5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

What would you like to see NWP do next for the 5th Gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #1  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
What would you like to see NWP do next for the 5th Gen?

NWP Engineering rocks. That's a pretty safe statement to make here in the 5th Gen forum. In addition to crafting quality parts, Aaron has cultivated a great reputation as a professional businessman, and a decent guy. Personally, I love what his phenolic spacers have done for my '03 6MT. I'm convinced his VIAS-delete mod is worth pursuing for a modified 3.5, and his new torque link connecting rod is getting excellent reviews. I'll be pursuing both of those mods next Spring, 2010.

Right now I think the 5.5 Maxima is in a sweet-spot for modifications. It's a relatively common vehicle that gives a great bang-for-your-buck, and it's a platform that accepts mods well. That, and its used car age puts it in the hands of the right target audience.

So I got to thinking... if I were Aaron, I'd be looking for ways to take additional advantage of the next few years, to expand the NWP product line while it's hot. But with what?

Any ideas, guys? What products would you like to see out of NWP?


- - [updated 07.01.2011 for the 5.0 gen shift ****/STS idea] - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Here's the list within, categorized but otherwise in no particular sequence, compiled solely as a brainstorming activity, and nothing else.

Aaron, if you're reading this... I apologize for messing in your sandbox. We just like your stuff and want more of it.


ENGINE
  • 2-piece STS Kit, like the old Watkins short-throw shifter adapter, with a powdercoated, hardened-steel pivot-arm bracket.
  • Cold Air shielding for SRI (See post 172)
  • Single-piece Short Ram from TB to Filter
  • Cold-air scoop integrated into the fender shield
  • Cold-air hood scoop or vent
  • Oil Catch Can
  • Crank Pulley
  • 3" ID MAF tube in various lengths with or without breather hole
  • Big-bore MAF Housing
  • 5.0 Gen MAF IAT upgrades for 5.5 Gen
  • Ported Heads & Intake Manifold (as a product, whole or trade)
  • Throttle Body Spacer
  • Under-hood, Roots-style Supercharger Kit

SUSPENSION
  • Fender Braces
  • Front Strut Tower Brace (like the old Cattman Ti-bar)
  • Traction bars
  • Engine anti-roll brace
  • Rear-engine Torque Link Connector Rod
  • Subframe Connectors
  • Coilovers
  • Rear Anti-roll bar
  • Lowering Springs

EXHAUST
  • Affordable Headers
  • 3.0” Exhaust
  • 3.5" Exhaust
  • 3.0” Test-Pipe
  • Fitted Test-Pipe with a cut-out, manual or electronic

OTHER
  • A NWP-branded shift ****.
  • A short-shifter for the 5.0 Gen.
  • NWP-branded Dead-Pedal
  • Seat rail extenders to push the driver seat back further
  • Front-Lip (better then Stillen)
  • Wheel Spacers
  • Cross-drilled & Slotted Rotors
  • Anything for improved air flow…
  • Anything for improved heat management…
  • Anything NWP makes…

Last edited by Rochester; Jul 1, 2011 at 05:36 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #2  
perkman87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 737
From: West Palm Beach
I have the NWP spacers- Now thats some quality stuff, worth every penny.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
this one is going to take some thinking over...im trying to think what else the car would need and what would be in their line of work that would make them profit...


maybe. . .
1.traction rods?
2.pulley? (stretching for ideas on this one)


how about you rochester? you made the thread

Last edited by mist max2000; Dec 3, 2009 at 09:08 AM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:02 AM
  #4  
321VQ35MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,436
From: Sanford, FL
Originally Posted by perkman87
I have the NWP spacers- Now thats some quality stuff, worth every penny.


I need some soon.. Aaron is a great person to deal with and has great engineering. Anything he produces I would invest in.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:07 AM
  #5  
perkman87's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 737
From: West Palm Beach
Originally Posted by 321VQ35MAX
I need some soon.. Aaron is a great person to deal with and has great engineering. Anything he produces I would invest in.
Its such an easy install and the pulling power on the highway is unbelievable.

when are you going to do the spark plugs?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:25 AM
  #6  
321VQ35MAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,436
From: Sanford, FL
Originally Posted by perkman87
Its such an easy install and the pulling power on the highway is unbelievable.

when are you going to do the spark plugs?

Not sure. I have to replace my clutch/flywheel soon. After that I will most likely do the spacers and spark plugs.. Maybe Feb/Mar..
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #7  
2slow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 575
From: Chicagoland
A short ram intake using a box (w/heat shielding) around the filter and a tube to deliver cold air from a high pressure zone (front of vehicle, perhaps the cowl).

edit: it should also incorporate a velocity stack; preferably as an individual piece to lower filter replacement costs.

Last edited by 2slow; Dec 3, 2009 at 10:30 AM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #8  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by mist max2000
maybe. . .
1.traction rods?
2.pulley? (stretching for ideas on this one)
What are traction rods?

Pulley... yeah, since the UR crank pulley is so expensive now, that's not bad.


Originally Posted by mist max2000
how about you rochester? you made the thread
I'd like to see something in the area of suspension and handling. Isn't it strange that ES doesn't sell front/rear motor mount inserts?

Or how about a new MAF housing, with the 5.0 gen MAF sensor already upgraded with the 5.5 IAT?

I bet NWP could sell a warehouse full of FSTB's, if he engineered one like Cattman's old Ti-bar.


Originally Posted by 2slow
A short ram intake using a box (w/heat shielding) around the filter and a tube to deliver cold air from a high pressure zone (front of vehicle, perhaps the cowl).

edit: it should also incorporate a velocity stake; preferably as an individual piece to lower filter replacement costs.
A NWP short-ram... that's not bad. There are a million opinions about air intakes, so it would be good to see a single, highly tested and efficient product from a trusted manufacturer.


Originally Posted by 321VQ35MAX
I need some soon.. Aaron is a great person to deal with and has great engineering. Anything he produces I would invest in.
See, now that's the kind of customer loyalty that's as good as printing money. I think NWP is at the stage where this kind of response can be leveraged into new product.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #9  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
I would like them to use my car to test their products and give me them for free
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 10:52 AM
  #10  
tookrzy4u192's Avatar
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7
From: Oklahoma City
Originally Posted by perkman87
I have the NWP spacers- Now thats some quality stuff, worth every penny.
glad you're liking em!

how about a 3 inch exhaust with dual tips that'll come out faster than CustomMaxima's..
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #11  
rroderiques77's Avatar
Demodded and Forgotten
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Area 51
Originally Posted by Rochester
What are traction rods?
I think he probably meant traction bars, which would be an excellent idea which in fact another vendor is in the process of developing. IMHO, however, our cars get plently of traction off the line with ES motor mount and the torque link.
What would I like to see in the future from NWP? Hmmmmm....Good question. How about a ported and polished cylinder heads, LIM and UIM combo for my N/A engine.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #12  
PulsarGTS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,400
From: Cininnati, OH
Originally Posted by rroderiques77
What would I like to see in the future from NWP? Hmmmmm....Good question. How about a ported and polished cylinder heads, LIM and UIM combo for my N/A engine.
Aren't all those available from Cosworth already?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #13  
rroderiques77's Avatar
Demodded and Forgotten
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,881
From: Area 51
Originally Posted by PulsarGTS
Aren't all those available from Cosworth already?
He asked what I would like to see from NWP and I answered.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #14  
hot_wax_tree's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,044
From: Minnesota
Wheels spacers?
FSTB?
Personally I would love to get a cheaper crank pulley.
Bigger MAF housing.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #15  
nzelinsky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 821
From: Calgary, AB
I think a custom shortram midpipe and heatshield would be great. could a throttle body spacer be developed for a 5.5 as well?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #16  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by nzelinsky
could a throttle body spacer be developed for a 5.5 as well?
To do what... extend the TB away from the intake plenum a bit more?

For what purpose?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #17  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Def a big MAF housing I can drop my stock probe into. And a 3" intake pipe.

To do what... extend the TB away from the intake plenum a bit more?

For what purpose?
Normally the TB spacer is used to increase the intake charge velocity and "spin" the charge (using a vortex shape inside it) to help improve atomization when it reaches the intake manifold.

Worthless.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 02:12 PM
  #18  
MIK3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,106
From: California
A 3" testpipe like the 240 guys have or a shortened-height shifter for the 6MT guys...I would be the first to purchase this.

FSTB similar to Brian's bar would probably sell as well.

It seems as if the 5.5's really respond well to any type of modification that allows greater air flow or heat dispersion. Anything in that realm I'm sure would do well.

Last edited by MIK3; Dec 3, 2009 at 02:14 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 02:50 PM
  #19  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
roots supercharger kit
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #20  
MaximusMorpheus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 725
From: Living it up in MA..
I am enjoying NWP's spacers and engine torque link, FTW!

I like the idea of traction bars and a custom NWP FSTB...
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 03:30 PM
  #21  
Staticxout2's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 135
From: Mukwonago,Wi
I'm with 2slow on the intake idea! But i think i'm going to go ahead and make my own. Can't wait.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #22  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Rear anti-roll bar, intake that makes dyno proven power
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #23  
The6spdMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,194
From: Maryland
Anything with performance within affordable price range than handling.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #24  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally Posted by nzelinsky
I think a custom shortram midpipe and heatshield would be great. could a throttle body spacer be developed for a 5.5 as well?
they have them for the 350 Z, same thing just most companies don't market it under maxima

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/OBX-T...Q5fAccessories

Short Height shifter
http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...r-5-5-gen.html

Last edited by knight_yyz; Dec 3, 2009 at 05:32 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 05:30 PM
  #25  
PulsarGTS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,400
From: Cininnati, OH
Originally Posted by rroderiques77
He asked what I would like to see from NWP and I answered.
Ok...
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #26  
Rochester's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by MIK3
It seems as if the 5.5's really respond well to any type of modification that allows greater air flow or heat dispersion. Anything in that realm I'm sure would do well.
That's a fact. Are you thinking of anything in particular, MIK3?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #27  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
rochester- you were asking about the traction rods-- i figured since they are alot like the tq link in terms of parts maybe they would be able to produce these eaisly

http://forums.maxima.org/6th-generat...tion-rods.html

http://forums.maxima.org/advanced-su...ants-some.html

^^ some reading material

but yeah to keep this going these are all some great ideas but where is NWP on all this

rochester.. you should make a # list in your first post with everyones ideas and keep it updated and then maybe aaron will chime in and tell us were all crazy
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #28  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
How about lowering springs?

Subframe connectors.

Coilovers.

Last edited by MoncefA33; Dec 3, 2009 at 05:55 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #29  
User 12822's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 561
intake for sure. one that boosts torque and hp.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #30  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Man what is with people who want "dyno proven" intakes that increase everything.


Last edited by MoncefA33; Dec 3, 2009 at 06:38 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #31  
2slow's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 575
From: Chicagoland
Because I am visual person, how about something like this:


With something like this directing air towards it:


And one of these under the filter:


And market it with some dyno numbers to prove the awesomenessss.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #32  
User 12822's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 561
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
Man what is with people who want "dyno proven" intakes that increase everything.

Is that even a question? Why would I buy a performance part that is not dyno proven?

Especially if Im buying a performance intake, its not some regular intake. Im spending extra money for performance so I should be able to see what performance I'm getting.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #33  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
Man what is with people who want "dyno proven" intakes that increase everything.

I don't buy intakes for the sound. I didn't buy the VIAS block plate until I saw dyno pulls.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:19 PM
  #34  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by TeH BawNeY
Is that even a question? Why would I buy a performance part that is not dyno proven?

Especially if Im buying a performance intake, its not some regular intake. Im spending extra money for performance so I should be able to see what performance I'm getting.
After endless debate, stock airboxes on 5th/5.5 gens are not the weakest point of the car. And the gains of common intakes NOT including the Injen (which is a crap mod no matter what) are near-negligible. You'll see increased response on the road with a JWT or Berk or PR-style just on the basis of velocity stack and cone style filter (read: more effective filter area).

Unless you have a larger MAF housing/intake pipe and the supporting mods to go with it (AFC, wideband, empty road... ) you won't see actual whp gains.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #35  
User 12822's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 561
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
After endless debate, stock airboxes on 5th/5.5 gens are not the weakest point of the car. And the gains of common intakes NOT including the Injen (which is a crap mod no matter what) are near-negligible. You'll see increased response on the road with a JWT or Berk or PR-style just on the basis of velocity stack and cone style filter (read: more effective filter area).

Unless you have a larger MAF housing/intake pipe and the supporting mods to go with it (AFC, wideband, empty road... ) you won't see actual whp gains.
I feel like you are beating around the bush, I'm not attacking quality of intakes and gains in general. I personally stand by the stock air box with holes drilled and a K&N drop in filter.

The point is you should never purchase a performance part without seeing some dyno runs.

I could put on the market and intake for our cars that claims 50 whp and torque...
See where I'm going with this?

Dynos are in essence the seals of authenticity needed for the seller to make a decision.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #36  
User 12822's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 561
Back on topic, Nwp seems to favor metal based/rubber based products so why not some sway bars?
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #37  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by TeH BawNeY
I feel like you are beating around the bush, I'm not attacking quality of intakes and gains in general. I personally stand by the stock air box with holes drilled and a K&N drop in filter.

The point is you should never purchase a performance part without seeing some dyno runs.

I could put on the market and intake for our cars that claims 50 whp and torque...
See where I'm going with this?

Dynos are in essence the seals of authenticity needed for the seller to make a decision.
Your point is valid. But if you do 3 pulls on a car with no variables changed, you still get different numbers due to heat soak and other variables that affect horsepower (measurement error probably)

Now say on Run 1, you do a pull. On Run 2, you switch intakes. You see a gain. Switch to another aftermarket intake, and do another pull. You see a different horsepower figure.

You don't know how the other issues around the car are affecting this. Which since you're testing an intake (whos purpose, as everyone knows is to suck in air) is one of the more variable issues. Especially when your hood is up and you've got a huge fan blowing into the bay. With these issues, how do you dyno "prove" an intake?

As opposed to headers, or NWP plate/spacers or tuning you see horsepower gains that are large enough to justify purchase for other people, inspite of other variables like heat soak etc.

And yeah, back on topic. Sorry for the...wall of text

Last edited by MoncefA33; Dec 3, 2009 at 08:48 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #38  
SoulEater's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 510
From: Queens, NY
Im always thinking i wanna upgrade my cooling system. i already had an aluminum radiator on my maxima. but that doesnt work quite efficiently without cooler thermostat and aluminum shroud.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 08:55 PM
  #39  
User 12822's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 561
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
Your point is valid. But if you do 3 pulls on a car with no variables changed, you still get different numbers due to heat soak and other variables that affect horsepower (measurement error probably)

Now say on Run 1, you do a pull. On Run 2, you switch intakes. You see a gain. Switch to another aftermarket intake, and do another pull. You see a different horsepower figure.

You don't know how the other issues around the car are affecting this. Which since you're testing an intake (whos purpose, as everyone knows is to suck in air) is one of the more variable issues. Especially when your hood is up and you've got a huge fan blowing into the bay. With these issues, how do you dyno "prove" an intake?

As opposed to headers, or NWP plate/spacers or tuning you see horsepower gains that are large enough to justify purchase for other people, inspite of other variables like heat soak etc.
Okay I see where you are coming from here. My answer would be to dyno the car with the stock intake and a basic average filter. Do maybe 5-6 pulls for consistency. Then swap in the new intake, drive the car a few miles so the computer can "get used to it" then go do another 5-6 runs with the new intake. Of course cool down times in between would help. With enough pulls if there is an increase a trend should become apparent.

You could also use a test car with full exhaust, as we all know air flow mods tend to be supportive. On a stock car an intake may only see increases of 1-2 whp but on a car with performance exhaust you may see differences of up to 8 whp. So you could definitely dyno prove the intake.

Intakes are always the first "exploration" mod if you will and are a good stepping stone for people new to modding. Its one of the easiest performance mods to understand and sadly there is no reasonably priced after market intake specifically built for 5th gens. The best intake for the money is definitely the GBA mod with a K&N filter. The next best intake that would cost more would be a home made intake, 3 inch home depot piping and a high performance/high flow air filter.

I could build a custom intake for less the cost of any after market intake out there for our cars and get the same if not better numbers. Thus the opportunity is definitely there for Nwp if they can make an intake that gives as good or better gains than any after market intake out there and is cheaper.

Basically take the home made cheaper option intake set up and polish it up a bit to turn into a marketable product.
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:07 PM
  #40  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
There ya go. That makes more sense.

More runs will help consistency, but IMO for intakes, true performance has to be measured on the strip. The tradeoff between different pipe lengths, filter placement, velocity stack etc will show in your ETs and trap speeds. Also it'll give you an appropriate environment for the intake to perform. IE; realistic speeds, hood down (hopefully )

This is why I suggested a 3" intake pipe/MAF housing. I want and will pay for this, because that's the only way to get gains. More volume FTW.

And a JWT was my first mod.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.