5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

VQ on Ward's 10Best List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 03:54 PM
  #1  
MajesticBlueNTO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,658
VQ on Ward's 10Best List

For the 8th straight year

http://www.autonet.ca/AutonetStories...m?storyID=3914

cheers
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 03:56 PM
  #2  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 03:59 PM
  #3  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE
Hell yea
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
Hell yea
wonton power
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 04:01 PM
  #5  
MichaelAE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,026


Go team, go.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 04:03 PM
  #6  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE


wonton power
No duhhhh.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 04:51 PM
  #7  
mattattax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,575
good engines are definitely good
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 07:20 PM
  #8  
jykishan's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 369
damn the VQ is in five nissan cars and trucks. And in 2003 in seven. All I got to say is DAMN.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
ColgateU's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 52
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 08:02 PM
  #10  
190hpKiLLA's Avatar
Granny Driven
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,445
Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
Well I dont care how good the "Ward's Communications Inc." is , cause other mags also say that nissan engines rock!
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 08:37 PM
  #11  
i•maxx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 179
Originally posted by 190hpKiLLA

Well I dont care how good the "Ward's Communications Inc." is , cause other mags also say that nissan engines rock!
Ward's Automotive is the Grammy Awards organization for automotive engines. When they elect you to their Top 10
your the SH**. Enough said!!

Congrats to Nissan and to All maxima drivers who know how sweet those engines are!!
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 08:45 PM
  #12  
Ludacris's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,668
From: S O C A L
Whoohoo!
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 10:52 PM
  #13  
maxracer27's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 107
YEAH BABY !!!!!!
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 11:51 PM
  #14  
Empz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,642
Hey ... its GOOD to let all your Jealousy and Ill Feelings out.

U'll feel a bit better.

And Colgate, go Brush your Teeth cuz I can smell your stank over the net.


Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 03:55 AM
  #15  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is . . . .
When a 3-liter V6 puts out nearly the same power (222 - 227) as the previous-generation BMW inline 6 (240) and runs smoothly enough that its V-configuration is not apparent without looking under the hood it should be expected to make anybody's 10 Best engines list. The surprise would be if it didn't.

Norm
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
nc00max
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
I've never seen the Ward's list, but I know that I can take this as a sure sign that the 3.2 TL/CL type-S engine didn't make it on there.

Congratulations to Nissan...Again.
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 01:01 PM
  #17  
Driven EF9's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 554
Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
Who knows. The only place i have ever heard of Ward's Comm. or Ward's auto was in reference to the VQ series.

Yes, the engine is spectacular and fits every point that the article makes, however, the company/magazine/paper eludes me in other fashions.

Norm Peterson
When a 3-liter V6 puts out nearly the same power (222 - 227) as the previous-generation BMW inline 6 (240) and runs smoothly enough that its V-configuration is not apparent without looking under the hood it should be expected to make anybody's 10 Best engines list. The surprise would be if it didn't.
I don't get what you're trying to suggest? Are you saying a V6 doesn't run as smoothly as an I6?

the difference between Nissan and BMW is, BMW has the ***** to put a rwd configuration to their engines and make it work right. It isn't surprising why the 3-series is among the 10 best from Motor Trend.

Just imagine a VQ in a 3000lb RWD chassis. That would win 10 Best Awards, Best Import of the Year, Best everything...oh wait, the 350z will have it and I can't wait! Took nissan 6 years to introduce a sports car into the USDM... (sorry, but the USDM last gen 240sx is such a disgrace to the sports car moniker).

Go VQ!
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 07:45 PM
  #18  
ru4real's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,216
Originally posted by ColgateU
Who the hell is "Ward's Communications Inc." anyway, and what's to say they have any understanding about engines. Has anybody else questioned this, because I read some of the comments they had about other engines, and it seemed like they knew jack sh-t about cars.
People that know the automotive industry recognize Ward's Communications as the publisher of the monthly magazine Ward's AutoWorld as well as other newsletters. They've covered the industry for over 75 years.
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 07:52 PM
  #19  
littledog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 530
Here's the link to the actual article from wardsauto.com

http://www.industryclick.com/microsi...azineid=50&srt
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 08:15 PM
  #20  
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
go nissan, go nissan, go my new car, that's my engine it's my birthday
Old Dec 12, 2001 | 08:59 PM
  #21  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
go nissan, go nissan, go my new car, that's my engine it's my birthday
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 03:24 AM
  #22  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Originally posted by Driven EF9
. . . I don't get what you're trying to suggest? Are you saying a V6 doesn't run as smoothly as an I6?
Exactly that. An inline 6 can be completely balanced for both primary and secondary forces and moments for the rotating/reciprocating assembly. A V6 cannot bring all 4 of those parameters into balance simultaneously specifically because of the angle between the banks of cylinders.

Norm
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 04:31 AM
  #23  
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
Originally posted by AznWontonboy
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 06:41 AM
  #24  
Stereodude's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,617
From: Detroit Metro Area
Originally posted by Norm Peterson


Exactly that. An inline 6 can be completely balanced for both primary and secondary forces and moments for the rotating/reciprocating assembly. A V6 cannot bring all 4 of those parameters into balance simultaneously specifically because of the angle between the banks of cylinders.

Norm
That depends on the angle of the V. 60 degree V-6's are balanced. 90 degree ones are not (without the aid of balance shafts).

Stereodude
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 06:57 AM
  #25  
straight six's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 399
Originally posted by UMD_MaxSE
Old Dec 13, 2001 | 08:05 AM
  #26  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,341
From: state of confusion
Originally posted by Stereodude
That depends on the angle of the V. 60 degree V-6's are balanced. 90 degree ones are not (without the aid of balance shafts).
Not true. Because the firing spacing is even for 60 degree 6's they are certainly smoother than odd-fire 90 degree 6's. Even-fire 6's are better than odd-fires, but introduce some small additional vibrations of their own as a consequence of the split crankpins that give you the even firing.

But rotating/reciprocating balance is a function of moving/rotating internal masses and the angular relations among them, not the spacing between combustion events. I think it's at least the secondary moments that can't be balanced since the inertia forces developed by a piston moving up in one bank cannot be equal to and and parallel with the inertia forces developed by any other piston. Not even in a 60 degree V6. Somewhere in my pile of books at home I've got better descriptions of this. Or maybe I can find something in a copy of Marks' Handbook for Mechanical Engineers here in the office.

As a practical matter, these imbalances can be minimized by careful design and close tolerances, and are normally less than the same disturbances in an inline-4 of similar bore & stroke.

Norm
Old Dec 14, 2001 | 04:40 AM
  #27  
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
Originally posted by Norm Peterson


Not true. Because the firing spacing is even for 60 degree 6's they are certainly smoother than odd-fire 90 degree 6's. Even-fire 6's are better than odd-fires, but introduce some small additional vibrations of their own as a consequence of the split crankpins that give you the even firing.

But rotating/reciprocating balance is a function of moving/rotating internal masses and the angular relations among them, not the spacing between combustion events. I think it's at least the secondary moments that can't be balanced since the inertia forces developed by a piston moving up in one bank cannot be equal to and and parallel with the inertia forces developed by any other piston. Not even in a 60 degree V6. Somewhere in my pile of books at home I've got better descriptions of this. Or maybe I can find something in a copy of Marks' Handbook for Mechanical Engineers here in the office.

As a practical matter, these imbalances can be minimized by careful design and close tolerances, and are normally less than the same disturbances in an inline-4 of similar bore & stroke.

Norm
so the VQ is still the smoothest V6 out there. although those 15 degree VR6 VW engines are nice, but wimpy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaxLvr21
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
Oct 17, 2015 12:11 PM
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
Oct 17, 2015 02:15 AM
REDinLV
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 12:31 AM
rnb754
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
6
Sep 14, 2015 11:39 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 AM.