5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Sigh, Velocity Stack Round 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 06:26 PM
  #81  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
http://www.nicoclub.com/FSM/maxima/

yeah the swirl valves are in the lower manifold. however, they are controlled by the VIAS module the power rod removal/ bop gets rid of. for now i zip tied it to permanently open, i figured some loss of low end is better than the restrictions top end... no idea tho
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 06:28 PM
  #82  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Thanks man.

It really bothers me not having the FSM downloaded on this computer, I'm never home anymore, but I can't find the damn FSM download link now! Now this is bothering me...
Happy Birthday!!!

Edit: McSteve beat me to it.
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #83  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by knight_yyz


Check the middle pipe, ignore the 'wood's sign. Also I rotated the Iacv pipes on the breather 90* recently.
Do you make these in aluminum with swaged ends??????
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 06:38 PM
  #84  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by McSteve
http://www.nicoclub.com/FSM/maxima/

yeah the swirl valves are in the lower manifold. however, they are controlled by the VIAS module the power rod removal/ bop gets rid of. for now i zip tied it to permanently open, i figured some loss of low end is better than the restrictions top end... no idea tho
How were you able to twist it open? I've read a couple of threads about the flimsy metal cup breaking loose from the power rod causing it not to rotate when the vias activates.
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #85  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by McSteve
http://www.nicoclub.com/FSM/maxima/

yeah the swirl valves are in the lower manifold. however, they are controlled by the VIAS module the power rod removal/ bop gets rid of. for now i zip tied it to permanently open, i figured some loss of low end is better than the restrictions top end... no idea tho
Originally Posted by nelledge
Happy Birthday!!!

Edit: McSteve beat me to it.
Thanks boys I have that link but I hate it, I want the downloadable PDF one so I can peruse it properly. In either case I panned through the EC section and couldn't get a clear answer on what the 3rd one is for, seems I'll have to get off my azz and look tomorrow.


Oh and McSteve, I think you're confused on the whole purpose of removing the VI system.

The system works very well, but the issue is it requires a physical valve, butterfly and rod to be present in the intake stream at all times, so even when it's wide open, the valve is a restriction in the intake stream which needless to say is unwanted.
The purpose of disabling this system is so you can REMOVE that valving and allow the full potential of intake air through the runners.

Leaving it in there and just cranking it open will cause nothing but a decrease in power because you lose the benefits of it and keep all the negatives.
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #86  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
no i realize that.

The power rod and spring valves are two different things.

The power rod is the plastic part connected to the vias cup. I installed a VIAS bop so I can use cruise control with the PFTB. I found out btw that my vias cup was broken too...
I removed the long plastic power rod to increase the air flow in the UPPER intake manifold.

In the LOWER intake manifold are the swirl valves. They are operated by a vacuum hose going to the VIAS solenoid. Since i removed the VIAS solenoid I was worried that the valves in the LIM are gonna by stuck closed the entire time. So with some finicky zip tie action I pulled the lever open in the LIM.

Now I need to know something tho. When the lever is pulled, does it close or open the valves in the LIM? I feel a loss of torque, but don't know whether I have stuck the lower valves in the open or closed position..
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 09:16 PM
  #87  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally Posted by CMax03
Do you make these in aluminum with swaged ends??????
Sorry, no I don't
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 05:55 AM
  #88  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Thanks boys I have that link but I hate it, I want the downloadable PDF one so I can peruse it properly. In either case I panned through the EC section and couldn't get a clear answer on what the 3rd one is for, seems I'll have to get off my azz and look tomorrow.
I have the 2003 FSM as a PDF, but as separate PDF files for each section. It's a total PITA to browse when it jumps files and can't go backwards.
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 06:16 AM
  #89  
nelledge's Avatar
"I'm just sayin'..."
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,226
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Rochester
I have the 2003 FSM as a PDF, but as separate PDF files for each section. It's a total PITA to browse when it jumps files and can't go backwards.
So, combine the files. I'm sure you have Acrobat. Did you forget the simple things to remember more complex issues?
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 06:38 AM
  #90  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by nelledge
So, combine the files. I'm sure you have Acrobat. Did you forget the simple things to remember more complex issues?
There are all kinds of PDF merging utilities out there, and they seem to work just fine. But after the files are merged, the cross-references no longer function.
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 10:49 AM
  #91  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Swirl Control Valve Control Solenoid Valve
The swirl control valve control solenoid valve responds to signals
from the ECM. When the ECM sends an ON (ground) signal, the solenoid valve is bypassed to apply intake manifold vacuum to the swirl control valve actuator. This operation closes the swirl control valve. When the ECM sends an OFF signal, the vacuum signal is cut and the swirl control valve opens.

this means that with the hose disconnected it should always be open right?
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 06:15 PM
  #92  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by McSteve
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Swirl Control Valve Control Solenoid Valve
The swirl control valve control solenoid valve responds to signals
from the ECM. When the ECM sends an ON (ground) signal, the solenoid valve is bypassed to apply intake manifold vacuum to the swirl control valve actuator. This operation closes the swirl control valve. When the ECM sends an OFF signal, the vacuum signal is cut and the swirl control valve opens.

this means that with the hose disconnected it should always be open right?
Sounds correct.

And in response to your other question about them being open or closed, you've got them open if you have a loss of torque.
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #93  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
So why doesn't someone clean one of these Apexi's and observe closely if there is adverse affect on the the element!!!!!!!
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 11:02 PM
  #94  
knight_yyz's Avatar
Toolie
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,711
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally Posted by Rochester
There are all kinds of PDF merging utilities out there, and they seem to work just fine. But after the files are merged, the cross-references no longer function.
I have a copy on cd with an index, I also have a copy on my hard drive with an index. The phat20 site was better than the nicoclub site when it was up and running.
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 04:09 AM
  #95  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Sounds correct.

And in response to your other question about them being open or closed, you've got them open if you have a loss of torque.
That's the purpose of the whole VIAS/Swirl Valve system, improved low/mid-range torque! I always wonder why people delete the VIAS, which works well for real world driving. To get a few more ponies at WOT/high RPM's???
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 06:41 PM
  #96  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Pezz, I feel the EXACT same way about it as you do, mine is untouched.



Now, I am home for a few mins!! Rochester, here's yours: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2003-...ce-manual.html

And us 5th gen guys: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2001-...ce-manual.html
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 06:42 PM
  #97  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
And the 3rd Vacuum valve is for the Powersteering switch.
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #98  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Pezz, I feel the EXACT same way about it as you do, mine is untouched.



Now, I am home for a few mins!! Rochester, here's yours: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2003-...ce-manual.html

And us 5th gen guys: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2001-...ce-manual.html
That's nice of you, Matt. The page exists, but the actual zip file doesn't.

No worries, though. I'll muddle through the next half year somehow.
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 07:36 PM
  #99  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
yeah if you're planning on revving to 7500 regularly the top end gains might be worth it. especially when going FI or cams...

considering sparks made 50hp gain with a custom gutted IM
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 03:27 AM
  #100  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Pezz, I feel the EXACT same way about it as you do, mine is untouched.



Now, I am home for a few mins!! Rochester, here's yours: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2003-...ce-manual.html

And us 5th gen guys: http://www.freepdfdownload.net/2001-...ce-manual.html
VIAS delete is apparently another matter of taste mod. Are the gains worth the drawbacks? My VQ30DE-K with 4AT and OD off can easily hit the rev limiter @67K RPM WFO at FTL speeds(with drag as a factor). All the restrictive stock intake/air-box/snorkel/VIAS is in place. So where's the BIG advantage?

Last edited by BobPezz; Sep 28, 2011 at 03:42 AM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 03:31 AM
  #101  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by McSteve
yeah if you're planning on revving to 7500 regularly the top end gains might be worth it. especially when going FI or cams...

considering sparks made 50hp gain with a custom gutted IM
"Sparks" made amazing HP gains with more than just a gutted IM. It was a complete custom designed/fabricated big plenum upper IM with tuned CAI inlet system, Bigger MAF/TB, and supporting mods. I.E. piggyback tuner, headers, 3" exhaust, etc. Which IMHO raises the bar way above a VIAS delete mod. As a matter of record "Sparks" always noted the 00VI as the BEST OEM IM design for our cars. Why mess with it?

Last edited by BobPezz; Sep 28, 2011 at 03:40 AM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 04:32 AM
  #102  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by BobPezz
VIAS delete is apparently another matter of taste mod. Are the gains worth the drawbacks? My VQ30DE-K with 4AT and OD off can easily hit the rev limiter @67K RPM WFO at FTL speeds(with drag as a factor). All the restrictive stock intake/air-box/snorkel/VIAS is in place. So where's the BIG advantage?
I thought VIAS-delete was a simple 5.5 mod (I've done it), whereas you 5.0 genners have something called a "power-rod" that you remove? And that the smaller displacement engine has a VIAS design prone to failure from a cracked part... yes? no? I'm not real conversant with the 3.0L engine.

Someone clarify, please. (Tuner)
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 04:43 AM
  #103  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Rochester
That's nice of you, Matt. The page exists, but the actual zip file doesn't.

No worries, though. I'll muddle through the next half year somehow.
Rochester, I stumbled across a site with a free D/L of the 2003 Max FSM. However, it was such a convoluted search I couldn't post the link for some reason. So I D/L the manual for you, it's sitting on my hard drive, PM me with your E-Mail address and I can send it. FYI; It's a complete, virus free, zip archive 27.6Mb.

SOaB! I just found the site again, couldn't send the D/L link since it's secured. Go here and click download, it'll take you to the secured site, click download and your all set.
http://carsmanual.net/2003-Nissan-Ma...e-Manual.html#

Last edited by BobPezz; Sep 28, 2011 at 04:58 AM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 04:50 AM
  #104  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Rochester
I thought VIAS-delete was a simple 5.5 mod (I've done it), whereas you 5.0 genners have something called a "power-rod" that you remove? And that the smaller displacement engine has a VIAS design prone to failure from a cracked part... yes? no? I'm not real conversant with the 3.0L engine.

Someone clarify, please. (Tuner)
Absolutely correct on all points. However there's a VERY effective fix for the 3.0 VIAS actuator problem, right on the .ORG. I did it and reaped the benefits. I suspect the VIAS probably doesn't affect 3.5L low end as much Since it's a larger displacement higher torque engine from the start.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 05:42 AM
  #105  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by BobPezz
Rochester, I stumbled across a site with a free D/L of the 2003 Max FSM...
Nice of you, Bob, but unnecessary. I'm selling the car next year after 10 years of thoroughly content ownership. Time to move on.

Anyway, that zip file has the same layout as my version of the FSM, where each section is its own PDF file. No worries, though. And thanks anyway.

Last edited by Rochester; Sep 28, 2011 at 06:21 AM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 07:17 AM
  #106  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by BobPezz
Absolutely correct on all points. However there's a VERY effective fix for the 3.0 VIAS actuator problem, right on the .ORG. I did it and reaped the benefits. I suspect the VIAS probably doesn't affect 3.5L low end as much Since it's a larger displacement higher torque engine from the start.
Is that the JB Weld fix?
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 07:35 AM
  #107  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by T_Behr904
Is that the JB Weld fix?
Yes.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #108  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
I did the fix yesterday and i can't see the LIM actuator do anything. If I manually apply vacuum (sucking on the hose oh yeah) i can see the LIM switch move. Can anyone let me know how it is at idle and at what rpm it moves?

@Bob

I have a custom 3.5" CAI, BBMAF, PFTB, Intake Spacers Headers test pipe and a 3" exhaust tuning with the Emanage ultimate.....

I was just thinking gutted IM > non working vias.. and I still think that only half of my vias is working but need to confirm
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #109  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by McSteve

I was just thinking gutted IM > non working vias..
I agree.

Originally Posted by McSteve
and I still think that only half of my vias is working but need to confirm
Half?
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 11:07 AM
  #110  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
top, power rod half, i don't see any movement on the lever regulating the swirl valves... so somehow my vias solenoid doesn't send out vacuum out on that hose... but maybe it only does so under load and not in neutral when revving?

I guess i'll have to go through the FSM procedures....

Last edited by McSteve; Sep 28, 2011 at 11:23 AM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #111  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by McSteve
top, power rod half, i don't see any movement on the lever regulating the swirl valves... so somehow my vias solenoid doesn't send out vacuum out on that hose... but maybe it only does so under load and not in neutral when revving?

I guess i'll have to go through the FSM procedures....
That is weird. I would remove the power rod considering your current mod status though. A dead DEK VIAS is just like an A32 USDM IM, FTL.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 01:38 PM
  #112  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by T_Behr904
Is that the JB Weld fix?
Yes and it made a big difference in the way the car performs now. Even though my VIAS cup only had worn slightly roughly 15-20deg of play it was enough to prevent it from closing/opening the power rod completely. Giving a loss of bottom and top end power.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 01:42 PM
  #113  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Rochester
Nice of you, Bob, but unnecessary. I'm selling the car next year after 10 years of thoroughly content ownership. Time to move on.

Anyway, that zip file has the same layout as my version of the FSM, where each section is its own PDF file. No worries, though. And thanks anyway.
Oh well, it was good intentioned. Since as you stated the file doesn't exist anymore on the link you were given. You might want to keep the link to; http://carsmanual.net/ handy for your next car.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 01:46 PM
  #114  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by BobPezz
Yes and it made a big difference in the way the car performs now. Even though my VIAS cup only had worn slightly roughly 15-20deg of play it was enough to prevent it from closing/opening the power rod completely. Giving a loss of bottom and top end power.
Makes sense since it's in-between both worlds, no you can't has all top end and no, you can't has bottom end either.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 01:56 PM
  #115  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by BobPezz
Yes and it made a big difference in the way the car performs now. Even though my VIAS cup only had worn slightly roughly 15-20deg of play it was enough to prevent it from closing/opening the power rod completely. Giving a loss of bottom and top end power.
I need to get mine fixed. I've researched a couple of threads on it, I just need to figure out the procedures to do it. For example, do I need to remove the rod in order to re-glue the cup back on the rod, or can I do it with the rod still inside the intake?
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 02:03 PM
  #116  
McSteve's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
From: Phoenix, AZ
It's beautifully explained here.

The cup doesn't attach to the rod. It'll be all clear when you look at the link.

http://www.vqpower.com/v2/articles.php?article_id=21
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 02:10 PM
  #117  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by McSteve
It's beautifully explained here.

The cup doesn't attach to the rod. It'll be all clear when you look at the link.

http://www.vqpower.com/v2/articles.php?article_id=21
Cool, thanks... I'll be reading up on that
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 02:34 PM
  #118  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Makes sense since it's in-between both worlds, no you can't has all top end and no, you can't has bottom end either.
Yup! And I drove the car for a while thinking it had *****, before reading about the fix, doing it, and the BIG WOW afterwards.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #119  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by T_Behr904
Cool, thanks... I'll be reading up on that
It's actually a pretty simple fix. My advice, definitely get new screws/hardware before hand. I used Allen heads which made re-installation SO much easier, using a ball end Allen wrench vs. Phillips head screw driver. To remove the Junk OEM screws get a Phillips head that fits perfectly, clamp a Vice-Grip to the shaft and apply FIRM downward pressure on the screw using the Vice-Grip to turn the screw. Or the OEM screw-heads will strip before you can say "AW $#!+". Use the original 24hr cure JBWeld. And label all the hoses well. I used masking tape which fell off 1 hose and left me puzzled for a while, since it wasn't shown in the FSM.

Last edited by BobPezz; Sep 28, 2011 at 02:54 PM.
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #120  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
I went out to the car and grabbed a screwdriver to test how tight the screws are on, and wow, they're tight. Any recommendations on removing them?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:57 PM.