weeks, it will be the new normal.

Still, everything you're observing reads as a positive testimonial to dumping the VIAS valve. Try to stay as sensitive as long as possible to the changes in behavior, and keep commenting.

Have you experienced a different engine tone at WOT?
Rochester is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 02:42 PM
  #111  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
nzelinsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 821
I love the vias delete. period. I would do it over and over again if I had any other vq engines.

I love the extra power that really seems to pick up as your rpms climb. If you are some ***** who just wants this to have something on thier mod list but doesnt drive hard and is going to complain about mpg then just gtfo because you dont belong here.
nzelinsky is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:22 PM
  #112  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by Rochester

Have you experienced a different engine tone at WOT?
Actually yes. I already have the GAB so there is already some intake noise. Now it sounds like a quadrajet carb when the secondaries open up. First time I got on it, the sound reminded me a Q-jet.

Listen at 16 and 36 seconds...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxhwWSDA8P4
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:00 PM
  #113  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
spock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: north of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 968
The sound of the good old days. Gas was cheap and tires didn't last long.

My plate is @ the post office. Didn't have time to pick it up today, hopefully tomorrow. Weather is still nice, so I should be installing it within the next couple of days.
spock is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:17 PM
  #114  
Senior Member
 
beefy23b/97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: canby, OR
Posts: 121
I've had the block plate for about six months now. For the first month I was playing around on the throttle more than usual. By the way with the plate installed the power doesn't fade right before redline like it used to now it pulls right till it shifts (A/T). I did however see worse mileage. Now that I'm not playing with it as much I've seen my mpg's go back to pre plate numbers.
beefy23b/97 is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 08:40 PM
  #115  
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 4,014
Originally Posted by beefy23b/97
By the way with the plate installed the power doesn't fade right before redline like it used to now it pulls right till it shifts (A/T).
That is definitely noticeable. Feels like VTEC, yo.
Scottwax is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 09:21 PM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
beefy23b/97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: canby, OR
Posts: 121
Originally Posted by Scottwax
That is definitely noticeable. Feels like VTEC, yo.
Makes a big difference now that I've got the TransGo installed. Nothing like a loss of power at that crucial point and seeing the fender next to you gain half a car cause you lost power and your tranny takes so long to shift you can make a sandwich before it hits the next gear.
beefy23b/97 is offline  
Old 11-23-2009, 10:13 PM
  #117  
Member
iTrader: (6)
 
02nismaxlegnd94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Queens NY
Posts: 201
Originally Posted by byrdman164
Also realize, that dyno's are conducted under WOT, which means airflow velocity would be at it's highest (fully open throttle plate allowing the most airflow it can). Under cruise, it's a light load, low throttle opening. I think the reason the fuel mileage went down is because there's no VIAS to help TUNE the airflow. I'm having a hard time explaining it but try to follow along. Seeing as how the air has more places to go, it'd become more scattered, causing it to be less effective when entering the combustion chamber, reducing effective power and thus creating the need to push the accelerator further. Pushing the accelerator further opens increases airflow, thus creating more load and increasing fuel pulse width. Now, that being said, under cruise with light load, the MAF is still pulling in X amount of air, but it's now being scattered. The fuel pulse width would theoretically remain the same because it's seeing the same amount of air, but it isn't being "tuned" by the VIAS. So, wouldn't you think slightly more fuel may be entering the combustion chamber, creating more fuel consumption? I know, it's a long shot, but it all might be in my head too lol. Does anyone see where I'm going with this, or should I just give up haha. Feel free to criticize, I thought I was heading somewhere with it, but I lost my train of thought at this point....
i agree with your reasoning , i just took a trip up to Reno , this last weekend, i had an average of 28-30 MPG on cruiser control @ 68 MPH. but in stop and go traffic i had an average of 22 MPG. tomorrow i'll swap back to stock set up to guage the daily fuel consumption in regular street traffic. i originally installed the block plate because of a bad VIAS solenoid. but i've since purchased 2 working ones, so back to stock i go, maybe later on when i get a CAI i'll put the block plate back on.
02nismaxlegnd94 is offline  
Old 11-24-2009, 11:14 AM
  #118  
iTrader: (19)
 
tookrzy4u192's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 8
good thread with lots of info.. i'm about to purchase this once again!
tookrzy4u192 is offline  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:13 PM
  #119  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
byrdman164's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 311
Originally Posted by nzelinsky
I love the vias delete. period. I would do it over and over again if I had any other vq engines.

I love the extra power that really seems to pick up as your rpms climb. If you are some ***** who just wants this to have something on thier mod list but doesnt drive hard and is going to complain about mpg then just gtfo because you dont belong here.
I really hope you're not trying to bash me for asking a question. I didn't buy it just to "add to my mod list". It was purchased along with a set of spacers that unfortunately I had to sell due to my dealership closing down. But, for those of us on a budget and the low cost of the plate it's an easy and simple modification. Yes, I'll agree the power does climb with RPM's even with an A/T, and I'm not necessarily complaining about mpg's. I'm simply seeing what everyone else is noticing before and after installing the plate. So if that bothers you please, keep your rude comments to yourself. I didn't mean to ruin your day.

Thanks to Rochester for starting a very informative thread, and for all those with constructive comments!
byrdman164 is offline  
Old 11-24-2009, 06:59 PM
  #120  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Rochester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 5,296
Originally Posted by byrdman164
I really hope you're not trying to bash me for asking a question....
Zelinski is enthusiastic about his Maxima. (Aren't we all?) Don't take it personally. I think the MPG info is good to know.

Group hug, guys.

Originally Posted by byrdman164
Thanks to Rochester for starting a very informative thread, and for all those with constructive comments!
Yeah, I'm pleased with all the good feedback, too. I am definitely doing the VIAS-delete when Winter is over. And I'll be buying Aaron's nicely polished plate. That, and his Torque Link.

Until then, it's something to look forward to when the snow tires come off.
Rochester is offline  


Quick Reply: Who has a NWP VIAS block plate on their 5.5 gen?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 PM.