5th gen Off Topic Thread (Official Ghustle thread v1)
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...d-yes-means-no
maybe not that one...but basically, it's a mind trick. If the cat was able to get enough dogs to tell the subject that he, in fact, WAS a cow, then the dog wuld start to belive it.
it was a serious question... you and chester already label me like that so how am i trolling?... you guys didnt sugar coat any of that info, im just accepting the fact that im "so" unintelligent and fail to meet the basic requirements to talk to the great social genius like yourselves...
so now im trying to educate myself because the question had me confused and i actually dont know what the answer is? any of this a surprise???
so now im trying to educate myself because the question had me confused and i actually dont know what the answer is? any of this a surprise???
This is actually very similar to a phychology study I read about....
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...d-yes-means-no
maybe not that one...but basically, it's a mind trick. If the cat was able to get enough dogs to tell the subject that he, in fact, WAS a cow, then the dog wuld start to belive it.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...d-yes-means-no
maybe not that one...but basically, it's a mind trick. If the cat was able to get enough dogs to tell the subject that he, in fact, WAS a cow, then the dog wuld start to belive it.
This is actually very similar to a phychology study I read about....
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...d-yes-means-no
maybe not that one...but basically, it's a mind trick. If the cat was able to get enough dogs to tell the subject that he, in fact, WAS a cow, then the dog wuld start to belive it.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...d-yes-means-no
maybe not that one...but basically, it's a mind trick. If the cat was able to get enough dogs to tell the subject that he, in fact, WAS a cow, then the dog wuld start to belive it.
it was a serious question... you and chester already label me like that so how am i trolling?... you guys didnt sugar coat any of that info, im just accepting the fact that im "so" unintelligent and fail to meet the basic requirements to talk to the great social genius like yourselves...
so now im trying to educate myself because the question had me confused and i actually dont know what the answer is? any of this a surprise???
so now im trying to educate myself because the question had me confused and i actually dont know what the answer is? any of this a surprise???

it's funny how someone that's neutral is obviously showing how pompous chester and tuner can/are being, very entertaining
Look at my first post... I was "trolling" in that post.... if you continue to read you learn to see that I've done the swap that the OP failed to search for.
More than anything, people in this thread side with GH on this on-going crap, so if you're being serious, then that thing Americaner posted applies tot he way GH speaks/lables Rochester, more than the other way around.
This isn't me siding with one or the other, as I'm sure GH will point out shortly. This is simply a neutral observation.
this is so satisfyingly hilarious... maybe him and chester should start a perma ban thread 
hahhahahahaaa now he should go make a thread
i did state it was a serious question... but i kinda wanted tuner to reply to it before any comments but he can now reply if he wants to...
I see an equal amount of name calling between 'chester' and 'gh'. They both lable each other equally.
More than anything, people in this thread side with GH on this on-going crap, so if you're being serious, then that thing Americaner posted applies tot he way GH speaks/lables Rochester, more than the other way around.
This isn't me siding with one or the other, as I'm sure GH will point out shortly. This is simply a neutral observation.
More than anything, people in this thread side with GH on this on-going crap, so if you're being serious, then that thing Americaner posted applies tot he way GH speaks/lables Rochester, more than the other way around.
This isn't me siding with one or the other, as I'm sure GH will point out shortly. This is simply a neutral observation.
IMHO instead of Chester actually trying to see anyone's point of view he's quick to lash out at the comment and spark controversy. from what i see
I see an equal amount of name calling between 'chester' and 'gh'. They both lable each other equally.
More than anything, people in this thread side with GH on this on-going crap, so if you're being serious, then that thing Americaner posted applies tot he way GH speaks/lables Rochester, more than the other way around.
This isn't me siding with one or the other, as I'm sure GH will point out shortly. This is simply a neutral observation.
More than anything, people in this thread side with GH on this on-going crap, so if you're being serious, then that thing Americaner posted applies tot he way GH speaks/lables Rochester, more than the other way around.
This isn't me siding with one or the other, as I'm sure GH will point out shortly. This is simply a neutral observation.
... ive simply embraced the name calling/labelling they call me and he is still mad at me for that..
Hustle what are you trying to prove to anybody for that matter? This is supposed to be a thread where we talk about bull**** and make fun of each other in a FUN manner. Not get angry all the time. You dont have to win every argument.
if you ask me, Chester acts like the wife of this thread............
can we all just shut up and move on? everybody adds to the fire in their own way and text is easily misread and misinterpreted. Leave it at that. Its "Mob week" on AMC who is watching? Godfather marathon after Once Upon a Time in America is over.....Noyce
its cool i also like psychology myself, my step father was going to actually pursue a career in psychology at one point and i thought he was crazy at 1st until you realize how great that subject can be... nothing i would strongly pursue but its a bit intriguing to me alsoi can't see your observation as neutral as you always side w/ Chester. whatever the reason, you do. especially today it has become evident of the labels that Chester tosses around. you dont see the labels because you're siding w/ Chester. just speaking truth.
IMHO instead of Chester actually trying to see anyone's point of view he's quick to lash out at the comment and spark controversy. from what i see
IMHO instead of Chester actually trying to see anyone's point of view he's quick to lash out at the comment and spark controversy. from what i see
Thats how Rochester has fun in here. If you play into it then it will never end. Thats why Clashez was so much fun for him. Perfect target. There is no "winning" an argument on a forum. If you believe you are right then when someone tries to disprove it it is just funny to them. You wont change their mind
Thats how Rochester has fun in here. If you play into it then it will never end. Thats why Clashez was so much fun for him. Perfect target. There is no "winning" an argument on a forum. If you believe you are right then when someone tries to disprove it it is just funny to them. You wont change their mind
anyway

S/O to Chester aka
bro i wasnt angry at all lol... if you scrolled a few pages back and start reading ever since i post the chick fil A ad you will see where i was doing my regular ghustling and being neutral and chester went on this big hate rant, i respected what he said and shared my beliefs and stayed neutral and chester was the one calling me an igit or small minded and all kinds of names and now tuner is mad at me because i stayed neutral and say o.k and didnt bend to their beliefs or didnt do whatever it is that they wanted me to do... i wasnt trying to win any argument at all
Thats how Rochester has fun in here. If you play into it then it will never end. Thats why Clashez was so much fun for him. Perfect target. There is no "winning" an argument on a forum. If you believe you are right then when someone tries to disprove it it is just funny to them. You wont change their mind
i can't see your observation as neutral as you always side w/ Chester. whatever the reason, you do. especially today it has become evident of the labels that Chester tosses around. you dont see the labels because you're siding w/ Chester. just speaking truth.
IMHO instead of Chester actually trying to see anyone's point of view he's quick to lash out at the comment and spark controversy. from what i see
IMHO instead of Chester actually trying to see anyone's point of view he's quick to lash out at the comment and spark controversy. from what i see
Anyways, I see how you think I side with him, no different than you do with GH. The difference is, I don't gang up with him, I just call things as I see them. If Hustle was saying sometihng that I agree with (happens), I agree. It just so happens, that 95% of the time what he says is BS, and he just tries to drag people into arguments.
That's trolling. I'm tired of his trolling.
Rochester has a holier than thou attitude. I'm guilty of that at times too, but yeah, he is that way.
Anyways, I see how you think I side with him, no different than you do with GH. The difference is, I don't gang up with him, I just call things as I see them. If Hustle was saying sometihng that I agree with (happens), I agree. It just so happens, that 95% of the time what he says is BS, and he just tries to drag people into arguments.
That's trolling. I'm tired of his trolling.
Anyways, I see how you think I side with him, no different than you do with GH. The difference is, I don't gang up with him, I just call things as I see them. If Hustle was saying sometihng that I agree with (happens), I agree. It just so happens, that 95% of the time what he says is BS, and he just tries to drag people into arguments.
That's trolling. I'm tired of his trolling.
today, yes he did troll, trolled like a motherfuker, we sat back and watched like a motherfuker as Hustle SAID i know you wont allow anyone else to have the last word, and proved his point. more of the times i agree w/ hustle because of the way that chester approaches 'arguments/debates' Chester has a shoot first mentality, never ask questions, never even later after it's over.






(No offense, phatboi.)
