03 6 Speed Cold Shift Crunch
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
became off topic after rochesters and my own points about the troubles of STS in the cold and otherwise were thrown into a mechanical lever height discussion, so I'll leave it to get back to gear oil talk before tunermaxima informs me that STS actually means "Short Tallness Shifter"
Ugh, read better before getting offended. I said that your comments about STS compounding the cold weather problem were on topic.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
So you're talking about reducing height without reducing the throw, then? I just don't see how that was relevant to anything in the discussion, since I was specifically talking about reducing throw when you made your comment in reply to me. Just to reiterate more simply, STS=Short Throw Shifter was the topic of discussion.
I don't see how the possibility that he cut his shifter instead of installing a proper STS ISN'T an on-topic discussion.
In any case, said topic quickly became off topic after rochesters and my own points about the troubles of STS in the cold and otherwise were thrown into a mechanical lever height discussion, so I'll leave it to get back to gear oil talk before tunermaxima informs me that STS actually means "Short Tallness Shifter"

You mean it doesn't?
Hey sparks I noticed you said you dont run the sts because its harder to get into gear which ive gotta agree with you there but are you running ES shifter bushings ? I was thinking about swapping my ES bushings with oem's.I wonder if they would allow for a little easier shifting because the nissan ones have a little bit of flex to them.with the sts for me wot 2nd to 3rd avove 6 grand is a ***** sometimes.I. Noticed this morning the amsoil shifts a little worse cold but better when it warms up,i give up springs almost here
~
~
well it looks like were all headed ot here but im curious as to know what everyone else is using for gear oil and or atf and if they are happy with it or not and sparks I pulled my sts off today and its freaking effortless now but its gonna take a little while to get used to the old 18 wheeler throws again but maybe in the spring ill throw it back on although Nismo sells a sts that relocates the shifter bushing under the boot,i wonder if that would work better because its further away from the pivot
anyone heard about them or uses one ?
anyone heard about them or uses one ?
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
well it looks like were all headed ot here but im curious as to know what everyone else is using for gear oil and or atf and if they are happy with it or not and sparks I pulled my sts off today and its freaking effortless now but its gonna take a little while to get used to the old 18 wheeler throws again but maybe in the spring ill throw it back on although Nismo sells a sts that relocates the shifter bushing under the boot,i wonder if that would work better because its further away from the pivot
anyone heard about them or uses one ?
anyone heard about them or uses one ?It's amazing how much easier it is going back to stock after the STS, huh? Our transmission is notchy (especially when cold) and requires a good bit of force to change gears, so reducing the throw is very noticeable for us.
well it looks like were all headed ot here but im curious as to know what everyone else is using for gear oil and or atf and if they are happy with it or not and sparks I pulled my sts off today and its freaking effortless now but its gonna take a little while to get used to the old 18 wheeler throws again but maybe in the spring ill throw it back on although Nismo sells a sts that relocates the shifter bushing under the boot,i wonder if that would work better because its further away from the pivot
anyone heard about them or uses one ?
anyone heard about them or uses one ?As to the 2-piece STS adapter... if you ever run across something called the Watkins STS, snap it up immediately. Best STS design for our cars, ever.
I really, really wish NWP would replicate that design. A small, easily shipped, solid metal part is exactly the type of thing Aaron does well.
^ ^ ^ Thanks man I guess thats true about de-modding for a while and putting it back later lol.Ive heard of the watkins sts...what is it exactly ? I thought a while back I saw that Nismo one but never gave it much thought,i work at a Nissan dealer so tomorrow ill run over to parts and see if they can find it,i think it was 100 bucks but if I can get a shorter throw and a little smoother shift than the free sts so be it,i get a discount too.and sparks you aint kidding about the ease of the throws,it doesn't even feel like it goes into gear its so smooth.
I've got an 05 6 speed and my only problem is when it's cold outside and I go to put the car in reverse in the morning I've got to tug on the shifter so hard it feels like it's going to break off. First few times it happened I figured I just needed to put it in 1st and roll forward a little but it's hard as hell to put it in 1st also. I've drained the fluid and filled it with the factory Nissan stuff and it made no difference. Once it moves it shifts fine, it just doesn't want to wake up in the morning. It was an easy fix though. I just leave it in reverse when I park it now.
I tried Red line MT-90 in my 6sp tranny about 2 yrs. ago and had to drain it because it was hard to shift into 2nd gear when cold. I went back to the original nissan MT fluid. I just noticed that my maxima's owners manual calls for 75w90 only but on the original nissan MT bottle it says 75w85. So i've decided to order the new Red line MT-85 to do a gear oil change next weekend.
I switched from Redline MT-90 back in October of last year to Amsoil MTG. I HATE the Amsoil so far! My car now feels like a tractor when the temps go below 40F, and even the warm shifts are notchier. I'll probably leave it in until next fall and then go with the new Redline MT-85 that came out a week after I bought the Amsoil.
Last edited by 036mtmax; Feb 7, 2011 at 10:50 AM.
That's basically what the Watkins STS was. Aluminum, 2-piece adapter to relocate the banjo bushing on both ends of the cable.
Personally, I think $175 is an awful lot of money to do something marginally better than the Free STS Mod. (And that says a lot, coming from a guy who's spent good money on silly things.)
Personally, I think $175 is an awful lot of money to do something marginally better than the Free STS Mod. (And that says a lot, coming from a guy who's spent good money on silly things.)
I hear that Rochester that price was quoted to me from another Nissan dealer because mine couldn't find the part from Nismo but even in my eyes it looks to not be worth a penny over 75 bucks.
That's basically what the Watkins STS was. Aluminum, 2-piece adapter to relocate the banjo bushing on both ends of the cable.
Personally, I think $175 is an awful lot of money to do something marginally better than the Free STS Mod. (And that says a lot, coming from a guy who's spent good money on silly things.)
Personally, I think $175 is an awful lot of money to do something marginally better than the Free STS Mod. (And that says a lot, coming from a guy who's spent good money on silly things.)
I agree that this adapter doesn't seem worth more than $75. Just dig up one of the many Free STS threads here and take your time with the mod.
On the flip side, $175 is not a crazy cost when you factor in the 100% plug-n-play nature of the adapter. Everybody weighs their own priorities against the dollar. Although for $175, you'd think it would come in a variety of colors.
This is my Free STS right here. It's not pretty, but it works quite well.
On the flip side, $175 is not a crazy cost when you factor in the 100% plug-n-play nature of the adapter. Everybody weighs their own priorities against the dollar. Although for $175, you'd think it would come in a variety of colors.
This is my Free STS right here. It's not pretty, but it works quite well.
I switched from Redline MT-90 back in October of last year to Amsoil MTG. I HATE the Amsoil so far! My car now feels like a tractor when the temps go below 40F, and even the warm shifts are notchier. I'll probably leave it in until next fall and then go with the new Redline MT-85 that came out a week after I bought the Amsoil.

So you feel more resistance when shifting now? Did you have any other ills that were fixed or still remain? Or was your transmission more or less operating ideally before the fluid change?
It works very good, no issues here. It shifts into every gear even when it's cold. I still have about half a quart in my garage so I ordered 2 bottles of the new MT-85 which is actually 75W85 just like the original nissan mt fluid. My 6 spd tranny takes about 2.3 quarts to fill up and I'll be doing the gear oil change this coming weekend so I'll be reporting about it.
Oh, hey, kbo! I forgot I've been waiting all those months to hear your opinion of the Amsoil you picked.
So you feel more resistance when shifting now? Did you have any other ills that were fixed or still remain? Or was your transmission more or less operating ideally before the fluid change?
So you feel more resistance when shifting now? Did you have any other ills that were fixed or still remain? Or was your transmission more or less operating ideally before the fluid change?
First gear has gone from harder to shift into when cold with MT-90 to "Is my clutch broken?" with the Amsoil. 2nd gear when cold now feels like what 3rd gear used to when cold with Redline. 3rd gear is a bit worse when cold than the Redline, but nothing drastic. Needless to say, I'll be switching to the MT-85 for sure after this summer. Provided the performance of the Amsoil is ok during the warmer months. I'm just pissed Redline didn't come out with MT-85 only 2 weeks sooner, I'd be running it instead of Amsoil now. I really want to hear your thoughts on the MT-85. How come you haven't put it in yet?
Hey kbo,let me know if the mt-85 works any better for you.My 2nd gear is getting notchy when its cold and use to go away after a few minutes or so but now it seems to take longer to get rid of the notchiness.Im going to order the mt-85 today so whoever gets it in first we will have to see.im curious about it.
It works very good, no issues here. It shifts into every gear even when it's cold. I still have about half a quart in my garage so I ordered 2 bottles of the new MT-85 which is actually 75W85 just like the original nissan mt fluid. My 6 spd tranny takes about 2.3 quarts to fill up and I'll be doing the gear oil change this coming weekend so I'll be reporting about it.
Hey kbo,let me know if the mt-85 works any better for you.My 2nd gear is getting notchy when its cold and use to go away after a few minutes or so but now it seems to take longer to get rid of the notchiness.Im going to order the mt-85 today so whoever gets it in first we will have to see.im curious about it.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Just want to point out that these oils have 2 numbers for a reason. If one of them reads 75w90 and the other reads 75w85, that means their cold weather viscosity will be the same, and when warmed to full operating temperature, the 85 will be thinner. Thinner is not always better in a synchromesh transmission like ours, as a thicker fluid can help the synchros operate better.
Either way, the mt 85 may be a different blend all together and perform better, but I'm not entirely convinced that it being thinner at operating temperatures will help cold performance.
Either way, the mt 85 may be a different blend all together and perform better, but I'm not entirely convinced that it being thinner at operating temperatures will help cold performance.
Yeah, even though they are both 75W-XX, the 75-85 is still thinner than the 75-90. You can see on Red Line's info pages that MT-85 is less viscous at all temperatures than MT-90. I'd also assume that, since it is much newer than MT-90, the technology involved in its creation was more advanced, so all processes attached to the product would (theoretically) be better than MT-90, even if only slightly.
MT-85 vs MT-90
I got married shortly after I bought it, so that ate up a solid ~2 months. Once the newly-wed thing settled down, winter hit like, um, like how it hit the rest of the country, and I am not going to attempt to change it until this Sunday/Monday, when it's finally going to hit the upper 40s. It's 21 right now, yuck.
For now, the MT-85 is performing extremely well in the basement. Yep. Increasing the speed of my dryer's shifts, even.
MT-85 vs MT-90
Originally Posted by kbohip
I really want to hear your thoughts on the MT-85. How come you haven't put it in yet?
For now, the MT-85 is performing extremely well in the basement. Yep. Increasing the speed of my dryer's shifts, even.
Last edited by Eirik; Feb 9, 2011 at 09:55 AM.
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
I have tried a few different gear oil options and honestly haven't seen a big difference in any case. This transmission is just notchy and difficult to shift.
I know that the newer version of the 6speed has better synchros along with the 4.1 FD. I didn't get a 05+ 6 speed when I replaced mine, but when this one fails I'll be aiming to go in that direction... probably from a 06-07ish spec V for cheaper prices and easier LSD availability.
I know that the newer version of the 6speed has better synchros along with the 4.1 FD. I didn't get a 05+ 6 speed when I replaced mine, but when this one fails I'll be aiming to go in that direction... probably from a 06-07ish spec V for cheaper prices and easier LSD availability.



(Oops! Off topic again.)

