5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.
View Poll Results: Did you lower for looks or performance?
Looks
20
60.61%
Performance
13
39.39%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Did you lower for looks or performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2013 | 08:45 AM
  #1  
metalpiotr's Avatar
Thread Starter
03 Maxima, 6spd
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 211
Did you lower for looks or performance?

For those of you that have your cars lowered... did you do it for looks or better handling? I know most of you would want to answer BOTH but please choose the one that was the bigger motivator.

I lowered my car because... well, the stock handling on our generation kind of sucks. The improved looks were just of a nice bonus. When I chose my springs, it was based on comments regarding performance, comfort and reliability (rather than wheel gaps). I know however that some of you have different priorities, so I am curious to see what the split is.
Old 04-13-2013 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
theblackone3.5's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 707
I like the look but i want something that doesn't bounce and what not over every bump in the road. Who cares what other people think of what your car looks like, as long as you like the look that all that matters. Now for performance/handling you are the one driving the car so if you like the extra stiffness in the car thats great, get coil-overs. If you want something not so harsh get lowering springs and shocks and struts.
Old 04-13-2013 | 09:12 AM
  #3  
2damax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 836
From: Connecticut
This is an interesing one for me. I guess I did it for performance. I did not like how the stock setup ran. However, the ride is to harsh for me now. Also, I think the car sits to high stock. So AFTER the upgrade I like the looks more than performance.

I vote performance since that was my original reason.
Old 04-13-2013 | 09:51 AM
  #4  
TravisCadello's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,432
Jus got tired of front lookin lifted sky high and rear bein saggy with any weight looked ugly as hellllll!!! So Looks is what i was goin for and the performance was jus a bonus.
Old 04-13-2013 | 10:15 AM
  #5  
mrjasonlyrics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,245
I did it for both...
Old 04-13-2013 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
95VQ30's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 605
From: St. Charles, MO
yes
Old 04-13-2013 | 12:28 PM
  #7  
george__'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,230
From: Earth
looks

front is too high and back is too low
Old 04-13-2013 | 12:32 PM
  #8  
Rods03Max619's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,949
From: Diego,California
Originally Posted by mrjasonlyrics
I did it for both...
Old 04-13-2013 | 02:09 PM
  #9  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,548
From: Ontario, Canada
Intriguing, but the question is redundant, no?

Lowering this car negatively impacts handling, period.

However, all of the springs and struts that improve handling typically lower the car at least a bit.

Sorry if I'm just being semantical here, I just want to make sure no one actually thinks lowering their Maxima will improve handling. It won't. It's the change in springs and struts that improves the handling. Lowering makes handling worse.
Old 04-13-2013 | 02:34 PM
  #10  
JWatZ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 660
From: In the 3OH2
Both. Not a fan of the "on stilts" look and wanted to reduce body roll. But like most people that do it for performance (I presume anyway), I also upgraded the struts and added a fstb.
Old 04-13-2013 | 02:42 PM
  #11  
metalpiotr's Avatar
Thread Starter
03 Maxima, 6spd
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Lowering this car negatively impacts handling, period.

...

Lowering makes handling worse.
I suppose there may be edge cases where one does not imply the other... and yes, different suspension setups have advantages in different terrains and conditions... but lets not get carried away.

I don't want to get too much off topic, but generally speaking I'm curious on your thoughts on how does lowering the center of gravity negatively impact handling?
Old 04-13-2013 | 05:27 PM
  #12  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,548
From: Ontario, Canada
The only positive thing gained from lowering is lower center of gravity.
That's it.

Lowering a car changes the geometry of the suspension. Things like working angles, leverage points, roll centers, etc. all of these carefully calculated things are changed, sometimes drastically. those changes will slow you down, not speed you up.

Its a common effect to think the car feels faster after lowering, its usually stiffer and more responsive in feel, plus a bunch of placebo effect. In truth though the car will be slower on a track.
Lowering this car especially is bad because there are no adjustments or adjustable products for purchase to even semi-correct the geometry.
Old 04-13-2013 | 05:45 PM
  #13  
george__'s Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,230
From: Earth
^
so don't spend $$ lowering or are you saying do it but don't expect performance gains?
Old 04-13-2013 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
Chris Gregg's Avatar
Get Off My Lawn
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: Johnson City, TN
Both: But in spirit of the question, primarily looks. If I wanted something that looked like a 4x4 going down the road, I'd drive a truck.
Old 04-13-2013 | 06:16 PM
  #15  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,548
From: Ontario, Canada
I'm only clarifying that lowering a car, especially this car, normally makes handling worse.

The best thing you can do for a 5th gens handling is a RSB, good tires, and decent Coilovers that don't lower the car too much.

In real life, on the street where we all drive pretty much, looks and feel are more important than actual handling improvements. As long as you aren't suffering delusions that you have improved the handling by lowering the car, who cares. Make it look good, ride smooth, be responsive, and you will love it.

Fyi, I had my car pretty low, and it did handle better than stock, but that is because decent Coilovers, not because I was low. My car would have been faster on the same Coilovers if the car was raised up higher. It was low for looks.

On my G, the car gets raised when it goes to the track. Low for the street.
Old 04-14-2013 | 03:19 AM
  #16  
Dan03se's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
I chose to lower my Max for the looks. I have always been partial to cars with a lowered stance, just looks more aggressive. I don't know if handling was really improved on my car or not, but I sure do enjoy the ride.
Old 04-14-2013 | 07:46 AM
  #17  
Maverick4189's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 520
From: Fayettville,AR
I'm low for looks mainly. Riding coils because I can adjust all aspects of it, the ride I like to think is better performance wise jus because my stocks were blown. Now I'm pretty stiff and way less body roll. I guess my main reason was because I didn't wanna look like a rock crawler in a car with wheel gap my head would fit in
Old 04-14-2013 | 04:48 PM
  #18  
Will's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 628
From: Toronto, Canada
I did mine strictly for looks as I don't drive hard. The OE wheel gaps on Nissan and Infinitis are horrible, enough to bother me to the point of spending several hundred to solve the problem, haha.
Old 04-14-2013 | 06:10 PM
  #19  
TallTom's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,805
From: NYC
Originally Posted by mrjasonlyrics
I did it for both...
Same here
Old 04-15-2013 | 08:52 AM
  #20  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Lowering this car negatively impacts handling, period.

...

Lowering makes handling worse.
the question should really be, when you lowered your car did it handle better before or after?

aside from coilovers cranked way down and maybe S-techs or something similar, the answer for just about every maxima owner is that it handled better after lowering.

Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
The best thing you can do for a 5th gens handling is a RSB, good tires, and decent Coilovers that don't lower the car too much.
The single greatest handling modification for me was lowering the engine cradle 1". Huge difference. Then tires, then wheel spacers.
Old 04-15-2013 | 07:33 PM
  #21  
metalpiotr's Avatar
Thread Starter
03 Maxima, 6spd
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by Gemner
the question should really be, when you lowered your car did it handle better before or after?

aside from coilovers cranked way down and maybe S-techs or something similar, the answer for just about every maxima owner is that it handled better after lowering.
+1

Originally Posted by Gemner
The single greatest handling modification for me was lowering the engine cradle 1". Huge difference.
Very interesting. First time I heard of this. How did you do that? Different engine mounts?
Old 04-15-2013 | 09:21 PM
  #22  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,548
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Gemner
the question should really be, when you lowered your car did it handle better before or after?

aside from coilovers cranked way down and maybe S-techs or something similar, the answer for just about every maxima owner is that it handled better after lowering.



The single greatest handling modification for me was lowering the engine cradle 1". Huge difference. Then tires, then wheel spacers.

Didn't know that project ever completed nice work dude.

As for the lowering thing as I mentioned the better handling is because of the springs and shocks, not the lower ride height. The two just go together. Tein SS are one of the only Coilovers that will raise up to almost stock height, and I can assure you that at the higher ride setting the car handles better. It gets progressively worse the lower you go. The primary factor is roll center.
Old 04-15-2013 | 09:32 PM
  #23  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
drilled new bolt location for the passenger mount, and used spacers with longer bolts in the other locations. I cant remember who originally told me about this, but they were racing a 3.5 swapped sentra with this done. Its really easy to do, drilled a new hole in the passenger mount, and put spacers and longer bolts in three places: where the transmission bolts up to the mount, where the engine crossmember meets the radiator core, and where the crossmember meets the body in the rear.
Old 04-15-2013 | 10:18 PM
  #24  
DjHackStyle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 973
From: Bronx, NY
Originally Posted by Gemner
drilled new bolt location for the passenger mount, and used spacers with longer bolts in the other locations. I cant remember who originally told me about this, but they were racing a 3.5 swapped sentra with this done. Its really easy to do, drilled a new hole in the passenger mount, and put spacers and longer bolts in three places: where the transmission bolts up to the mount, where the engine crossmember meets the radiator core, and where the crossmember meets the body in the rear.
Did u lower the car 1" then lower the engine 1" to match it up?
Old 04-15-2013 | 10:22 PM
  #25  
pimpin02max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,366
From: Desloge, MO
I would say probably both, but if I had to choose I would have to go with looks because I don't Auto-X my car or anything so I guess they are more for aesthetics than anything.
Old 04-16-2013 | 12:32 AM
  #26  
Mr. Blue Sky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,301
From: nowheres, CA
originally for looks, but some performance came along with it.
Old 04-16-2013 | 08:27 AM
  #27  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by DjHackStyle
Did u lower the car 1" then lower the engine 1" to match it up?
no. its not related, when you lower the car the engine goes with it, but you can lower the engine without lowering the car.
Old 04-16-2013 | 08:36 AM
  #28  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,555
From: Fairfax, VA
Performance. If I do any cosmetic/looks mods, they cannot compromise performance.
Old 04-16-2013 | 09:30 AM
  #29  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,588
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Puppetmaster
Performance. If I do any cosmetic/looks mods, they cannot compromise performance.


I only have 2 cosmetic mods and those are my front only clear corners and all red tails.

Other than that, everything else is functional (wheels/altitude modification/tint/HID fogs).
Old 04-16-2013 | 11:21 AM
  #30  
clipse's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,320
From: Southeastern,CT
Originally Posted by mrjasonlyrics
I did it for both...
Originally Posted by Rods03Max619
I did it for both as well...
Old 04-16-2013 | 12:16 PM
  #31  
uptownsamcv's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,100
From: Kissimmee FL
I did it mainly for looks. I hate fender gap. I went with the megan racing smaxngs and my max came with kyb gr2. the ride isn't harsh at all cant tell the differance between stock. doesnt have the slammed look . I have 350z touring wheels on 225/45 tires..
Old 04-17-2013 | 07:55 PM
  #32  
metalpiotr's Avatar
Thread Starter
03 Maxima, 6spd
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by NmexMAX


I only have 2 cosmetic mods and those are my front only clear corners and all red tails.

Other than that, everything else is functional (wheels/altitude modification/tint/HID fogs).
I'm all about utility as well. I don't think I have any cosmetic mods... I may eventually replace the gauge LEDs... although I don't see myself finding the motivation to do that.

On a side note, interesting results on this thread so far.
Old 04-18-2013 | 12:49 AM
  #33  
Genes1s's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,162
From: Vancouver, WA
I did it for the look. My maxima is pretty immune to suspension upgrade, RSB, FSTB, GRB 2 Shock, Tien Springs, new bushings, Sticky Tires, and it still drives like a boat.

Last edited by Genes1s; 04-18-2013 at 12:51 AM.
Old 04-18-2013 | 06:07 AM
  #34  
sunysb83's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 666
Did it for looks, other than that, my car is pretty much stock since it is my daily driver. Of course driving a lowered car in NYC is no fun, but I don't like how the car sits on the stock suspension.
Old 04-18-2013 | 07:40 AM
  #35  
Max_Gator's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,038
I did it for both.

To me, the term performance is relative, though. There is track performance and then there is street performance. I think Tuner is really referring to track performance which is much more demanding than the street.

There is no doubt that my car "handles" better on the street as a result of the upgraded springs and struts. By that I mean reduced understeer, how the car turns in, how it handles turns of various degree at speed, lateral acceleration, roll etc. One area where handling is clearly worse is bump steer.

I don't know how that would translate to the track but imagine Tuner is correct.

But I'm not saying it handles better because it is lower - I mean I see the guys with cut springs bouncing down the road and I know those cars don't handle better.
Old 04-18-2013 | 08:02 AM
  #36  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,588
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by metalpiotr
I'm all about utility as well. I don't think I have any cosmetic mods... I may eventually replace the gauge LEDs... although I don't see myself finding the motivation to do that.

On a side note, interesting results on this thread so far.
Oh yeah, LED gauge bulbs too. Forgot about that.
Old 04-18-2013 | 08:51 AM
  #37  
aackshun's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,404
From: Houston, TX
Red car (99, BC coilovers) is strictly lowered for performance.

Turn in is stiffer but the steering response greatly improved at a lower height.

Slaloms for eg. at stock height are possibly the most miserable thing I've ever done in a Maxima, makes me question rather or not why I even modded the car.

Lowered at the height I put it at for race-car-ing slaloms are a breeze, at the cost of the quick whip turn in though, so I'd have to predict and plan corners a second longer but I mean who does their best at anything type of racing on the first try?

Also I've noticed keeping the stock *** sag helps a bit for killing understeer, it's dissapointing to look at but who has time to look at your stance when you're lapping? a track (Hint Hint: kind of why HnR's are consistently good springs on our cars)

Black car (03 I35) is @ stock height, stock suspension.

I am impressed at how the stock setup rewards you for simple little tricks I've learned @ road courses, but the way the rear wobbles when it's unloaded is scary

Last edited by aackshun; 04-18-2013 at 08:57 AM.
Old 04-18-2013 | 09:11 AM
  #38  
FastnFuriousMax's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 961
From: RI
Looks, maximas were not designed for performance.
Old 04-18-2013 | 09:31 AM
  #39  
Chris Gregg's Avatar
Get Off My Lawn
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: Johnson City, TN
Originally Posted by FastnFuriousMax
maximas were not designed for performance.
My stickers on both Maximas would say otherwise.
Old 04-18-2013 | 10:08 AM
  #40  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,985
Handling with respect to body roll is significantly reduced. Bump steer and tracking on the other hand is a fcking nightmare.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mahmuth
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
08-16-2024 09:23 PM
MaxLvr21
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
10-17-2015 01:11 PM
JonBlz
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
2
10-05-2015 07:02 PM
DC_Juggernaut
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
09-28-2015 05:07 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 PM.